Hepatic and splenic sonographic and sonoelastographic findings in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of sonographic and sonoelastographic parameters with clinical cardiac parameters, as well as to assess their value in predicting survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with PAH and normal liver function were prospectively enrolled in this prospective study along with 26 healthy controls, all of whom underwent ultrasound and point shear wave elastography examinations. Additionally, the portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI), inferior vena cava collapsibility index, and clinical cardiac variables were obtained in PAH patients. The values of hepatic (LVs) and splenic shear wave velocity (SVs) were compared between PAH patients and controls. The relationships between all sonographic and clinical parameters in the PAH patients were analyzed. Furthermore, their prognostic value in predicting survival was investigated. RESULTS: LVs values in PAH patients (median, 1.62 m/s) were significantly higher than in controls (median, 0.99 m/s), while no significant difference was observed in SVs values. Patients with higher grades of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) had significantly different values of PVPI (P=0.010) and sonoelastographic parameters (P<0.001 for LVs and P=0.004 for SVs) compared to those with less severe TR. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion values were the only investigated parameter found to be associated with survival (hazard ratio, 0.814; 95% confidence interval, 0.694 to 0.954; P=0.011). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated a direct association between cardiac congestion (i.e., the severity of TR) and liver stiffness, which should be kept in mind during the assessment of fibrosis in patients with PAH.

Successful resection and reconstruction of primary cardiac lymphoma.

Primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL) is one of the rarest tumors of the heart. The most common type is diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma. Most often, the right atrium and the right ventricle are involved, and if not diagnosed and treated in time, it can be fatal. In this case, a female patient underwent an urgent operation for a large, infiltrative, right atrial mass. Extensive resection of the lateral walls of both atria and the interatrial septum as well as reconstruction were performed successfully. The pathological evaluation suggested PCL. The aim of this case is to raise awareness of this disease and to highlight clinical and surgical approaches.

Comparison of Warfarin use in terms of efficacy and safety in two different polyclinics.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of warfarin in specialized international normalized ratio (INR) outpatient clinic (INR-C) and in general cardiology outpatient clinic (General-C). METHODS: Herein, 381 consecutive patients with a regular follow-up at INR-C (n=233) or General-C (n=148) for at least 1 year were retrospectively included. While INR-C patients were followed by a single experienced trained nurse, General-C patients were followed by a different cardiologist who worked in a rotational principle every month. During controls, demographic characteristics, INR levels, bleeding events, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attacks in the last 1 year were recorded. Primary endpoint was defined as the evaluation of the combined major bleeding and ischemic event, and secondary endpoint was defined as the evaluation of them separately. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62±12.86 and 43.8% were male. Mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) level was statistically higher in INR-C than that in General-C (68.8%±15.88 and 51.6%±23.04, respectively; p<0.001). Primary outcomes were significantly higher in General-C than that in INR-C [13.5% (20) and 6.4% (15); respectively, p=0.020]. Overall, major bleeding was observed in 25 patients (6.5%) and (2.6%) ischemic event was observed in 10 patients. In General-C patients, both major bleeding (8.8% vs. 5.2%; p=0.163) and the ischemic event (4.7% vs. 1.3%; p=0.051) were more, and no statistically significant differences were detected between the two clinics. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study demonstrate that patients followed in INR-C had higher TTR levels and lower bleeding and ischemic events rates that those followed in General-C.

The role of specialized prevention clinics for the short term follow-up of acute coronary syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of specialized prevention clinics and standard clinics follow-ups on secondary protection after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: A total of 118 patients who received thrombolytic therapy after being diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were followed up for 6 months. After ACS, patients in a specialized prevention clinic (Group 1) (n=67) and those in a standard clinic (Group 2) (n=51) were compared in terms of the change in their lifestyle, management of risk factors, and drug compliance. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between groups in terms of baseline clinical and laboratory findings except for triglyceride level (Group 1: median 174 mg/dL; Group 2: median 136 mg/dL; p=0.039). Six months after indexing, smoking cessation (72.4% vs. 50%, p=0.037), diet compliance (43% vs.19.6%, p=0.012), and exercise rates (31% vs. 13.7%, p=0.044) were significantly higher in Group 1. Although the weight control rate was higher in Group 1, no significant difference was noted between the groups (27% vs. 15.6%, p=0.219). The rate of systolic and diastolic blood pressures >140/90 mmHg was significantly higher in Group 2 (23.5% vs. 9%, p=0.029) at 6 months. The median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value was significantly lower in Group 1 patients (Group 1: 91 mg/dL; Group 2: 102 mg/dL; p=0.042). Moreover, the rate of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction compared with baseline was significantly higher in Group 1 (32.8% vs. 13.7%, p=0.016). Although the recommended treatments were similar in both groups, the statin use rate was significantly higher in Group 1 (95.5% vs. 80.3%, p=0.021) at 6 months. CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that specialized prevention clinics were more effective during the management of cardiovascular risk factors after ACS.