The effects of poloxamer and sodium alginate mixture (Guardix-SG®) on range of motion after axillary lymph node dissection: A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study.

PURPOSE: Restricted shoulder mobility is a major upper extremity dysfunction associated with lower quality of life and disability after breast cancer surgery. We hypothesized that a poloxamer and sodium alginate mixture (Guardix-SG®) applied after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) would significantly improve shoulder range of motion (ROM) in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, prospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Guardix-SG® for the prevention of upper extremity dysfunction after ALND. The primary outcome measure was shoulder ROM at baseline (T0) and 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3) after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score(DASH), pain associated with movement, which was assessed using a numeric rating scale, and lymphedema assessed using body composition analyzer. RESULTS: A total of 83 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to either the Guardix-SG® group or the control group. In the Guardix-SG® group (n = 37), Guardix-SG® was applied to the axillary region after ALND. In the control group (n = 46), ALND was performed without using Guardix-SG®. Comparing ROM for shoulder flexion before surgery (178.2°) and 12 months after surgery (172.3°), that was restored 12 months after surgery in the Guardix-SG® group, and there was no statistically significant difference between that at before surgery and 12 months after surgery (p = 0.182). No adverse effect was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that Guardix-SG® help improve shoulder ROM without causing adverse effects in patients who underwent breast cancer surgery. However, there was no statistically significant difference from the control group. A further large-scale study is needed to obtain a more conclusive conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRISKCT0003386; https://cris.nih.go.kr (20181207).

Changes in bone mineral density during 5 years of adjuvant treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in postmenopausal women is a risk factor for bone loss. However, the association between bone mineral density (BMD) changes in premenopausal breast cancer patients and various adjuvant treatment regimens is not well characterized. In this study, we evaluated the changes in BMD according to adjuvant treatment in premenopausal women with breast cancer. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, BMD data of 910 premenopausal women with breast cancer before operation and 1, 2, 3.5, and 5 years post-operation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided according to the type of treatment: observation (O), tamoxifen (T), chemotherapy (C), C followed by T (C → T), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist with T (G + T). RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, BMD changes were similar between the T and O groups (all p > 0.05). Within 1 year of treatment, the C group showed the most significant BMD loss. The C → T and G + T groups showed more significant BMD loss in the lumbar spine and femur than the O and T groups (both p < 0.001, both). After 1 year of treatment, BMD loss in the lumbar spine was significantly greater in the C → T and G + T groups than in the T group; this tendency was maintained for 5 years of treatment (all p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women who received adjuvant treatment which induced menopause showed significant bone loss which lasted for 5 years. Although no significant difference was observed between the O and T groups, tamoxifen treatment during chemotherapy or GnRH agonist treatment might prevent bone loss.

Clinical Implication of HER2 Status in Hormone Receptor-Positive Mucinous Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a rare breast cancer with favorable outcome. Unlike typical breast cancer, the current guidelines do not recommend chemotherapy or anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy for hormone receptor (HR)-positive MC, regardless of HER2 status. We evaluated the prognostic implication of HER2 status in HR-positive MC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 471 patients with pure MC (stages I-III) who underwent curative surgery. We analyzed 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), according to clinicopathological characteristics. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 79.0 months. Overall, the 5-year DFS rate was 95.7% and the 5-year DMFS rate was 96.2%. Nodal status was the only significant factor for DFS (relative risk [RR], 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.40-9.67, p = 0.021). Among HR-positive/node-negative patients with tumor size ≥ 3 cm, HER2-positive patients showed significantly worse DFS (RR, 8.76; 95% CI 1.45-52.76, p = 0.018) and DMFS (RR, 11.37; 95% CI 1.37-74.70, p = 0.011). This finding was consistently significant, when combining both "HR-positive/node-negative/tumor size ≥ 3 cm" and "HR-positive/node-positive" MC (n = 125) for DFS (RR, 4.30; 95% CI 1.43-12.97, p = 0.009) and DMFS (RR, 4.93; 95% CI 1.63-14.90, p = 0.005). Intriguingly, within this subgroup, among HER2-positive tumors, whereas 5-year DFS was 60.2% in patients who did not receive trastuzumab, 100% of those who received trastuzumab were disease free (p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: In HR-positive, node-negative MC with tumor size ≥ 3 cm, patients with HER2-positive MC showed worse survival, suggesting a potential role of an anti-HER2 strategy in this subgroup.

Survival outcome of adjuvant endocrine therapy alone for patients with lymph node-positive, hormone-responsive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer is better than that of other subtypes. Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy for N1 breast cancer patients. However, this has the possibility to be over-treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 18,549 patients who were surgically treated for invasive breast cancer, at a single center in South Korea, between January 1993 and December 2012. N1 stage breast cancer patients who were hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative were enrolled, and propensity score matching was performed to compare patients treated with anti-hormonal therapy alone (N = 83) and those treated with chemotherapy followed by anti-hormonal therapy (N = 85). RESULTS: In survival analysis, the survival parameters of the endocrine therapy-only group and the chemotherapy with endocrine therapy group were respectively 96.1% and 94.0% for 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS), 89.6% and 94.0% for 10-year RFS, 97.4% and 94.0% for 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), 93.2% and 94.0% for 10-year DMFS, 98.7% and 98.8% for 10-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and 98.7% and 98.8% for 10-year overall survival (OS). There were no significant differences in RFS (p = 0.871), DMFS (p = 0.491), BCSS (p = 0.569) and OS (p = 0.731) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Several patients with clinicopathologic features like hormone receptor positivity and HER2 negativity can avoid chemotherapy even with lymph node metastasis. Future studies with a long-term follow-up and a larger number of patients are required for validating our results.

Age-related risk factors associated with primary contralateral breast cancer among younger women versus older women.

PURPOSE: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is increasing, despite unclear evidence of improving survival. To investigate the age-related risk factors for contralateral breast cancer (CBC). METHODS: This study included 8716 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic unilateral invasive breast cancer between 1989 and 2008. Data on primary tumor size, node metastasis, grade and subtype using individual matching were used to adjust for differences in the primary tumor and treatment between younger and older age groups. CBC risk factors, CBC-free survival, and annual CBC risk were analyzed by age. RESULTS: The younger group included 652 patients aged under 35 years, and the older group included 2608 women aged 35 years or older. The median time to CBC development was 6.1 years. CBC was detected in 6.6% of the women in the younger group and 2.5% of those in the older group. Multivariable analysis revealed a relative CBC risk of 2.48 in younger women compared to older women. The risk was significantly higher among women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 4.98), a family history of breast cancer (HR 7.79), and anti-hormone therapy (HR 3.46). In younger women with HER2-positive cancer, CBC occurrence peaked at 4.6 years after surgery, in those with hormone receptor-positive cancer, it peaked at 7.1 years after surgery, and in triple-negative disease cases, and it increased steadily over time. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for primary breast tumor characteristics, patients < 35 years old had 2.5 times the risk of CBC development compared to the older women. CBC occurrence peaked within 5 years after primary breast cancer in younger women with the HER2-positive subtype and after 5 years in cases with the hormone receptor-positive subtype.

A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: This preliminary study was conducted to evaluate the association between Oncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score and traditional prognostic factors. We also developed a nomogram to predict subgroups with low ODX recurrence scores (less than 25) and to avoid additional chemotherapy treatments for those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical variables were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed from a series of 485 T1-3N0-1miM0 hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2‒negative breast cancer patients with available ODX test results at Asan Medical Center from 2010 to 2016. One hundred twenty-seven patients (26%) had positive axillary lymph node micrometastases, and 408 (84%) had ODX recurrence scores of ≤25. Logistic regression was performed to build a nomogram for predicting a low-risk subgroup of the ODX assay. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that estrogen receptor (ER) score, progesterone receptor (PR) score, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and Ki-67 had a statistically significant association with the low-risk subgroup. With these variables, we developed a nomogram to predict the low-risk subgroup with ODX recurrence scores of ≤25. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 0.96). When applied to the validation group the nomogram was accurate with an area under the curve = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: The low ODX recurrence score subgroup can be predicted by a nomogram incorporating five traditional prognostic factors: ER, PR, histologic grade, LVI, and Ki-67. Our nomogram, which predicts a low-risk ODX recurrence score, will be a useful tool to help select patients who may or may not need additional ODX testing.

Survival analysis according to period and analysis of the factors influencing changes in survival in patients with recurrent breast cancer: a large-scale, single-center study.

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to analyze changing survival patterns regarding recurrent breast cancer in Korea during the last 16 years (1993-2008). We also sought to determine factors possibly influencing outcomes and changes over time in the duration of survival after recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 9671 patients with breast cancer treated between January 1993 and December 2008, comparing the periods 1993-2002 and 2003-2008.We retrospectively reviewed the collected database including the age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, pathology report, surgical methods, types of adjuvant treatment modalities, type of recurrence, and follow-up period. RESULTS: There were 1944 cases (20.1%) of recurrence. Median age at the first recurrence was 49.5 years (range 21.8-92.9). Median follow-up was 28.8 months (range 0-228.0) from the time of relapse. Median survival time was 35.0 months. Survival after recurrence (SAR) significantly improved in 2003-2008 compared to that in 1993-2002. Median survival time increased from 27.6 months in the period I to 42.3 months in period II (p = 0.001). Independent prognostic factors after the first recurrence by multivariate analysis were age at diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, tumor grade, subtype, anti-hormonal therapy, time at diagnosis, and disease-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of breast cancer have been improving recently, and survival time after the first recurrence of breast cancer has steadily increased in recent decades. We confirmed that advances in treatments have contributed to this improvement in survival after the first recurrence.

Chronological Improvement in Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Large-Scale, Single-Center Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to chronologically evaluate survival of patients with breast cancer in Korea and investigate the observed changes during the last 20 years. We also sought to determine factors that may influence outcomes and changes in the duration of survival over time. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 10,988 patients with breast cancer who were treated at our institution between January 1993 and December 2008. We divided the study period into three periods (P1, 1993-1997; P2, 1998-2002; and P3, 2003-2008). We retrospectively reviewed the collected data from the Asan database, including age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, pathology report, surgical methods, types of adjuvant treatment modalities, type of recurrence, and follow-up period. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8.2 years, we observed that survival outcomes have improved recently. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate also increased from 82.8% in P1 to 92.6% in P3 (p<0.001). The survival rate in patients with tumors at each stage increased in similar patterns in all patients, and, remarkably, there was a significant survival improvement in patients with stage III breast cancer (P1 vs. P3: 5-year BCSS, 57.4% vs. 80.0%, p<0.001). The time period was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P1 vs. P2: hazard ratio [HR], 0.83, p=0.035; P1 vs. P3: HR, 0.75, p=0.015). CONCLUSION: The study results suggest an improvement in breast cancer survival in Korea, which is consistent with the development of treatments and early detection.

Comparing Accuracy of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Residual Calcified Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is performed to increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery in advanced breast cancer patients. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accurate in predicting residual cancer, if calcification remains, the issue of whether to perform the surgery on the basis of the residual tumor prediction range in mammography (MMG) or MRI has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to estimate the accuracy of predicting residual tumor after NST for residual microcalcification on mammographic and enhancing lesion on MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. We included breast cancer patients who underwent NST, had microcalcifications in the post-NST MMG, and underwent surgery from January 2, 2013 to December 30, 2014 at Asan Medical Center. Patients with post-NST MMG as well as MRI were included. Final pathologic tumor size with histopathology and biomarker status were obtained postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients were included in this study. Overall, MRI correlated better than MMG in predicting the tumor size (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.769 vs. 0.651). For hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+)/HER2- subtype, MMG had higher correlation than MRI (ICC = 0.747 vs. 0.575). In HR- subtype, MRI had a strong correlation with pathology (HR-/HER2+ or triple negative (TN), ICC = 0.939 vs. 0.750), whereas MMG tended to overestimate the tumor size (HR-/HER2+ or TN, ICC = 0.543 vs. 0.479). CONCLUSION: Post-NST residual microcalcifications on MMG have a lower correlation with residual tumor size than MRI. Other than HR+/HER2- subtype, the extent of calcifications on preoperative evaluation might not be accurate in evaluating the residual extent of the tumor after NST.

A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is a group of diseases with different intrinsic molecular subtypes. However, anatomic staging alone is insufficient to determine prognosis. The present study analyzed the prognostic value of the American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition cancer staging system. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included breast cancer cases diagnosed from January 1999 to December 2008. We restaged patients based on the 8th edition AJCC cancer staging system and analyzed the prognostic value of the anatomic and prognostic staged groups. Follow-up data including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and clinic-pathological data were collected to analyze the differences between the two staging subgroups. RESULTS: The study enrolled 7458 breast cancer patients with a 98.7-month median follow-up. Both the 5-year DFS and OS were significantly different between the anatomic and prognostic staged groups. The 5-year OS according to disease subtype was as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative [HR(+)/HER2(-)], 90.9%; HR(+)/HER2(+), 84.7%; HR(-)/HER2(+), 81.1%; and HR(-)/HER2(-), 80.9%. According to the anatomic stage, the 5-year OS of patients with stage III HR(+)/HER2(-) disease was superior to that of patients with stage II HR(-)/HER2(-) disease (88.3 vs. 86.5%). Per the prognostic stage, both the 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients with stage II HR(-)/HER2(-) disease were higher than those of patients with stage III HR(+)/HER2(-) disease (90.1 and 94.3% vs. 79.1 and 88.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic staging system is a refined version of the anatomic staging system and encourages a more personalized approach to breast cancer treatment.

No Association of Positive Superficial and/or Deep Margins with Local Recurrence in Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of positive superficial and/or deep margin status on local recurrence (LR) in invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 3,403 stage 1 and 2 invasive breast cancer patients treated with BCS followed by radiotherapy from January 2000 to December 2008 were included in this study. These patients were divided into three groups according to margin status: clear resection margin status for all sections (group 1, n=3,195); positive margin status in superficial and/or deep sections (group 2, n=121); and positive peripheral parenchymal margin regardless of superficial and/or deep margin involvement (group 3, n=87). The LR-free survival between these three groups was compared and the prognostic role of margin status was analyzed. RESULTS: Across all groups, age, tumor size, nodal status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status did not significantly differ. High grade, positive extensive intraductal component, hormone receptor positivity, hormone therapy received, and chemotherapy not received were more prevalent in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1. Five-year LR rates in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 1.9%, 1.7%, and 7.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that group 3 was a significant predictor for LR (hazard ratio [HR], 4.78; p < 0.001), but that positive superficial and/or deep margin was not (HR, 0.66; p=0.57). CONCLUSION: Superficial and/or deep margin involvement following BCS is not an important predictor for LR.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer: Results of Analysis of a Nationwide Breast Cancer Registry Database.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) in comparison with non-pregnancy associated breast cancer (non-PABC). METHODS: A total of 344 eligible patients with PABC were identified in the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry database. PABC was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, or invasive lobular carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy or within 1 year after the birth of a child. Patients with non-PABC were selected from the same database using a 1:2 matching method. The matching variables were operation, age, and initial stage. RESULTS: Patients with PABC had significantly lower survival rates than patient with non-PABC (10-year survival rate: PABC, 76.4%; non-PABC, 85.1%; p=0.011). PABC patients had higher histologic grade and were more frequently hormone receptor negative than non-PABC patients. Being overweight (body mass index [BMI], ≥23 kg/m2), early menarche (≤13 years), late age at first childbirth (≥30 years), and a family history of breast cancer were more common in the PABC group than in the non-PABC group. Multivariate analysis showed the following factors to be significantly associated with PABC (vs. non-PABC): early menarche (odds ratio [OR], 2.165; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.566-2.994; p<0.001), late age at first childbirth (OR, 2.446; 95% CI, 1.722-3.473; p<0.001), and being overweight (OR, 1.389; 95% CI, 1.007-1.917; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Early menarche, late age at first childbirth, and BMI ≥23 kg/m2 were more associated with PABC than non-PABC.

Survival improvement in hormone-responsive young breast cancer patients with endocrine therapy.

PURPOSE: We investigated the oncologic outcomes by intrinsic subtype and age in young breast cancer patients and whether survival differences were related to treatment changes over time. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 9633 invasive breast cancer patients treated at Asan Medical Center from January 1989 to December 2008. We also enrolled a matched cohort adjusting for tumor size, lymph node metastasis, subtypes, and tumor grade. Patients aged <35 years were included in the younger group (n = 602) and those aged ≥35 years were included in the older group (n = 3009). RESULTS: The younger patients showed a significantly higher T stage, a more frequent axillary node presentation, higher histologic grade, and higher incidence of triple-negative subtype tumors than older patients and also received more chemotherapy and were less likely to undergo hormone therapy. The younger patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors showed significantly poorer disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and breast cancer-specific survival outcomes than older patients. Younger patients with HR-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumor subtypes had a significantly improved DFS over time (p = 0.032). Within the HR-positive/Her2-negative subtype, more women received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen treatment from 2003 to 2008 compared with 1989 to 2002 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.075, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HR-positive young breast cancer patients have a poorer survival compared with older patients, even with more frequent chemotherapy, but more recent use of tamoxifen and ovarian suppression might improve this outcome in these patients.

Interaction between body mass index and hormone-receptor status as a prognostic factor in lymph-node-positive breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the body mass index (BMI) at a breast cancer diagnosis and various factors including the hormone-receptor, menopause, and lymph-node status, and identify if there is a specific patient subgroup for which the BMI has an effect on the breast cancer prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 8,742 patients with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer from the research database of Asan Medical Center. The overall survival (OS) and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes were compared among BMI groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression models with an interaction term. There was a significant interaction between BMI and hormone-receptor status for the OS (P = 0.029), and BCSS (P = 0.013) in lymph-node-positive breast cancers. Obesity in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer showed a poorer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92 to 2.48) and significantly poorer BCSS (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.99). In contrast, a high BMI in hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer revealed a better OS (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.19) and BCSS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.44). Being underweight (BMI < 18.50 kg/m2) with hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer was associated with a significantly worse OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.00-3.95) and BCSS (HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.12-4.47). There was no significant interaction found between the BMI and hormone-receptor status in the lymph-node-negative setting, and BMI did not interact with the menopause status in any subgroup. In conclusion, BMI interacts with the hormone-receptor status in a lymph-node-positive setting, thereby playing a role in the prognosis of breast cancer.

Poor Prognosis of Lower Inner Quadrant in Lymph Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients Who Received No Chemotherapy: A Study Based on Nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Registry Database.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prognostic influence of primary tumor site on the survival of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 63,388 patients with primary breast cancer from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry were analyzed. Primary tumor sites were classified into 5 groups: upper outer quadrant, lower outer quadrant, upper inner quadrant, lower inner quadrant (LIQ), and central portion. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) according to primary tumor site. RESULTS: Central portion and LIQ showed lower survival rates regarding both OS and BCSS compared with the other 3 quadrants (all P < .05) and hazard ratios were 1.267 (95% CI, 1.180-1.360, P < .001) and 1.215 (95% CI, 1.097-1.345, P < .001), respectively. Although central portion showed more unfavorable clinicopathologic features, LIQ showed more favorable features than the other 3 quadrants. Primary tumor site was a significant factor in univariate and multivariate analyses for OS and BCSS (all P < .001). For lymph node-negative patients, LIQ showed a worse OS than the other primary tumor sites in the subgroup with no chemotherapy (P < .001), but that effect disappeared in the subgroup with chemotherapy (P = .058). CONCLUSION: LIQ showed a worse prognosis despite having more favorable clinicopathologic features than other tumor locations and it was more prominent for lymph node-negative patients who received no chemotherapy. The hypothesis of possible hidden internal mammary node metastasis could be suggested to play a key role in LIQ lesions.

Depression Screening Using Daily Mental-Health Ratings from a Smartphone Application for Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Mobile mental-health trackers are mobile phone apps that gather self-reported mental-health ratings from users. They have received great attention from clinicians as tools to screen for depression in individual patients. While several apps that ask simple questions using face emoticons have been developed, there has been no study examining the validity of their screening performance. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we (1) evaluate the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker that uses three daily mental-health ratings (sleep satisfaction, mood, and anxiety) as indicators for depression, (2) discuss three approaches to data processing (ratio, average, and frequency) for generating indicator variables, and (3) examine the impact of adherence on reporting using a mobile mental-health tracker and accuracy in depression screening. METHODS: We analyzed 5792 sets of daily mental-health ratings collected from 78 breast cancer patients over a 48-week period. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as the measure of true depression status, we conducted a random-effect logistic panel regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the screening performance of the mobile mental-health tracker. In addition, we classified patients into two subgroups based on their adherence level (higher adherence and lower adherence) using a k-means clustering algorithm and compared the screening accuracy between the two groups. RESULTS: With the ratio approach, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.8012, indicating that the performance of depression screening using daily mental-health ratings gathered via mobile mental-health trackers is comparable to the results of PHQ-9 tests. Also, the AUC is significantly higher (P=.002) for the higher adherence group (AUC=0.8524) than for the lower adherence group (AUC=0.7234). This result shows that adherence to self-reporting is associated with a higher accuracy of depression screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker as a tool for screening for depression in practice. Also, this study provides clinicians with a guideline for generating indicator variables from daily mental-health ratings. Furthermore, our results provide empirical evidence for the critical role of adherence to self-reporting, which represents crucial information for both doctors and patients.

Survival Outcome of Combined GnRH Agonist and Tamoxifen Is Comparable to That of Sequential Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy Plus Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients with Lymph-Node-Negative, Hormone-Responsive, HER2-Negative, T1-T2 Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes between combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen (GnRHa+T) and sequential adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and tamoxifen (AC->T) in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, lymph-node-negative breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 994 premenopausal women with T1-T2, lymph-node-negative, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer between January 2003 and December 2008 were included in this retrospective cohort study. GnRHa+T and AC->T were administered to 608 patients (61.2%) and 386 patients (38.8%), respectively. Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting were applied to the original cohort, and 260 patients for each treatment arm were included in the final analysis. Recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival was compared between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 994 patients were followed up for a median of 7.4 years (range, 0.5 to 11.4 years). The 5-year follow-up rate was 98.7%, and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. In propensity-matched cohorts (n=520), there was no difference in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates between the two treatment groups (p=0.306, p=0.212, and p=0.102, respectively), and this was maintained after applying inverse probability weighting. CONCLUSION: GnRHa+T is a reasonable alternative to AC->T in patients with premenopausal, hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, lymph-node-negative, T1-T2 breast cancer.

Patient reporting pain intensity immediately after surgery can be associated with underlying depression in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of severe, definite depression symptoms, as measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and the association between high CES-D scores (i.e., ≥25) and sociodemographic and perioperative factors during perioperative period. METHODS: Among 1690 consecutive breast cancer patients who were admitted for definitive breast surgery during the study period, 1499 patients were included in this study. Patients with a past medical history of psychiatric medication or support, a plan for elective surgery due to locoregional recurrence, or any metastatic disease were excluded. The CES-D score was checked 1 day before definitive surgeries. The sociodemographic data and perioperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean CES-D score was 18.5, with 24.1% (362/1499) and 56.7% (850/1499) having high CES-D scores of ≥25 and ≥16, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of family members with any malignancy (≥2 vs. 0), sedative medication (yes vs. no), and postoperative numeric rating scale scores (persistent, severe pain vs. stably mild pain) were significantly associated factors for severe, definite depression symptoms [CES-D score of ≥25: adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10-2.21, p = 0.013; adjusted OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.00-2.71, p = 0.048; and adjusted OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.15-3.95, p = 0.016, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Depression may increase the intensity of postoperative acute pain. Self-reporting of persistent postoperative pain intensity is potentially useful in detecting hidden depression symptoms in breast cancer patients during the perioperative period.

Metformin increases survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer patients with diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Metformin use has recently been observed to decrease both the rate and mortality of breast cancer. Our study was aim to determine whether metformin use is associated with survival in diabetic breast cancer patients by breast cancer subtype and systemic treatment. METHODS: Data from the Asan Medical Center Breast Cancer Database from 1997 to 2007 were analyzed. The study cohort comprised 6,967 nondiabetic patients, 202 diabetic patients treated with metformin, and 184 diabetic patients that did not receive metformin. Patients who were divided into three groups by diabetes status and metformin use were also divided into four subgroups by hormone receptor and HER2-neu status. RESULTS: In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the metformin group had a significantly better overall and cancer specific survival outcome compared with non metformin diabetic group (P <0.005 for both). There was no difference in survival between the nondiabetic and metformin groups. In multivariate analysis, Compared with metformin group, patients who did not receive metformin tended to have a higher risk of metastasis with HR 5.37 (95 % CI, 1.88 to 15.28) and breast cancer death with HR 6.51 (95 % CI, 1.88 to 15.28) on the hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. The significant survival benefit of metformin observed in diabetic patients who received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (HR for disease free survival 2.14; 95 % CI 1.14 to 4.04) was not seen in diabetic patients who did not receive these treatments. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving metformin treatment when breast cancer diagnosis show a better prognosis only if they have hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive tumors. Metformin treatment might provide a survival benefit when added to systemic therapy in diabetic patients.

The reality in the follow-up of breast cancer survivors: survey of Korean Breast Cancer Society.

PURPOSE: Follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer is an important component of survivor care and various international guidelines exist for the surveillance. However, little is known about current actual practice patterns of physicians whether they adhere to or deviate from recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how physicians follow-up their patients after primary treatment for breast cancer in Korea. METHODS: A questionnaire survey with 34 questions in 4 categories was e-mailed to the members of Korean Breast Cancer Society from November to December 2013. Respondents were asked how they use follow-up modalities after primary treatment of breast cancer and we compared the survey results with present guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 129 respondents, 123 (95.3%) were breast surgeons. The most important consideration in follow-up was tumor stage. History taking, physical examinations, and mammography were conducted in similar frequency recommended by other guidelines while breast ultrasonography was performed more often. The advanced imaging studies such as CT, MRI, and bone scan, which had been recommended to be conducted only if necessary, were also examined more frequently. Regular screenings for secondary malignancy were performed in 38 respondents (29.5%). Five years later after primary treatment, almost the whole respondents (94.6%) themselves monitored their patients. CONCLUSION: A majority of respondents have been performed more intensive follow-up modalities in comparison with present guidelines and less frequently screenings for secondary malignancy. For optimal follow-up of breast cancer survivors, tailored delivery system should be considered.