Urinary peptidomics and bioinformatics for the detection of diabetic kidney disease.

The aim of this study was to establish a peptidomic profile based on LC-MS/MS and random forest (RF) algorithm to distinguish the urinary peptidomic scenario of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with different stages of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Urine from 60 T2DM patients was collected: 22 normal (stage A1), 18 moderately increased (stage A2) and 20 severely increased (stage A3) albuminuria. A total of 1080 naturally occurring peptides were detected, which resulted in the identification of a total of 100 proteins, irrespective of the patients' renal status. The classification accuracy showed that the most severe DKD (A3) presented a distinct urinary peptidomic pattern. Estimates for peptide importance assessed during RF model training included multiple fragments of collagen and alpha-1 antitrypsin, previously associated to DKD. Proteasix tool predicted 48 proteases potentially involved in the generation of the 60 most important peptides identified in the urine of DM patients, including metallopeptidases, cathepsins, and calpains. Collectively, our study lightened some biomarkers possibly involved in the pathogenic mechanisms of DKD, suggesting that peptidomics is a valuable tool for identifying the molecular mechanisms underpinning the disease and thus novel therapeutic targets.

Combined creatinine-cystatin C CKD-EPI equation significantly underestimates measured glomerular filtration rate in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of creatinine and cystatin C (cysC) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and healthy adults. METHODS: Case-control study including 84 patients with type 2 DM and 100 healthy adults with measured GFR (mGFR)≥60mL/min/1.73m2. GFR was measured by 51Cr-EDTA and estimated (eGFR) by the following equations using creatinine, cysC or both markers: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Caucasian Asian Pediatrics and Adults (CAPA), CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C (CKDEPI-CC), and CKD-EPI cystatin C (CKDEPIcysC). Agreement was evaluated by Bland & Altman analysis. RESULTS: Healthy individuals were 66% females, aged 38±14years; they presented mGFR 112±19mL/min/1.73m2 and eGFR by CKD-EPI, CKDEPI-CC, CKDEPIcysC and CAPA equations, respectively, 108±17, 102±15, 97±16 and 93±16mL/min/1.73m2. DM group were 50% females, aged 59±19years and presented mGFR 104±27 and eGFR 87±19, 80±18, 74±20 and 73±18mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. All equations significantly underestimated mGFR, excepting creatinine-based CKD-EPI in the healthy group. The performance was considerably worse for GFRs above 120mL/min/1.73m2. CONCLUSION: In both healthy and type 2 DM patients, cystatin C-based equations, including the combined CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin equation, failed to improve the accuracy of GFR estimation, especially for normal and high normal GFR values.

Influence of age, gender and body mass index on late-night salivary cortisol in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is one of the most reliable tests to screen for endogenous Cushing syndrome. This test is simple, inexpensive and noninvasive and has high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our study was to analyze the putative influence of age, gender and body mass index (BMI) on LNSC levels in a healthy population. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in healthy adults. Midnight saliva samples were collected at home. Participants refrained from teeth brushing, eating or drinking for 2 h prior to collection. Salivary cortisol measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (number 140073). RESULTS: We evaluated 122 nonsmoking healthy volunteers. Mean age was 35±14 years (range, 18-74 years); 63% were women. Mean BMI was 24±3 kg/m2, blood pressure 115/74 mmHg and fasting plasma glucose 4.8±0.5 mmol/L. LNSC presented a non-Gaussian distribution; the median was 3.58 (range, 0.55-8.55) nmol/L (0.13 [range, 0.02-0.31] µg/dL), and the 97.5th percentile (P97.5) was 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 µg/dL). Multiple linear regression disclosed a significant positive association between salivary cortisol levels and age (r2=0.21, p<0.001), but no association with gender (p=0.105) or BMI (p=0.119). Accordingly, participants aged >50 years had significantly higher salivary cortisol as compared to those aged <50 years (5.24 nmol/L [0.19 µg/dL] vs. 3.31 nmol/L [0.12 µg/dL], respectively, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum reference value (P97.5) of LNSC was set at 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 µg/dL) using ECLIA. Advanced age was associated with higher LNSC levels, with no evident influence of gender or BMI.

Availability of urinary albumin measurement in Southern Brazilian Laboratories

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading worldwide cause of endstage renal disease. The current recommendation is to screen for DKD by evaluating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and measuring urinary albumin (UA) levels in a spot sample. The aim of this study was to evaluate the availability of UA measurement in Southern Brazilian laboratories. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the routine use of UA in all laboratories registered in the State Pharmacy Council of Rio Grande do Sul, the southernmost state of Brazil. Data was collected by mail, e-mail, telephone, or personal interview. A sample size of at least 384 laboratories was necessary to achieve 5% precision at a 95% confidence level based on a fixed proportion of 0.5. Results: Eight hundred and eighty laboratories currently registered in the state were invited to participate in the study; 548 (62%) answered the technical specification questionnaire. Only 306 (55%) of the 548 surveyed laboratories performed UA measurements. The laboratories were also required to provide the number of UA measurements performed per day, which ranged from less than one per week to 65 per day. Conclusion: The availability of UA measurements is undesirably low in Southern Brazil. This demonstrates the urgent need to increase the availability of this important test. It also reveals the gap between the current guidelines and the awareness about them among health care professionals...

Low rates of automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate in Southern Brazilian laboratories.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of eGFR reporting in Southern Brazilian laboratories. DESIGN AND METHODS: The eGFR automatic reporting, as assessed by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and/or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-based equations, was evaluated in a representative cross-sectional sample. A standardized questionnaire to obtain this information was given out by mail or email. RESULTS: Five-hundred fifty laboratories, evenly distributed in the different state regions, completed the questionnaire. The eGFR was automatically reported by 54 (9.8%) laboratories, and the MDRD was the most commonly used equation (94.5%). The Jaffe methods were the most employed technique (94%) to measure serum creatinine. CONCLUSION: The automatic eGFR reporting rate was unacceptably low, emphasizing the crucial role of educating medical teams and laboratories on the importance of having these tools available to optimize detection of renal disease and proper treatment.

Comparison between IDMS-traceable Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays for estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the CKD-EPI equation in healthy and diabetic subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to compare the agreement between creatinine measured by Jaffe and enzymatic methods and their putative influence on eGFR as calculated by the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation in healthy and diabetic individuals. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in 123 adult southern Brazilians with GFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m² (53 patients with type 2 diabetes, 70 healthy volunteers). Mean age was 49±16 years (range of 19-86). Most were female (55%) and white (83%). Creatinine was measured by a traceable Jaffe method (Modular P, Roche Diagnostic) and by an enzymatic method (CREA plus, Roche/Hitachi 917). GFR was measured by the 5¹Cr-EDTA single-injection method. RESULTS: Serum creatinine measured by the Jaffe and enzymatic methods was similar in healthy subjects (0.79±0.16 vs. 0.79±0.15 mg/dL, respectively, P=0.76), and diabetic patients (0.96±0.22 vs. 0.92±0.29 mg/dL, respectively, P=0.17). However, the correlation between the two methods was higher in the healthy group (r=0.90 vs. 0.76, P<0.001). The difference between Jaffe creatinine and enzymatic creatinine was <10% in 63% of cases in the healthy group and 40% of cases in the diabetes group (P=0.018). In the subset of patients with diabetes, eGFR based on enzymatic assay results showed better agreement with measured GFR than did eGFR based on Jaffe results. CONCLUSION: Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods show adequate agreement in healthy subjects, but in the presence of diabetes, the enzymatic method performed slightly better.

Reference values for glomerular filtration rate in healthy Brazilian adults.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best index of renal function, but age, gender and ethnicity can putatively affect its values. The aim of this study was to establish reference values for GFR in healthy Brazilian subjects while taking these factors into account. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, GFR was measured by the 51Cr-EDTA single-injection method. GFR reference values were developed according to CLSI Guidelines for Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory (CLSI C28 protocol). RESULTS: The age range of the 285 healthy individuals was 19 to 70 years, 57% were females, and GFR was 106 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2). There was no difference between male and female GFRs (108 ± 18 vs. 104 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2) respectively, P = 0.134), and reference values were therefore developed from the pooled sample. GFR values were lower in subjects aged ≥45 years as compared with those younger than 45 years (98 ± 15 vs.112 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.001). Based on mean ± 2 SD, GFR reference values were 76 to 148 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for subjects younger than 45 years and 68 to 128 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for individuals older than 45 years, irrespective of gender. CONCLUSION: The age-adjusted reference intervals reported may be reliably adopted to evaluate kidney function, since they are based on recommended standards.

Low-dose aspirin does not affect the renal function of microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients / Aspirina em baixa dosagem não afeta a função renal de pacientes com diabete melito tipo 2 microalbuminuricos

Low-grade inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, and anti-inflammatory drugs could be potentially useful as a therapeutic tool. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of low-dose aspirin (300 mg/d) on urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) levels of microalbuminuric type 2 DM patients. Methods: in this randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study, 18 microalbuminuric (UAE=30-300 mg/24 h) type 2 DM patients received aspirin (300 mg/d) or identical placebo for 8 weeks, with a 6-week washout period. The patients were aged 56±9 years, had a diabetes duration of 16±7.5 years; 11 (61%) were female, and they were all using enalapril 10 mg bid. GFR was measured by 51Cr-EDTA single-injection method and UAE by immunoturbidimetry. The sample-size calculation showed that 17 patients were needed to detect a 30% change in UAE (α= 0.05 and β= 0.20). Results: after 8 weeks of treatment, there were no significant differences between placebo and aspirin, respectively, regarding UAE [57.7 (8.9-420.0) vs. 63 (8.2-272.0) mg/24 h; P=0.45] and GFR (108±34 vs. 111±47 ml/min/1.73 m2; P=0.90). Glycemic control was stable throughout the C-reactive protein levels [2.72 (0.34-10.3) vs. 2.03 (0.25-10.3) μg/l; P=0.21] were comparable after placebo and aspirin, respectively. There were no period (P=0.41) or carry-over effects (P=0.49). Conclusion: low-dose aspirin did not affect GFR and UAE levels of microalbuminuric type 2 DM. It seems that the putative low-grade inflammation of diabetic nephropathy does not respond to these low doses of the drug

A inflamação em baixo grau tem sido implicada na patogênese da nefropatia diabética e o uso de anti-inflamatórios poderia ser potencialmente útil como terapêutica. Objetivo: o objetivo deste estudo foi analisar o efeito de baixas doses de aspirina sobre a excreção urinária de albumina (EUA) e taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG) de pacientes com diabete melito(DM) tipo 2 microalbuminuricos. Métodos: neste estudo randomizado, duplo-cego, cruzado, controlado com placebo, 18 pacientes DM tipo 2 microalbuminuricos (EUA = 30-300 mg/24 h) receberam aspirina (300 mg/dia) ou placebo idêntico por 8 semanas, com um período de washout de 6 semanas. Os pacientes tinham idade de 56±9 anos, duração diabetes de 16±7,5 anos, 11 (61%) eram do sexo feminino, e todos estavam usando 20 mg de enalapril/dia. A TFG foi medida pelo 51Cr-EDTA e a EUA por imunoturbidimetria. O calculo do tamanho da amostra: 17 pacientes para detectar uma alteração de 30% na EUA (α=0,05 e β=0,20). Resultados: após 8 semanas, não houve diferenças significativas entre placebo e aspirina, respectivamente, em relação a EUA [57,7 (8,9-420,0) vs. 63 (8,2-272,0) mg/24 h;P=0,45] e TFG (108±34 vs. 111±47 ml/min/1,73 m2; P=0,90). O controle glicêmico manteve-se estável. Os níveis de proteína C reativa [2,72 (0,34-10,3) vs. 2,03 (0,25-10,3) mg/l; P=0,21] foram semelhantes após placebo e aspirina, respectivamente. Não houve efeito de período (P=0,41) ou carry-over (P=0,49). Conclusão: a inflamação de baixo grau descrita na patogênese da nefropatia diabética não responde a baixas doses de aspirina

Recomendações atuais para a detecção da nefropatia diabética / Guidelines for the detection of diabetic nephropathy

A nefropatia diabética (ND) é uma complicação crônica grave do diabetes melito (DM); é a principal causa de insuficiência renal terminal. A ND é classificada em 3 estágios conforme a excreção urinária de albumina (EUA): normoalbuminúria (EUA <17 mg/l), microalbuminúria (EUA 17-174 mg/l) e macroalbuminúria (>174 mg/l). Da fase de microalbuminúria pode ocorrer regressão para normoalbuminúria (30% casos) ou progressão para a macroalbuminúria, quando ocorre maior risco de evolução para a doença renal crônica (DRC) terminal. O diagnóstico da ND é realizado através da medida da albumina na urina e pela avaliação da taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG). Recomenda-se a medida da albumina em amostra isolada de urina (primeira da manhã ou amostra casual), podendo-se medir o índice albumina-creatinina ou a concentração de albumina. Valores elevados de albuminúria devem ser confirmados em pelo menos 2 de 3 coletas de urina, em um intervalo de 3 a 6 meses. Na impossibilidade da medida da albuminúria, a medida de proteínas totais (proteinúria @430 mg/l em amostra ou >500 mg/24 h), pode ser utilizada para diagnóstico de fases mais avançadas de ND. Em pacientes com DM tipo 2 o rastreamento deve iniciar ao diagnóstico de DM, e nos pacientes com DM tipo 1 deve ser após os 10 anos de idade; logo após o início da puberdade; ou quando a duração do DM for >5 anos. Se negativo repetir anualmente; e, se positivo, recomenda-se a monitoração mais frequente da albumina urinária. A estimativa da TFG é realizada através de fórmulas que empregam a creatinina sérica, ajustadas para idade, gênero e etnia. São recomendadas as equações do estudo Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) e Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). Deve ser levado em conta que, em pacientes com DM, essas equações tendem a subestimar a TFG. A ND deve ser identificada o mais precocemente possível e para isto tanto os profissionais de saúde como os pacientes com DM devem ser conscientizados.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is an important chronic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is the leading cause of end-staage renal disease. DN is classified into stages according to the urinary albumin excretion (UAE): normoalbuminuria (UAE <17 mg/l), microalbuminuria (UAE 17-174 mg/l), and macroalbuminuria (UAE >174 mg/l. From microalbuminuria there might be regression to normoalbuminuria (30% cases) or progression to macroalbuminuria, in which case there is higher risk of progression to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). DN has a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rate that is possibly more significant than the progression to terminal CKD. DN diagnosis is established by the measurement of albumin in the urine and assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The measurement of albumin in an isolated urine sample (first morning urine or random sample) is recommended, with the possibility of measuring albumin-creatinine ratio or albumin concentration. High levels of albuminuria should be confirmed by at least 2 out of 3 urine samples within a time interval of 3 to 6 months. If albuminuria cannot be measured, total protein level (proteinuria @ 430 mg/l in a sample or > 500 mg/24 h) can be used to diagnose advanced stages of DN. In patients with type 2 DM, screening should start upon diagnosis of DM, and in patients with type 1 DM, it should be started after the patient turns 10 years old; soon after the onset of puberty; or when the duration of DM is >5 years. In case of negative results, screening should be repeated annually and, if the result is positive, more frequent monitoring of urinary albumin is recommended. GFR estimation is calculated using formulas that employ serum creatinine adjusted for age, gender, and ethnicity. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study and CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration) equations are the recommended. In patients with DM, this equation shows a tendency to underestimate GFR.

Glomerular filtration rate measurement and prediction equations.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as the presence of kidney damage or a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for three or more months. Measurement of serum creatinine is the most commonly used method to evaluated kidney function, but it must be included in formulas to estimate GFR, adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity, such as the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation. The performance of this equation is acceptable for patients with CKD but appears to under-estimate GFR in populations with unknown kidney status. A new formula has been developed recently. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation appears to perform better than the MDRD equation. Cystatin C has been widely evaluated as a marker for GFR and seems to be more sensitive than creatinine. The aim of this review is to discuss the recommendations for detecting CKD, emphasizing the characteristics and limitations of GFR estimating equations and pitfalls in the evaluation of urinary albumin excretion.

Calibração da creatinina sérica com uso de equação de regressão: influência na performance da fórmula do estudo MDRD / Serum creatinine calibration with regression equation: influence on MDRD formula performance

Diferenças nos métodos de medida da creatinina sérica podem determinar amplas variações na taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG) estimada com fórmulas. Para a padronização da medida da creatinina, deve ser usado método calibrado rastreável para medida de referência com ID-MS (isotope dilution mass spectrometry). Objetivo: Avaliar a TFG estimada com a equação MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) original (MDRDo, creatinina método não calibrado) e a equação MDRD re-expressa (MDRDr, método calibrado por ID-MS), comparando-as com a TFG medida pelo 51Cr-EDTA (método padrão) em indivíduos normais. Métodos: Foram avaliados 101 indivíduos, com idade média de 38±12 anos, sendo 45 homens. A TFG foi medida pela técnica de injeção única do 51Cr-EDTA (TFG 51Cr-EDTA) e estimada pelas equações MDRDo: 186 x creatinina sérica-1,154 x idade-0,203 x 0,742 (se mulher) x 1,210 (se negro) e MDRDr, substituindo-se o valor 186 por 175 na equação. A creatinina sérica foi medida pelo método de Jaffe não calibrado e transformada em calibrado com a fórmula: y=1,07x-0,249, obtida previamente por regressão. A concordância entre os métodos foi avaliada através da análise de Bland&Altman. Resultados: Os valores médios para as TFG 51Cr-EDTA, MDRDr e MDRDo foram de 105±18, 102±21 e 84±13 ml/min/1,73 m², respectivamente. Acurácia (percentual de casos de TFG estimada que não desviam em mais de 15% do valor medido) foi maior com o uso da MDRDr em relação à MDRDo (57% vs. 35%, P=0,002). O viés (diferença entre TFG medida e estimada) para 51Cr-EDTA e MDRDr foi de 3±23 ml/min/1,73 m². Para 51Cr-EDTA e MDRDo o viés foi significativamente maior, sendo de 21±18 ml/min/1,73 m². No entanto, a precisão, avaliada como desvio padrão do viés indicou elevada dispersão nos dois casos. Conclusão: O uso da equação re-expressa do MDRD, empregando a creatinina calibrada, produz uma estimativa mais acurada da TFG do que a equação original do MDRD.

Differences in methods of measurement of serum creatinine may provide wide variations in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated with formulas. To standardize the measurement of creatinine, calibrated methods should be used, traceable to the reference ID-MS (isotope dilution mass spectrometry) method. Aim: To evaluate the performance of GFRs estimated with the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation (MDRDo; non-calibrated creatinine method) and with the re-expressed MDRD equation (MDRDr; ID-MS creatinine), comparing them with the GFR measured by 51Cr-EDTA (standard method ) in normal adults. Methods: 101 subjects, aged 38±12 years, 45 (45%) men were evaluated. GFR was measured by single-injection 51Cr-EDTA (GFR 51Cr-EDTA) technique and estimated by the following equations - MDRDo: 186 x serum creatinine-1. 154 x age-0.203 x 0.742 (if female) x 1.210 (if black), and MDRDr, replacing the value 186 by 175 in the equation. Serum creatinine was measured by a non-calibrated Jaffe’s method and transformed into calibrated with the formula: y=1.07x-0.249, previously obtained by regression. The agreement between methods was assessed by the Bland&Altman analyses. Results: The mean GFR 51Cr-EDTA, MDRDr and MDRDo were 105±18, 102±21 and 84±13 ml/min/1, 73 m2, respectively. There was no agreement between 51Cr-EDTA and MDRDo GFR (P <0.001), but it was present between 51Cr-EDTA and MDRDr GFR (P=0.149). Accuracy (percentage of cases of estimated GFR within 15% of measured value) was higher with the use of MDRDr in comparison to MDRDo (57% vs. 35%, P=0.002). Bias (diference between measured and estimated GFR) for 51Cr-EDTA and MDRDr was 3±23 ml/min/1.73 m². For 51Cr-EDTA and MDRDo the bias was significantly higher, 21±18 ml/min/1.73 m². However, the precision, evaluated as standard deviation of bias indicated a huge variation in both cases. Conclusion: The re-expressed MDRD equation, using calibrated creatinine, is a more accurate estimation of GFR than.