Low-intensity rehabilitation in persistent post COVID-19 dyspnoea: the value of Spa health resort as appropriate setting.

Background: Post COVID-19 syndrome is a frequent disabling outcome, leading to a delay in social reintegration and return to working life. Study design: This was a prospective observational cohort study. The main objective was to explore the effectiveness of a Spa rehabilitation treatment on the improvement of post COVID-19 dyspnoea and fatigue, also analyzing the relationship between such symptoms. Additionally, it was assessed if different clinical characteristics could predispose patients in experiencing post COVID-19 symptoms or could influence the effectiveness of a Spa intervention. Methods: From July to November 2021, 187 post COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients complained persisting dyspnoea, whose impact on daily activities was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. 144 patients (77.0%) reported also fatigue. The Spa treatment was started at least 3 months after COVID-19 acute phase. At the end of the treatment, patients were asked to rate the improvement in the dyspnoea and fatigue sensation. 118 patients also underwent the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale for severity estimation of Exertion Dyspnoea and the Barthel index for severity estimation of Physical Limitation. Results: 165 out of 187 patients (88.2%) reported an improvement in dyspnoea, while 116 out 144 patients (80.6%) reported an improvement in both dyspnoea and fatigue. On a total of 118 subjects, a clinically significant improvement in the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale (i.e. Delta Borg equal or more than -2.0 points) was reached by the 50.8% of patients, while a clinically significant improvement in the Barthel index (i.e. Delta Barthel equal or more than +10.0 points) was reached by the 51.7% of them. The 31.4% of patients reached a minimal clinically important improvement in both the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale and the Barthel index. No risk factors were associated to a clinically impacting dyspnoea at entry, while a BMI>30 Kg/m2 was the main risk factor for chronic fatigue. Presence of respiratory comorbidities, obesity and severe acute COVID-19 (phenotype 4) configured risk factors for the lack of improvement of dyspnoea after the treatment, while no risk factors were associated to a lack of improvement for fatigue. Older age, obesity and comorbidities seemed to make more difficult to reach a clinically meaningful improvement in the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale and the Barthel index after treatment. Female gender may imply more physical limitation at entry, while male patients seem to show less improvement in the Barthel index after treatment. Conclusions: Dyspnoea and fatigue were confirmed to be important post COVID-19 symptoms even in younger subjects of working age and subjects with absent or modest pulmonary alterations at distance from acute COVID-19. A Spa health resort seems to be an effective "low-intensity" setting for a rehabilitation program of such patients. There is a strong relationship in terms of improvement between dyspnoea and fatigue, even if risk factors for their occurrence appear to be different. The improvement in exertion dyspnoea and physical limitation seemed to be less mutually related, probably due to a greater complexity in the assessment questionnaires. Some risk factors may predict a lack of improvement in symptoms after treatment.

Mortality in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and overlap syndrome (OS): The role of nocturnal hypoxemia and CPAP compliance.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two chronic diseases that afflict many individuals worldwide with negative effects on health that may overlap in Overlap Syndrome (OS). The aim of our study was to investigate the differences in mortality between OSAS alone and OS and the risk factors involved. METHODS: The study was conducted on patients with OSAS or OS diagnosis that completed 15-year follow-up between 2005 and 2023. Of these, the clinical, functional, sleep and survival data were registered and analysed. Risk factors were found by regression analysis. RESULTS: 501 patients (428 OSAS and 73 OS) were enrolled. Patients with OS had higher mortality than OSAS (p < 0,001). The morality risk factors for the overall population found were age >65 years (odds ratio (OR) = 10.69 (95%CI 3,85-29,69), p < 0,001) and low forced-expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1) (OR = 10.18 (95%CI 2,32-44,68), p = 0,002). In patients with OSAS, age and nocturnal hypoxemia (NH) (OR = 2.41 (95%CI 1,07-5,41), p = 0,03) were risk factors, while adherence to nighttime positive airway pressure (PAP) reduced mortality (OR = 0,36 (95%CI 0,15-0,83), p = 0,017). Multivariate analysis confirmed age and FEV1 as risk factors in OS. Conversely, the risk factors for the overall population under 65 years were NH, which is confirmed in patients with OSAS alone (OR = 4,72 (95%CI 1,07-20,77), p = 0,04) in whom, on the other hand, PAP compliance reduced the mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that NH is a risk factor for all-cause mortality in sleep disorders by excluding the age; conversely, nighttime PAP improves the survival.

Clinical Evaluation and Management of Overlap Syndrome (OS) and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS).

Background and Aim: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is an extremely common disorder with a high impact on morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to compare overlap syndrome (OS) and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) and to highlight and understand the differences between them. Material and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively on 132 subjects selected by consecutive sampling from those attending our unit for suspected SDB. After clinical evaluation as well as functional and sleep investigations, the population was divided according to diagnosis in OS and OHS; then, the clinical parameters of two groups were compared with different statistical analysis. Results: The subjects with OHS were younger and reported higher rated daytime sleepiness (p = 0.005). In addition, they presented more nocturnal respiratory events (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 63.61 ± 22.79 events·h−1 vs. AHIOS 42.21 ± 22.91 events·h−1, p < 0.0001) at the sleep investigation as worse gas exchange during sleep leading to a higher percentage of nocturnal hypoxemia (p < 0.0001). In contrast, subjects with OS had more an impaired respiratory function. With regard to night-time ventilatory therapy, more subjects with OS were effectively treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (p = 0.011), while more OHS were treated with auto-adjusting PAP (APAP) (14% vs. 1%, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The present study tried to establish a framework for OS and OHS because proper management of the two disorders would reduce their burden on healthcare.