Defining Patient Satisfaction after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has grown rapidly. As indications for the procedure expand, the proportion of patients who have satisfactory outcomes after rTSA has not been well defined. This systematic literature review explores overall patient satisfaction after rTSA and defines patient satisfaction based on indication for surgery. METHODS: A literature search was performed for studies describing patient satisfaction after rTSA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Papers were included if they investigated patient satisfaction after rTSA at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Follow-up duration, indication for surgery, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) relating to patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: There were a total of 5234 patients and 5288 shoulders from the 45 included studies. The overall study population was 61.2% female and the average age was 71.1 years (range 23-99). Satisfaction results were recorded at final follow-up, with average follow-up of 49.1 months (range 24-228). Overall patient satisfaction ranged from 77.7 to 87.8%, depending on patient satisfaction PROMs. When stratified by diagnosis, patients with a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) rated better satisfaction on all metrics when compared to patients with a diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) or massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT). CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that patients who undergo rTSA for either GHOA, CTA, or MRCT are generally satisfied with their procedure, with the rate of satisfaction highest in GHOA. Focusing on patient satisfaction may provide the best overall assessment of health care quality in a very understandable and tangible form. Overall satisfaction rate is valuable information for patient education and can be utilized as part of effective surgical counseling.

Same-Day Discharge vs. Inpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Age Stratified Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Hospital Charges.

BACKGROUND: As the number of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures increases, there is a growing interest in improving patient outcomes, limiting costs, and optimizing efficiency. One approach has been to transition these surgeries to an outpatient setting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct an age-stratified analysis comparing the 90-day postoperative outcomes of primary TSA in the same-day discharge (SDD) and inpatient (IP) settings with a specific focus on the super-elderly. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA between January 2018 and December 2021 in ambulatory and inpatient settings. The outcome measures included LOS, complications, hospital charges, ED utilization, readmissions, and reoperations within 90-days following TSA. Patients with LOS ≤8 hours were considered as SDD, and those with LOS >8 hours were considered as IP. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 121 and 174 procedures performed in SDD and IP settings, respectively. There were no differences in comorbidity indices between the SDD and IP groups (ASA score P=0.12, ECI P=0.067). The SDD cohort was younger than the IP group (SDD 67.0 years vs. 73.0 IP years, P<0.001), and the SDD group higher rate of intraoperative tranexamic acid use (P=0.015) and lower estimated blood loss (P=0.009). There were no differences in 90-day overall minor (P=0.20) and major complications (P=1.00), ED utilization (P=0.63), readmission (P=0.25) or reoperation (P =0.51) between the SDD and IP groups. When stratified by age, there were no differences in overall major (P=0.80) and minor (P=0.36) complications among the groups. However, the LOS was directly correlated with increasing age (LOS=8.4 hours in ≥65 to < 75-year cohort vs. LOS=25.9 hours in ≥80-year cohort; P<0.001). There were no differences in hospital charges between SDD and IP primary TSA in all 3 age groups (P=0.82). CONCLUSION: SDD TSA has a shorter LOS without increasing postoperative major and minor complications, ED encounters, readmissions, or reoperations. Older age was not associated with an increase in the complication profile or hospital charges even in the SDD setting, although it was associated with increased LOS in the IP group. These results suggest that TSA can be safely performed expeditiously in an outpatient setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Comparative Study.

Intramuscular endometriosis of the forearm: a case report.

Endometriosis is a disorder that commonly affects females of reproductive age and is defined as the presence of endometrial glands or stroma outside the uterine cavity. Patients typically present with cyclical pain during menses. Endometriosis can be characterized as endopelvic or extrapelvic depending on the sites involved. We report a case of a 40-year-old, right-hand-dominant, female who presented with a painful mass in her right proximal forearm. She was ultimately diagnosed with intramuscular endometriosis and underwent surgical excision.

Common characteristics of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration following COVID-19 vaccination: a comprehensive systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is incompletely understood, but it is postulated to be an immune-mediated inflammatory response to a vaccine antigen, leading to shoulder pain and dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation is to systematically review the literature related to SIRVA specifically after the COVID-19 vaccination by describing the diagnostic and clinical characteristics, diagnoses associated with SIRVA, and incidence between vaccine types. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify level I to IV studies and case descriptions of shoulder pain occurring after COVID-19 vaccination. To confirm that no studies were missing from the systematic review, references of studies from the initial search were scanned for additional relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies, comprised of 81 patients, were identified meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Reports were most commonly published from countries in Asia (53.1%; n = 43/81). The most commonly described vaccines were Oxford-AstraZeneca at 37.0% (n = 30/81) and Pfizer-BioNTech at 33.3% (n = 27/81). Symptoms occurred most commonly after at least 72 hours of administration (30.9%, n = 25/81). One hundred percent of patients (n = 81/81) described pain as an associated symptom and 90.1% of patients (n = 73/81) described multiple symptoms. The diagnostic modalities utilized to identify a specific pathology consisted of magnetic resonance imaging (55.6%; n = 45/81), ultrasound (28.4; n = 23/81), radiograph (25.9%; n = 21/81), and computed tomography (4.9%; 4/81). Nearly a third of patients (32.1%; n = 26/81) were diagnosed with bursitis, while 22 (27.2%) were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis, 17 (21.0%) with either rotator cuff tear or tendinopathy, and 14 (17.3%) with polymyalgia rheumatica or polymyalgia rheumatica-like syndrome. The 2 most common treatment options were physical therapy (34.6%; n = 28/81) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (33.3%; 27/81). The majority of SIRVA cases (52.1%; n = 38/73) completely resolved within a few weeks to months. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited quality and lack of large-scale studies, it is important for providers to recognize SIRVA as a potential risk factor as the number of patients receiving COVID-19 vaccinations and boosters continues to rise.

Patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty prefer greater surgeon involvement in shared decision making.

BACKGROUND: There has been a shift in medical decision making from a paternalist model to a shared decision-making (SDM) approach, described as a patient-physician relationship where both parties collaborate to arrive on an evidence-based treatment regimen that best suits the patient's needs and values. However, there is a scarcity in evidence regarding SDM in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall patient preference for SDM and determine demographic and socioeconomic factors related to SDM preference in those undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients aged 40-89 years who had undergone a total shoulder arthroplasty were enrolled. Two-part questionnaires were administered collecting patient demographic information and SDM subscale scores postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariate regression models were used to determine factors associated with SDM Total and subscale scores. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients (53 male; mean age, 69.5 ± 10.4 years) who had undergone primary total shoulder arthroplasty were included. The mean Total SDM score was -2.24 ± 1.9 and the Preoperative, Operative, and Postoperative SDM subscale scores were -1.54 ± 2.0, -2.59 ± 2.2, and -2.48 ± 2.1, respectively, indicating a preference for SDM in the Preoperative subscale and surgeon-driven decision making in the total score and other 2 subscales. Multivariate regression models demonstrated a preference for surgeon decision making at both the 4-12-week postoperative period for the Preoperative subscale (odds ratio [OR] -1.03, 95% CI -2.0, -0.1, P = .039) and the 2-4-week postoperative period for the Operative subscale (OR -1.74, 95% CI -3.4, -0.1, P = .038) when compared to patients at the 2-week postoperative period. No other variables were significantly associated with any of the SDM subscale scores or Total SDM score. CONCLUSION: Patients reported a more passive role in the decision-making process with an overall preference for a surgeon-led approach in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients preferred a shared decision-making approach in regard to preoperative considerations but indicated a significant preference for surgeon-led decision making regarding day of surgery decisions. There were no correlations between SDM scores and age, sex, race, income, education level, insurance type, or treating surgeon. Overall, patients demonstrated a predilection for an SDM approach for preoperative considerations, contrary to those decisions associated with the day of surgery and postoperative care.

Opportunity Costs of Internal Promotions in Plastic Surgery: Are Women Given a Fair Shot?

Background: Academic advancement in plastic surgery necessitates creation of opportunities for rising faculty, which are pivotal for women in their efforts to close prominent gender gaps in higher ranks. We study positions of academic prestige that benefit from internal nomination as surrogates for opportunities afforded to men and women seeking leadership roles. Methods: We collected the following datapoints: authors of invited discussions published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery from 2010 to 2019; current editorial board members of representative plastic surgery journals; recipients of society-sponsored traveling fellowships; and directors of the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Public profiles for all authors and surgeons were referenced to confirm gender identification. Results: Seven-hundred ninety-seven plastic and reconstructive surgery discussions were included, 18% of which included female first or senior authorship. Seventy-one (9%) discussions listed a female senior author. Male and female senior authors were equally as likely to collaborate with a female first co-author (25% and 26%, respectively). Only 17% of invited authors contributed to 55% of discussion articles. Women occupied 19% of journal editorial board positions, though none were editors-in-chief. American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Maxiliofacial Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and Plastic Surgery Foundation traveling fellowships were awarded to one (3%), four (7%), five (13%), and 141 (15%) female plastic surgeons, respectively. Women comprise 26% of directors of American Board of Plastic Surgery. Conclusions: Female representation in plastic surgery is rising, but it is not mirrored across appointed positions in academia. We should strive to support advancements that allow selected prestigious positions to more accurately reflect the gender distribution within the plastic surgery community.