RESUMO
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in several risk factors for child maltreatment. There was also a sudden decrease in the systems available to identify and support at risk children and families. This study aims to describe the number of children presenting to specialized medical care for suspected child abuse and neglect during the first seven months of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the three previous years. This was a retrospective chart review of all cases evaluated by the child abuse team in Rhode Island from March 1st until September 30th of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. During the first seven months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were 10% fewer children evaluated by the child abuse team with the most significant decrease (35%) in the number of children evaluated for physical abuse. With the known increased risk factors for physical abuse due to COVID-19, the decrease in the number of children evaluated for physical abuse is unlikely due to a decrease in the incidence of physical abuse. This decrease is most likely due to physical abuse not being identified or children not being referred to specialized medical care. Without the ability to see and interact with children in person, professionals' ability to identify child victims of abuse is limited. Professionals working with children and families at risk should develop strategies to be able to continue to provide in-person services in the future if another pandemic or natural disaster occurs.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Maus-Tratos Infantis , Criança , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Rhode Island/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnósticoRESUMO
Child abuse is common in the United States but is often undetected. The incidence of this form of abuse is difficult to quantify, but children with a history of abuse are at risk of chronic health conditions. Medical providers are in the unique position of triaging trauma patients and differentiating unintentional from abusive trauma, as well as having the important position of being a mandated reporter of abuse in all states. Obtaining a detailed history and screening for risk factors can help identify children at risk of abuse. Certain orthopedic injuries may be related to abuse, which may trigger clinical suspicion and lead to further workup or intervention. By increasing awareness, through medical provider education and increased screening, earlier detection of abuse may prevent more serious injuries and consequences. This review evaluates current literature regarding the orthopedic manifestations of child abuse in hopes of increasing medical provider awareness. IMPACT: Child abuse is common in the United States but often remains undetected. Medical professionals are in the unique position of evaluating trauma patients and identifying concerns for abusive injuries. Certain orthopedic injuries may raise concern for abuse triggering clinical suspicion and further workup or intervention.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Fatores de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: No studies have evaluated how training physicians intervene when corporal punishment (CP) is observed in a simulated hospital setting. The pilot study examined physician trainee performance in a simulation where hitting is observed between caregiver and child during a medical visit and to assess physician self-reported experiences, opinions, and comfort when observing CP in a simulation. METHODS: We ran 7 simulations where one pediatric resident, emergency medicine resident, or pediatric emergency medicine fellow participated in the simulation while a group of similar trainees observed. All participants were given a postsurvey, followed by a semistructured debriefing led by a child abuse pediatrician. RESULTS: Thirty-seven physician trainees participated; 7 engaged in the simulation while 30 observed. The majority (6/7) did not de-escalate the increasingly aggravated parent prior to hitting, 4 of 7 did not recommend that the caregiver refrain from CP, and most (5/7) did not provide education to the parent about more appropriate discipline. The majority (91.4%) believe that a physician should intervene when a parent hits or spanks his/her child in the hospital setting, highlighting the incongruity between this belief and their performance in/knowledge of intervening. All participants stated they would benefit from additional education and training on CP. CONCLUSIONS: The educational experience provided physicians in training with the opportunity to participate in or observe a situation in which CP occurs in the medical setting. The simulation and debriefing were an innovative approach to providing an educational opportunity for physicians to learn from difficult situations and discussions surrounding CP with caregivers.
Assuntos
Médicos , Punição , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Relações Pais-Filho , Pais , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
Corporal punishment (CP) is defined as inflicting pain to redirect an undesired behavior. The objective of the current study is to assess Rhode Island physicians' perceptions, experiences and education regarding CP. Our data may be used to inform future research and education/training for health care providers on how to provide guidance and have conversations surrounding CP. We developed an anonymous survey that assessed the perceptions, experiences and training of Hasbro Children Hospital physicians regarding CP in the medical setting. A total of 58 physicians responded; participants responded that CP was never effective for improving behavior (67.2%) and never recommended CP (98.2%) to patient families. However, most participants reported never received education on CP (67.9%). Our findings highlight that pediatric providers do not find CP an appropriate method of discipline and underscore the need for standardized training and education surrounding this issue.