The correlation analysis between organizational justice, knowledge-hiding behaviour and Nurses' innovation ability: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to analyse the correlations among organizational justice, knowledge-hiding behaviour and nurses' innovation ability. DESIGN: A descriptive and cross-sectional design and the data were collected using questionnaires. METHODS: Demographic information, professional data, innovation capacity scales, knowledge-hiding scales and organizational justice scales were used in this study. Using descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way analysis of variance and Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analyses, we compared the differences and examined the correlations between participants' demographic and innovation capacity scales, and knowledge-hiding scales and organizational fairness scales. RESULTS: We received 1486 valid responses, with an effective response rate of 96.68%. We found team role, nursing age, number of training, literature-reading habits, organizational justice, information justice, fair distribution and deaf knowledge-hiding as the influencing factors of nurses' innovation. Nurses' sense of organizational fairness negatively correlated with knowledge concealment and positively correlated with innovation ability. Moreover, knowledge hiding negatively correlated with nurses' innovation ability. Furthermore, knowledge-hiding plays a partial intermediary role between organizational fairness and nurses' innovation ability.

An m-Health Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis in China ("Rheumatism Center" app): Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

AIM: To study the feasibility and effectiveness of a m-Health app in improving the management of rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty rheumatoid arthritis participants will be recruited for a 6-month feasibility study. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to receive standard care or standard care plus the m-Health intervention. The primary outcome is the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial. In addition, we will investigate patient satisfaction in using the "Rheumatism Center" app in the intervention group. The secondary outcomes include the scores for the simplified disease activity index, clinical disease activity index, disease activity score 28, health assessment questionnaire and 6-item self-efficacy scale for chronic diseases. The assessments will be performed at baseline and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the study is initiated. At the end of the study, we will also collect user views of the app through qualitative interviews. RESULTS: This study is ongoing. The findings of this study will determine the feasibility and effectiveness of m-Health intervention in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, hoping to enhance the awareness of disease management and quality of life for rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Study on Pain Catastrophizing From 2010 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the global scientific output of research on pain catastrophizing and explore the hotspots and frontiers from 2010 to 2020 using bibliometric methods. Methods: Publications regarding pain catastrophizing published from 2010 to 2020 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace was used to analyze the number of publications, countries, institutions, journals, authors, cited references, and keywords using standard bibliometric indicators. Results: A total of 1,576 publications on pain catastrophizing were retrieved from 2010 to December 31, 2020. The number and rate of the annual publications gradually increased totally. Pain (130) was the most productive journal. Meanwhile, Pain ranked first in the frequency (1,432) and centrality (0.31) of the cited journals. The most productive country and institution in this frequency field were the United States (642) and the University of Washington (73), respectively. Jensen MP (34) was the most prolific author, and Sullivan MJL (1,196) ranked first among the cited authors. In the ranking of frequency in the cited references, the first article was a critical review about pain catastrophizing published by Quartana (100). The keyword "Low back pain" had the highest frequency (556). "Total hip" was identified as a frontier research item for 2016-2020. Conclusion: The findings of this bibliometric study provide the current status and trends in the clinical research of pain catastrophizing and may help researchers to identify hot topics and explore new research directions in this field.