Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal wall incision. Surgical technique is an important risk factor for the development of incisional hernia. The aim of these updated guidelines was to provide recommendations to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed on 22 January 2022. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network instrument was used to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses, RCTs, and cohort studies. The GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to appraise the certainty of the evidence. The guidelines group consisted of surgical specialists, a biomedical information specialist, certified guideline methodologist, and patient representative. RESULTS: Thirty-nine papers were included covering seven key questions, and weak recommendations were made for all of these. Laparoscopic surgery and non-midline incisions are suggested to be preferred when safe and feasible. In laparoscopic surgery, suturing the fascial defect of trocar sites of 10 mm and larger is advised, especially after single-incision laparoscopic surgery and at the umbilicus. For closure of an elective midline laparotomy, a continuous small-bites suturing technique with a slowly absorbable suture is suggested. Prophylactic mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomy can be considered to reduce the risk of incisional hernia; a permanent synthetic mesh in either the onlay or retromuscular position is advised. CONCLUSION: These updated guidelines may help surgeons in selecting the optimal approach and location of abdominal wall incisions.

An incisional hernia results from a weakness of the abdominal wall muscles that allows fat from the inside or organs to bulge out. These hernias are quite common after abdominal surgery at the site of a previous incision. There is research that discusses different ways to close an incision and this may relate to the chance of hernia formation. The aim of this study was to review the latest research and to provide a guide for surgeons on how best to close incisions to decrease hernia rates. When possible, surgery through small incisions may decrease the risk of hernia formation. If small incisions are used, it may be better if they are placed away from areas that are already weak (such as the belly button). If the incision is larger than 1 cm, it should be closed with a deep muscle-fascia suture in addition to skin sutures. If there is a large incision in the middle of the abdomen, the muscle should be sutured using small stitches that are close together and a slowly absorbable suture should be used. For patients who are at higher risk of developing hernias, when closing the incision, the muscle layer can be strengthened by using a piece of (synthetic) mesh. There is no good research available on recovery after surgery and no clear guides on activity level or whether a binder will help prevent hernia formation.

Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotics after Surgery for Peritonitis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Serum procalcitonin (PCT) is a useful biomarker to tailor the duration of antibiotics in respiratory infections. The objective of this study was to determine whether PCT levels could tailor postoperative antibiotic therapy in patients operated for peritonitis. METHOD: Patients with peritonitis were randomized postoperatively. The control group received antibiotics for a defined duration according to institutional guidelines. In the study group, antibiotics were stopped based on serum PCT levels. Patients were stratified into three categories: (1) gastrointestinal perforation, (2) perforated appendicitis, and (3) postoperative complication. Primary outcome was duration of antibiotics. RESULTS: We included 162 patients; 83 and 79 patients in the control group and study group, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with peritonitis due to gastrointestinal perforation, we found 7 days of antibiotics in the PCT group versus 10 days in the control group (p value 0.065). There was no difference in infectious complications, mortality, median length of hospital stay, and necessity to restart antibiotics. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in duration of antibiotics when applying PCT guidance. However, in the subgroup of primary perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, there was a difference in duration of antibiotics in favor of the PCT group without obtaining significance, as the study was not powered for subgroup analysis. Further studies including only this subgroup should be performed.

Prospective Evaluation of Discharge Trends after Colorectal Surgery within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways proved to reduce complications, length of hospital stay and costs after colorectal surgery. Standardized discharge criteria have been established that are fulfilled after complete medical recovery is achieved. This study aimed to assess the timing of complete medical recovery in relation to the timing of actual discharge, and to assess reasons for prolonged hospital stay within an ERAS pathway. METHODS: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS pathway were included in this prospective analysis. Fulfillment of discharge criteria was assessed daily and reasons for prolonged hospital stay were documented. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients went home on the day that all discharge criteria were met. Overall, patients were discharged at a median of 2 days (interquartile range 1-3) after fulfillment of discharge criteria. Reasons for delayed discharge were (1) organizational in 20%; (2) patient or surgeon unwilling in 29%; and (3) because the patient was deemed to be discharged too soon distance from the operation in 51%. CONCLUSION: In this observational study, only 30% of patients were discharged on the day all recovery criteria were met. The main reason for continued hospitalization was surgeon- or patient-related reluctance or 'precaution'; thus, better and more of general information seems to be necessary.

Prevention of leakage by sealing colon anastomosis: experimental study in a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: In colorectal surgery, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most significant complication. Sealants applied around the colon anastomosis may help prevent AL by giving the anastomosis time to heal by mechanically supporting the anastomosis and preventing bacteria leaking into the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare commercially available sealants on their efficacy of preventing leakage in a validated mouse model for AL. METHODS: Six sealants (Evicel, Omnex, VascuSeal, PleuraSeal, BioGlue, and Colle Chirurgicale Cardial) were applied around an anastomosis constructed with five interrupted sutures in mice, and compared with a control group without sealant. Outcome measures were AL, anastomotic bursting pressure, and death. RESULTS: In the control group there was a 40% death rate with a 50% rate of AL. None of the sealants were able to diminish the rate of AL. Furthermore, use of the majority of sealants resulted in failure to thrive, increased rates of ileus, and higher mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: If sealing of a colorectal anastomosis could achieve a reduction of incidence of clinical AL, this would be a promising tool for prevention of leakage in colorectal surgery. In this study, we found no evidence that sealants reduce leakage rates in a mouse model for AL. However, the negative results of this study make us emphasize the need of systemic research, investigating histologic tissue reaction of the bowel to different sealants, the capacity of sealants to form a watertight barrier, their time of degradation, and finally their results in large animal models for AL.

Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis.

Many different techniques of colorectal anastomosis have been described in search of the technique with the lowest incidence of anastomotic leak. A systematic review of leak rates of techniques of hand-sewn colorectal anastomosis was conducted to provide a guideline for surgical residents and promote standardization of its technique. Clinical and experimental articles on colorectal anastomotic techniques and anastomotic healing published in the past 4 decades were searched. We included evidence on suture material, suture format, single- vs double-layer sutures, interrupted vs continuous sutures, hand-sewn vs stapled and compression colorectal anastomosis, and anastomotic configuration. In total, 3 meta-analyses, 26 randomized controlled trials, 11 nonrandomized comparative studies, 20 cohort studies, and 57 experimental studies were found. Results show that, for many aspects of the hand-sewn colorectal anastomosis technique, evidence is lacking. A single-layer continuous technique using inverting sutures with slowly absorbable monofilament material seems preferable. However, in contrast to stapled and compression colorectal anastomoses, the technique for hand-sewn colorectal anastomoses is nonstandardized with regard to intersuture distance, suture distance to the anastomotic edge, and tension on the suture. We believe detailed documentation of the anastomotic technique of all colorectal operations is needed to determine the role of the hand-sewn colorectal anastomosis.

Optimizing working-space in laparoscopy: measuring the effect of mechanical bowel preparation in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Adequate working space is a prerequisite for safe and efficient minimal access surgery. No objective data exist in literature about the effect of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on working space in laparoscopic surgery. We objectively measured this effect with computed tomography in a porcine laparoscopy model. METHODS: Using standardized anesthesia, twelve 20-kg pigs without MBP and eight 20-kg pigs with MBP were studied with computed tomography at intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) levels of 0, 5, 10, and 15 mmHg. Volumes and dimensions of the pneumoperitoneum were measured on reconstructed CT images and compared between the pigs with and those without MBP. RESULTS: A reproducible and statistically significant increase of approximately 500 ml in pneumoperitoneum volume was found in the MBP group at all levels of IAP. This represents a 43 % relative increase at a pneumoperitoneum pressure of 5 mmHg, 21 % at IAP 10 mmHg, and 18 % at IAP 15 mmHg. Peak inspiratory pressure was lower at IAP 0 and 5 mmHg in the MBP group. Anteroposterior diameter in the group with MBP was lower at 0 mmHg, but abdominal dimensions were similar in both groups at all other IAPs. This shows that the gain in working space is due to a diminished volume of the intra-abdominal content and not to compression or displacement of the bowel. CONCLUSIONS: MBP increases working space by reducing bowel content. Especially at low intra-abdominal working pressures, the increase in working space associated with MBP could represent an important benefit in challenging laparoscopic surgery.

Effects of new anti-adhesion polyvinyl alcohol gel on healing of colon anastomoses in rats.

BACKGROUND: Adhesions follow abdominal surgery with an incidence as high as 95%, resulting in invalidating complications such as bowel obstruction, female infertility, and chronic pain. Searches have been performed for a safe and effective adhesion barrier; however, such barriers have impaired anastomotic site healing. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a new adhesion barrier, polyvinyl alcohol gel, on healing of colonic anastomoses using a rat model. METHODS: Thirty-two Wistar rats were divided in two groups. In all animals, an anastomosis was constructed in the ascending colon. The first group received no adhesion barrier, whereas in the second group, 2 mL of polyvinyl alcohol gel (A-Part Gel(®); Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) was applied circularly around the anastomosis. All animals were sacrificed on the seventh post-operative day, and the abdomen was inspected for signs of anastomotic leakage. The anastomotic bursting pressure, the adhesions around the anastomosis, and the collagen content of the excised anastomosis were measured. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of anastomotic leakage, the anastomotic bursting pressure (p=0.08), or the collagen concentration (p=0.91). No significant reduction in amount of adhesions was observed in the rats receiving polyvinyl alcohol gel. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental study showed no significant differences in anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bursting pressure, or collagen content of the anastomosis when using the adhesion barrier polyvinyl alcohol around colonic anastomoses. The barrier did not prevent adhesion formation.

Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel decreases formation of adhesions in a rat model of peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after surgery for peritonitis-related conditions, with such associated complications as intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility, remains an important problem. Applying a liquid barrier intra-peritoneally might reduce initial adhesion formation. METHODS: A combination of the cecal ligation and puncture model of peritonitis with the side-wall defect (SWD) model of adhesion formation was performed. Forty rats were assigned randomly to receive no barrier or 1 mL or 2 mL of the cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol and carboxymethylcellulose (PVA/CMC) hydrogel A-Part(®) Gel (B. Braun Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). After 14 days, the animals were sacrificed, and adhesion formation and abscess formation were scored. RESULTS: Thirty animals survived, distributed equally among the groups. There were significantly fewer adhesions to the SWD in the PVA/CMC groups (median 0) than in the control group (median 26%-50%) (p<0.05). The median tenacity of the adhesions was significantly higher in the control group (Zühlke score 2) than in the PVA/CMC groups (Zühlke score 0) (p<0.05). The amount and size of intra-abdominal abscesses were not significantly different in the three groups. CONCLUSION: In this experiment, PVA/CMC hydrogel reduced the amount of adhesions to the SWD and between viscera significantly with equal risk of abscess formation.

Significant contribution of the portal vein to blood flow through the common bile duct.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of the hepatic artery, gastroduodenal artery, and portal vein to the microvascular blood flow in the common bile duct (CBD). BACKGROUND: Biliary complications are a common cause of graft loss after liver transplantation. The occurrence is, partly, attributed to hepatic artery thrombosis, which is considered to be the sole provider of blood flow to the bile ducts. However, the contribution of the portal vein and the gastroduodenal artery to the bile ducts is unknown. METHODS: Microvascular blood flow in the CBD was determined in 15 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy with a combination of laser Doppler flowmetry and reflectance spectrophotometry. Microvascular blood flow was measured at baseline, during clamping the portal vein, during clamping the hepatic artery, and during clamping both. After transection of the CBD, these 4 measurements were repeated. RESULTS: Compared with baseline measurements, the microvascular blood flow through the CBD decreased to 62% after clamping the portal vein, 51% after clamping the hepatic artery, and 31% after clamping both. After the CBD was transected, these 3 measurements were 60%, 31%, and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : Historically, the hepatic artery has been considered mainly responsible for biliary blood flow. We show that after transection of the CBD, mimicking the situation after liver transplantation, the contribution of the portal vein to the microvascular blood flow through the CBD is 40%. This study emphasizes the importance of the portal vein, and disturbances in portal venous blood flow could contribute to the formation of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Long-term and perioperative corticosteroids in anastomotic leakage: a prospective study of 259 left-sided colorectal anastomoses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal resection. DESIGN: Review of records of patients who participated in the Analysis of Predictive Parameters for Evident Anastomotic Leakage study. SETTING: Eight health centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients who underwent left-sided colorectal anastomoses. INTERVENTION: Corticosteroids taken as long-term medication for underlying disease or perioperatively for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prospective evaluations for risk factors for symptomatic AL. RESULTS: In 23% of patients, a defunctioning stoma was constructed. The incidence of AL was 7.3%. The clinical course of patients with AL showed that in 21% of leaks, the drain indicated leakage; in the remaining patients, computed tomography or laparotomy resulted equally often in the detection of AL. In 50% of patients with AL, a Hartmann operation was needed. The incidence of AL was significantly higher in patients with pulmonary comorbidity (22.6% leakage), patients taking corticosteroids as longterm medication (50% leakage), and patients taking corticosteroids perioperatively (19% leakage). Perioperative corticosteroids were prescribed in 8% of patients for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly increased incidence of AL in patients treated with long-term corticosteroids and perioperative corticosteroids for pulmonary comorbidity. Therefore, we recommend that in this patient category, anastomoses should be protected by a diverting stoma or a Hartmann procedure should be considered to avoid AL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1258

Training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a new educational model using specially embalmed human anatomical specimen.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing percentage of colorectal resections performed laparoscopically nowadays, there is more emphasis on training "before the job" on operative skills, including the comprehension of specific laparoscopic surgical anatomy. As integration of technical skills with correct interpretation of the anatomical image must be incorporated in laparoscopic training, a human specimen training model with special emphasis on surgical anatomy was developed. METHODS: The new embalming method Anubifix™ combines long-term high-quality embalming of human bodies with almost normal flexibility and plasticity, and the body can be kept operational as long as conventionally embalmed human specimens. A colorectal training model was created in a specimen in which anatomical landmarks of colorectal anatomy were permanently colored to explore laparoscopic colorectal anatomy in a skills training setting. Airtight closure of the abdominal wall permits the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Residents were asked to test the model by mobilizing the small and large bowels and expose the central vessels and ureters. Afterward they were asked to fill out an eight-item questionnaire about the model. RESULTS: Eleven surgical residents in their first and second year of training participated. Responses to the questionnaire showed that a majority of residents considered the model to be representative of the real situation and superior to animal models or virtual reality simulators, and helped to improve the knowledge of three-dimensional anatomy and laparoscopic skills. CONCLUSION: The new training model for laparoscopic colorectal surgery proved to be a high-quality tool, concentrating on laparoscopic colorectal anatomy in a skills training setting. We believe it may be a valuable adjunct to residency training programs based on the principle of "training before the job."

Bowel preparation prior to laparoscopic colorectal resection: what is the current practice?

BACKGROUND: Much has been published on the role of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in open colorectal resection; however, the current study shows little evidence on the use of MBP prior to laparoscopic colorectal resections. In contrast to open procedures, MBP could influence the diameter of the bowel and thus the exposure of the surgical field in laparoscopy. This study aimed to assess the current practice of Dutch laparoscopic surgeons regarding MBP prior to colorectal resections. METHODS: In January 2010, members of the Dutch Association for Endoscopic Surgery were invited to fill out an online questionnaire investigating whether MBP is prescribed prior to laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and which considerations are taken into account when choosing or omitting MBP. RESULTS: The 82 (49%) returned questionnaires showed that 20% of respondents prescribe MBP prior to colonic resections, while 63% prescribe MBP prior to rectal resections. The most common reasons for giving MBP were the construction of a protective ileostoma (22%), improvement of the surgical field exposure (16%), and "other reasons" specified by free text (21%). The three most common reasons for conversion were inadequate surgical field exposure (88%), locally advanced tumor (68%), and adhesions (29%). Concerning the question which stages of the operation are influenced by MBP, 29% of respondents believed that the diameter of the small bowel was influenced by MBP, 29% indicated that the exposure of the surgical field was influenced by MBP, and 52% did not believe that any of the stages of the operation were influenced by MBP. CONCLUSION: The results of this questionnaire indicate that the implementation of MBP in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is based on individual preferences in the Netherlands. This emphasizes the need of new studies investigating the role of MBP on surgical field exposure in colorectal laparoscopic surgery.