[Street doctors warn of epidemic of uninsured homeless persons in the Netherlands]. / Straatdokters slaan alarm over epidemie van onverzekerde daklozen.

Over the past few years, the Netherlands Street Doctors Group, a national network of doctors and nurses providing outreach primary care to homeless people in the Netherlands, has observed a growing number of homeless patients who do not have health insurance resulting in their access to healthcare services and medication being limited. In this article we raise the alarm about the epidemic of uninsured Dutch homeless. We explain and comment on the reasons why people are no longer insured and elaborate on the regulations and obligations related to homelessness and the characteristics of consumers and providers of social and medical services. We describe how difficult it is for homeless people to become re-insured as in order to follow a complex set of requirements commitment and patience are necessary. For most homeless patients, the re-insurance process requires the personal guidance and support of a motivated case manager. Consequently, we suggest that policy makers and service providers should have a better understanding of factors contributing to being uninsured and more compassion for those who are.

Mortality and psychiatric disorders among public mental health care clients in Utrecht: a register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Different studies have shown similar or even lower mortality among homeless persons with compared to homeless persons without a severe mental disorder. AIMS: To clarify the association between presence of a psychiatric diagnosis and mortality among the socially marginalized. METHODS: The Public Mental health care (PMHc) is a legal task of the municipal authority aiming at prevention and intervention in case of (imminent) homelessness among persons with a serious shortage of self-sufficiency. The data of PMHc clients (N=6,724) and personally matched controls (N=66,247) were linked to the registries of Statistics Netherlands and analysed in a Cox model. RESULTS: The increased mortality among PMHc clients, compared to the general population (HR=2.99, 95%-CI: 2.63-3.41), was associated with a broad range of death causes. Clients with a record linkage to the Psychiatric Case Registry Middle Netherlands ('PMHc+') had an increased risk of suicide (HR=2.63, 0.99-7.02, P=0.052), but a lower risk of natural death causes (HR=0.71, 0.54-0.92, P=0.011), compared to clients without this record linkage ('PMHc-'). Compared to controls, however, 'PMHc-' clients experienced substantially increased risks of suicide (HR=3.63, 1.42-9.26, P=0.007) and death associated with mental and behavioural disorders (ICD-10 Ch.V) (HR=7.85, 3.54-17.43, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Psychiatric services may deliver an important contribution to the prevention of premature natural death among the socially marginalized. KEYPHRASES: The earlier observed lower mortality among vulnerably housed and homeless persons with a psychiatric diagnosis compared to vulnerably housed and homeless persons without a psychiatric diagnosis appears to be due to a significantly lower risk of natural causes of death. Compared to controls from the general population, vulnerably housed and homeless persons without registered diagnosis at a local psychiatric service have a significantly increased mortality associated both with natural death causes and with suicide and death due to mental and behavioural disorders. Services for mental health care may deliver an important contribution to the prevention of premature death due to somatic disorders among the socially marginalized.

Predictors of Death in Trauma Patients who are Alive on Arrival at Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors predict death occurring in trauma patients who are alive on arrival at hospital Design Prospective cohort study Method Data were collected from 507 trauma patients with multiple injuries, with a Hospital Trauma Index-Injury Severity Score of 16 or more, who were initially delivered by the Emergency Medical Services to the Emergency Department of the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU) during the period 1999-2000. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that every year of age increase resulted in a 2% greater risk of death. If the patient had been intubated at the scene of the accident, this risk was increased 4.3-fold. Every point of increase in the Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS) reduced the risk of death by 30%. A similar (but inverse) tendency was found for the HTI-ISS score, with every point of increase resulting in a 5% greater risk of death. There was a clear relationship between the base excess (BE) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels and the risk of death, the latter being increased by 8% for each mmol/l drop in BE, and reduced by 22% for each mmol/l increase in Hb. The risk of death occurring was 2.6 times higher in cases with isolated neurotrauma. These associations hardly changed in the multivariate analysis; only the relation with having been intubated at the scene disappeared. CONCLUSION: The risk of severely injured accident patients dying after arriving in hospital is mainly determined by the T-RTS, age, presence of isolated neurological damage, BE and Hb level. Skull/brain damage and hemorrhage appear to be the most important causes of death in the first 24 h after the accident. The time interval between the accident and arrival at the hospital does not appear to affect the risk of death.

Erratum to Predictors of Death in Trauma Patients who are Alive on Arrival at Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors predict death occurring in trauma patients who are alive on arrival at hospital Design Prospective cohort study Method Data were collected from 507 trauma patients with multiple injuries, with a Hospital Trauma Index-Injury Severity Score of 16 or more, who were initially delivered by the Emergency Medical Services to the Emergency Department of the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU) during the period 1999-2000. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that every year of age increase resulted in a 2% greater risk of death. If the patient had been intubated at the scene of the accident, this risk was increased 4.3-fold. Every point of increase in the Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS) reduced the risk of death by 30%. A similar (but inverse) tendency was found for the HTI-ISS score, with every point of increase resulting in a 5% greater risk of death. There was a clear relationship between the base excess (BE) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels and the risk of death, the latter being increased by 8% for each mmol/l drop in BE, and reduced by 22% for each mmol/l increase in Hb. The risk of death occurring was 2.6 times higher in cases with isolated neurotrauma. These associations hardly changed in the multivariate analysis; only the relation with having been intubated at the scene disappeared. CONCLUSION: The risk of severely injured accident patients dying after arriving in hospital is mainly determined by the T-RTS, age, presence of isolated neurological damage, BE and Hb level. Skull/brain damage and hemorrhage appear to be the most important causes of death in the first 24 h after the accident. The time interval between the accident and arrival at the hospital does not appear to affect the risk of death.

["Natural cause of death or not?" How do nursing home physicians act when in doubt of natural cause of death?]. / "Dood-gewoon of niet?" Hoe handelt de verpleeghuisarts bij twijfel aan een natuurlijke dood?

The objective of the study was to explore if nursing home physicians act by law, when they doubt the natural cause of death. In May 1999, a questionnaire was sent to 153 nursing home physicians in the region of Utrecht and Nijmegen. They were asked if they consult the coroner when they have doubts about the natural cause of death. Eighty-six percent (104) returned the questionnaire. Thirty-two percent of the nursing home physicians always consult the coroner and 52% does so most of the time. Only 12% does not consult the coroner most of the time and 2% never does. The main reasons for not consulting the coroner were that nursing home physicians judge a death after a fall as an incident that fits in the descending lifeline of patients and that some nursing home physicians had bad experiences consulting the coroner. We conclude that this policy may lead to underregistration of unnatural deaths. Changing the definition or changing the law may reduce this problem. Education and information can also contribute to change in physician's attitudes.