Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: How Long Is Long Enough?

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications. They are among the first-line medications for several chronic or relapsing-remitting psychiatric conditions, including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. The advantages of SSRI use include ease of titration and their tolerability and safety profile. Guidelines for the short-term use of SSRIs are widely available, but there is no well-organized guidance on how and whether to maintain a patient on SSRIs for the long-term. In this article, we discuss the benefits and possible adverse consequences of long-term SSRI use, as well as clinical practice considerations when using SSRIs chronically. The major benefit of long-term SSRI use is relapse prevention. The current literature suggests that the general health risks of long-term SSRI use are low; however, further research, particularly in special populations including youth and the elderly, is needed. Long-term SSRI use increases the risk of tachyphylaxis and discontinuation syndrome. Recognizing that many patients may remain on SSRIs for many years, there are several factors that prescribers should consider if they choose to use an SSRI when initiating treatment and during long-term monitoring. The decision to continue or to discontinue an SSRI should be an active one, involving both the patient and prescriber, and should be revisited periodically. Patients who remain on SSRIs for the long-term should also have periodic monitoring to reassess the risk-benefit ratio of remaining on the SSRI, as well as to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the medication.

Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry: Ready for Primetime?

Pharmacogenomic testing in clinical psychiatry has grown at an accelerated pace in the last few years and is poised to grow even further. Despite robust evidence lacking regarding efficacy in clinical use, there continues to be growing interest to use it to make treatment decisions. We intend this article to be a primer for a clinician wishing to understand the biological bases, evidence for benefits, and pitfalls in clinical decision-making. Using clinical vignettes, we elucidate these headings in addition to providing a perspective on current relevance, what can be communicated to patients, and future research directions. Overall, the evidence for pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry demonstrates strong analytical validity, modest clinical validity, and virtually no evidence to support clinical use. There is definitely a need for more double-blinded randomized controlled trials to assess the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical decision-making and care, and until this is done, they could perhaps have an adjunct role in clinical decision-making but minimal use in leading the initial treatment plan.

Neuropsychiatric aspects of concussion.

Over the past decade, concussion has become the most widely discussed injury in contact sports. However, concussions also occur in several other settings, such as non-contact sports, elderly individuals, young children, military personnel, and victims of domestic violence. Concussion is frequently undiagnosed as a cause of psychiatric morbidity, especially when the patient has no history of loss of consciousness or direct head trauma. Almost all of the extant literature focuses on traumatic brain injury and assumes that concussion is merely a mild form of traumatic brain injury, which has resulted in a lack of understanding about what concussion is, and how to diagnose, monitor, and treat its varied neuropsychiatric symptoms. In this Review, we address key issues so that the psychiatric clinician can better understand and treat patients with a clinical phenotype that might be the direct result of, or be exacerbated by, concussion. Future research needs to focus on prospective clinical trials in all affected patient populations (ie, those affected by concussion and those affected by various degrees of traumatic brain injury), the identification of reliable biomarkers that can be used to assist with diagnosis and treatment response, and the development of effective treatment interventions. Clearly differentiating concussion from traumatic brain injury is essential to achieve reliable and clinically relevant outcomes.

Psychopharmacologic Management in Integrated Care: Challenges for Residency Education.

The integration of psychiatric care in primary care is becoming a reality. Psychiatric training programs are facing multiple challenges to accommodate this transition. We here present the perspectives of Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry Committee on Psychopharmacology. The members of the group respond to the concerns raised by a resident currently confronting this changing landscape. By discussing the training, clinical, and communicating challenges of integrated care, they shed light on many of the questions being tackled by residency training programs. This commentary on the timely discussion about integrated care seeks to provide insight on the future of training in psychiatry by outlining the core questions of this change.