Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 146: 152-157, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781079

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative recurrence patterns for high-risk nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify prognostic factors associated with site-specific metastatic recurrence using a multi-institutional contemporary cohort. METHODS: Data for nonmetastatic ≥pT3a RCC patients treated with surgery at 4 independent centers was analyzed. Initial recurrence locations were identified, and imaging templates were defined by anatomic landmarks using radiologic definitions. Prognostic factors for site specific recurrence were evaluated with univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1057 patients were treated surgically for ≥pT3a RCC. Initial recurrence location was in a single site for 160 (59.3%) patients and at multiple locations in 110 (41.7%) patients. The most common sites of metastatic recurrence were lung (144/270, 53.3%), liver (54/270, 20.0%), and bone (48/270, 17.8%). Recurrence was identified in 52 of 270 (19.3%) patients outside the chest/abdomen template, most commonly in the pelvis (25/270, 9.3%). Bone and brain metastases were the most common organs for metastases outside chest/abdomen. Patients with tumor diameter >10 cm and grade 4 were more likely to recur in the bone (HR 3.61, P <.001) and brain (HR 16.5, P <.001). CONCLUSION: Metastatic progression outside chest/abdomen imaging templates was present in 1 of 5 high risk patients at initial metastatic RCC diagnosis, most commonly in the pelvis. Patients with large (>10 cm) tumors and grade 4 histology are at highest risk for bone and brain metastases.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Urol ; 203(5): 996-1002, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825298

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A minimum number of index procedures is required for graduation. Without thresholds for surgical technique, it is unclear if robotic and open learning is balanced. We assessed the distribution of robotic and open surgeries performed by residents upon graduation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Voluntary Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident case logs from 11 institutions were de-identified and trends in robotic and open major surgeries were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum and 2-sample t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 89,199 major cases were recorded by 209 graduates from 2011 to 2017. The median proportion of robotic cases increased from 2011 to 2017 in reconstruction (4.7% to 15.2%), oncology (27.5% to 54.2%) and pediatrics (0% to 10.9%) (all values p <0.001). Robotic and open cases remained most divergent in reconstruction, with a median of 12 robotic (IQR 9-19) to 70 open cases (IQR 55-106) being performed by residents in 2017. Similar observations occurred in pediatrics. In oncology the number of robotic procedures superseded that of open in 2016 and rose to a median of 148 robotic (IQR 108-214) to 121 open cases (IQR 90-169) in 2017, with the driver being robotic prostatectomy. Substantial differences in surgical technique were observed between institutions and among graduates from the same institution. CONCLUSIONS: Although robotic volume is increasing, the balance of surgical technique and the pace of change differ in reconstruction, oncology and pediatrics, as well as among individual institutions and graduates themselves. This raises questions about whether more specific guidelines are needed to ensure equity and standardization in training.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Urologia/educação , Acreditação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 17(2): 132-138, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30563753

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to explore whether the practice of postoperative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) surveillance affords a survival benefit by investigating whether detection of RCC recurrences in an asymptomatic versus symptomatic manner influences mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 737 patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for M0 RCC between 1998 and 2016. Overall survival and disease-specific survival stratified by the type of recurrence detection (asymptomatic vs. symptomatic) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier probabilities both from the time of surgery and from the time of recurrence. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the type of recurrence detection on mortality. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (10.6%) experienced recurrence after surgery, of whom 63 (80.8%) were asymptomatic (detected using routine surveillance) and 15 (19.2%) were symptomatic. The median postoperative follow-up was 47.2 months (interquartile range, 26.3-89.4 months). Five- and 10-year overall survival, from time of surgery, among patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic recurrences was 57% and 39% versus 24% and 8%, respectively (P = .0002). As compared with asymptomatic recurrences, patients with symptomatic recurrences had an increased risk of overall (OD) and disease-specific death (DSD) both when examined from the time of surgery (OD: hazard ratio [HR], 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-7.49; P = .0091 and DSD: HR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.38-8.57; P = .0079) and from the time of recurrence (OD: HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.24-6.93; P = .0143 and DSD: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.45-9.01; P = .0058). CONCLUSIONS: Capturing RCC recurrences in an asymptomatic manner during routine surveillance is associated with improved patient survival.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Vigilância da População , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Análise de Sobrevida , Avaliação de Sintomas , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA