Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate Loxodes magnus.

Most eukaryotes have one nucleus and nuclear genome per cell. Ciliates have instead evolved distinct nuclei that coexist in each cell: a silent germline vs. transcriptionally active somatic nuclei. In the best-studied model species, both nuclei can divide asexually, but only germline nuclei undergo meiosis and karyogamy during sex. Thereafter, thousands of DNA segments, called internally eliminated sequences (IESs), are excised from copies of the germline genomes to produce the streamlined somatic genome. In Loxodes, however, somatic nuclei cannot divide but instead develop from germline copies even during asexual cell division, which would incur a huge overhead cost if genome editing was required. Here, we purified and sequenced both genomes in Loxodes magnus to see whether their nondividing somatic nuclei are associated with differences in genome architecture. Unlike in other ciliates studied to date, we did not find canonical germline-limited IESs, implying Loxodes does not extensively edit its genomes. Instead, both genomes appear large and equivalent, replete with retrotransposons and repetitive sequences, unlike the compact, gene-rich somatic genomes of other ciliates. Two other hallmarks of nuclear development in ciliates-domesticated DDE-family transposases and editing-associated small RNAs-were also not found. Thus, among the ciliates, Loxodes genomes most resemble those of conventional eukaryotes. Nonetheless, base modifications, histone marks, and nucleosome positioning of vegetative Loxodes nuclei are consistent with functional differentiation between actively transcribed somatic vs. inactive germline nuclei. Given their phylogenetic position, it is likely that editing was present in the ancestral ciliate but secondarily lost in the Loxodes lineage.

Genetic studies of human-chimpanzee divergence using stem cell fusions.

Complete genome sequencing has identified millions of DNA changes that differ between humans and chimpanzees. Although a subset of these changes likely underlies important phenotypic differences between humans and chimpanzees, it is currently difficult to distinguish causal from incidental changes and to map specific phenotypes to particular genome locations. To facilitate further genetic study of human-chimpanzee divergence, we have generated human and chimpanzee autotetraploids and allotetraploids by fusing induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of each species. The resulting tetraploid iPSCs can be stably maintained and retain the ability to differentiate along ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm lineages. RNA sequencing identifies thousands of genes whose expression differs between humans and chimpanzees when assessed in single-species diploid or autotetraploid iPSCs. Analysis of gene expression patterns in interspecific allotetraploid iPSCs shows that human-chimpanzee expression differences arise from substantial contributions of both cis-acting changes linked to the genes themselves and trans-acting changes elsewhere in the genome. To enable further genetic mapping of species differences, we tested chemical treatments for stimulating genome-wide mitotic recombination between human and chimpanzee chromosomes, and CRISPR methods for inducing species-specific changes on particular chromosomes in allotetraploid cells. We successfully generated derivative cells with nested deletions or interspecific recombination on the X chromosome. These studies confirm an important role for the X chromosome in trans regulation of expression differences between species and illustrate the potential of this system for more detailed cis and trans mapping of the molecular basis of human and chimpanzee evolution.