Extracellular-Matrix-Anchored Click Motifs for Specific Tissue Targeting.

Local presentation of cancer drugs by injectable drug-eluting depots reduces systemic side effects and improves efficacy. However, local depots deplete their drug stores and are difficult to introduce into stiff tissues, or organs, such as the brain, that cannot accommodate increased pressure. We present a method for introducing targetable depots through injection of activated ester molecules into target tissues that react with and anchor themselves to the local extracellular matrix (ECM) and subsequently capture systemically administered small molecules through bioorthogonal click chemistry. A computational model of tissue-anchoring depot formation and distribution was verified by histological analysis and confocal imaging of cleared tissues. ECM-anchored click groups do not elicit any noticeable local or systemic toxicity or immune response and specifically capture systemically circulating molecules at intradermal, intratumoral, and intracranial sites for multiple months. Taken together, ECM anchoring of click chemistry motifs is a promising approach to specific targeting of both small and large therapeutics, enabling repeated local presentation for cancer therapy and other diseases.

Selective Osmotic Shock for Islet Isolation in the Cadaveric Canine Pancreas.

Currently, islet isolation is performed using harsh collagenases that cause nonspecific injury to both islets and exocrine tissue, negatively affecting the outcome of cell transplantation. We evaluated a novel islet isolation protocol utilizing high concentrations of glucose to cause selective osmotic shock (SOS). Islets have a membrane glucose transporter that allows adaptation to changes in glucose concentrations while exocrine tissue can be selectively destroyed by these osmolar shifts. Canine pancreata were obtained within 15 min after euthanasia from animals ( n = 6) euthanized for reasons unrelated to this study. Each pancreas was divided into 4 segments that were randomized to receive 300 mOsm glucose for 20 min (group 1), 600 mOsm for 20 min (group 2), 300 mOsm for 40 min (group 3), or 600 mOsm for 40 min (group 4). Islet yield, purity, and viability were compared between groups. Mean ± standard error of the mean islet yield for groups 1 to 4 was 428 ± 159, 560 ± 257, 878 ± 443, and 990 ± 394 islet equivalents per gram, respectively. Purity ranged from 37% to 45% without the use of density gradient centrifugation and was not significantly different between groups. Islet cell viability was excellent overall (89%) and did not differ between treatment protocol. Islet function was best in groups treated with 300 mOsm of glucose (stimulation index [SI] = 3.3), suggesting that the lower concentration of glucose may be preferred for use in canine islet isolation. SOS provides a widely available means for researchers to isolate canine islets for use in islet transplantation or in studies of canine islet physiology.