RESUMO
Background: The strategy of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) induced by atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for TR induced by AF. Methods: From 2000 to 2021, a total of 1,301 patients underwent tricuspid valve (TV) surgery. Among them 43 patients who diagnosed as AF induced TR were enrolled. The tricuspid valve-related events (TVRE) included cardiac death, TV reoperation, development of moderate or greater TV disease, congestive heart failure requiring re-admission, and major bleeding or thrombosis. The median follow-up duration was 42.0 months. Results: The interval from diagnosis of AF to more than moderate TR was 61.2 months, and the interval from initial diagnosis of severe TR to surgery was 2.4 months. Concomitant Cox-maze III procedure was performed in 39 patients. The operative mortality occurred in 1 patient, and there was no permanent pacemaker implantation. Overall survival rates at 1- and 5-year were 90.6% and 79.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of TVRE at 1- and 5-year were 16.3% and 26.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of AF recurrence at 1- and 3-year in the patients with surgical ablation were 29.7% and 67.6%. The TVRE was significantly associated with the longer interval from diagnosis of severe TR to surgery (hazard ratio: 1.023, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.042). Conclusions: TV surgery for TR induced by AF showed low surgical mortality and favorable mid-term outcomes. For these patients, early surgery after progress to severe TR can be helpful to decrease the occurrence of TVRE.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: As redo surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is relatively high risk, valve-in-valve transcatheter AVR has emerged as an alternative for failed prostheses. However, the majority of studies are outdated. This study assessed the current clinical outcomes of redo AVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled 324 patients who underwent redo AVR due to prosthetic valve failure from 2010 to 2021 in four tertiary centers. The primary outcome was operative mortality. The secondary outcomes were overall survival, cardiac death, and aortic valve-related events. Logistic regression analysis, clustered Cox proportional hazards models, and competing risk analysis were used to evaluate the independent risk factors. Redo AVR was performed in 242 patients without endocarditis and 82 patients with endocarditis. Overall operative mortality was 4.6% (15 deaths). Excluding patients with endocarditis, the operative mortality of redo AVR decreased to 2.5%. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that endocarditis (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.990, p = 0.014), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR: 1.006, p = 0.037), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR: 0.956, p = 0.034) were risk factors of operative mortality. Endocarditis and lower LVEF were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSION: The relatively high risk of redo AVR was due to reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis. The outcomes of redo AVR for nonendocarditis are excellent. Our findings suggest that patients without endocarditis, especially with acceptable LVEF, can be treated safely with redo AVR.
