A randomized, double-blind study on the efficacy of oral domperidone versus placebo for reducing SARS-CoV-2 viral load in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients in primary health care.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical effect of domperidone against COVID-19 has been investigated in a double-blind phase III clinical trial (EudraCT number 2021-001228-17). Domperidone has shown in vitro antiviral activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and potential immudolatory properties through the stimulation of prolactin secretion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of oral domperidone plus standard of care (SOC; n = 87) versus placebo plus SOC (n = 86) was evaluated in a 28-day randomized double-blind multicentre study in primary health care centres. A total of 173 outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were included. Three daily doses of 10 mg (30 mg/day) of domperidone or placebo were administered for 7 days. Reduction of viral load on day 4 was the primary efficay endpoint. It was estimated in saliva samples by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), as the cycle thresholds detected ORF1ab, N Protein and S Protein genes. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the viral load was observed (p < 0.001) from baseline to days 4, 7 and 14 of the three genes studied with non-significant differences between domperidone and placebo groups. Twenty-three patients (13.3%) experienced adverse events, 14 patients in the domperidone group (16.1%) and 9 patients in the placebo group (10.5%). No patients needed to be hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Results do not prove the use of domperidone as antiviral in patients with COVID-19.

A 28-day double-blind clinical trial was performed to investigate the antiviral effect of domperidone, 30 mg/day for 7 days (n = 87) versus placebo (n = 86) in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction of viral load on day 4 as compared with baseline, estimated as the cycle thresholds to detect ORF1ab, N Protein and S Protein genes by RT-qPCR in saliva samples.The study findings do not prove the use of domperidone as antiviral in patients with COVID-19.

Transition of patients with metabolic bone disease from paediatric to adult healthcare services: current situation and proposals for improvement.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no models for the transition of patients with metabolic bone diseases (MBDs) from paediatric to adult care. The aim of this project was to analyse information on the experience of physicians in the transition of these patients in Spain, and to draw up consensus recommendations with the specialists involved in their treatment and follow-up. METHODS: The project was carried out by a group of experts in MBDs and included a systematic review of the literature for the identification of critical points in the transition process. This was used to develop a questionnaire with a total of 48 questions that would determine the degree of consensus on: (a) the rationale for a transition programme and the optimal time for the patient to start the transition process; (b) transition models and plans; (c) the information that should be specified in the transition plan; and (d) the documentation to be created and the training required. Recommendations and a practical algorithm were developed using the findings. The project was endorsed by eight scientific societies. RESULTS: A total of 86 physicians from 53 Spanish hospitals participated. Consensus was reached on 45 of the 48 statements. There was no agreement that the age of 12 years was an appropriate and feasible point at which to initiate the transition in patients with MBD, nor that a gradual transition model could reasonably be implemented in their own hospital. According to the participants, the main barriers for successful transition in Spain today are lack of resources and lack of coordination between paediatric and adult units. CONCLUSIONS: The TEAM Project gives an overview of the transition of paediatric MBD patients to adult care in Spain and provides practical recommendations for its implementation.

One-year efficacy and safety of naloxegol on symptoms and quality of life related to opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: KYONAL study.

OBJECTIVES: Naloxegol is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) for treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The main objective was to analyse the long-term efficacy, quality of life (QOL) and safety of naloxegol in patients with cancer in a real-world study. METHODS: This one-year prospective study included patients older than 18 years, with active oncological disease who were under treatment with opioids for pain control and Karnofsky≥50 and OIC with inadequate response to treatment with laxative (s). All the patients received treatment with naloxegol according to clinical criteria. The main efficacy objectives were measured by the patient assessment of constipation QOL questionnaire (PAC-QOL), the PAC symptoms (PAC-SYM), the response rate at day 15, and months 1-3-6-12, and global QOL (EuroQoL-5D-5L). RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (58.7% males) with a mean age of 61.5 years (95% CI 59.4 to 63.7) were included. PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL total score and all their dimensions improved from baseline (p<0.0001). At 12 months, 77.8% of the patients were responders to naloxegol treatment. Global QOL was conserved from baseline. A total of 28 adverse reactions, mainly gastrointestinal were observed in 15.1% of the patients (19/126), being 75% (21) mild, 17.9% (5) moderate and 7.1% (2) severe. Most adverse reactions (67.9%) appeared the first 15 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this first long-term and real-world-data study in patients with cancer, showed the sustained efficacy and safety of naloxegol for the treatment of OIC in this group of patients.

Does Your Loved One With Cognitive Symptoms Need to See a Doctor? Check It Online.

Widespread access to emerging information and communication technologies (ICT) allows its use for the screening of diseases in the general population. At the initiative of the Spanish Confederation of Associations of Families of People with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (CEAFA), a website (http://www.problemasmemoria.com) has been created that provides information about Alzheimer's disease and includes questionnaires to be completed by family or friends concerned about memory problems of a relative. A cross-sectional, randomized, multicenter study was performed to evaluate feasibility, validity, and user satisfaction with an electronic method of completion vs. the current method of paper-based questionnaires for clinically dementia screening completed by the informants: the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) and the Alzheimer's disease-8 screening test (AD8). A total of 111 pairs were recruited by seven memory clinics. Informants completed IQCODE and AD8 questionnaires both in their paper and electronic versions. The correlation between paper and electronic versions was significantly positive for IQCODE (r = 0.98; p < 0.001) and AD8 (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The execution time did not differ significantly, and participants considered their use equally easy. This study shows that an electronic version of the IQCODE and AD8 questionnaires is suitable for its online use via the internet and achieves the same results as the traditional paper versions.

Assessment of the Management of Patients with Chronic Pain Referred to a Specialized Pain Unit: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study (the DUO Project).

A multicenter cross-sectional study was designed to assess the quality of treatment of 1190 patients with chronic pain at the time of referral to a specialized pain unit. A total of 119 physicians from 77 pain units throughout Spain collected 23 indicators of the quality of care from 10 consecutive clinical records of chronic pain patients (5 men, 5 women). Degenerative spinal diseases (38.6%) and lumbosciatic pain (29.8%) were the most common etiologies. At the time of referral to the pain unit, 9.8% of patients were not receiving any analgesic treatment. Treatment was modified in 88.1% of the patients by adding adjuvant drugs, adding opioids or increasing the doses of analgesic medications, and using analgesic techniques. Women had higher percentages of osteoarthritis, headache and fibromyalgia as the cause of pain, longer duration of pain and severe pain intensity, and a higher proportion of changes in the diagnosis of the underlying condition with which they had been referred to the pain unit. Improvements should be made in the patient management and referral protocols not only in the clinics prior to patient referral to the pain unit, but also in the pain units themselves.

Efficacy of Bromhexine versus Standard of Care in Reducing Viral Load in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Disease Attended in Primary Care: A Randomized Open-Label Trial.

A 28-day randomized open-label multicenter study was conducted to assess the efficacy of bromhexine plus standard of care (SOC) (n = 98) vs. SOC alone (n = 93) in 191 outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the primary health care setting. Bromhexine three daily doses of 10 mL (48 mg/day) were administered for seven days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction of viral load estimated as the cycle thresholds (Ct) to detect ORF1ab, N Protein, and S Protein genes by RT-qPCR in saliva samples on day 4 as compared with baseline. Ct values of the three genes increased from baseline throughout days 4 to 14 (p < 0.001) but significant differences between the study groups were not found. Differences in the percentages of patients with low, medium, and high viral loads at 4, 7, and 14 days were not found either. In summary, treatment with bromhexine plus SCO was associated with a viral load reduction of ORF1ab, N Protein, and S Protein genes at day 4, which was not significantly different than similar viral load reductions observed with SOC alone. The present findings do not seem to favor the use of bromhexine as an antiviral in patients with COVID-19.

Efficacy of naloxegol on symptoms and quality of life related to opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: a 3-month follow-up analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) can affect up to 63% of all patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to assess quality of life as well as efficacy and safety of naloxegol, in patients with cancer with OIC. METHODS: An observational study was made of a cohort of patients with cancer and with OIC exhibiting an inadequate response to laxatives and treated with naloxegol. The sample consisted of adult outpatients with a Karnofsky performance status score ≥50. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) were applied for 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (58.2% males) with a mean age of 61.3 years (range 34-89) were included. Clinically relevant improvements (>0.5 points) were recorded in the PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM questionnaires (p<0.0001) from 15 days of treatment. The number of days a week with complete spontaneous bowel movements increased significantly (p<0.0001) from 2.4 to 4.6 on day 15, 4.7 after 1 month and 5 after 3 months. Pain control significantly improved (p<0.0001) during follow-up. A total of 13.5% of the patients (17/126) presented some gastrointestinal adverse reaction, mostly of mild (62.5%) or moderate intensity (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant improvements in OIC-related quality of life, number of bowel movements and constipation-related symptoms were recorded as early as after 15 days of treatment with naloxegol in patients with cancer and OIC, with a good safety profile.

Decision-making for pediatric allergy immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a narrative review.

There has been exciting progress in diagnosis and in the treatment of allergic patients. The objective of this review is to summarize the most relevant contributions in the past 10 years with a special focus on the pediatric population allergic to aeroallergens and provide the most relevant references and practical issues for the decision-making. Current guidelines on allergy diagnosis recommend a thorough clinical history as the first step, followed by allergen extract testing using an in vivo prick test and/or an in vitro specific IgE test. Molecular diagnosis is recommended when previous tests are inconclusive. In practice, the most important factors to decide the AIT treatment are the actual intensity and duration of the patient's symptoms and the availability of appropriate AIT products for the patient's sensitization profile at high allergen concentrations and with confirmed efficacy and safety from clinical trials. This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. The experts concluded that AIT is efficacious and safe for the treatment of allergic patients that is available for the most frequent aeroallergens.What is Known:• The prevalence of allergic asthma and rhinitis in children has increased in recent decades.• The efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy has been shown in multiple studies and systematic reviews.What is New:• This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. Recommendations of expert authors for the decision of the patients more suitable for allergen immunotherapy are included.

Evaluación de la comorbilidad y la ansiedad social en adolescentes con trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad: Estudio SELFIE / Assessment of comorbidity and social anxiety in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the SELFIE study

Introducción: El trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH) y su comorbilidad repercuten en la ansiedad social de niños y adolescentes, no obstante, apenas hay estudios que aborden este tema en la adolescencia. El objetivo era evaluar el grado de ansiedad social y analizar la presencia de comorbilidades psiquiátricas (CPS). Metodología: Estudio observacional transversal en el que se incluyeron pacientes de 12-18 años con diagnóstico confirmado de TDAH (DSM-5). Se recogió información sobre la presencia y tipo de CPS y se evaluó la ansiedad social mediante la escala Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A). Resultados: Participaron 46 especialistas de psiquiatría del niño y del adolescente o neuropediatría, que incluyeron a 234 pacientes. El 68,8% (159) eran varones y el 31,2% (72) mujeres, con edad media de 14,9 años (IC 95%: 14,6-15,1). El 51,7% (121) tenía TDAH de tipo combinado (TC), el 37,2% (87) con predominio del déficit de atención (TDA) y el 9% (21) con predominio hiperactivo-impulsivo (TH). El 97,9% (229 pacientes) recibía tratamiento farmacológico: metilfenidato en el 78,6% (184), lisdexanfetamina en el 15% (35) y atomoxetina en el 4,3% (10). El 50,4% (118) presentaba alguna CPS, con predominio de los trastornos del aprendizaje y de la comunicación (47, 20,1%) y los trastornos de ansiedad (45, 19,2%). Se observó un grado de ansiedad social significativamente mayor en comparación con los valores normales de la escala en la población sana. Los adolescentes con TDA presentaron peores puntuaciones en la escala SAS-A en comparación con adolescentes con TH (p = 0,015). La presencia de trastornos de ansiedad comórbidos se relacionó con peores puntuaciones en la escala SAS-A, reflejando una mayor ansiedad social en estos pacientes (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Los adolescentes con diagnóstico de TDA y aquellos con comorbilidades psiquiátricas de tipo ansiedad presentaron un mayor grado de ansiedad social según su puntuación en la escala SAS-A. Este aspecto psicológico debería ser detectado y controlado en los adolescentes con TDAH para favorecer su adaptación social

Introduction: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its comorbidities have an impact on the social anxiety of children and adolescents, but there are practically no studies addressing this topic in adolescence. Our objective was to assess the degree of social anxiety and to analyse the presence of psychiatric comorbidities (PSCs) in adolescents with ADHD. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in patients aged 12 to 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD (DSM-5). We collected data on the presence and type of PSCs and assessed social anxiety by means of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A). Results: Forty-six child and adolescent psychiatrists and paediatric neurologists participated in the study and recruited 234 patients. Of the total patients, 68.8% (159) were male and 31.2% (72) female, with a mean age in the sample of 14.9 years (95% CI, 14.6-15.1). The type of ADHD was combined type (C) in 51.7% (121), predominantly inattentive (PI) in 37.2% (87), and predominantly hyperactive-impulsive (PH) in 9% (21). Of all patients, 97.9% (229) received pharmacological therapy: 78.6% (184) methylphenidate, 15% (35) lisdexamfetamine and 4.3% (10) atomoxetine.We found PSCs in 50.4% of the patients (118), of which the most frequent were learning and communication disorders (20.1%, n = 47) and anxiety disorders (19.2%, n = 45). The patients scored significantly higher in the SAS-A compared to reference values in the healthy population. The scores in the SAS-A were less favourable in adolescents with the PI type compared to those with the PH type (P = .015). The presence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was associated with worst scores in SAS-A (P < .001) showing an increased social anxiety. Conclusion: Adolescents with ADHD classified as PI and those with comorbid anxiety had a higher degree of social anxiety as measured by the SAS-A. This psychological aspect must be identified and controlled in adolescents with ADHD to promote their social adaptation

[Assessment of comorbidity and social anxiety in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the SELFIE study]. / Evaluación de la comorbilidad y la ansiedad social en adolescentes con trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad: Estudio SELFIE.

INTRODUCTION: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its comorbidities have an impact on the social anxiety of children and adolescents, but there are practically no studies addressing this topic in adolescence. Our objective was to assess the degree of social anxiety and to analyse the presence of psychiatric comorbidities (PSCs) in adolescents with ADHD. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in patients aged 12 to 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD (DSM-5). We collected data on the presence and type of PSCs and assessed social anxiety by means of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A). RESULTS: Forty-six child and adolescent psychiatrists and paediatric neurologists participated in the study and recruited 234 patients. Of the total patients, 68.8% (159) were male and 31.2% (72) female, with a mean age in the sample of 14.9 years (95% CI, 14.6-15.1). The type of ADHD was combined type (C) in 51.7% (121), predominantly inattentive (PI) in 37.2% (87), and predominantly hyperactive-impulsive (PH) in 9% (21). Of all patients, 97.9% (229) received pharmacological therapy: 78.6% (184) methylphenidate, 15% (35) lisdexamfetamine and 4.3% (10) atomoxetine.We found PSCs in 50.4% of the patients (118), of which the most frequent were learning and communication disorders (20.1%, n=47) and anxiety disorders (19.2%, n=45). The patients scored significantly higher in the SAS-A compared to reference values in the healthy population. The scores in the SAS-A were less favourable in adolescents with the PI type compared to those with the PH type (P=.015). The presence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was associated with worst scores in SAS-A (P<.001) showing an increased social anxiety. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with ADHD classified as PI and those with comorbid anxiety had a higher degree of social anxiety as measured by the SAS-A. This psychological aspect must be identified and controlled in adolescents with ADHD to promote their social adaptation.

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction of Patients with Neuropathic Pain and Breakthrough Pain: Economic Impact Based on Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the quality of life and satisfaction with treatment of patients with chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) who experience breakthrough pain (BTP) and to assess its economic impact. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Fifteen pain units from Spanish hospitals completed the study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 124 patients with adequately controlled CNP who experienced BTP were enrolled into the study. INTERVENTION: No interventions were required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life was assessed using the SF12 v2 questionnaire, the results of which were used to calculate the estimated costs per patient and month and the SF-6D Health Utility Index. Patient satisfaction with treatment received for CNP and for BTP was assessed using a 10-point visual analogue scale. Other associated symptoms were analyzed using the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System). RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 60.2 years (95% CI 58.4-63.3), and 46.8% (58) were males. 18.9% (23) experienced their first episode of BTP. A severe impairment of the physical component of SF12v2 was noted, with 94% of patients below the mean score of the population, while 88% had values lower than normal for the mental component. Mean cost per patient and month was $679 and was significantly greater in males ($763 versus $606), 4.96 times greater than in healthy population, and approximately double the cost of patients with CNP in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of BTP in patients with CNP causes a substantial increase in healthcare costs which is significantly greater in older males.

Observational Study Evaluating the Economic Impact of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice in Spain: The IMDI Study.

INTRODUCTION: Breakthrough pain (BTP) has great repercussions on the quality of life, and on the use of health resources. The scope of BTP costs in cancer patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic cost of BTP in patients with cancer and the relationship with their quality of life. METHODS: A 1-month observational prospective cost-of-illness study was designed. The patients recorded the consumption of health resources and drugs related to BTP in a diary. The current symptoms in Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS) and their quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3) were assessed. The direct medical and non-medical costs fixed and variable and the indirect costs of the patient and the caregivers were evaluated. Factors related to cost and quality of life were identified using linear generalized models (LGM) type gamma and logistic link. Participants were oncologic patients with BTP, older than 18 years, with controlled basal pain. RESULTS: Eight Spanish pain units, eight palliative care units, and one oncology department included 152 patients. One hundred patients (65.8%) were male and the mean age was 66.8 years (95% CI 64.8-68.8). The total cost per patient was 2941.60 euros per month: 88% direct medical costs, 5% non-medical direct costs, and 7% indirect costs due to lost productivity. A better score in EORTC QLQ-30 quality of life was associated with a reduction in overall costs. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed the results of the first real-life prospective study evaluating the cost of illness of BTP in cancer patients demonstrating that the presence of breakthrough pain in a cancer patient causes a very significant increase in healthcare costs. FUNDING: Kyowa Kirin Farmacéutica, S.L.U.

Observational study to analyze patterns of treatment of breakthrough dyspnea in cancer patients in clinical practice. / Estudio observacional para analizar las pautas de tratamiento de la disnea irruptiva en pacientes con cáncer en la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Although breakthrough dyspnea is very frequent in cancer patients, there are no precise recommendations for treating it. The main objective of this study was to analyze what treatments are used in clinical practice for the management of breakthrough dyspnea in cancer patients in Spain and the secondary objectives were to describe the characteristics of cancer patients with breakthrough dyspnea and the attributes of the disorder. METHODS: Cancer patients over 18 years of age, with breakthrough dyspnea and a Karnofsky performance score of ≥30, who were treated at departments of oncology in institutes across Spain were included in this cross-sectional observational study. The characteristics of breakthrough dyspnea, history of treatment, anthropometric variables, Mahler dyspnea index, Borg scale, Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction with current breakthrough dyspnea treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 149 included patients was 66 years (95% confidence interval: 64.3 to 67.9), and 53 were females (35.6%). The mean breakthrough dyspnea intensity was 5.85 (95% confidence interval 5.48 to 6.22, Borg scale). A total of 55.1% of the first-choice treatments consisted of opioids, followed by oxygen (17.3%). A total of 119 patients (79.9%) received monotherapy for breakthrough dyspnea. Patients presenting with basal dyspnea received oxygen in a greater proportion of cases (21.1% vs 7.4%; p = 0.07). Patients with predictable dyspnea received a greater proportion of opioids (70.9% vs 44.4%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids constitute first-line therapy for breakthrough dyspnea in routine clinical practice, though the scientific evidence supporting their use is scarce. Further information derived from controlled clinical trials is needed regarding the comparative efficacy of the different treatments in order to justify their use.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Siendo la disnea irruptiva un síntoma muy frecuente en los pacientes oncológicos, no existen recomendaciones precisas para su tratamiento. El objetivo principal del estudio fue analizar qué tratamientos se utilizan en la práctica clínica diaria para el manejo de la disnea irruptiva en pacientes con cáncer en España. Los objetivos secundarios fueron describir las características de los pacientes oncológicos con disnea irruptiva y los atributos de esta alteración. MÉTODOS: Pacientes oncológicos mayores de 18 años, con disnea irruptiva y estado funcional Karnofsky mayor o igual a 30, atendidos en servicios de oncología. Se recogió el historial de tratamientos para la disnea irruptiva y las características de esta patología, variables antropométricas, índice de disnea de Mahler, escala de Borg, escala Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale, satisfacción del paciente con el tratamiento actual de la disnea irruptiva. RESULTADOS: La edad media de los 149 pacientes incluidos fue de 66 años (intervalo de confianza 95%: 64,3 a 67,9), siendo mujeres el 35,6% (53). La intensidad media de la disnea irruptiva fue de 5,85 (intervalo de confianza 95%: 5,48 a 6,22 Borg). El 55,1% de los tratamientos de primera opción fueron los opioides, seguidos del oxígeno (17,3%). El 79,9% de los pacientes (119) fueron tratados en monoterapia. En los casos que presentaban disnea basal se administró oxígeno en mayor proporción 21,1% versus 7,4% (p = 0,07). Si la disnea era predecible se administró en mayor proporción opioides, 70,9% versus 44,4% (p = 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: Los opioides constituyen el tratamiento de primera línea de la disnea irruptiva en la práctica clínica habitual; sin embargo, el grado de evidencia científica que justifique su uso es escasa. Se necesita más información procedente de ensayos clínicos controlados en los que se evalúe la eficacia comparativa de diferentes tratamientos.

Psychiatric Comorbidity at the Time of Diagnosis in Adults With ADHD: The CAT Study.

OBJECTIVE: The CAT (Comorbilidad en Adultos con TDAH) study aimed to quantify and characterize the psychiatric comorbidity at the time of diagnosis of ADHD in adult outpatients. METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter, observational register of adults with ADHD diagnosed for the first time. RESULTS: In this large sample of adult ADHD (n = 367), psychiatric comorbidities were present in 66.2% of the sample, and were more prevalent in males and in the hyperactive-impulsive and combined subtypes. The most common comorbidities were substance use disorders (39.2%), anxiety disorders (23%), and mood disorders (18.1%). In all, 88.8% patients were prescribed pharmacological treatment for ADHD (in 93.4% of cases, modified release methylphenidate capsules 50:50). CONCLUSION: A high proportion of psychiatric comorbidity was observed when adult outpatients received a first-time diagnosis of ADHD. The systematic registering of patients and comorbidities in clinical practice may help to better understand and manage the prognostic determinants in adult ADHD.

Evaluación de la calidad de vida en la mujer menopáusica mediante la escala Cervantes: impacto del tratamiento en la práctica clínica / Assessment of quality of life in postmenopausal women through the Cervantes scale: impact of treatment in clinical practice

Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de vida actual de las mujeres menopáusicas y conocer el efecto del tratamiento instaurado. Sujetos y métodos: El estudio epidemiológico transversal y multicéntrico que incluyó a 1.344 mujeres menopáusicas. Se empleó la escala Cervantes para valorar la calidad de vida. Resultados: La puntuación global de la calidad de vida fue mejor en los grupos con tratamiento (terapia hormonal e isoflavonas, diferencia puntuación total: 13,62 y 7,93 puntos, respectivamente; p < 0,001) versus las que no recibían terapia. Factores que influyen en la calidad de vida son: el alcohol, los antecedentes de enfermedad y el tiempo de evolución de la menopausia. Conclusiones: Las mujeres menopáusicas pueden mejorar su calidad de vida con el tratamiento con terapia hormonal y con isoflavonas, siendo la escala Cervantes una herramienta clínica muy útil (AU)

Objective: To assess the current quality of life of menopausal women and determine the effect of treatment. Subjects and methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional, epidemiological study included 1344 postmenopausal women. The Cervantes scale was used to assess quality of life. Results: The overall quality of life score was better in the treatment groups (hormonal therapy and isoflavones, with differences in total scores of 13.62 and 7.93 points, respectively; P<.001) versus those not receiving therapy. Factors influencing quality of life were alcohol, history of disease, and time since onset of menopause. Conclusions: Menopausal women can improve their quality of life with treatment with hormonal therapy and isoflavones. The Cervantes scale is a useful clinical tool (AU)

Factores que influyen sobre el tiempo hasta la necesidad de intervenir un paciente en la lista de espera para prótesis de rodilla / Factors related with the time to surgery in waiting-list patients for knee prostheses

Objetivo. En el año 2006 se inició en el Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén un nuevo modelo de consulta monográfica de artrosis de rodilla (CMAR), para ofrecer al paciente un tratamiento de calidad basado en las guías de práctica clínica. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el rendimiento de la unidad, en términos de prolongación del tiempo hasta la necesidad de cirugía protésica de rodilla. Pacientes y métodos. Se realizó el análisis de una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes atendidos en la CMAR y que dispusieran de un conjunto mínimo de datos. Se realizaron un análisis de Kaplan-Meier para evaluar el tiempo hasta la derivación del paciente a cirugía y un análisis de regresión de Cox para estudiar los factores relacionados con el tiempo hasta la derivación. Resultados. Participaron 224 pacientes con una edad media de 65,7 años (IC del 95%, 64 a 67), el 67,9% eran mujeres. El 48,2% tenía una afectación de grado 3 (Kellgren-Lawrence), un 27,5% de grado 2, un 15,3% de grado 4, y un 9% de grado 1. El 90,2% (202) recibió tratamiento con viscosuplementación (ácido hialurónico NASHA). La afectación de una sola articulación (p<0,0001; OR = 0,267, IC del 95%, 0,130 a 0,549), la mayor gravedad de la artrosis (p=0,048; OR = 0,410, IC del 95%, 0,169 a 0,992) y la menor intensidad del dolor (p<0,0001; OR = 1,091, IC del 95%, 1,044 a 1,141) fueron los factores relacionados con menor tiempo hasta la cirugía. El tratamiento con viscosuplementación aumentó el tiempo hasta la cirugía en todos los pacientes. Conclusiones. Factores como la menor edad del paciente y la afectación de una sola articulación influyeron en la decisión de derivación del paciente para cirugía. La administración de viscosuplementación prolongó el tiempo hasta que el paciente fue finalmente derivado a cirugía(AU)

Objective: In the year 2006 the Hospital Complex of Jaén began a new model of attention for consultation of knee osteoarthritis (CMAR), to offer quality treatment to the patient based on clinical practice guidelines. The objective of this study was to analyse the efficiency of the unit, in terms of delaying the time until a knee prostheses is needed. Patients and methods: An analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients seen at the CMAR was made, with a minimum available data set, and a Kaplan Meier analysis carried out in order to evaluate the time until the referral of the patient to surgery, as well as a Cox regression analysis in order to study the factors related with the time until the referral. Results: 224 patients were included, with mean age of 65.7 years (95% CI 64 to 67), 67.9% women. 48.2% had a stage III affection (Kellgren-Lawrence), 27.5% stage 2, 15.3% stage 4, and 9% stage 1. 90.2% (202) received treatment with viscosupplementation (Hialuronic acid NASHA). Single joint affection (P<.0001; OR 0,267, 95% CI 0.130 to 0,549), a higher degree of osteoarthritis (P=.048; OR 0,410, 95% CI 0.169 to 0,992), and lower intensity of pain (P<.0001; OR 1,091, 95% CI 1.044 to 1,141), were the factors related with shorter time until surgery. Treatment with viscosupplementation increased the time until surgery in all patients. Conclusions: Factors like a lower age of the patient and the involvement of a single joint influenced the referral of the patient to surgery. The administration of viscosupplementation, delayed the time until the patient was finally referred to surger(AU)

Factors related with the time to surgery in waiting-list patients for knee prostheses.

OBJECTIVE: In the year 2006 the Hospital Complex of Jaén began a new model of attention for consultation of knee osteoarthritis (CMAR), to offer quality treatment to the patient based on clinical practice guidelines. The objective of this study was to analyse the efficiency of the unit, in terms of delaying the time until a knee prostheses is needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients seen at the CMAR was made, with a minimum available data set, and a Kaplan Meier analysis carried out in order to evaluate the time until the referral of the patient to surgery, as well as a Cox regression analysis in order to study the factors related with the time until the referral. RESULTS: 224 patients were included, with mean age of 65.7 years (95% CI 64 to 67), 67.9% women. 48.2% had a stage III affection (Kellgren-Lawrence), 27.5% stage 2, 15.3% stage 4, and 9% stage 1. 90.2% (202) received treatment with viscosupplementation (Hialuronic acid NASHA). Single joint affection (P<.0001; OR 0,267, 95% CI 0.130 to 0,549), a higher degree of osteoarthritis (P=.048; OR 0,410, 95% CI 0.169 to 0,992), and lower intensity of pain (P<.0001; OR 1,091, 95% CI 1.044 to 1,141), were the factors related with shorter time until surgery. Treatment with viscosupplementation increased the time until surgery in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Factors like a lower age of the patient and the involvement of a single joint influenced the referral of the patient to surgery. The administration of viscosupplementation, delayed the time until the patient was finally referred to surgery.

Evaluation of the immediate post-operative procedure after dental interventions. 24 hours follow up study. Epico study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to make a descriptive approximation of the therapeutic management of the different dental interventions in clinical practice today, and to analyze the degree of consensus among the specialists participating in the study. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 447 odontologists, stomatologists or maxillofacial surgeons from 43 Spanish provinces participated in the study. The study sample consisted of patients aged 18 years old or over attending the clinic for a dental intervention. The type of intervention carried out and treatments administered before and after the intervention were recorded. At 24 hours after the intervention, intensity of pain experienced by the patient, rescue therapy administered for pain relief, sleep affectation, the appearance of adverse events or complications of the intervention, and treatment compliance were also recorded. RESULTS: Data corresponding to 4,194 patients were analyzed, of whom 53.2% were women (2,232). The mean age was 42.6 years (95%CI 42.2- 43). The most frequent interventions corresponded to: oral surgery (66.4%), endodontics (17.3%) and periodontal treatment (4.6%). A total of 43.2% of the patients were taking some medication before the intervention: anticoagulants (2.5%), antibiotics (33%), pain relief and/or anti-inflammatory agents (23%) and other drugs (7.6%); 16.6% were receiving combined treatment with antibiotics and analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory agents before the intervention. Treatments prescribed to the patient for the 24 hours following the intervention corresponded to only one analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory in 18%, and a combination of analgesics and/or anti-inflammatories in 77.1%. Antibiotics were prescribed in 39.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Different patterns of therapeutic management by the specialists were noted depending on the type of intervention carried out. The use of analgesics and/or anti-inflammatories depended on the severity of pain expected with each intervention and the administration of antibiotics was related to the prevention of local infections.

Control de factores de riesgo coronario en prevención secundaria: estudio PRESENAP / Control of coronary risk factors in secondary prevention: PRESENAP study

Fundamento y objetivo: Evaluar el grado general de consecución de objetivos de control de los factores de riesgo en prevención secundaria de los pacientes que han tenido un episodio coronario y son seguidos en atención primaria. Pacientes y método: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y multicéntrico con inclusión mediante muestreo consecutivo de los primeros 5 pacientes que acudieron a consulta y habían tenido un episodio coronario en un período previo de 6 meses a 10 años. Los objetivos de control fueron: presión arterial < 140/90 mmHg en población general y < 130/85 mmHg en diabéticos, colesterol de las lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) < 100 mg/dl y no ser fumador. Resultados: Se incluyó a 8.817 pacientes (varones el 73,7%) con una media (desviación estándar) de edad de 65,4 (10,3) años. El 76,6% eran hipertensos; el 73,4%, dislipémicos, y el 32,7%, diabéticos. El 60,2% alcanzó el objetivo de presión arterial, el 26,3% alcanzó el objetivo de cLDL < 100 mg/dl y el 11,4% siguió fumando. Cumplió la totalidad de las recomendaciones el 16,4%. Los factores relacionados de forma independiente con un buen control fueron la menor edad, el sexo masculino, el ingreso por síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del ST (odds ratio [OR] = 1,39; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,01-1,93; p = 0,04) o para revascularización (OR = 1,37; IC del 95%, 1,12-1,67; p = 0,002), tener enfermedad arterial periférica (OR = 1,43; IC del 95%, 1,11-1,84; p = 0,005) y que los objetivos planteados por los médicos fueran adecuados (OR = 1,90; IC del 95%, 1,48-2,44; p < 0,0001). El control fue peor en los pacientes hipertensos o dislipémicos. Conclusiones: El control general de los factores de riesgo en prevención secundaria de la enfermedad coronaria se consigue en 1 de cada 6 pacientes atendidos en atención primaria

Background and objective: Evaluate the overall achievement of goals in the control of risk factors in secondary prevention in patients who have suffered a coronary event and are followed up in primary care centers. Patients and method: Descriptive, transversal, multicenter study with sampling by consecutive inclusion of the first 5 patients attending the doctor's office who had suffered a coronary event 6 months to 10 years previously. The targets for control were: blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg in the general population and < 130/85 mmHg in diabetics; LDL-cholesterol < 100 mg/dl and no smoking habit. Results: 8,817 patients (73.7% males) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 65.4 (10.3) years; 76.6% were hypertensive, 73.4% dyslipidemic and 32.7% diabetics; 60.2% achieved target blood pressure; 26.3% achieved LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dl and 11.4% continued smoking; 16.4% fulfilled all recommendations. Factors independently related with good control were a lower age, male sex, patients who had been admitted with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation (OR = 1.39; CI 95%, 1.01-1.93; p = 0.04) or for revascularization (OR = 1.37; CI 95%; 1.12-1.67; p = 0.002), patients with peripheral arterial disease (OR = 1.43; CI 95%, 1.11-1.84; p = 0.005) and when the physicians proposed suitable objectives (OR = 1.90; CI 95%, 1.48-2.44; p < 0.0001). Control was poorer in hypertensive or dyslipidemic patients. Conclusions: Overall control of risk factors in secondary prevention of coronary disease is achieved in one in six patients attending primary care

[Control of coronary risk factors in secondary prevention: PRESENAP study]. / Control de factores de riesgo coronario en prevención secundaria: estudio PRESENAP.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the overall achievement of goals in the control of risk factors in secondary prevention in patients who have suffered a coronary event and are followed up in primary care centers. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Descriptive, transversal, multicenter study with sampling by consecutive inclusion of the first 5 patients attending the doctor's office who had suffered a coronary event 6 months to 10 years previously. The targets for control were: blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg in the general population and < 130/85 mmHg in diabetics; LDL-cholesterol < 100 mg/dl and no smoking habit. RESULTS: 8,817 patients (73.7% males) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 65.4 (10.3) years; 76.6% were hypertensive, 73.4% dyslipidemic and 32.7% diabetics; 60.2% achieved target blood pressure; 26.3% achieved LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dl and 11.4% continued smoking; 16.4% fulfilled all recommendations. Factors independently related with good control were a lower age, male sex, patients who had been admitted with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation (OR = 1.39; CI 95%, 1.01-1.93; p = 0.04) or for revascularization (OR = 1.37; CI 95%; 1.12-1.67; p = 0.002), patients with peripheral arterial disease (OR = 1.43; CI 95%, 1.11-1.84; p = 0.005) and when the physicians proposed suitable objectives (OR = 1.90; CI 95%, 1.48-2.44; p < 0.0001). Control was poorer in hypertensive or dyslipidemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall control of risk factors in secondary prevention of coronary disease is achieved in one in six patients attending primary care.