RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A fusion gene is a hybrid gene consisting of parts from two previously independent genes. Chromosomal rearrangements leading to gene breakage are frequent in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and have been reported as a common mechanism for inactivating tumor suppressor genes. However, no fusion genes have been repeatedly reported to be recurrent driver events in ovarian carcinogenesis. We combined genomic and transcriptomic information to identify novel fusion gene candidates and aberrantly expressed genes in ovarian carcinomas. METHODS: Examined were 19 previously karyotyped ovarian carcinomas (18 of the serous histotype and one undifferentiated). First, karyotypic aberrations were compared to fusion gene candidates identified by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). In addition, we used exon-level gene expression microarrays as a screening tool to identify aberrantly expressed genes possibly involved in gene fusion events, and compared the findings to the RNA-seq data. RESULTS: We found a DPP9-PPP6R3 fusion transcript in one tumor showing a matching genomic 11;19-translocation. Another tumor had a rearrangement of DPP9 with PLIN3. Both rearrangements were associated with diminished expression of the 3' end of DPP9 corresponding to the breakpoints identified by RNA-seq. For the exon-level expression analysis, candidate fusion partner genes were ranked according to deviating expression compared to the median of the sample set. The results were collated with data obtained from the RNA-seq analysis. Several fusion candidates were identified, among them TMEM123-MMP27, ZBTB46-WFDC13, and PLXNB1-PRKAR2A, all of which led to stronger expression of the 3' genes. In view of our previous findings of nonrandom rearrangements of chromosome 19 in this cancer type, particular emphasis was given to changes of this chromosome and a DDA1-FAM129C fusion event was identified. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified novel fusion gene candidates in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. DPP9 was involved in two different fusion transcripts that both resulted in deregulated expression of the 3' end of the transcript and thus possible loss of the active domains in the DPP9 protein. The identified rearrangements might play a role in tumorigenesis or tumor progression.
Assuntos
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Dipeptidil Peptidases e Tripeptidil Peptidases/genética , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Perilipina-3/genética , Fosfoproteínas Fosfatases/genética , Idoso , Carcinogênese/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/genética , Fusão Gênica/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Transcriptoma/genéticaRESUMO
The mechanisms behind bilaterality of ovarian carcinomas are not fully understood, as the two tumors could possibly represent two primary tumors, a primary tumor and a metastasis, or two metastases. The gene expression profiles from bilateral high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) and clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) of the ovary were compared to study the association between the tumors of the two sides. A separate analysis of genes from chromosome 19 was also performed, since this chromosome is frequently rearranged in ovarian carcinomas. Tumors from four patients were included (three pairs of HGSC and one pair of CCC). The gene expression was analyzed at the exon level, and bilateral tumors were compared to identify within-pair differences. Gene expression data were also compared with genomic information on the same tumors. Similarities in gene expression were observed between the tumors within each pair, as expected if the two tumors were clonally related. However, certain genes exhibited differences in expression between the two sides, indicating metastasis involvement. Among the most differently expressed genes, one gene was common to all four pairs: Immunoglobulin J. In all HGSC pairs, serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2, serpin family E member 1 and phospholipase A2, group IIA (platelets, synovial fluid) were also among the differentially expressed genes. The specific analysis of chromosome 19 highlighted expression differences in the zinc finger protein 36 gene. These results indicate that bilateral ovarian tumors represent different stages during progression of a single clonal process. Several of the genes observed to be differently expressed are known to be metastasis-related, and are likely to be also involved in spreading from one side to the other in the bilateral cancer cases examined.