Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 48(3): 322-332, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882252

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is the only life-extending intervention for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Given the co-existence with colitis, patients may also require colectomy; a factor potentially conferring improved post-transplant outcomes. AIM: To determine the impact of restorative surgery via ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) vs retaining an end ileostomy on liver-related outcomes post-transplantation. METHODS: Graft survival was evaluated across a prospectively accrued transplant database, stratified according to colectomy status and type. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2016, 240 individuals with PSC/colitis underwent transplantation (cumulative 1870 patient-years until first graft loss or last follow-up date), of whom 75 also required colectomy. A heightened incidence of graft loss was observed for the IPAA group vs those retaining an end ileostomy (2.8 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years, log-rank P = 0.005), whereas rates between IPAA vs no colectomy groups were not significantly different (2.8 vs 1.7, P = 0.1). In addition, the ileostomy group experienced significantly lower graft loss rates vs. patients retaining an intact colon (P = 0.044). The risks conferred by IPAA persisted when taking into account timing of colectomy as related to liver transplantation via time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary strictures were the principal aetiologies of graft loss overall. Incidence rates for both were not significantly different between IPAA and no colectomy groups (P = 0.092 and P = 0.358); however, end ileostomy appeared protective (P = 0.007 and 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSION: In PSC, liver transplantation, colectomy + IPAA is associated with similar incidence rates of hepatic artery thrombosis, recurrent biliary strictures and re-transplantation compared with no colectomy. Colectomy + end ileostomy confers more favourable graft outcomes.


Assuntos
Colangite Esclerosante/cirurgia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Fígado , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Adulto , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/etiologia , Colangite Esclerosante/epidemiologia , Colangite Esclerosante/reabilitação , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Colectomia/reabilitação , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/epidemiologia , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Feminino , Artéria Hepática/patologia , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Ileostomia/métodos , Ileostomia/reabilitação , Ileostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Transplante de Fígado/reabilitação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/efeitos adversos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/reabilitação , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...