The Relationship Between Level of Adherence to Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring and Survival in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) technology embedded within cardiac rhythm devices permits continuous monitoring, which may result in improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study used "big data" to assess whether RM is associated with improved survival and whether this is influenced by the type of cardiac device and/or its degree of use. METHODS: We studied 269,471 consecutive U.S. patients implanted between 2008 and 2011 with pacemakers (PMs), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with pacing capability (CRT-P)/defibrillation capability (CRT-D) with wireless RM. We analyzed weekly use and all-cause survival for each device type by the percentage of time in RM (%TRM) stratified by age. Socioeconomic influences on %TRM were assessed using 8 census variables from 2012. RESULTS: The group had implanted PMs (n = 115,076; 43%), ICDs (n = 85,014; 32%), CRT-D (n = 61,475; 23%), and CRT-P (n = 7,906; 3%). When considered together, 127,706 patients (47%) used RM, of whom 67,920 (53%) had ≥75%TRM (high %TRM) and 59,786 (47%) <75%TRM (low %TRM); 141,765 (53%) never used RM (RM None). RM use was not affected by age or sex, but demonstrated wide geographic and socioeconomic variability. Survival was better in high %TRM versus RM None (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.10; p < 0.001), in high %TRM versus low %TRM (HR: 1.32; p < 0.001), and also in low %TRM versus RM None (HR: 1.58; p < 0.001). The same relationship was observed when assessed by individual device type. CONCLUSIONS: RM is associated with improved survival, irrespective of device type (including PMs), but demonstrates a graded relationship with the level of adherence. The results support the increased application of RM to improve patient outcomes.

Results from a phase II multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled study of Del-1 (VLTS-589) for intermittent claudication in subjects with peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: This study compared VLTS-589 (plasmid encoding the angiomatrix protein Del-1 in conjunction with poloxamer 188) with poloxamer 188 control, for the treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with moderate to severe peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Subjects with bilateral intermittent claudication and peak walking time (PWT) between 1 and 10 minutes on 2 qualifying (reproducible; within 25% of each other) treadmill tests were enrolled. Patients received VLTS-589 or poloxamer 188 control, administered as 21 intramuscular injections to each lower extremity (42 mL in each extremity). In addition to safety and tolerability, efficacy evaluations compared to baseline included the following: change in PWT at 90 days (primary end point), change in claudication onset time, change in ankle brachial index (ABI), and change in quality of life measures. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were randomized and treated. During the 30, 90, and 180 days follow-up, mean PWT, claudication onset time, and ABI were significantly increased compared to baseline values in both treatment groups with no significant difference between groups in the primary or secondary end points. In addition, both groups demonstrated significantly improved quality of life at follow-up vs baseline, with no significant differences between groups. Serious adverse events were similar in both groups--none were definitely treatment-related. CONCLUSION: Intramuscular delivery of both Del-1 expressing plasmid and the control resulted in significant improvement in exercise capacity compared to baseline at 30, 90, and 180 days. There was no difference in outcome measures associated with the Del-1 plasmid.