Intravenous medicine preparation technique training programme for nurses in clinical areas.

OBJECTIVE: The key objective of this study was to highlight the weak points in the medicine use process. METHOD: We collected 15 videos from eight neonatal intensive care units where staff nurses showed how medicine preparation was performed. Recorded medicines were: vancomycin (6), gentamicin (5), caffeine citrate (2) and phenobarbital (2). RESULTS: We did not review any video without errors. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the same syringe was used to measure the medicine and the diluent. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the syringes used were not the correct size for the volume being measured. In 4/15 (26.6%) videos, the volume measured into the syringes was not checked after it was measured from vials or ampoules. In just one vancomycin preparation could the reconstitution process be described as a correct process; in the other five videos, mixing after diluent addition to the vancomycin vial was almost non-existent (less than 10 s). Mixing after the medicine and diluent were in the same syringe was also non-existent in all of the videos. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals should provide training programmes outlining the correct preparation technique.

Medicine preparation errors in ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units.

This study assessed the rate of errors in intravenous medicine preparation at the bedside in neonatal intensive care units vs the preparation error rate in a hospital pharmacy service. We conducted a prospective observational study between June and September 2013. Ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units and one hospital pharmacy service participated in the study. Two types of preparation errors were considered: calculation errors and accuracy errors. A total of 522 samples were collected: 238 of vancomycin, 139 of gentamicin, 39 of phenobarbital and 88 of caffeine citrate preparations. Of these, 444 samples were collected by nurses in neonatal intensive care units, and 60 were provided by the hospital pharmacy service. Overall, 18 samples were excluded from the analysis. We detected calculation errors in 6/444 (1.35%) and accuracy errors in 243/444 (54.7%) samples from the neonatal intensive care units. In contrast, in samples from the hospital pharmacy service, no calculation errors were detected, but there were accuracy errors in 23/60 (38.3%) samples. CONCLUSION: While calculation errors can be eliminated using protocols based on standard drug concentrations, accuracy error rates depend on several variables that affect both neonatal intensive care units and hospital pharmacy services. WHAT IS KNOWN: Medication use is associated with a risk of errors and adverse events. Medication errors are more frequent and have more severe consequences in paediatric patients. Lack of knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in relation to physiological immaturity makes neonates more vulnerable to medication errors. WHAT IS NEW: Calculation errors are avoided using concentration standard preparation protocols. Accuracy in the preparation process depends mainly on the degree to which commercial drug preparations meet current legal requirements and the syringes and preparation techniques used.

Strategies implementation to reduce medicine preparation error rate in neonatal intensive care units.

UNLABELLED: This study assessed the rate of errors in intravenous medicine preparation at bedside in neonatal intensive care units versus preparation error rate in a hospital pharmacy service before and after several strategies were implemented. We performed a prospective observational study during 2013-2015. Ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units and one hospital pharmacy service participated in the study. Two types of preparation errors were considered, calculation errors and accuracy errors. The study was carried out over three consecutive phases: (1) pre-intervention phase, when medicine preparation samples were collected from neonatal intensive care units and hospital pharmacy service according to their normal clinical practice; (2) intervention phase, when protocol standardisation and educational strategy took place; and (3) post-intervention phase, when new medicine samples were collected after strategy implementation. In neonatal intensive care units, 1.35 % of samples registered calculation errors in pre-intervention phase; no calculation errors were registered in hospital pharmacy service samples. In post-intervention phase, no calculation errors were registered in either group. Accuracy error rate decreased both in neonatal intensive care units (54.7 vs 23 %) and hospital pharmacy service (38.3 vs 14.6 %). CONCLUSION: Calculation errors can disappear with good standardisation protocols. Decrease in accuracy error depends on good preparation technique and environmental factors. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Medication use is associated with a risk of errors and adverse events. Medication errors are more frequent and have more severe consequences in paediatric patients. • Lack of commercial drug formulations adapted to newborn infants makes medicine preparation process more prone to error. What is New: • Calculation errors are minimising using concentration standard protocols. Preparation rules are essential to ensure the accuracy process. • Environmental conditions affect the accuracy process.