Meningeosis Neoplastica in Patients with Glioblastoma: Analysis of 36 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Meningeosis neoplastica is a rare manifestation of high-grade gliomas and is usually associated with a devastating outcome. The aim of this bicenter series was to investigate the clinical course and outcome of patients with meningiosis neoplastica. METHODS: This case series included patients in whom surgery was performed for World Health Organization grade IV primary and secondary glioblastoma (GBM) at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany between 2009 and 2021 and Burdenko Institute of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia between 2012 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were manifestation of clinical and neuroradiologic signs of leptomeningeal, ependymal, or spinal dissemination of GBM at various time points during the course of the disease. RESULTS: Meningeosis neoplastica was found in 36 patients. Nine patients developed spinal metastases and 12 ependymal dissemination and 15 patients had a leptomeningeal manifestation of high-grade glioma. The median age of patients at first diagnosis of primary tumor was 56 years. Typical symptoms were headache, nausea, vomiting, and acute paraplegia. The median overall survival was 11 months and progression-free survival was 8 months. Meningeosis neoplastica developed a median 2 months after the initial tumor diagnosis. Salvage therapies included ventriculoperitoneal shunting, decompression of spinal metastases, and spinal radiation therapy. The median time between meningeosis manifestation and death was 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Meningeosis neoplastica is a rare manifestation of GBM. It has a poor prognosis. The overall survival after the manifestation of meningeosis was barely longer than 3 months. Salvage therapies did not improve the outcome in our patient cohort.

Prediction of Intraoperative Fluorescence of Brain Gliomas: Correlation between Tumor Blood Flow and the Fluorescence.

INTRODUCTION: The prediction of the fluorescent effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in patients with diffuse gliomas can improve the selection of patients. The degree of enhancement of gliomas has been reported to predict 5-ALA fluorescence, while, at the same time, rarer cases of fluorescence have been described in non-enhancing gliomas. Perfusion studies, in particular arterial spin labeling perfusion, have demonstrated high efficiency in determining the degree of malignancy of brain gliomas and may be better for predicting fluorescence than contrast enhancement. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between tumor blood flow, measured by ASL, and intraoperative fluorescent glow of gliomas of different grades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumoral blood flow was assessed in 75 patients by pCASL (pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling) within 1 week prior to surgery. In all cases of tumor removal, 5-ALA had been administered preoperatively. Maximum values of tumoral blood flow (TBF max) were measured, and normalized tumor blood flow (nTBF) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 76% of patients had significant contrast enhancement, while 24% were non-enhancing. The histopathology revealed 17 WHO grade II gliomas, 12 WHO grade III gliomas and 46 glioblastomas. Overall, there was a relationship between the degree of intraoperative tumor fluorescence and ASL-TBF (Rs = 0.28, p = 0.02 or the TBF; Rs = 0.34, p = 0.003 for nTBF). Non-enhancing gliomas were fluorescent in 9/18 patients, with nTBF in fluorescent gliomas being 54.58 ± 32.34 mL/100 mg/s and in non-fluorescent gliomas being 52.99 ± 53.61 mL/100 g/s (p > 0.05). Enhancing gliomas were fluorescent in 53/57 patients, with nTBF being 170.17 ± 107.65 mL/100 g/s in fluorescent and 165.52 ± 141.71 in non-fluorescent gliomas (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumoral blood flow levels measured by non-contrast ASL perfusion method predict the fluorescence by 5-ALA; however, the additional value beyond contrast enhancement is not clear. ASL is, however, useful in cases with contraindication to contrast.