RESUMO
Feline calicivirus (FCV), a member of the diverse family Caliciviridae, is a respiratory and oral pathogen of cats. Although conventional FCV vaccines are available, there are some safety and efficacy problems associated with their use. The potential of DNA vaccination against FCV infection was therefore explored. Four cats were inoculated intramuscularly with three 100 microg doses, 2 weeks apart, with a plasmid (pF9VAC) containing the mature capsid protein gene of FCV strain F9. Four control cats received the same plasmid lacking the FCV gene insert. All eight cats showed clinical signs following heterologous challenge with FCV strain LS027. However, rectal temperatures and general clinical sign scores were significantly lower in vaccinates compared to controls, and there was a marked difference in ulcer distribution between the two groups. Although no serological responses were detected in either group prior to challenge, post-challenge titres in the vaccinated group were generally higher. The results indicate that partial protection against a calicivirus is possible by DNA vaccination but that other approaches to enhance efficacy such as the use of cytokine genes or prime-boost protocols may also be required.
Assuntos
Calicivirus Felino/genética , Calicivirus Felino/imunologia , Vacinas de DNA/genética , Vacinas Virais/genética , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Infecções por Caliciviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Caliciviridae/veterinária , Capsídeo/genética , Capsídeo/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Gatos , Feminino , Masculino , Plasmídeos/genéticaRESUMO
Two visits, six weeks apart, were made to a cat rescue shelter and single oropharyngeal swabs were taken from all the compliant cats. Feline calicivirus was isolated from 14 of 45 swabs (31 per cent) taken on the first visit and 12 of 46 swabs (26 per cent) taken on the second visit. Nucleotide sequences were obtained for nine isolates from the first visit, six isolates from the second visit, and for the vaccine virus used in the cattery. Distance analysis showed that the majority of the isolates could be assigned to one of two groups. All the isolates obtained from cats sharing the same pen or isolates obtained from the same cat on successive visits, were less than 5 per cent distant, whereas most of the isolates from cats in different pens were more than 20 per cent distant. Phylogenetic analysis showed that at least seven distinct field isolates were present in the cattery. The only good evidence for virus transmission within the cattery was a case in which two viruses isolated from cats in different pens had sequences that were less than 5 per cent distant.
