Ralinepag Phase II Open-Label Extension Study in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Ralinepag is a potent, titratable, orally administered prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. A phase II randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 22-week study of immediate-release (IR) ralinepag safety and efficacy met its primary endpoint, significantly reducing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) compared with placebo. This phase II open-label extension (OLE) study assessed long-term safety and tolerability of ralinepag. METHODS: Participants were eligible for the OLE if they completed the parent study or experienced a clinical worsening event while receiving placebo. Those previously receiving IR ralinepag remained on their current dose, and participants formerly administered placebo were titrated to the highest tolerated dose. Participants were transitioned to an extended-release ralinepag formulation toward the end of the OLE. The primary objective evaluated long-term safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class, clinical worsening, and hemodynamic measures. RESULTS: In total, 45/61 participants enrolled in the OLE study, 30 from the IR ralinepag group and 15 from the placebo group. The most common adverse events (AEs) were known prostacyclin-related effects (e.g., headache, 64.4%; diarrhea, 37.8%; jaw pain, 33.3%). There was a notable decline in AEs after reaching and maintaining a stable dose. At month 24 after entering the OLE, 6MWD significantly increased by a mean of 36.3 m (P = 0.004) from OLE baseline, and most participants remained stable in their functional class (84.8%). Post-baseline PVR in 1 or 2 years decreased by a median of 52.2 dyn.s/cm5 and mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased by a median of 2.0 mmHg (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ralinepag produced sustained, durable improvements in 6MWD along with durable reductions in PVR and a manageable AE profile. Most participants continuing treatment with ralinepag maintained functional measures throughout the OLE and those switching from placebo to ralinepag often experienced functional improvements.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease caused by elevated pressure in the blood vessels connecting the heart to the lungs. A previous phase 2 study found that ralinepag significanlty reduced pulmonary vascular resistance (the force or resistance that blood encounters as it flows through the blood vessels in the lungs) compared with placebo. This clinical study of 45 patients investigated whether ralinepag was safe and effective for long-term use to treat people with pulmonary arterial hypertension. All participants received ralinepag twice daily until a new once daily pill was available later in the study. The primary endpoints were long-term safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints included exercise capacity, impact on daily life (functional class), clinical worsening, and hemodynamic measures (metrics to measure how well the heart is working). The study found that ralinepag had a manageable side effect profile, with a decrease in side effects for patients who continued taking ralinepag over time. Moreover, the study showed that ralinepag improved the ability to exercise, maintained functional measures, and helped to reduce pressure in the blood vessels connecting the heart to the lungs over a 24-month period for participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Delphi consensus recommendation for optimization of pulmonary hypertension therapy focusing on switching from a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor to riociguat.

Dual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open-ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus-based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence-based guidance is unavailable.

An expert panel delphi consensus statement on patient selection and management for transitioning between oral and inhaled treprostinil.

Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), is available for administration by parenteral, oral, or inhaled routes. Transitioning between routes may be beneficial for appropriate patients; however, there is little published data on transitions between oral and inhaled treprostinil. We used a modified Delphi process to develop expert consensus recommendations on transitions between these formulations. Three questionnaires were used to develop statements about relevant aspects of transition management, which the panelists rated, using a Likert scale, from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). Eleven physicians with expertise in PAH treatment modalities, participated in the panel. Of the 492 statements evaluated, consensus was reached on 215 (43.7%). Key consensus recommendations included (1) accurately defining successful transition, as stable or improved PAH with good tolerability and adherence, and (2) patients with stable, low-risk PAH showing insufficient response or tolerability to their existing treprostinil therapy (and due to restrictions in up titration of dosing), as appropriate candidates for transitions between treprostinil formulations. Panelists did not reach consensus for an overall strategy for performing these transitions, mainly because of variability in their practice parameters. Consensus was also achieved on recommendations for adverse event management, including reassurance, administration of oral treprostinil 3 times daily with food, and dosing inhaled treprostinil at intervals ≥3 hours apart. The Delphi process aided in developing expert consensus recommendations that may provide clinically useful guidance for transitioning between treprostinil formulations. However, additional data from centers with high volumes of PAH patients undergoing treprostinil transitions would be optimal for defining more complete and robust strategies to facilitate successful transition.

Efficacy and safety of riociguat in combination therapy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PATENT studies).

Many patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension do not achieve treatment goals with monotherapy, and therefore combination therapy is becoming the standard of care. The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is licensed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; here we present findings from patients who were receiving combined riociguat plus endothelin receptor antagonists or non-intravenous prostanoids in the randomized, placebo-controlled PATENT-1 study and its open-label extension (PATENT-2). Moreover, we include new data from patients receiving early sequential combination therapy (three to six months of endothelin receptor antagonist treatment) or long-term background endothelin receptor antagonist therapy (>6 months). Patients were randomized to riociguat 2.5 mg-maximum (N = 131 pretreated patients) and placebo (N = 60 pretreated patients). Riociguat improved 6-min walking distance (PATENT-1 primary endpoint), functional capacity, and hemodynamics after 12 weeks in pretreated patients. The placebo-corrected changes in 6-min walking distance were +24 m in endothelin receptor antagonist-pretreated patients and +106 m in the small group of prostanoid-pretreated patients. In the early sequential combination and long-term background endothelin receptor antagonist groups, the placebo-corrected changes in 6-min walking distance were +65 m (95% CI: 17 to 113 m) and +13 m (95% CI: -8 to 33 m), respectively. In conclusion, these data suggest that early sequential combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist plus riociguat is a feasible treatment option. Both early sequential therapy and long-term background endothelin receptor antagonist plus riociguat were well tolerated in the PATENT studies.

Ambrisentan in portopulmonary hypertension: A multicenter, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Ambrisentan has shown effectiveness in the treatment of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a subset of Group 1 PAH, few clinical trials have been testing PAH therapies in patients with PoPH. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan in PoPH. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial in which treatment-naive patients with PoPH with Child-Pugh class A/B were administered with ambrisentan for 24 weeks, followed by a long-term extension (24-28 weeks). The primary end-points were change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and 6-minutes walk distance (6MWD) at 24 weeks, whereas secondary end-points included safety, World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) and echocardiographic assessments. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 23 finished 24 weeks of ambrisentan therapy and 19 finished the extension. PVR decreased significantly (mean ± SD) (7.1 ± 5 vs 3.8 ± 1.8 Wood units, p < 0.001), whereas 6MWD remained unchanged (314 ± 94 vs 336 ± 108 m). Other hemodynamic parameters such as right atrial pressure (13 ± 8 vs 9 ± 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (46 ± 13 vs. 38 ± 8 mm Hg, p < 0.01), cardiac index (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.7 liter/min/m2, p < 0.001) showed improvement, whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained unchanged. Of the 22 patients with WHO FC assessments at baseline and 24 weeks, WHO FC improved significantly (p = 0.005). Most frequent drug-related adverse events were edema (38.7%) and headache (22.5%). One episode of leg edema resulted into the permanent discontinuation of ambrisentan. CONCLUSIONS: Ambrisentan monotherapy in PoPH improves hemodynamics and FC at 24 weeks; however, it did not show any improvement in 6MWD. These preliminary outcomes should be interpreted with caution (Clinicaltrials.Gov:NCT01224210).

Efficacy and safety of ralinepag, a novel oral IP agonist, in PAH patients on mono or dual background therapy: results from a phase 2 randomised, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This phase 2 study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of immediate-release orally administered ralinepag, a selective, non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist with a 24-h terminal half-life, compared to placebo in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: 61 PAH patients who were receiving standard care, including mono or dual PAH-targeted background therapy were randomised 2:1 to ralinepag (n=40) or placebo (n=21). The starting dose of ralinepag was 10 µg twice daily. Dosage was then up-titrated as tolerated over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period, to a maximum total daily dose of 600 µg (300 µg twice daily). The primary efficacy end-point was the absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22. Additional end-points included percentage change in PVR from baseline, other haemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Ralinepag significantly decreased PVR by 163.9 dyn·s·cm-5 compared to an increase of 0.7 dyn·s·cm-5 with placebo (p=0.02); the least-squares mean change from baseline PVR was -29.8% compared with placebo (p=0.03). 6MWD increased from baseline by 36.2 m with ralinepag and 29.4 m with placebo (p=0.90). Serious adverse events occurred in 10% of ralinepag patients and 29% of placebo patients. Study discontinuations occurred in 13% of ralinepag patients and 10% of placebo patients. SUMMARY: Ralinepag reduced PVR compared with placebo in PAH patients on mono (41%) or dual combination (59%) background therapy.

Riociguat improves health-related quality of life for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the phase 4 MOTION study.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by progressive dyspnea and exercise limitation and is associated with reduced health-related quality of life. Few clinical studies have evaluated the primary effects of treatment of PAH from the patient perspective. Here, we present the impact of riociguat on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in treatment-naïve patients with PAH. MOTION (NCT02191137) was an open-label, phase 4 trial of riociguat monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with PAH. The primary endpoint was the change in total score from baseline to Week 24 in the Living with Pulmonary Hypertension (LPH) questionnaire. The Short Form-12 Health Survey and Work Limitations Questionnaire 8 were also utilized to assess PROs. Other secondary endpoints included change from baseline in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, and safety. At week 24 (n = 66), the mean (standard deviation [SD]) total LPH score was 37.17 (24.61), for a mean (SD) change from baseline of -10.99 (22.51). At last visit, with week 24 imputed, the mean (SD) total score was 40.63 (28.38), for a mean (SD) change from baseline of -5.40 (27.8) (n = 75; P = 0.0484). Improvement in LPH questionnaire total score was observed by week 4 and was maintained through week 24. Improvements were observed in WHO FC, Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, and accelerometer-measured 6MWD at week 24. Treatment with riociguat had a positive impact on PROs in treatment-naïve patients with PAH and was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile to that observed in placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.

Mortality in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated With Continuous Prostanoids.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral prostanoids are considered the treatment of choice for patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Prognostic studies for patients treated in the modern era are limited. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients initiating IV epoprostenol or IV or subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil therapy for PAH from 2007 to 2016 at UT Southwestern and The Ohio State University were included. Transplant-free survival was assessed from the time of IV/SC therapy initiation and from the time of first follow-up. The utility of traditional prognostic measures was assessed by using categories (lower, intermediate, and higher risk) recommended in the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines for functional class, 6-min walk distance, brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, and hemodynamic results. RESULTS: Patients with group 1 PAH receiving IV epoprostenol (n = 132), IV treprostinil (n = 25), or SC treprostinil (n = 38) were included. Survival from IV/SC prostanoid initiation was 84%, 77%, and 67% at 1, 2, and 3 years. Follow-up assessment was performed after a minimum of 90 days' therapy (mean, 356 ± 247 days) in 163 patients. After treatment with an IV/SC prostanoid, better functional class, 6-min walk distance, brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level, and mixed venous O2 saturation (but not cardiac index) was associated with survival, as was the total number of lower risk and higher risk findings. Having zero lower risk findings or two or more higher risk findings was associated with particularly poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PAH receiving treatment with a parenteral prostanoid, survival was significantly associated with the number of guideline-recommended lower risk and higher risk criteria achieved at first follow-up.

Quality of life and psychological symptoms in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a delay in diagnosis that makes time since diagnosis of interest in this population. OBJECTIVES: To assess psychological conditions, perceived stress, QOL, and interpersonal support and to explore whether these factors may correlate with time since diagnosis in patients with PAH. METHODS: Participants at an academic medical center (n = 108) completed psychological questionnaires (Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Perceived Stress Scale-10, and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-Short Form). RESULTS: Prevalence of psychiatric disorder, major depression, and "other depressive disorder" were 29.6%, 15.7%, and 9.3%, respectively. Participants reported adequate social support, high perceived stress, and average quality of life. Time since diagnosis was positively associated with greater perceived social support (ρ = 0.174, p = .075) and greater perceived stress (ρ = 0.191, p = .048), but no other psychological factor. CONCLUSIONS: Routine psychological assessment and timely referral for mental health services are suggested. Social support may buffer patients from stress.

Recommendations for the clinical management of patients receiving macitentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): A Delphi consensus document.

In patients treated with macitentan (Opsumit®, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), prevention and/or effective management of treatment-related adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of these adverse events can be challenging and the base of evidence and clinical experience for macitentan is limited. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using macitentan to treat PAH may benefit patients and physicians who are using macitentan. Consensus recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with macitentan and PAH using a modified Delphi process. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of macitentan in PAH and rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. The panel of 18 physicians participated and developed a total of 118 statements on special populations, add-on therapy, drug-drug interactions, warnings and precautions, hospitalization and functional class, and adverse event management. The resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance on real-world issues in using macitentan to treat patients with PAH.

Individual dose adjustment of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Riociguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that has been approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension following pulmonary endarterectomy. Riociguat is administered using an 8-week individual dose-adjustment scheme whereby a patient initially receives riociguat 1.0 mg three times daily (tid), and the dose is then increased every 2 weeks in the absence of hypotension, indicated by systolic blood pressure measurements and symptoms, up to a maximum dose of 2.5 mg tid. The established riociguat dose-adjustment scheme allows the dose of riociguat to be individually optimized in terms of tolerability and efficacy. The majority of patients in the phase III clinical trials and their long-term extension phases achieved the maximum riociguat dose, whereas some patients remained on lower doses. There is evidence that these patients may experience benefits at riociguat doses lower than 2.5 mg tid, with improvement in exercise capacity being observed after only 2-4 weeks of treatment in the phase III studies and in the exploratory 1.5 mg-maximum patient group of PATENT-1. This review aims to provide an overview of the rationale behind the riociguat dose-adjustment scheme and examine its application to both clinical trials and real-life clinical practice.

Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

BACKGROUND: We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics. METHODS: We generate strong (Grade 1) and weak (Grade 2) recommendations based on high- (Grade A), moderate- (Grade B), and low- (Grade C) quality evidence. RESULTS: For VTE and no cancer, as long-term anticoagulant therapy, we suggest dabigatran (Grade 2B), rivaroxaban (Grade 2B), apixaban (Grade 2B), or edoxaban (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggest VKA therapy over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Grade 2C). For VTE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), dabigatran (Grade 2C), rivaroxaban (Grade 2C), apixaban (Grade 2C), or edoxaban (Grade 2C). We have not changed recommendations for who should stop anticoagulation at 3 months or receive extended therapy. For VTE treated with anticoagulants, we recommend against an inferior vena cava filter (Grade 1B). For DVT, we suggest not using compression stockings routinely to prevent PTS (Grade 2B). For subsegmental pulmonary embolism and no proximal DVT, we suggest clinical surveillance over anticoagulation with a low risk of recurrent VTE (Grade 2C), and anticoagulation over clinical surveillance with a high risk (Grade 2C). We suggest thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism with hypotension (Grade 2B), and systemic therapy over catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 2C). For recurrent VTE on a non-LMWH anticoagulant, we suggest LMWH (Grade 2C); for recurrent VTE on LMWH, we suggest increasing the LMWH dose (Grade 2C). CONCLUSIONS: Of 54 recommendations included in the 30 statements, 20 were strong and none was based on high-quality evidence, highlighting the need for further research.

Macitentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious disease characterized by elevation of pulmonary artery pressures and right ventricular failure. It is a progressive disease with a poor 5-year survival despite recent advances in treatment. Endothelin plays an important role in the development and progression of the disease. Endothelin receptor blockers have been used to treat PAH since 2001. More recently, macitentan was approved for treatment of PAH. AREA COVERED: This review covers the preclinical and clinical data on macitentan. EXPERT OPINION: Macitentan is a more potent ERA and has been shown to delay progression of the disease. It does not appear to have any significant hepatotoxicity and has a convenient once-a-day dosing. In the large event driven trial, macitentan significantly reduced morbidity in patients with PAH. It was safe and well tolerated and the benefit was seen in treatment-naïve patients and those already receiving PAH therapy.

Pharmacologic therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults: CHEST guideline and expert panel report.

OBJECTIVE: Choices of pharmacologic therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are ideally guided by high-level evidence. The objective of this guideline is to provide clinicians advice regarding pharmacologic therapy for adult patients with PAH as informed by available evidence. METHODS: This guideline was based on systematic reviews of English language evidence published between 1990 and November 2013, identified using the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The strength of available evidence was graded using the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Guideline recommendations, or consensus statements when available evidence was insufficient to support recommendations, were developed using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Available evidence is limited in its ability to support high-level recommendations. Therefore, we drafted consensus statements to address many clinical questions regarding pharmacotherapy for patients with PAH. A total of 79 recommendations or consensus statements were adopted and graded. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decisions regarding pharmacotherapy for PAH should be guided by high-level recommendations when sufficient evidence is available. Absent higher level evidence, consensus statements based upon available information must be used. Further studies are needed to address the gaps in available knowledge regarding optimal pharmacotherapy for PAH.

An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of pulmonary hypertension of sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: In adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), an increased tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) measured by Doppler echocardiography, an increased serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) level, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) diagnosed by right heart catheterization (RHC) are independent risk factors for mortality. METHODS: A multidisciplinary committee was formed by clinician-investigators experienced in the management of patients with PH and/or SCD. Clinically important questions were posed, related evidence was appraised, and questions were answered with evidence-based recommendations. Target audiences include all clinicians who take care of patients with SCD. RESULTS: Mortality risk stratification guides decision making. An increased risk for mortality is defined as a TRV equal to or greater than 2.5 m/second, an NT-pro-BNP level equal to or greater than 160 pg/ml, or RHC-confirmed PH. For patients identified as having increased mortality risk, we make a strong recommendation for hydroxyurea as first-line therapy and a weak recommendation for chronic transfusions as an alternative therapy. For all patients with SCD with elevated TRV alone or elevated NT-pro-BNP alone, and for patients with SCD with RHC-confirmed PH with elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure and low pulmonary vascular resistance, we make a strong recommendation against PAH-specific therapy. However, for select patients with SCD with RHC-confirmed PH who have elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, we make a weak recommendation for either prostacyclin agonist or endothelin receptor antagonist therapy and a strong recommendation against phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with SCD with increased mortality risk are provided, but will require frequent reassessment and updating.

Managing an acutely ill patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by a vasculopathy that results in sustained elevation of pulmonary artery pressures, which ultimately leads to right ventricular failure (RVF) and death. Several advances have been made in the treatment of PAH, but it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Managing an acutely ill patient with PAH is especially challenging. The mechanisms of RVF are incompletely understood; these patients do not tolerate fluid shifts well and there are no controlled trials to assess superiority of a certain approach. This article outlines an approach based on current understanding of RVF in PAH and recommends an approach based on the pathophysiology, current evidence and experience.