Eligibility Criteria and Representativeness of Randomized Clinical Trials That Include Infants Born Extremely Premature: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the eligibility criteria and trial characteristics among contemporary (2010-2019) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that included infants born extremely preterm (<28 weeks of gestation) and to evaluate whether eligibility criteria result in underrepresentation of high-risk subgroups (eg, infants born at <24 weeks of gestation). STUDY DESIGN: PubMed and Scopus were searched January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, with no language restrictions. RCTs with mean or median gestational ages at birth of <28 weeks of gestation were included. The study followed the PRISMA guidelines; outcomes were registered prospectively. Data extraction was performed independently by multiple observers. Study quality was evaluated using a modified Jadad scale. RESULTS: Among RCTs (n = 201), 32 552 infants were included. Study participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were highly variable. A total of 1603 eligibility criteria were identified; rationales were provided for 18.8% (n = 301) of criteria. Fifty-five RCTs (27.4%) included infants <24 weeks of gestation; 454 (1.4%) infants were identified as <24 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies sources of variability across RCTs that included infants born extremely preterm and reinforces the critical need for consistent and transparent policies governing eligibility criteria.

High levels of self-reported prescription opioid use by HIV-positive individuals.

Prescription medication use (other than antiretroviral therapy (ART)) is highly prevalent among people living with HIV. Prescription medications may be used medically or non-medically: non-medical use includes using more medication than prescribed, using medication prescribed to someone else, or using medication for a purpose other than its prescribed use. During 12 weeks in 2014-2015, we characterized medical and non-medical prescription medication use among HIV-positive patients attending an academic medical center (n = 149) and a community clinic (n = 105). Separately for the past year and the past month, these 254 participants self-reported their use of prescription opioids, sedatives, stimulants, anti-anxiety medications, antipsychotic medications, and erectile dysfunction medications. Respondents were largely male (91%), aged 40 or older (61%), identified as gay or bisexual (79%), and were men who have sex with men (85%). ART use was nearly universal (95%). Nearly half (43%) of participants reported medical use of prescription opioids; 11% of the opioid use was reported as non-medical use. Anti-anxiety medication use was also frequent, and differed by site: 41% of community-clinic responders reported medical use of anti-anxiety medications compared to 23% of hospital clinic respondents who reported medical use. Prescription sedative use was also approximately twice as high among community-clinic participants, with medical use reported by 43% of respondents and non-medical use by 12%; in comparison, at the hospital clinic, sedative use was reported by 18% (medical) and 7% (non-medical) of participants. Stimulant use was rare in both sites. No demographic characteristic was significantly associated with medical or non-medical use of any prescription medication. The current focus of many studies on only non-medical prescription medication use not only underestimates the widespread exposure of HIV-positive individuals to these drugs, but may also underestimate potential adverse effects of prescription medications in this population.