Unexpected "Lazarus response" to single-agent bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Early clinical trials aimed to halt cancer progression by inhibiting the growth of new blood vessels in tumors through single-agent targeted therapy with bevacizumab. These trials largely proved unsuccessful. However, bevacizumab turned out to be efficient when administered in combination with other anticancer drugs. The efficacy of this approach is explained by the ability of bevacizumab to eliminate immature blood vessels thus normalizing intratumoral blood flow and improving the delivery of cytotoxic or targeted agents. This report describes four cases of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had no meaningful treatment options left, and who received single-agent bevacizumab as an empirical last-resort therapy. Three of these patients had severe complaints, and they demonstrated striking symptomatic relief within the first day of this treatment. In addition to the observed "Lazarus response", which was likely attributed to the bevacizumab-driven resolution of edema, some evidence of a direct antitumor effect was observed. These data may call for the reconsideration of bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with HER2-associated breast cancer, and perhaps in some other categories of cancer patients.

Changes in the concentration of EGFR-mutated plasma DNA in the first hours of targeted therapy allow the prediction of tumor response in patients with EGFR-driven lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze changes in the plasma concentration of EGFR-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) occurring immediately after the start of therapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: Serial plasma samples were collected from 30 patients with EGFR-driven non-small cell lung cancer before intake of the first tablet and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after the start of the therapy. The content of EGFR alleles (exon 19 deletions or L858R) in ctDNA was measured by ddPCR. RESULTS: ctDNA was detected at base-line in 25/30 (83%) subjects. Twelve (50%) out of 24 informative patients showed > 25% reduction of the ctDNA content at 48 h time point; all these patients demonstrated disease control after 4 and 8-12 weeks of therapy. The remaining 12 individuals showed either stable content of EGFR-mutated ctDNA (n = 5) or the elevation of ctDNA concentration (n = 7). 10 of 12 patients with elevated or stable ctDNA level achieved an objective response at 4 weeks, but only 5 of 10 evaluable patients still demonstrated disease control at 8-12 weeks (p = 0.032, when compared to the group with ctDNA decrease). The decline of the amount of circulating EGFR mutant copies at 48 h also correlated with longer progression-free survival (14.7 months vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Comparison of concentration of EGFR-mutated ctDNA at base-line and at 48 h after the start of therapy is predictive for the duration of TKI efficacy.

Content of circulating tumor DNA depends on the tumor type and the dynamics of tumor size, but is not influenced significantly by physical exercise, time of the day or recent meal.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate factors, which influence the content of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). METHODS: 398 serial plasma samples were collected within 1-7 consecutive days from patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer (n = 13), RAS/RAF-mutated colorectal cancer (n = 54) and BRAF-mutated melanoma (n = 17), who presented with measurable tumor disease. The amount of ctDNA was determined by ddPCR. RESULTS: Among 82 patients, who donated 2-6 serial plasma samples, 42 subjects were classified as ctDNA-positive; only 22% cases were mutation-positive across all consecutive tests, while 24/82 (29%) patients showed presence of mutated ctDNA in some but not all blood draws. Subjects with progressing tumors had higher probability of being detected ctDNA-positive as compared to patients, who responded to therapy or had stable disease (39/55 (71%) vs. 4/24 (17%); p = 0.0001). Our study failed to reveal the impact of the time of the day, recent meal or prior physical exercise on the results of ctDNA testing. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of ctDNA in plasma is particularly characteristic for patients, who experience clinical progression of tumor disease. Consecutive plasma tests may occasionally provide discordant data; thus, the repetition of analysis may be advised in certain cases in order to ensure the validity of negative ctDNA result.

First-Line Cetuximab Monotherapy in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutation-Negative Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are sensitive to treatment by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies only if they do not carry activating mutations in down-stream EGFR targets (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF). Most clinical trials for chemo-naive CRC patients involved combination of targeted agents and chemotherapy, while single-agent cetuximab or panitumumab studies included either heavily pretreated patients or subjects who were not selected on the basis of molecular tests. We hypothesized that anti-EGFR therapy would have significant efficacy in chemo-naive patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC. METHODS: Nineteen patients were prospectively included in the study. RESULTS: Two (11%) patients experienced partial response (PR) and 11 (58%) subjects showed stable disease (SD). Median time to progression approached 6.1 months (range 1.6-15.0 months). Cetuximab efficacy did not correlate with RNA expression of EGFR and insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2). Only one tumor carried PIK3CA mutation, and this CRC responded to cetuximab. Exome analysis of patients with progressive disease (PD) revealed 1 CRC with high-level microsatellite instability and 1 instance of HER2 oncogene amplification; 3 of 4 remaining patients with PD had allergic reactions to cetuximab, while none of the subjects with PR or SD had this complication. Comparison with 19 retrospective KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative patients receiving first-line fluoropyrimidines revealed no advantages or disadvantages of cetuximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab demonstrates only modest efficacy when given as a first-line monotherapy to KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC patients. It is of question, why meticulous patient selection, which was undertaken in the current study, did not result in the improvement of outcomes of single-agent cetuximab treatment.