Stromal cell-derived factor-1-induced LFA-1 activation during in vivo migration of T cell hybridoma cells requires Gq/11, RhoA, and myosin, as well as Gi and Cdc42.

Dissemination of T cell hybridomas in mice, a model for in vivo migration of memory T cells and for T lymphoma metastasis, depends on the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and the integrin LFA-1 and correlates well with invasion into fibroblast cultures. In addition to the known role of the pertussis toxin-sensitive heterotrimeric GTPase G(i), we show that also the pertussis toxin-insensitive GTPase G(q/11) is required for dissemination and invasion. Furthermore, we show that the small GTPases, Cdc42 and RhoA, are involved, and that invasion is blocked by inhibitors of actinomyosin contraction. G(q/11), RhoA, and contraction are specifically required for LFA-1 activation, since 1) they are essential for LFA-1-dependent migration toward low SDF-1 concentrations through ICAM-1-coated filters, but not for migration toward high SDF-1 levels, which is LFA-1 independent; 2) G protein (AlF(4)(-))-induced adhesion to ICAM-1 requires RhoA and contraction; 3) constitutively active G(q) induces aggregation, mediated by LFA-1. We previously reported that binding of this activated LFA-1 to ICAM-1 triggers a signal, transduced by the zeta-associated protein 70 tyrosine kinase, that activates additional LFA-1 molecules. This amplification of LFA-1 activation is essential for invasion. We show here that zeta-associated protein 70-induced LFA-1 activation requires neither Cdc42 and RhoA nor contraction and is thus quite different from that induced by SDF-1. We conclude that two modes of LFA-1 activation, with distinct underlying mechanisms, are required for the in vivo migration of T cell hybridomas.

Gi and Gq/11 proteins are involved in dissemination of myeloid leukemia cells to the liver and spleen, whereas bone marrow colonization involves Gq/11 but not Gi.

The migration of leukocytes into tissues is regulated by chemokines and other chemotactic factors that act on receptors that signal through Gi proteins. It seems likely that the colonization of tissues during dissemination of hematopoietic tumor cells is similarly regulated. In fact, dissemination of a T-cell hybridoma, a model for T lymphoma, was blocked when Gi proteins were inactivated by the S1 catalytic subunit of pertussis toxin that had been transfected into those cells. Pertussis toxin S1 blocked dissemination of MDAY-D2 murine myeloid leukemia cells to the liver and spleen, as in T-cell hybridoma cells, but it did not prevent bone marrow colonization. In contrast, overexpression of a function-defective mutant of the Gq/11 protein blocked dissemination to the bone marrow and also prevented Gq/11 dissemination to the liver and spleen. This indicates that the influx of these myeloid cells into all tissues requires the Gq/11 protein in addition to the Gi protein in the liver and spleen. (Blood. 2000;96:691-698)

LFA-1 to LFA-1 signals involve zeta-associated protein-70 (ZAP-70) tyrosine kinase: relevance for invasion and migration of a T cell hybridoma.

We previously showed that LFA-1-dependent in vitro invasion and in vivo migration of a T cell hybridoma was blocked in cells overexpressing a truncated dominant-negative zeta-associated protein (ZAP)-70. The truncated ZAP-70 also blocked LFA-1-dependent chemotaxis through ICAM-1-coated filters induced by 1 ng/ml stromal cell-derived factor-1, but not LFA-1-independent chemotaxis induced by 100 ng/ml stromal cell-derived factor-1. This suggested that LFA-1 engagement triggers a signal that amplifies a weak chemokine signal and that dominant-negative ZAP-70 blocks this LFA-1 signal. Here we show that cross-linking of part of the LFA-1 molecules with Abs causes activation of free LFA-1 molecules (not occupied by the Ab) on the same cell, which then bind to ICAM-2 on other cells. This causes cell aggregation that was also blocked by dominant-negative ZAP-70. Thus, an LFA-1 signal involving ZAP-70 activates other LFA-1 molecules, suggesting that the chemokine signal can be amplified by multiple cycles of LFA-1 activation. The chemokine and the LFA-1 signal were both blocked by a phospholipase C inhibitor and a calpain inhibitor, suggesting that one of the amplified signals is the phospholipase C-dependent activation of calpain. Finally, we show that both Src-homology 2 domains are required for inhibition of invasion, chemotaxis, and aggregation by the truncated ZAP-70, suggesting that ZAP-70 interacts with a phosphorylated immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) sequence. Remarkably, this is not an ITAM in the TCR/CD3 complex because this is not expressed by this T cell hybridoma.

ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase is required for LFA-1-dependent T cell migration.

The ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase is essential for T cell activation by the T cell receptor. We show that ZAP-70 is also required for migration of T cells that is dependent on the integrin LFA-1. Invasion of TAM2D2 T cell hybridoma cells into fibroblast monolayers, which is LFA-1-dependent, was blocked by overexpression of dominant-negative ZAP-70 and by piceatannol but not by herbimycin A. The Syk inhibitor piceatannol blocks the Syk homologue ZAP-70, which is expressed by TAM2D2 cells, with the same dose dependence as the inhibition of invasion. Dominant-negative ZAP-70 completely inhibited the extensive metastasis formation of TAM2D2 cells to multiple organs upon i.v. injection into mice. Migration of TAM2D2 cells through filters coated with the LFA-1 ligand ICAM-1, induced by 1 ng/ml of the chemokine SDF-1, was blocked by anti-LFA-1 mAb and also abrogated by dominant-negative ZAP-70 and piceatannol. In contrast, migration induced by 100 ng/ml SDF-1 was independent of both LFA-1 and ZAP-70. LFA-1 cross-linking induced tyrosine phosphorylation, which was blocked by dominant-negative ZAP-70 and piceatannol. We conclude that LFA-1 engagement triggers ZAP-70 activity that is essential for LFA-1-dependent migration.

Temperature-sensitive Gbeta mutants discriminate between G protein-dependent and -independent signaling mediated by serpentine receptors.

Deletion of the single gene for the Dictyostelium G protein beta-subunit blocks development at an early stage. We have now isolated temperature-sensitive alleles of Gbeta to investigate its role in later development. We show that Gbeta is directly required for adenylyl cyclase A activation and for morphogenetic signaling during the entire developmental program. Gbeta was also essential for induction of aggregative gene expression by cAMP pulses, a process that is mediated by serpentine cAMP receptors (cARs). However, Gbeta was not required for cAR-mediated induction of prespore genes and repression of stalk genes, and neither was Gbeta needed for induction of prestalk genes by the differentiation inducing factor (DIF). cAMP induction of prespore genes and repression of stalk genes is mediated by the protein kinase GSK-3. GSK-3 also determines cell-type specification in insects and vertebrates and is regulated by the wingless/wnt morphogens that are detected by serpentine fz receptors. The G protein-dependent and -independent modes of cAR-mediated signaling reported here may also exist for the wingless/wnt signaling pathways in higher organisms.

Phosphorylation of chemoattractant receptors is not essential for chemotaxis or termination of G-protein-mediated responses.

In several G-protein-coupled signaling systems, ligand-induced receptor phosphorylation by specific kinases is suggested to lead to desensitization via mechanisms including receptor/G-protein uncoupling, receptor internalization, and receptor down-regulation. We report here that elimination of phosphorylation of a chemoattractant receptor of Dictyostelium, either by site-directed substitution of the serines or by truncation of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, completely prevented agonist-induced loss of ligand binding but did not impair the adaptation of several receptor-mediated responses including the activation of adenylyl and guanylyl cyclases and actin polymerization. In addition, the phosphorylation-deficient receptors were capable of mediating chemotaxis, aggregation, and differentiation. We propose that for chemoattractant receptors agonist-induced phosphorylation regulates surface binding activity but other phosphorylation-independent mechanisms mediate response adaptation.

Activation of G-proteins with AIF-4 induces LFA-1-mediated adhesion of T-cell hybridoma cells to ICAM-1 by signal pathways that differ from phorbol ester- and manganese-induced adhesion.

T-cell hybridomas metastasize widely, and the extent of dissemination correlates with invasiveness in fibroblast cultures. Previously, we provided evidence that both metastasis and in vitro invasion require activation of LFA-1, induced by G-protein-transduced signals triggered by as yet unidentified factors. We show here that LFA-1-mediated adhesion of TAM2D2 T-cell hybridoma cells to ICAM-1 can in fact be induced by direct activation of G-proteins using AIF-4, to the same extent as by using PMA or Mn2+. We assessed effects of protein kinase C (PKC), tyrosine kinase (TK), PI3-kinase (PI3K), and phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitors. Both AIF-4-induced adhesion and invasion were completely blocked by the TK inhibitor genistein and partially blocked by the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin, but not influenced by PKC inhibitor GF109203X. Downregulation of PKC did not affect invasion or adhesion induced by AIF-4 either. In contrast, GF109203X and PKC downregulation blocked PMA-induced adhesion, but genistein and wortmannin had no effect. Invasion and both AIF-4- and PMA-induced adhesion were completely blocked by the PLC inhibitor U73122. Mn(2+)-induced adhesion, which was not or was only partially blocked by the other inhibitors, was delayed by U73122, and spreading of Mn(2+)-treated cells was completely prevented by U73122. However, PLC activity during adhesion was not detected. We conclude that signals required for invasion and G-protein-induced adhesion are similar and are distinct from PKC-induced adhesion, and that in all cases PLC is likely to be activated, but is probably too local and/or transient to be detected.

Extracellular cAMP depletion triggers stalk gene expression in Dictyostelium: disparities in developmental timing and dose dependency indicate that prespore induction and stalk repression by cAMP are mediated by separate signaling pathways.

During Dictyostelium development, amoebae differentiate into spores and stalk cells. Earlier studies showed that extracellular cAMP is essential for induction of prespore differentiation and that cAMP represses stalk gene expression in vitro. We show that the repressive pathway is operative in vivo, because activation of the stalk-specific promoter region of the ecmB gene is strongly enhanced by overexpression of a phosphodiesterase that depletes extracellular cAMP. To test whether a single cAMP transduction pathway controls the choice between prespore or stalk cell differentiation, we compared the timing and dose dependency of the effects of cAMP on both responses. Cells acquire competence for cAMP repression of ecmB promoter activity 4 hr later than for prespore gene induction. Half-maximal prespore induction requires 30 microM stable cAMP analog Sp-cAMPs, while ecmB induction is half-maximally repressed by 200 nM Sp-cAMPs, which is equivalent to about 3 to 13 nM cAMP. At concentrations exceeding 10 microM, Sp-cAMPs stimulates ecmB expression from the intact promoter, but not from the stalk-specific subregion. These data suggest that distinct signaling pathways operating at different developmental stages control induction of prespore genes on one hand and repression of stalk genes on the other. Both stalk gene repression and prespore gene induction by Sp-cAMPs are antagonized by millimolar adenosine concentrations. However, an adenosine analog that is resistant to extracellular metabolism is active at 10 microM. Since adenosine inhibits cAMP binding to cAMP receptors, it may facilitate stalk gene expression by reducing the perceived cAMP concentration.

Extracellular cAMP can restore development in Dictyostelium cells lacking one, but not two subtypes of early cAMP receptors (cARs). Evidence for involvement of cAR1 in aggregative gene expression.

Extracellular cAMP induces expression of several classes of developmentally regulated genes in Dictyostelium. Four highly homologous surface cAMP receptors (cARs) were identified earlier, but involvement of specific cARs in gene regulation has not been clarified. Cells lacking the chemotactic receptor, cAR1, neither aggregate nor express developmentally regulated genes. Expression of aggregative genes is in wild-type cells induced by nanomolar cAMP pulses and repressed by persistent micromolar cAMP stimuli, which induce expression of prespore and prestalk-enriched genes during the postaggregative stages of development. We show here that in cell lines carrying a cAR1 gene disruption, nanomolar pulses cannot induce aggregative gene expression. Remarkably, micromolar cAMP can induce expression of aggregative genes in car1- cells as well as expression of prespore and prestalk-enriched genes, and furthermore restores their ability to form normal slugs and fruiting bodies. These data indicate that cAR1 mediates aggregative but not postaggregative gene expression and morphogenesis, and suggest that after gene disruption, its function is partially taken over by a lower affinity receptor that is not subjected to desensitization. The absence of another early cAMP receptor, cAR3, does not affect development. However, in a car1-/car3- double mutant, cAMP stimulation cannot restore any developmental gene expression, indicating that cAR3 may have substituted for cAR1 in car1- cell lines.

Two cAMP receptors activate common signaling pathways in Dictyostelium.

Multiple signal transduction pathways within a single cell may share common components. In particular, seven different transmembrane helix receptors may activate identical pathways by interacting with the same G-proteins. Dictyostelium cells respond to cAMP using one such receptor, cAR1, coupled by a typical heterotrimeric G-protein to intracellular effectors. However, cells in which the gene for cAR1 has been deleted are unexpectedly still able to respond to cAMP. This implies either that certain responses are mediated by a different receptor than cAR1, or alternatively that a second, partially redundant receptor shares some of the functions of cAR1. We have examined the dose response and ligand specificity of one response, cAMP relay, and the dose response of another, cyclic GMP synthesis. In each case, the EC50 was approximately 100-fold higher and the maximal response was smaller in car1- than wild-type cells. These data indicate that cAR1 normally mediates responses to cAMP. The ligand specificity suggests that the responses seen in car1- mutants are mediated by a second receptor, cAR3. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a cell line containing deletions of both cAR1 and cAR3 genes. As predicted, these lines are totally insensitive to cAMP. We conclude that the functions of the cAR1 and cAR3 receptors are partially redundant and that both interact with the same heterotrimeric G-protein to mediate these and other responses.

Cell-permeable non-hydrolyzable cAMP derivatives as tools for analysis of signaling pathways controlling gene regulation in Dictyostelium.

A novel class of cAMP derivatives were tested for binding to surface cAMP receptors (CAR), protein kinase A (PKA), and cAMP-phosphodiesterase (PDE) and for induction of three classes of cAMP regulated genes in Dictyostelium discoideum. These derivatives carry sulfur substitutions for either the axial (Sp) or equatorial (Rp) exocyclic oxygen atoms, while further modifications were introduced to provide specificity for binding to either CAR or PKA, and/or to increase lipophilicity and render the derivatives membrane-permeable. All derivatives bind weakly to PDE and are almost not degraded during incubation with Dictyostelium cells. One cAMP derivative, 6-thioethyl-purineriboside 3',5'-monophosphorothioate, Sp-isomer (Sp-6SEtcPuMPS), fulfills the criteria for selective activation of PKA in vivo. The compound enters Dictyostelium cells and reaches an intracellular concentration of 1 microM, sufficient to activate PKA, at an extracellular concentration of 30 microM, which is insufficient to activate CAR. Expression of cAMP-regulated prespore and prestalk genes and the aggregative PDE gene are effectively induced by CAR agonists and very poorly by PKA agonists. Even Sp-6SEtcPuMPS is ineffective to induce gene expression. These data not only indicate that surface cAMP receptors are the first targets for cAMP-induced gene expression, but argue against direct induction of expression of these genes by cAMP-induced PKA activation.

Functional elements in the promoter region of the Aspergillus nidulans gpdA gene encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Analysis of the promoter region of the highly expressed Aspergillus nidulans gpdA gene is described. The nucleotide (nt) sequence of a 1.3-kb region upstream from the ATG was determined. Comparison with promoter regions of other Aspergillus and Neurospora genes revealed several regions of similar sequence. Both random and site-specific mutations were introduced into the promoter region of the gpdA gene, and the resulting mutant promoters were fused to the Escherichia coli lacZ gene. The constructed fusions were introduced into A. nidulans and transformants that contained one copy of these fusions at the argB locus were analysed. beta-Galactosidase assays and primer extension experiments were used to identify sequence elements involved in transcription activation and transcription initiation. Two elements, located around 650 and 250 nt upstream from the major transcription start point (tsp), were identified as transcription activation elements. These elements coincide with regions of putative secondary structure (direct or inverted repeats). A third element, a C + T-rich region directly upstream from the major tsp, was shown to be involved in correct initiation of transcription.