RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) therapy has been recognized as effective treatment option for reducing bacterial load in chronic wounds, such as adult ventricular assist device (VAD) driveline exit-site infections. Currently, there have been no reports on the safety and efficacy of CAP therapy for pediatric cannula infections and inflammations in paracorporeal pulsatile VADs. METHODS: The mechanical strength of Berlin Heart EXCOR cannulas were tested both before and after CAP treatment (SteriPlas, Adtec Healthcare Limited, UK) to prove material safety. A ring tensile test of 20 untreated and 20 CAP-treated (5 min) EXCOR cannulas (Ø12mm), assessed the force at the breaking point of the cannulas (Fmax), at 25% (F25%) and 50% (F50%) of the maximum displacement. Additionally, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs for both groups examined any surface changes. Finally, the case of a 13-year-old male EXCOR patient with cannula infections, treated with CAP over 100 days, is presented. RESULTS: The in vitro measurements revealed no statistically significant differences in mechanical strength between the control and CAP group for F25% (8.18 ± 0.36 N, vs. 8.02 ± 0.43 N, p = 0.21), F50% (16.87 ± 1.07 N vs. 16.38 ± 1.32 N, p = 0.21), and FMAX (44.55 ± 3.24 N vs. 42.83 ± 4.32 N, p = 0.16). No surface structure alterations were identified in the SEM micrographs. The patient's cannula exit-sites showed a visible improvement in DESTINE wound staging, reduction in bacterial load and inflammatory parameters after CAP treatment without any side effects. CONCLUSION: Overall, CAP therapy proved to be a safe and effective for treating EXCOR cannula exit-site wound healing disorders in one pediatric patient, but further studies should investigate this therapy in more detail.
RESUMO
Driveline infection (DLI) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Because trauma to the driveline exit-site (DLES) is a risk factor for DLI, adhesive anchoring devices are used to immobilize the DL. In this study, commonly used products (identified through literature review and contact with nine international VAD implantation centers) were mechanically characterized to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing DLES trauma. Eight devices were tested in an in vitro abdominal model of the DLES, where a tensile force (10 N) was applied to a HeartMate 3 DL, whereas the resulting force ( FTotal ) on the DLES was recorded using a three-axis load cell. Four devices (CathGrip: FTotal = 2.1 ± 0.4 N, Secutape: FTotal = 2.6 ± 0.3 N, Hollister: FTotal = 2.7 ± 0.5 N, Tubimed: FTotal = 2.9 ± 0.2 N) were significantly ( p < 0.05) better at preventing tensile forces at the DLES compared to the other four devices (Main-Lock: FTotal = 3.7 [0.7] N, Secutape sensitive: FTotal = 3.9 ± 0.4 N, Foley Anchor: FTotal = 4.3 ± 0.5 N, Grip-Lok: FTotal = 5.4 ± 0.8 N). Immobilization of the DL with each anchoring device resulted in lower tensile force on the DLES than without an anchor ( FTotal = 8.2 ± 0.3 N). In conclusion, the appropriate selection of anchoring devices plays a critical role in reducing the risk of DLI, whereas the CathGrip, Secutape, Hollister, or Tubimed were superior in preventing trauma to the DLES in this study.