Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt A): 179-184, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34911639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that gender can influence how learners are assessed and the feedback they receive. We investigated the quality of faculty narrative comments in general surgery trainee evaluation using trainee-assessor gender dyads. METHODS: Narrative assessments of surgical trainees at the University of British Columbia were collected and rated using the McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Scale (MNCRS). Variables from the MNCRS were inputted into a generalized linear mixed model to explore the impact of gender dyads on the quality of narrative feedback. RESULTS: 2,469 assessments were collected. Women assessors tended to give higher-quality comments (p's < 0.05) than men assessors. Comments from men assessors to women trainees were significantly more positive than comments from men assessors to men trainees (p = 0.02). Men assessors also tended to give women trainees more reinforcing than corrective comments than to men trainees (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the quality of faculty feedback to trainees by gender dyads. A range of solutions to improve and reduce differences in feedback quality are discussed.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cirurgia Geral , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Narração
2.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 42(3): 564-572, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27754613

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Residency training programmes worldwide are experiencing a shift from the traditional time-based curriculum to competency-based medical education (CBME), due to changes in the healthcare system that have impacted clinical learning opportunities. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS) programmes are one of the first North American surgical specialties to adopt the new CBME curriculum. OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the literature pertaining to CBME in OTL-HNS programmes worldwide, to identify the tools that have been developed and identify potential barriers to the implementation of CBME. SEARCH STRATEGY: Four online databases, OVID MEDLINE (R) from 1946 to 5 August 2015, EMBASE 1974 to 5 August 2015, Cochrane and CINAHL databases up to 5 August 2015, were searched using key words related to OTL-HNS and CBME. EVALUATION METHOD: Two researchers independently reviewed the literature in a systematic manner and met to discuss and address any discrepancies at each step of the review process. RESULTS: Of the 207 publications identified in the initial search, 31 were included in this scoping review. Two key themes emerged from the literature: first, OTL-HNS programmes reported a need for new assessment tools that assess competency and also provide the learner with formative feedback. Second, although varieties of tools assessing both technical and non-technical skills have been developed, implementation of such tools has been met with some challenges. These challenges include a lack of faculty support, inadequate administrative support and a lack of knowledge on how to start the transition to CBME. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review suggests that task-specific checklists, entrustment scales, evaluation portfolios from multiple assessments and faculty training sessions are key aspects to incorporate as OTL-HNS training programmes shift towards a CBME curriculum.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Educação Baseada em Competências/organização & administração , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Internato e Residência , Otolaringologia/educação , Currículo , Humanos
3.
Bone Joint J ; 98-B(10): 1320-1325, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694584

RESUMO

As residency training programmes around the globe move towards competency-based medical education (CBME), there is a need to review current teaching and assessment practices as they relate to education in orthopaedic trauma. Assessment is the cornerstone of CBME, as it not only helps to determine when a trainee is fit to practice independently, but it also provides feedback on performance and guides the development of competence. Although a standardised core knowledge base for trauma care has been developed by the leading national accreditation bodies and international agencies that teach and perform research in orthopaedic trauma, educators have not yet established optimal methods for assessing trainees' performance in managing orthopaedic trauma patients. This review describes the existing knowledge from the literature on assessment in orthopaedic trauma and highlights initiatives that have recently been undertaken towards CBME in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. In order to support a CBME approach, programmes need to improve the frequency and quality of assessments and improve on current formative and summative feedback techniques in order to enhance resident education in orthopaedic trauma. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1320-5.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência , Ortopedia/educação , Médicos/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões , Canadá , Humanos , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
4.
Curr Oncol ; 23(2): e138-43, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122982

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In many hospitals, resource barriers preclude the use of preoperative multidisciplinary cancer conferences (mccs) for consecutive patients with cancer. Collaborative cancer conferences (cccs) are modified mccs that might overcome such barriers. METHODS: We established a ccc at an academic tertiary care centre to review preoperative plans for patients with rectal cancer. Attendees included only surgeons who perform colorectal cancer procedures and a radiologist with expertise in cross-sectional imaging. Individual reviews began with the primary surgeon presenting the case information and initial treatment recommendations. Cross-sectional images were then reviewed, the case was discussed, and consensus on ccc-treatment recommendations was achieved. Outcomes for the present study were changes in treatment recommendations defined as "major" (that is, redirection of patient to preoperative radiation from straight-to-surgery or uncertain plan, or redirection of the patient to straight-to-surgery from preoperative radiation or plan uncertain) or as "minor" (that is, referral to a multidisciplinary cancer clinic, request additional tests, change type of neoadjuvant therapy, change type of surgery). Chart reviews provided relevant patient, tumour, and treatment information. RESULTS: Between September 2011 and September 2012, 101 rectal cancer patients were discussed at a ccc. Of the 35 management plans (34.7%) that were changed as a result, 8 had major changes, and 27 had minor changes. Available patient and tumour factors did not predict for a change in treatment recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cccs at a tertiary-care centre changed treatment recommendations for one third of patients with rectal cancer. Given that no specific factor predicted for a treatment plan change, it is likely prudent that all rectal cancer patients undergo some form of collaborative review.

5.
Bone Joint J ; 95-B(11): 1445-9, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24151260

RESUMO

Valid and reliable techniques for assessing performance are essential to surgical education, especially with the emergence of competency-based frameworks. Despite this, there is a paucity of adequate tools for the evaluation of skills required during joint replacement surgery. In this scoping review, we examine current methods for assessing surgeons' competency in joint replacement procedures in both simulated and clinical environments. The ability of many of the tools currently in use to make valid, reliable and comprehensive assessments of performance is unclear. Furthermore, many simulation-based assessments have been criticised for a lack of transferability to the clinical setting. It is imperative that more effective methods of assessment are developed and implemented in order to improve our ability to evaluate the performance of skills relating to total joint replacement. This will enable educators to provide formative feedback to learners throughout the training process to ensure that they have attained core competencies upon completion of their training. This should help ensure positive patient outcomes as the surgical trainees enter independent practice.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/educação , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Médicos/normas , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Neuroreport ; 12(11): 2443-8, 2001 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11496126

RESUMO

We show that the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related potential can be used to measure auditory temporal resolution in human infants. Infrequent stimuli with silent gaps of 4, 8, or 12 ms modulated the P2 component, generated MMN, and produced a P3a-like positivity. The data indicate that within-channel gap detection thresholds at 6 months are essentially at adult levels under conditions of little adaptation. Since MMN is elicited without attention and does not require a behavioural response, it can be measured similarly across the lifespan. We are now in a position to study the development of cross-channel temporal resolution and adaptation effects in infancy, and to examine how these abilities in infancy relate to later language acquisition.


Assuntos
Córtex Auditivo/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos/fisiologia , Percepção da Fala/fisiologia , Estimulação Acústica , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...