Effect of aspirin intake at bedtime versus on awakening on circadian rhythm of platelet reactivity. A randomised cross-over trial.

The risk of acute cardiovascular events is highest during morning hours, and platelet activity peaks during morning hours. The effect of timing of aspirin intake on circadian rhythm and morning peak of platelet reactivity is not known. It was our objective to evaluate the effect of timing of aspirin intake on circadian rhythm and morning peak of platelet reactivity. A randomised open-label cross-over trial in healthy subjects (n=14) was conducted. Participants used acetylsalicylic acid (80 mg) on awakening or at bedtime for two periods of two weeks, separated by a four-week wash-out period. At the end of both periods blood was drawn every 3 hours to measure COX-1-dependent (VerifyNow-Aspirin; Serum Thromboxane B2 [STxB2]) and COX-1-independent (flow cytometry surface CD62p expression; microaggregation) platelet activity. VerifyNow platelet reactivity over the whole day was similar with intake on awakening and at bedtime (mean difference: -9 [95 % confidence interval (CI) -21 to 4]). However, the morning increase in COX-1-dependent platelet activity was reduced by intake of aspirin at bedtime compared with on awakening (mean difference VerifyNow: -23 Aspirin Reaction Units [CI -50 to 4]; STxB2: -1.7 ng/ml [CI -2.7 to -0.8]). COX-1-independent assays were not affected by aspirin intake or its timing. Low-dose aspirin taken at bedtime compared with intake on awakening reduces COX-1-dependent platelet reactivity during morning hours in healthy subjects. Future clinical trials are required to investigate whether simply switching to aspirin intake at bedtime reduces the risk of cardiovascular events during the high risk morning hours.

Human CD34+/KDR+ cells are generated from circulating CD34+ cells after immobilization on activated platelets.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of kinase-insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) on circulating CD34+ cells is assumed to be indicative for the potential of these cells to support vascular maintenance and repair. However, in bone marrow and in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood, less than 0.5% of CD34+ cells co-express KDR. Therefore, we studied whether CD34+/KDR+ cells are generated in the peripheral circulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using an ex vivo flow model, we show that activated platelets enable CD34+ cells to home to sites of vascular injury and that upon immobilization, KDR is translocated from an endosomal compartment to the cell-surface within 15 minutes. In patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, the percentage of circulating CD34+ co-expressing KDR was significantly elevated compared to age-matched controls. When treated with aspirin, the patients showed a 49% reduction in the generation of CD34+/KDR+ cells, indicating that the level of circulating CD34+/KDR+ cells also relates to in vivo platelet activation. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating CD34+/KDR+ are not mobilized from bone marrow as a predestined endothelial progenitor cell population but are mostly generated from circulating multipotent CD34+ cells at sites of vascular injury. Therefore, the number of circulating CD34+/KDR+ cells may serve as a marker for vascular injury.

The minor allele of GP6 T13254C is associated with decreased platelet activation and a reduced risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality: results from the SMILE-Platelets project.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory results have been published on the effects of T13254C (rs1613662), which distinguishes the two major isoforms of GP6, the gene encoding the platelet receptor glycoprotein VI, on platelet function and the risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We performed a population-based case-control study, the Study of Myocardial Infarctions in Leiden, among 547 male patients with a first myocardial infarction (MI) and 646 control subjects, as well as a prospective cohort study in which the same MI patients were followed for recurrent events (fatal and non-fatal MI and unstable angina) and mortality (median follow-up of 12 years). P-selectin expression by platelets induced by crosslinked collagen-related peptide (CRP-XL) was measured by whole blood flow cytometry in 274 MI patients. RESULTS: T13254C was not associated with a first MI, but seemed to be associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent events [per-allele hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.06] and mortality (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.89). Pooling with the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study revealed hazard ratios of 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.99) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.96). The minor C-allele was also strongly associated with a reduced percentage of P-selectin-expressing platelets. The reduction per C-allele was 23% (95% CI 18-28%). In an independent study of 219 healthy volunteers, the per-allele reduction of CRP-XL-induced aggregation was 10% (95% CI 2-18%). CONCLUSION: The minor allele of GP6 T13254C that reduced platelet activation and aggregation also seemed to be associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality, but was not associated with first MI.

High platelet reactivity is associated with myocardial infarction in premenopausal women: a population-based case-control study.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Platelets are involved in the occlusion of coronary arteries after rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque. Furthermore, activated platelets release large quantities of growth factors, chemokines and interleukins that regulate inflammatory reactions. Therefore, we hypothesized that high basal platelet reactivity may contribute to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in premenopausal women. METHODS: We assessed the relation between high platelet reactivity and MI in a population-based case-control study among premenopausal women (aged < 50 years). We used multivariable logistic regression to quantify the effect of high platelet reactivity, adjusted for potential confounders. Platelet reactivity was estimated by plasma levels of neutrophil activating peptide 2 (NAP-2), CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)4, soluble glycoprotein 1b (sGPIb) and soluble P-selectin. RESULTS: High platelet reactivity (i.e. levels >or= 90th percentile control subjects) was associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased incidence of MI: the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-6.4] for NAP-2, 2.2 (0.9-5.1) for CXCL4, 1.9 (0.7-4.6) for sP-selectin and 2.5 (1.1-5.7) for sGPIb. The incidence of MI dose-dependently increased when more markers were elevated. High platelet reactivity according to both NAP-2 and sGPIb was associated with an up to tenfold increased incidence (9.9, 95% confidence interval 2.0-48.3). CONCLUSIONS: High basal platelet reactivity was associated with a 2- to 3-fold higher incidence of MI compared with normal platelet reactivity in premenopausal women. Our results suggest that high basal platelet reactivity may contribute to a higher risk of MI.

Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The Wells clinical decision rule (CDR) and D-dimer tests can be used to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed a meta-analysis to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of an "unlikely" CDR (

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, other lipid-lowering medication, antiplatelet therapy, and the risk of venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Statins [3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors] and antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of atherosclerotic disease. Besides a reduction of lipid levels, statins might also have antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, and anti-platelet therapy reduces clot formation. We have studied the risk of venous thrombosis with use of statins, other lipid-lowering medication, and antiplatelet therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis in the leg or pulmonary embolism between March 1999 and September 2004 were included in a large population-based case-control study (MEGA study). Control subjects were partners of patients (53%) or recruited via a random-digit-dialing method (47%). Participants reported different all-medication use in a questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 4538 patients, 154 used statins (3.3%), as did 354 of 5914 control subjects (5.7%). The use of statins [odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.56] but not other lipid-lowering medications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.62-2.43), was associated with a reduced venous thrombosis risk as compared with individuals who did not use any lipid-lowering medication, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, atherosclerotic disease, antiplatelet therapy and use of vitamin K antagonists. Different types and various durations of statin therapy were all associated with a decreased venous thrombosis risk. Antiplatelet therapy also reduced venous thrombosis risk (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.42-0.74). However, sensitivity analyses suggested that this effect is most likely explained by a so-called 'healthy user effect'. Simultaneous use of medication most strongly reduced venous thrombosis risk. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the use of various types of statins is associated with a reduced risk of venous thrombosis, whereas antiplatelet therapy and other lipid-lowering medications are not.

Effects of aspirin on serum C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease: a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.

AIM: Low-grade inflammation plays a pivotal role in atherogenesis in type 2 diabetes. Next to its antithrombotic effects, several lines of evidence demonstrate anti-inflammatory properties of aspirin. We determined the effects of aspirin on inflammation - represented by C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) - in type 2 diabetic subjects without cardiovascular disease and assessed differential effects of aspirin 300 mg compared with 100 mg. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial was performed in 40 type 2 diabetic patients. In two periods of 6 weeks, patients used 100 or 300 mg aspirin and placebo. Plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were measured before and after both periods. RESULTS: Use of aspirin resulted in a CRP reduction of 1.23 +/- 1.02 mg/l (mean +/- s.e.m.), whereas use of placebo resulted in a mean increase of 0.04 +/- 1.32 mg/l (P = 0.366). Aspirin reduced IL-6 with 0.7 +/- 0.5 pg/ml, whereas use of placebo resulted in a mean increase of 0.2 +/- 0.8 pg/ml (P = 0.302). There were no significant differences in effects on CRP and IL-6 between 100 and 300 mg aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a 6-week course of aspirin does not improve low-grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease, although a modest effect could not be excluded. No significant differential effects between aspirin 100 and 300 mg were found.

Aspirin in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

This review summarizes available evidence on effects of aspirin on incidence and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE). From a pathophysiological point of view, inhibition of platelet aggregation is associated with an impaired thrombus formation both in an experimental model of venous thrombosis and in vivo. Epidemiological evidence in support of a beneficial effect of acetylsalicylic acid on VTE incidence is provided by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis of studies on the use of antiplatelet agents in cardiovascular risk reduction, showing a significant 25% risk reduction of pulmonary embolism. Moreover, a meta-analysis on older trials of antiplatelet agents in postsurgical VTE prevention and the large Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial demonstrate a protective effect of the same magnitude: 25-30%. However, as low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have shown a superior efficacy and safety profile, and no direct comparisons have been made between aspirin, LMWH and VKA in prolonged use, the most recent guidelines advise against aspirin monotherapy for thromboprophylaxis in the surgical patient. Currently, there is no evidence to support a role for aspirin in air travel-related VTE. Regarding prevention of recurrent VTE, studies are ongoing to determine the potential role of aspirin after a first unprovoked VTE.