Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue Following Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe fatigue following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is prevalent and debilitating. This study investigated the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for severe fatigue following COVID-19. METHODS: A multicenter, 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Netherlands with patients being severely fatigued 3-12 months following COVID-19. Patients (N = 114) were randomly assigned (1:1) to CBT or care as usual (CAU). CBT, targeting perpetuating factors of fatigue, was provided for 17 weeks. The primary outcome was the overall mean difference between CBT and CAU on the fatigue severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength, directly post-CBT or CAU (T1), and after 6 months (T2). Secondary outcomes were differences in proportions of patients meeting criteria for severe and/or chronic fatigue, differences in physical and social functioning, somatic symptoms, and problems concentrating between CBT and CAU. RESULTS: Patients were mainly nonhospitalized and self-referred. Patients who received CBT were significantly less severely fatigued across follow-up assessments than patients receiving CAU (-8.8 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9 to -5.8]); P < .001), representing a medium Cohen's d effect size (0.69). The between-group difference in fatigue severity was present at T1 (-9.3 [95% CI, -13.3 to -5.3]) and T2 (-8.4 [95% CI, -13.1 to -3.7]). All secondary outcomes favored CBT. Eight adverse events were recorded during CBT, and 20 during CAU. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients, who were mainly nonhospitalized and self-referred, CBT was effective in reducing fatigue. The positive effect was sustained at 6-month follow-up. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL8947.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 952 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in The Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics, disease course and outcomes in a large and well-documented cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study in The Netherlands including 952 of 1183 consecutively hospitalized patients that were admitted to participating hospitals between March 2nd, 2020, and May 22nd, 2020. Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters upon admission and during hospitalization were collected until July 1st. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years (IQR 58-77 years) and 605 (63.6%) were male. Cardiovascular disease was present in 558 (58.6%) patients. The median time of onset of symptoms prior to hospitalization was 7 days (IQR 5-10). A non ICU admission policy was applicable in 312 (32.8%) patients and in 165 (56.3%) of the severely ill patients admitted to the ward. At admission and during hospitalization, severely ill patients had higher values of CRP, LDH, ferritin and D-dimer with higher neutrophil counts and lower lymphocyte counts. Overall in-hospital mortality was 25.1% and 183 (19.1%) patients were admitted to ICU, of whom 56 (30.6%) died. Patients aged ≥70 years had high mortality, both at the ward (52.4%) and ICU (47.4%). The median length of ICU stay was 8 days longer in patients aged ≥70 years compared to patients aged ≤60 years. CONCLUSION: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged ≥70 years had high mortality and longer ICU stay compared to patients aged ≤60 years. These findings in combination with the patient burden of an ICU admission and possible long term complications after discharge should encourage us to further investigate the benefit of ICU admission in elderly and fragile COVID-19-patients.

18F-FDG PET/CT-Guided Treatment Duration in Patients with High-Risk Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Proof of Principle.

Current guidelines recommend intravenous antibiotic therapy for at least 4 wk in patients with high-risk Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), because of the risk for metastatic infection. We evaluated the safety of a shorter duration of treatment in patients with high-risk SAB without signs of metastatic infection at presentation, using standard 18F-FDG PET/CT and echocardiography. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed of patients with SAB admitted between 2013 and 2017 in 2 medical centers. Patients with risk factors for complicated bacteremia (community acquisition, persistently positive blood cultures, >72 h of fever, or foreign body materials present), a normal echocardiography result, and 18F-FDG PET/CT without signs of metastatic infection were included (cases) and compared with patients with uncomplicated bacteremia (absence of any of the risk factors and no known metastatic disease, controls). Primary outcomes were 3-mo SAB-specific mortality rate and recurrent infection. The secondary outcome was overall mortality. Results: We included 36 cases and 40 controls. Both groups had a similar treatment duration (15.9 vs. 15.4 d). No deaths occurred as a consequence of SAB in the cases, compared with 1 in the control group. One relapse occurred in the case group and 2 in the control group. Overall mortality did not differ between the groups (19.4% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.64). Conclusion: This study suggests that intravenous treatment for 2 wk in high-risk patients with SAB without endocarditis and absence of metastatic infection on 18F-FDG PET/CT is safe. A diagnostic-driven approach using 18F-FDG PET/CT to determine treatment duration in high-risk SAB seems feasible and allows tailoring treatment to individual patients.