Suspected adverse reactions to oral administration of a praziquantel-pyrantel combination in captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).

OBJECTIVE To characterize adverse reactions to oral administration of a combination of praziquantel and pyrantel embonate or pyrantel pamoate, with or without oxantel embonate, in captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). DESIGN Retrospective case series and case-control study. ANIMALS 16 captive cheetahs with signs of adverse reaction to oral administration of praziquantel and pyrantel, with or without oxantel embonate (affected group), and 27 cheetahs without such reactions (unaffected group), all from 3 independent facilities. PROCEDURES Medical records and postmortem findings for affected cheetahs were reviewed and compared with those of unaffected animals. Anthelmintic doses administered, age, and sex of cheetahs were compared between groups. RESULTS 3 reactions in affected cheetahs were fatal, whereas the remainder ranged from mild to severe. Postmortem examination failed to reveal any disease processes or conditions to explain the deaths. No differences in anthelmintic dose were identified between affected and unaffected cheetahs for all facilities combined, and no correlation existed between dose and reaction severity. No association with sex was detected, but affected cheetahs were significantly younger than unaffected cheetahs. This difference was not significant after controlling for facility. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Cheetahs were concluded to have had an adverse reaction to the praziquantel-pyrantel combination because of temporal proximity of onset of clinical signs to dose administration, similarity of signs to those reported for toxicosis in other species for these drugs, and a lack of other disease process or environmental explanatory factors. A highly cautious approach to the use of this drug combination is recommended for cheetahs.

Assessment of reproducibility of creatinine measurement and MELD scoring in four liver transplant units in the UK.

UNLABELLED: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) or similar scoring system is proposed in the UK for prioritization for liver transplantation. We evaluated the reproducibility of creatinine measurements and therefore MELD scores in four liver transplant units in the UK. METHODS: All transplant units were invited to participate; four agreed to do so, contributing 36 patients awaiting liver transplantation. Blood was collected from these 36 and divided into aliquots then sent to the four participating centres. Every centre measured creatinine and bilirubin for every patient. The results were analysed for the degree of agreement between centres for creatinine and MELD scores using the Bland-Altman method and Wilcoxon rank test. RESULTS: The mean creatinine value varied from 101 mumol/l in centre C to 110 micromol/l for the same sample in centre A, with significant differences between the four centres (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The MELD scores were significantly different between centre C and all other centres (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates lack of agreement in measurement of serum creatinine and MELD scoring between four UK transplant centres. A difference in two MELD points can have a significant impact on patient outcome, and these factors will have to be addressed if a UK-wide transplant list is to be initiated.