Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities Exist in Patients Pursuing Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for food allergy. Prior studies demonstrate significant differences among food allergic individuals across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic groups. Disparities in OIT have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We assessed disparities in the use of OIT in patients with peanut allergy based on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status at a single academic medical center. METHODS: We identified 1028 peanut allergic patients under 18 years of age receiving care in the University of Michigan food allergy clinics. 148 patients undergoing peanut OIT (treatment group) were compared to the 880 patients avoiding peanut (control group). Pertinent demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in gender or ethnicity between the OIT and control groups. However, Black patients comprised 18% of the control group but only 4.1% of the OIT treatment group (p<0.0001). The proportion of patients with private insurance was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to control group, 93.2% vs 82.2% (p=0.0004). Finally, the Neighborhood Affluence Index, a Census-based measure of the relative socioeconomic prosperity of a neighborhood, was significantly higher in the OIT group vs. the control group (0.51±0.18 vs 0.47±0.19) (p=0.015), while the Neighborhood Disadvantage Index, a Census-based measure of the relative socioeconomic disadvantage of a neighborhood, was significantly lower (0.082±0.062 vs 0.10±0.093) (p=0.020). CONCLUSION: Significant racial and economic disparities exist at our institution between peanut allergic individuals who receive OIT and those who do not. Efforts to understand the basis for these disparities are important to ensure patients have equitable access to OIT.

Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Additional information is needed to inform optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy by analyzing a real-world peanut OIT cohort. METHODS: Records were reviewed for 174 children undergoing peanut OIT at a pediatric allergy clinic. Patient age, peanut skin prick test results, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) results, with inclusion of additional foods in OIT, were analyzed for correlations with OIT outcomes. RESULTS: To date, 144 patients have achieved maintenance dosing, 50 of whom transitioned to ad lib twice-weekly peanut ingestion. A total of 30 discontinued OIT. In addition, 47 patients who underwent multifood OIT had no significant difference in reactions (FDR-adjusted P = .48) or time-to-reach maintenance (FDR-adjusted P = .48) compared with those on peanut OIT alone. Age at initiation inversely correlated with achievement of maintenance: 92% of patients 0.5 to less than 5 years, 81% of those 5 to less than 11 years, and 70% of those 11 to less than 18 years reached and continued maintenance (P = .01). Baseline peanut-sIgE level positively correlated with number of reactions during updosing (P < .001) and maintenance (P = .005), though it was not significantly different in patients achieving successful maintenance vs those who discontinued OIT (P = .09). Furthermore, 66% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 adverse reaction during OIT. Of those on ad lib peanut ingestion, 2 reported mild reactions after lapses in peanut consumption. CONCLUSION: Clinical peanut OIT has similar outcomes to research protocols. OIT can be successful in older children and those with high peanut-sIgE levels, though these factors affect outcomes. Clinical and laboratory criteria can guide successful transition to intermittent ad lib peanut consumption.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Existing and Upcoming Therapies in an Age of Emerging Molecular and Personalized Medicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent research efforts have spurred great progress in the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nonetheless, challenges remain in addressing disease burden and impairment in the growing EoE population. We highlight work from the Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders, the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers, and others that address these ongoing challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: New tools for characterizing EoE disease activity include the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS), endoscopic alternatives, validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, and investigational biomarkers. These diagnostic and monitoring strategies have been complemented by advances in EoE therapy. Treatment modalities have refined the traditional approaches of dietary elimination, swallowed steroids, and proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and biologics offer promise for future treatment. This review summarizes EoE advances in disease management and newly defined EoE endotypes that may serve as the foundation for EoE-personalized medicine.