Preclinical findings predicting efficacy and side-effect profile of LY2940094, an antagonist of nociceptin receptors.

Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is a 17 amino acid peptide whose receptor is designated ORL1 or nociceptin receptor (NOP). We utilized a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable antagonist with documented engagement with NOP receptors in vivo to assess antidepressant- and anxiolytic-related pharmacological effects of NOP receptor blockade along with measures of cognitive and motor impingement. LY2940094 ([2-[4-[(2-chloro-4,4-difluoro-spiro[5H-thieno[2,3-c]pyran-7,4'-piperidine]-1'-yl)methyl]-3-methyl-pyrazol-1-yl]-3-pyridyl]methanol) displayed antidepressant-like behavioral effects in the forced-swim test in mice, an effect absent in NOP -/- mice. LY2940094 also augmented the behavioral effect of fluoxetine without changing target occupancies (NOP and serotonin reuptake transporter [SERT]). LY2940094 did not have effects under a differential-reinforcement of low rate schedule. Although anxiolytic-like effects were not observed in some animal models (conditioned suppression, 4-plate test, novelty-suppressed feeding), LY2940094 had effects like that of anxiolytic drugs in three assays: fear-conditioned freezing in mice, stress-induced increases in cerebellar cGMP in mice, and stress-induced hyperthermia in rats. These are the first reports of anxiolytic-like activity with a systemically viable NOP receptor antagonist. LY2940094 did not disrupt performance in either a 5-choice serial reaction time or delayed matching-to-position assay. LY2940094 was also not an activator or suppressor of locomotion in rodents nor did it induce failures of rotarod performance. These data suggest that LY2940094 has unique antidepressant- and anxiolytic-related pharmacological effects in rodents. Clinical proof of concept data on this molecule in depressed patients have been reported elsewhere.

In vitro characterisation of the novel positive allosteric modulators of the mGlu5 receptor, LSN2463359 and LSN2814617, and their effects on sleep architecture and operant responding in the rat.

The demonstrated functional interaction of metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has prompted speculation that their activation may offer a potential treatment for aspects of schizophrenia. Development of selective mGlu5 agonists has been difficult, but several different positive allosteric modulator (PAM) molecules have now been identified. This study describes two novel mGlu5 PAMs, LSN2463359 (N-(1-methylethyl)-5-(pyridin-4-ylethynyl)pyridine-2-carboxamide) and LSN2814617 [(7S)-3-tert-butyl-7-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-A]pyridine], which are useful tools for this field of research. Both compounds are potent and selective potentiators of human and rat mGlu5 receptors in vitro, displaying curve shift ratios of two to three fold in the concentration-response relationship to glutamate or the glutamate receptor agonist, DHPG, with no detectable intrinsic agonist properties. Both compounds displaced the mGlu5 receptor antagonist radioligand, [³H]MPEP in vitro and, following oral administration reached brain concentrations sufficient to occupy hippocampal mGlu5 receptors as measured in vivo by dose-dependent displacement from the hippocampus of intravenously administered MPEPy. In vivo EEG studies demonstrated that these mGlu5 PAMs have marked wake-promoting properties but little in the way of rebound hypersomnolence. In contrast, the previously described mGlu5 PAMs CDPPB and ADX47273 showed relatively poor evidence of in vivo target engagement in either receptor occupancy assays or EEG disturbance. Wake-promoting doses of LSN2463359 and LSN2814617 attenuated deficits in performance induced by the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220,581 in two tests of operant behaviour: the variable interval 30 s task and the DMTP task. These effects were lost if the dose of either compound extended into the range which disrupted performance in the baseline DMTP task. However, the improvements in response accuracy induced by the mGlu5 potentiators in SDZ 220,581-treated rats were not delay-dependent and, therefore, perhaps more likely reflected optimization of general arousal than specific beneficial effects on discrete cognitive processes. The systematic profiling of LSN2463359 and LSN2814617 alongside other previously described molecules will help determine more precisely how mGlu5 potentiator pharmacology might provide therapeutic benefit. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.

Disrupted circadian rhythms in a mouse model of schizophrenia.

Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption has been widely observed in neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia [1] and often precedes related symptoms [2]. However, mechanistic basis for this association remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the circadian phenotype of blind-drunk (Bdr), a mouse model of synaptosomal-associated protein (Snap)-25 exocytotic disruption that displays schizophrenic endophenotypes modulated by prenatal factors and reversible by antipsychotic treatment [3, 4]. Notably, SNAP-25 has been implicated in schizophrenia from genetic [5-8], pathological [9-13], and functional studies [14-16]. We show here that the rest and activity rhythms of Bdr mice are phase advanced and fragmented under a light/dark cycle, reminiscent of the disturbed sleep patterns observed in schizophrenia. Retinal inputs appear normal in mutants, and clock gene rhythms within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are normally phased both in vitro and in vivo. However, the 24 hr rhythms of arginine vasopressin within the SCN and plasma corticosterone are both markedly phase advanced in Bdr mice. We suggest that the Bdr circadian phenotype arises from a disruption of synaptic connectivity within the SCN that alters critical output signals. Collectively, our data provide a link between disruption of circadian activity cycles and synaptic dysfunction in a model of neuropsychiatric disease.

A comparison of the effects of ketamine and phencyclidine with other antagonists of the NMDA receptor in rodent assays of attention and working memory.

RATIONALE: N-methyl-D: -Aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists such as ketamine induce cognitive symptoms in man similar to those of schizophrenia and therefore might be useful as models of the disease in animals. However, it is unclear which NMDAR antagonist(s) offer the best means to produce cognitive deficits in attention and working memory and to what extent those deficits can be measured selectively in rats. OBJECTIVES: The present study systematically compared the effects of eight different NMDAR antagonists-MK-801, phencyclidine, (S)-(+)-ketamine, memantine, SDZ-220,581, Ro 25-6981, CP 101-606 and NVP-AAM077-in rats using standard tests of visual attention, the five-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRT), and working memory, the delayed matching to position task (DMTP). RESULTS: Drug-induced responses varied qualitatively and quantitatively in both a compound- and a task-dependent manner. Effects were generally confounded by concomitant motor and motivational disruption, although individual doses of phencyclidine for example appeared to impair selectively cognitive functions. Interestingly, GluN2B selective antagonists were unique in their effects; inducing potential performance benefit in the 5CSRT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the opportunity to induce a selective cognitive deficit in attention (5CSRT) or working memory (DMTP) in the rat is limited by both the NMDAR antagonist and the dose range used. The importance of a preclinical focus on ketamine, which is used more frequently in clinical settings, is limited by the extent to which cognitive effects can be both detected and quantified using this exposure regimen within these two operant assays.

A within-subject cognitive battery in the rat: differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonists.

RATIONALE: The range of cognitive and psychotomimetic effects produced by antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor has lead to widespread usage of these molecules as pharmacological models of cognitive impairment for drug discovery. Historically, NMDA receptor antagonists have been used interchangeably on the assumption that they produce analogous effects. OBJECTIVES: To profile a subset of these antagonists across a novel within-subject cognitive battery in the rat. METHODS: Naïve male Lister Hooded rats were subjected to a series of tests in which they were required to learn a simple visuo-auditory conditional discrimination. They then underwent testing in a delayed discrimination test followed by rule reversal and rule extinction tests. RESULTS: All NMDA receptor antagonists tested impaired acquisition performance and, with the exception of ketamine and the GluN2A preferring antagonist, NVP-AAM077, impaired consolidation of extinction. GluN2B antagonism produced a singular profile with potentially enhanced delayed discrimination performance and reduced hit rates in the reversal phase. Only PCP (phencyclidine) and ketamine disrupted performance in the delay phase but did so in a delay-independent manner. MK-801, PCP and memantine all increased the hit rate in the reversal phase; whilst only MK-801 and PCP impaired extinction per se. CONCLUSIONS: NMDA receptor-dependent mechanisms are requisite in the acquisition of a simple conditional discrimination and consolidation of extinction. Their role in working memory and reversal tasks appear to be less critical and potentially specific to the paradigm and NMDA receptor antagonist used. It is clearly misleading to generalise across NMDA antagonists with respect to their preclinical cognitive profile.

Diverse and often opposite behavioural effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in rats: implications for "NMDA antagonist modelling" of schizophrenia.

RATIONALE: Little attention has been paid to the relative equivalence of behavioural effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in rodents, with different compounds often used interchangeably to "model" aspects of schizophrenia in preclinical studies. OBJECTIVES: To further resolve such conjecture, the present study systematically compared eight different NMDA receptor antagonists: MK-801, PCP, ketamine, memantine, SDZ 220,581, Ro 25-6981, CP 101-606 and NVP-AAM077, in a series of variable interval (VI) schedules of reinforcement. Aspects of motivation as indexed in these tasks may well be impaired in schizophrenia and undoubtedly impact on the capacity to perform more complex, explicit tasks of cognition. METHODS AND RESULTS: An initial locomotor activity assessment demonstrated that all antagonists tested, except the NR2A-subunit preferring antagonist NVP-AAM077, induced hyperactivity, albeit of greatly differing magnitudes, qualities and temporal profiles. Three distinct patterns of antagonist effect were evident from the VI assays used: a uniform decrease in responding produced by (S)-(+)-ketamine, memantine and NVP-AAM077, a uniform increase in responding caused by the NR2B-subunit preferring antagonists Ro 25-6981 and CP 101-606, and variable bidirectional effects of PCP, SDZ 220,581 and MK-801. CONCLUSION: Despite nominally common mechanisms of action and often presumed biological equivalence, the NMDA antagonists tested produced very diverse effects on the expression of instrumental action. Other aspects of responding were left intact, including switching and matching behaviours, and the ability to respond to conditional stimuli. The implications of such findings with regard to animal modelling of schizophrenic psychotic symptoms are manifold.

Recognising nicotine: the neurobiological basis of nicotine discrimination.

Drug discrimination methodology makes possible the objective, quantitative study of the perception of psychoactive drug effects in either human or animal subjects. Investigations of the nicotine discriminative stimulus complex have contributed to our present understanding of nicotine psychopharmacology by defining the origin of its effects at specific subtypes of nicotinic receptor and the role of diverse neurotransmitter systems as mediating and modulating mechanisms. The evidence strongly supports central sites as the origins of the nicotine stimulus, and these are likely to be located in the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic neurons; the medial prefrontal cortex is primarily involved, with the Nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of secondary importance, while another element of the complex stimulus may arise in the dorsal hippocampus. Additionally, it appears that interactions of nicotine with the dopamine, serotonin, cannabinoid and probably glutamate systems all contribute to the final perceived stimulus. The resemblance between the nicotine discriminative stimulus and those of the psychomotor stimulant drugs amphetamine and cocaine contributes to defining the nature of the addictive properties of nicotine. It is particularly interesting that acute and chronic exposure to caffeine produce quantitative and qualitative changes in the characteristics of the nicotine stimulus. Interactions of nicotine with caffeine and cannabinoids strengthen proposals that the use of one substance serves as a "gateway" in sequential shifts of the target substance for drug-seeking behaviour, with profound implications for the human use of the substances concerned. Drug discrimination is also an important standard technique used in assessments of the abuse liability of novel psychoactive compounds, with relevance to attempts to develop novel nicotinic agonists for use as cognitive enhancers.

WO03/062224 is an in vivo selective agonist at nicotinic beta4 receptors.

Pharmacological agents that increase cholinergic transmission have considerable use in cognitive disorders and evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) represent an attractive target for treating certain neurological disorders. This investigation aimed to provide an in vivo verification of the in vitro data on WO03/062224, an agonist selective at beta4 subunit-containing nicotinic receptors. The effects of WO03/062224 were tested on wildtype and beta4 nAChR null mice on two behavioural paradigms; locomotor behaviour and instrumental responding for food on a second order schedule. Separate groups of wildtype and beta4 nAChR subunit knockout mice were tested in each paradigm with instrumental responding and forward locomotion being measured. WO03/062224 had a greater effect in the wildtype mice than the beta4 knockout mice in both locomotor activity (unconditioned behaviour) and instrumental responding (conditioned behaviour). In wildtype mice WO03/062224 caused a significant initial depression in locomotor activity followed by a significant increase in activity. The beta4 knockout mice displayed no significant drug-induced alterations in locomotor activity at any time point. In wildtype mice WO03/062224 caused a significant depression in instrumental responding throughout the session at both 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg. The beta4 knockout mice only displayed a reduction in initial responding at 10 mg/kg. The present study demonstrated that the effects of WO03/062224 at 3 mg/kg on locomotor activity and instrumental responding are likely occurring through a beta4 nicotinic mechanism. This investigation has shown that at an appropriate dose WO03/062224 is a suitable in vivo probe for the contribution of beta4-containing nAChRs to behaviour and suggests that their involvement is greater than previously recognised.

Ligands selective for alpha4beta2 but not alpha3beta4 or alpha7 nicotinic receptors generalise to the nicotine discriminative stimulus in the rat.

RATIONALE: Nicotine produces behavioural effects that are potentially related to its interaction with diverse nicotinic acetylcholine receptor populations. Evidence from gene deletion studies suggests that the interoceptive stimulus properties of nicotine are mediated by heteromeric high-affinity receptors containing alpha4beta2 subunits. Mice lacking beta2 subunits do not discriminate nicotine (Shoaib et al., Neuropharmacology, 42:530-539, 2002), and nicotine does not elicit dopamine release in these animals (Grady et al., J Neurochem, 76:258-268, 2001). The stimulus properties of nicotine can be detected in rats using a two-lever operant drug discrimination paradigm, allowing them to be classified pharmacologically using ligands with selectivity for receptors containing alpha4beta2, alpha3beta4 or alpha7 subunits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg nicotine from vehicle were given the nicotinic receptor agonists, cytisine, varenicline, TC2559, ABT-594, A-85380 (all having high affinity but varying selectivity for alpha4beta2-containing receptors), and WO 03/062224 and WO 01/60821A1 (selective for beta4- and alpha7-containing receptors, respectively). In separate studies, WO 03/062224 was used as the training stimulus. RESULTS: Nicotine, TC-2559, A-85380 and ABT-594 showed dose-dependent and complete stimulus substitution, whilst WO 03/062224 and WO 01/60821A1 were completely without effect. Cytisine and varenicline showed partial generalisation, consistent with their partial agonist activity at nicotinic receptors eliciting dopamine release in rat striatal slices. After almost 50 training sessions with WO 03/062224, there was no clear evidence that an alpha3beta4 receptor agonist could sustain a discriminable stimulus. CONCLUSION: Substitution to the nicotine discriminative stimulus required high-affinity and high intrinsic activity at beta2 but not at beta4- or at alpha7-containing nicotinic receptors.

Alcohol seeking by rats: action or habit?

In two experiments, we examined the relative susceptibility to outcome devaluation of lever pressing by rats for either a 10% ethanol solution or food pellets. The rats were trained to press different levers for these two reinforcers using a sucrose-substitution procedure. An aversion was then conditioned from either the ethanol solution or the food pellets by pairing consumption with illness induced by lithium chloride. When instrumental performance was subsequently tested in extinction, the rats pressed less on the pellet lever if the pellets, rather than the ethanol, had been devalued by aversion conditioning. By contrast, performance on the ethanol lever was unaffected by whether the ethanol or pellets were devalued. Moreover, noncontingent presentations of the devalued reinforcer had no impact on test performance. The differential resistance to outcome devaluation suggests that, in contrast to food seeking, alcohol seeking is a stimulus-response habit rather than a goal-directed action mediated by a representation of the action-outcome contingency.