Prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain after peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rebound pain occurs after the resolution of peripheral nerve block and hampers patient recovery in the postoperative period. We sought to synthesise available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain in adult patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, RCTs reporting rebound pain and use of dexamethasone in the context of a peripheral nerve block were searched in various databases and updated in May 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain; secondary outcomes included the severity and time to onset of rebound pain, patient satisfaction with pain control, sleep disturbance because of pain, and adverse effects of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the effect of route of administration (intravenous or perineural) on the incidence of rebound pain. Trial sequential analysis was performed to rule out the possibility of a false positive result. RESULTS: Seven RCTs comprising 574 patients were included in this review. The dexamethasone group was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain with an odds ratio of 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27, P=0.00, I2=0%) compared with the control group. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the adequate information size for the beneficial effect of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis showed that both intravenous and perineural administration were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rebound pain. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both intravenous and perineural dexamethasone reduce the incidence of rebound pain after a peripheral nerve block provided for postoperative analgesia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42023424031.

Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The traditional loss-of-resistance (LOR) technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement can be associated with a high primary failure rate. In this study, we compared the traditional LOR technique and dynamic pressure-sensing (DPS) technology for primary success rate and secondary outcomes pertinent to identifying the thoracic epidural space. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded superiority trial enrolled patients ages 18 to 75 years, scheduled for major thoracic or abdominal surgeries at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Anesthesiology trainees (residents and fellows) placed thoracic epidural catheters under faculty supervision and rescue. The primary outcome was the success rate of thoracic epidural catheter placement, evaluated by the loss of cold sensation in the thoracic dermatomes 20 minutes after injecting the epidural test dose. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, ease of catheter placement, the presence of a positive falling meniscus sign, early hemodynamic changes, and unintended dural punctures. Additionally, we explored outcomes that included number of attempts, needle depth to epidural space, need for faculty to rescue the procedure from the trainee, patient-rated procedural discomfort, pain at the epidural insertion site, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption over 48 hours. RESULTS: Between March 2019 and June 2020, 133 patients were enrolled; 117 were included in the final analysis (n = 57 for the LOR group; n = 60 for the DPS group). The primary success rate of epidural catheter placement was 91.2% (52 of 57) in the LOR group and 96.7% (58 of 60) in the DPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference in proportions: -0.054 [-0.14 to 0.03]; P = .264). No difference was observed in procedural time between the 2 groups (median interquartile range [IQR] in minutes: LOR 5.0 [7.0], DPS 5.5 [7.0]; P = .982). The number of patients with epidural analgesia onset at 10 minutes was 49.1% (28 of 57) in the LOR group compared to 31.7% (19 of 60) in the DPS group (P = .062). There were 2 cases of unintended dural punctures in each group. Other secondary or exploratory outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial did not establish the superiority of the DPS technique over the traditional LOR method for identifying the thoracic epidural space (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03826186).

Neurological injury following peripheral nerve blocks: a narrative review of estimates of risks and the influence of ultrasound guidance.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury or post-block neurological dysfunction (PBND) are uncommon but a recognized complications of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB). A broad range of its incidence is noted in the literature and hence a critical appraisal of its occurrence is needed. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we wanted to know the pooled estimates of PBND and further, determine its pooled estimates following various PNB over time. Additionally, we also sought to estimate the incidence of PBND with or without US guidance. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A literature search was conducted in six databases. For the purposes of the review, we defined PBND as any new-onset sensorimotor disturbances in the distribution of the performed PNB either attributable to the PNB (when reported) or reported in the context of the PNB (when association with a PNB was not mentioned). Both prospective and retrospective studies which provided incidence of PBND at timepoints of interest (>48 hours to <2 weeks; >2 weeks to 6 weeks, 7 weeks to 5 months, 6 months to 1 year and >1 year durations) were included for review. Incidence data were used to provide pooled estimates (with 95% CI) of PBND at these time periods. Similar estimates were obtained to know the incidence of PBND with or without the use of US guidance. Additionally, PBND associated with individual PNB were obtained in a similar fashion with upper and lower limb PNB classified based on the anatomical location of needle insertion. FINDINGS: The overall incidence of PBND decreased with time, with the incidence being approximately 1% at <2 weeks' time (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 9 (8; to 11)) to approximately 3/10 000 at 1 year (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 0. 3 (0.1; to 0.5)). Incidence of PBND differed for individual PNB with the highest incidence noted for interscalene block. CONCLUSIONS: Our review adds information to existing literature that the neurological complications are rarer but seem to display a higher incidence for some blocks more than others. Use of US guidance may be associated with a lower incidence of PBND especially in those PNBs reporting a higher pooled estimates. Future studies need to standardize the reporting of PBND at various timepoints and its association to PNB.

Comparison of the Quality of Recovery-15 score in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery under monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia: a prospective quality improvement study.

PURPOSE: Whether changing the institutional practice from general anesthesia (GA) to monitored anesthesia care (MAC) affects postoperative quality of recovery for oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is currently unknown. We designed this quasi-experimental study to evaluate a quality improvement (QI) initiative instituted in Edmonton, AB, Canada. METHODS: We chose a prospective controlled cohort study design for this QI study, where patients underwent oncoplastic BCS under MAC in one hospital and BCS under GA at another hospital (control). A total of 125 patients undergoing surgery between May 2021 and February 2022 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were male sex, total mastectomy, or age under 18. All other patients were included. The primary outcome was the change in Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hr compared with a preoperative baseline. Secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative time profiles, perioperative analgesic and antiemetic use and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis included a propensity score analysis to account for confounding variables. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients received GA and 61 MAC. No enrolled patients were lost to follow up but two were excluded secondarily. No patients receiving MAC needed conversion to GA or unplanned airway management. Monitored anesthesia care was associated with superior outcomes for the primary outcome (ß/SE[ß], 3.31; 99.5% confidence interval, 0.45 to 6.17; P = 0.001) and most secondary outcomes, when accounting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: A care transformation initiative for patients undergoing oncoplastic BCS under MAC was associated with a higher quality recovery profile and shorter length of stay without any increase in perioperative or postoperative adverse events.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On ignore actuellement si le fait de modifier la pratique institutionnelle de l'anesthésie générale (AG) à la sédation procédurale (monitored anesthesia care) affecte la qualité de la récupération postopératoire en cas de chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique. Nous avons conçu cette étude quasi expérimentale pour évaluer une initiative d'amélioration de la qualité mise en place à Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. MéTHODE: Nous avons choisi une méthodologie d'étude de cohorte prospective contrôlée pour cette étude d'amélioration de la qualité, dans laquelle des patientes ont bénéficié d'une chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique sous sédation procédurale dans un hôpital et de la même chirurgie sous anesthésie générale dans un autre hôpital (groupe témoin). Au total, 125 patientes bénéficiant d'une intervention chirurgicale entre mai 2021 et février 2022 ont été recrutées. Les critères d'exclusion étaient le sexe masculin, la mastectomie totale ou un âge de moins de 18 ans. Toutes les autres personnes ont été incluses. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la variation du score de Qualité de la récupération 15 à 24 heures par rapport aux valeurs initiales préopératoires. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les profils temporels per- et postopératoires, l'utilisation périopératoire d'analgésiques et d'antiémétiques et la durée du séjour à l'hôpital. L'analyse statistique comprenait une analyse par score de propension pour tenir compte des variables de confusion. RéSULTATS: Soixante-quatre patientes ont reçu une anesthésie générale et 61 une sédation procédurale. Aucune patiente recrutée n'a été perdue au suivi, mais deux ont été exclues secondairement. Aucune patiente recevant une sédation procédurale n'a eu besoin d'une conversion en anesthésie générale ou d'une prise en charge non planifiée des voies aériennes. La sédation procédurale était associée à des issues supérieures pour le critère d'évaluation principal (ß/ET[ß], 3,31; intervalle de confiance à 99,5 %, 0,45 à 6,17; P = 0,001) et la plupart des critères d'évaluation secondaires, en tenant compte des facteurs de confusion. CONCLUSION: Une initiative de transformation des soins pour les patientes bénéficiant d'une chirurgie mammaire conservatrice oncoplastique sous sédation procédurale a été associée à un profil de récupération de meilleure qualité et à une durée de séjour plus courte sans augmentation des événements indésirables périopératoires ou postopératoires.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group.

INTRODUCTION: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS: Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

Feasibility and Utility of Routine Point-of-Care Gastric Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have indicated that point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) of the gastric antrum can predict the adequacy of fasting before surgery and anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of gastric POCUS in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy procedures. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy. Consenting patient's gastric antrum was scanned before anesthetic care for endoscopy to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) and qualitatively determine safe and unsafe contents. Further, an estimate of residual gastric volume was determined using the formula and the nomogram methods. Subsequently, gastric secretions aspirated during endoscopy were quantified and further correlated with nomogram and formula-based assessments. No patient required a change in the primary anesthetic plan except for using rapid sequence induction in those with unsafe contents on POCUS scans. RESULTS: Qualitative ultrasound measurements consistently determined safe and unsafe gastric residual contents in 83 patients enrolled in the study. Unsafe contents were determined by qualitative scans in 4 out of 83 cases (5%) despite adequate fasting status. Quantitatively, only a moderate correlation was demonstrated between measured gastric volumes and nomogram (r = .40, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.57; P = .0002) or formula-based (r = .38, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.55; P = .0004) determinations of residual gastric volumes. CONCLUSION: In daily clinical practice, qualitative POCUS determination of residual gastric content is a feasible and useful technique to identify patients at risk of aspiration before upper GI endoscopy procedures.

Diagnostic Performance of Airway Ultrasound for the Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and appraise the evidence regarding airway ultrasound assessment in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane collaboration guidelines and the recommendations for the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Observational studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of airway ultrasound for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy were included for consideration. SETTING: Literature searches were performed in 4 databases (PubMed [Medline], Embase, Clinical Trials, and Google Scholar) to identify all observational studies using any ultrasound technique to assess difficult laryngoscopy. The search terms included "sonography," "ultrasound," "airway," "difficult airway," "difficult laryngoscopy," "Cormack," "risk factors," "ultrasound at the point of care," "difficult ventilation," "difficult intubation" and others, combined with sensitive filters. The search was done for studies performed in the last 20 years in English or Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients older than 18 years old under general anesthesia for an elective procedure. Evident anatomic airway abnormalities, obstetric populations, those using an alternative imaging method besides ultrasound, and animal studies were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative bedside ultrasound measuring distances and ratios from the skin to different reference points, such as the ratio of the hyomental distance in a neutral position (HMDN) and hyomental distance in extension (HMDR), HMDN, and the skin-to-epiglottis distance (SED), the preepiglottic area, and tongue thickness, among others. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 studies evaluated the prediction of a difficult laryngoscopy using airway ultrasound. The diagnostic performance and the number of ultrasound parameters reported in the studies were variable. Meta-analysis was performed for 3 measurements consistently included in most studies. The SED and the HMDR ratio presented a sensitivity of 75% and 61%, respectively, and a specificity of 86% and 88%, respectively. The ratio of the preepiglottic distance to the epiglottic distance at the midpoint of the vocal cords (pre-E/E-VC) presented the best performance for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy (sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%, diagnostic odds ratio: 22.2). CONCLUSION: With the currently available evidence, the 3 commonly used point-of-care ultrasound measures used to identify difficult laryngoscopy, (SED, HMDR, and pre-E/E-VC), showed better sensitivity and similar specificity to clinical measures. Future studies and more data may change the authors' confidence in these conclusions, given the wide variability of measurements noted in studies.

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus guidelines on the management of the perioperative patient on cannabis and cannabinoids.

BACKGROUND: The past two decades have seen an increase in cannabis use due to both regulatory changes and an interest in potential therapeutic effects of the substance, yet many aspects of the substance and their health implications remain controversial or unclear. METHODS: In November 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine charged the Cannabis Working Group to develop guidelines for the perioperative use of cannabis. The Perioperative Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids Guidelines Committee was charged with drafting responses to the nine key questions using a modified Delphi method with the overall goal of producing a document focused on the safe management of surgical patients using cannabinoids. A consensus recommendation required ≥75% agreement. RESULTS: Nine questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved on third-round voting. Topics addressed included perioperative screening, postponement of elective surgery, concomitant use of opioid and cannabis perioperatively, implications for parturients, adjustment in anesthetic and analgesics intraoperatively, postoperative monitoring, cannabis use disorder, and postoperative concerns. Surgical patients using cannabinoids are at potential increased risk for negative perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Specific clinical recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoids were successfully created.

Neuromodulation using a hybrid technique of combined perineural local anesthetic and nerve stimulation in six challenging clinical scenarios.

PURPOSE: Postamputation pain is challenging because of complex mechanisms involving a multitude of pain pathways and psychological factors. This patient population also tends to have extensive comorbidities with or without a background of chronic pain. Electrical neuromodulation such as peripheral nerve stimulation has gained traction in the realm of chronic pain. Recently, the off-label use of hybrid perineural nerve stimulation in combination with locoregional block via the stimulating nerve block catheter has been described in single-center case reports. CLINICAL FEATURES: Herein, we present a case series of six patients from two different Canadian hospitals using such a hybrid technique in three different clinical scenarios. These scenarios were (1) local anesthetic dose minimization in the presence of multiple nerve block catheters, (2) analgesia augmentation when local anesthetic alone is insufficient, and (3) provision of an analgesic adjunct as part of a multimodal regimen. A stimulating sciatic nerve block catheter was inserted under ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for these cases. Patients tended to experience pain on the subsequent postoperative days whereby the off-label use of nerve stimulation successfully reduced their pain score and stabilized or decreased their opioid consumption or minimized the need to increase the local anesthetic dose when doing so could have precipitated local anesthetic toxicity. CONCLUSION: Our case series supports the feasibility of using a combination of low-frequency perineural stimulation and local anesthetic infusion via a single perineural nerve block catheter to manage challenging postamputation pain.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La douleur post-amputation est difficile à soulager en raison de mécanismes complexes impliquant une multitude de voies de la douleur et de facteurs psychologiques. Cette population de patients a également tendance à présenter de nombreuses comorbidités, avec ou sans antécédents de douleur chronique. Les techniques de neuromodulation électrique, telle que la stimulation nerveuse périphérique, sont de plus en plus populaires dans le domaine de la douleur chronique. Récemment, des présentations de cas monocentriques ont décrit l'utilisation hors indication d'une modalité hybride de stimulation nerveuse périneurale en combinaison avec un bloc locorégional via un cathéter de bloc nerveux stimulant. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: Nous présentons ici une série de cas de six patients de deux hôpitaux canadiens différents utilisant une telle technique hybride dans trois cas cliniques différents. Ces cas étaient (1) la minimisation de la dose d'anesthésique local en présence de plusieurs cathéters de blocs nerveux, (2) l'augmentation de l'analgésie lorsque l'anesthésique local seul était insuffisant, et (3) la fourniture d'un adjuvant analgésique dans le cadre d'un régime multimodal. Un cathéter stimulant pour l'administration d'un bloc du nerf sciatique a été inséré sous échoguidage et guide de stimulation nerveuse pour ces cas. Les patients ont eu tendance à ressentir de la douleur les jours postopératoires suivants, et l'utilisation hors indication de la stimulation nerveuse a alors réussi à réduire leur score de douleur, à stabiliser ou diminuer leur consommation d'opioïdes, ou à réduire la nécessité d'augmenter la dose d'anesthésique local alors que cela aurait pu précipiter une toxicité anesthésique locale. CONCLUSION: Notre série de cas soutient la faisabilité de l'utilisation d'une technique combinée de stimulation périnerveuse à basse fréquence et de perfusion d'anesthésique local via un seul cathéter de bloc nerveux périneural pour prendre en charge la douleur post-amputation.

The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies.

PURPOSE: To determine the preferences and attitudes of members of regional anesthesia societies during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Regional Anaesthesia-UK, and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was developed by a panel of experienced regional anesthesiologists and distributed by email to the participants. The survey covered the following domains: participant information, practice settings, preference for the type of anesthetic technique, the use of personal protective equipment, and oxygen therapy. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 729 participants from 73 different countries, with a response rate of 20.1% (729/3,630) for the number of emails opened and 8.5% (729/8,572) for the number of emails sent. Most respondents (87.7%) identified as anesthesia staff (faculty or consultant) and practiced obstetric and non-obstetric anesthesia (55.3%). The practice of regional anesthesia either expanded or remained the same, with only 2% of respondents decreasing their use compared with the pre-pandemic period. The top reasons for an increase in the use of regional anesthesia was to reduce the need for an aerosol-generating medical procedure and to reduce the risk of possible complications to patients. The most common reason for decreased use of regional anesthesia was the risk of urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Approximately 70% of the responders used airborne precautions when providing care to a patient under regional anesthesia. The most common oxygen delivery method was nasal prongs (cannula) with a surgical mask layered over it (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the perceived benefits of regional over general anesthesia, approximately half of the members of three regional anesthesia societies seem to have expanded their use of regional anesthesia techniques during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer les préférences et les attitudes des membres des sociétés d'anesthésie régionale pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. MéTHODE: Nous avons distribué un sondage électronique aux membres de l'American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, de Regional Anesthesia-UK et de l'European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. Un questionnaire composé de 19 questions a été élaboré par un panel d'anesthésiologistes régionaux d'expérience et distribué par courriel aux participants. Le sondage couvrait les domaines suivants : les renseignements sur les participants, les contextes de pratique, leur préférence quant au type de technique d'anesthésie, l'utilisation d'équipement de protection individuelle et l'oxygénothérapie RéSULTATS: Le sondage a été complété par 729 participants provenant de 73 pays différents, avec un taux de réponse de 20,1 % (729/3630) pour le nombre de courriels ouverts et de 8,5 % (729/8572) pour le nombre de courriels envoyés. La plupart des répondants (87,7 %) se sont identifiés comme anesthésiologistes (académique ou consultant) et pratiquaient l'anesthésie obstétricale et non obstétricale (55,3 %). Leur pratique de l'anesthésie régionale s'est étendue ou est demeurée inchangée, et seulement 2 % des répondants ont indiqué avoir diminué leur utilisation de cette pratique par rapport à la période pré-pandémique. Les principales raisons d'une augmentation de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie régionale étaient de réduire la nécessité d'une intervention médicale générant des aérosols et de réduire le risque de complications potentielles pour les patients. La raison la plus courante de diminution du recours à l'anesthésie régionale était le risque de conversion urgente à une anesthésie générale. Environ 70 % des intervenants ont utilisé des précautions en matière de propagation des aérosols lorsqu'ils procuraient des soins à un patient sous anesthésie régionale. La méthode d'administration d'oxygène la plus fréquemment utilisée était les canules nasales avec un masque chirurgical superposé (61 %). CONCLUSION: Compte tenu des avantages perçus de l'anesthésie régionale par rapport à l'anesthésie générale, environ la moitié des membres de trois sociétés d'anesthésie régionale semblent avoir élargi leur utilisation des techniques d'anesthésie régionale pendant la vague initiale de la pandémie de COVID-19.

How I Do It: Technical report on surgically-initiated rectus sheath catheter using catheter-over-needle assembly.

Development of chronic postsurgical pain following major abdominal or pelvic surgeries is increasingly recognized. Multimodal analgesia including regional anesthesia such as rectus sheath block is growing in popularity. While the literature mainly describes ultrasound-guided rectus sheath blocks, there are many advantages to surgically-initiated rectus sheath catheter performed at the end of surgery. In this technical description, we describe the rationale and technique of surgical insertion of rectus sheath catheters following major urologic surgery with midline incision which is routinely performed by urologists at our institution. Furthermore, we would like to highlight the type of catheter used during rectus sheath catheter insertion, namely the catheter-over-needle assembly. It is simple to insert while minimizes complications such as local anesthetic leakage at the insertion site causing dressing disruption and premature catheter dislodgement, as the catheter-over-needle assembly fits snugly with the skin after insertion.

Feasibility of Combining Nerve Stimulation and Local Anesthetic Infusion to Treat Acute Postamputation Pain: A Case Report of a Hybrid Technique.

Pain following amputation is often poorly controlled despite the use of nerve blocks. We describe a novel pain management approach in a 56-year-old woman with episodes of poorly controlled pain following below-knee amputation despite a multimodal analgesic regimen with continuous sciatic nerve block. Effective analgesia was observed during those episodes when the nerve block catheter was briefly stimulated at low frequency using a nerve stimulator designed for regional anesthesia procedural guidance. This case report explains the utilization and rationale of this hybrid technique of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and locoregional analgesia via perineural nerve block catheters to augment analgesia.

Impact of paravertebral blocks on analgesic and non-analgesic outcomes after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A propensity matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesic techniques such as paravertebral blocks (PVBs) have been popularized for analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this single center retrospective propensity matched cohort of subjects, we investigate the impact of paravertebral blocks on the analgesic and non-analgesic outcomes. METHODS: Institutional database was queried to identify all patients undergoing VATS between January 2013 and July 2019 and these patients were divided into those who received paravertebral blocks in combination with general anesthesia (GA) [PVB group] and those who received GA without paravertebral blocks [GA group]. Propensity score matching based on common patient confounders were used to identify patients in each group. Primary outcomes of the study were average pain scores and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Secondary analgesic outcomes included pain scores and opioid requirements at other timepoints over the first 48 hours. Non analgesic outcomes were obtained from STS General Thoracic Surgery Database and included length of hospital stay, need for ICU admission, composite outcome of any complication during the hospital course and 30-day mortality. Exploratory analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of PVB on analgesia following different types of surgery and as to whether any other covariates had a greater influence on the included patient centered outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: After propensity score matching, a total of 520 patients (260 per group) were selected for the study out of 1095 patients. The opioid consumption in terms of oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) [Median (IQR)] for the first 24 hours was significantly lower with the use of PVB [PVB group- 78.5 (96.75); GA group-127.0 (111.5); p<0.001] while the average pain scores in the first 24 hours did not differ significantly [PVB group-4.71 (2.28); GA group-4.85 (2.30); p = 0.70]. The length of hospital stay, opioid requirements at other timepoints, need for ICU admission in the immediate post-operative period and the composite outcome-'any complication' (35% vs 48%) were significantly lower with the use of PVB. Subgroup analysis showed a longer duration of benefit following major lung surgeries compared to others. CONCLUSION: Paravertebral blocks reduced the length of stay and opioid consumption up to 48 hours after VATS without significantly impacting pain scores.