Differences in clinical outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella aerogenes has been reclassified from Enterobacter to Klebsiella genus due to its phenotypic and genotypic similarities with Klebsiella pneumoniae. It is unclear if clinical outcomes are also more similar. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes of bloodstreams infections (BSI) caused by K. aerogenes, K. pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, through secondary data analysis, nested in PRO-BAC cohort study. METHODS: Hospitalized patients between October 2016 and March 2017 with monomicrobial BSI due to K. aerogenes, K. pneumoniae or E. cloacae were included. Primary outcome was a composite clinical outcome including all-cause mortality or recurrence until 30 days follow-up. Secondary outcomes were fever ≥ 72 h, persistent bacteraemia, and secondary device infection. Multilevel mixed-effect Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between microorganisms and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 29 K. aerogenes, 77 E. cloacae and 337 K. pneumoniae BSI episodes were included. Mortality or recurrence was less frequent in K. aerogenes (6.9%) than in E. cloacae (20.8%) or K. pneumoniae (19.0%), but statistical difference was not observed (rate ratio (RR) 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.55; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.71, respectively). Fever ≥ 72 h and device infection were more common in K. aerogenes group. In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for confounders (age, sex, BSI source, hospital ward, Charlson score and active antibiotic therapy), the estimates and direction of effect were similar to crude results. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that BSI caused by K. aerogenes may have a better prognosis than E. cloacae or K. pneumoniae BSI.

Mortality impact of further delays in active targeted antibiotic therapy in bacteraemic patients that did not receive initial active empiric treatment: results from the prospective, multicentre cohort PROBAC.

OBJECTIVES: The early initiation of the empirical antibiotic treatment and its impact on mortality in patients with bacteraemia has been extensively studied. However, information on the impact of precocity of the targeted antibiotic treatment is scarce. We aimed to study the impact of further delay in active antibiotic therapy on 30-day mortality among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) who had not received appropriate empirical therapy. DESIGN: We worked with PROBAC cohort (prospective and compound by patients from 26 different Spanish hospitals). We selected a total of 1703 patients, who survived to day 2 without having received any active antibiotic therapy against the causative pathogen. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 14% (238 patients). The adjusted odds of mortality increased for every day of delay, from 1.53 (95% CI 1.13-2.08) for day 3 or after to 11.38 (95% CI 7.95-16.38) for day 6 or after. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that among patients who had not received active treatment within the first two days of blood culture collection, additional delays in active targeted therapy were associated with increased mortality. These results emphasize the importance of active interventions in the management of patients with bloodstream infections.

Comparison of dalbavancin with standard of care in the management of infective endocarditis: efficacy, safety, and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Due to its long half-life, dalbavancin offers benefits for long-duration treatments, especially osteoarticular and infective endocarditis (IE). We evaluated the efficacy and costs of IE treatment, comparing dalbavancin with standard of care (SOC). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients with Gram-positive cocci definite IE. Dalbavancin was used as a sequential therapy before discharge. Efficacy was a combined variable of clinical cure and absence of recurrence in 12-month follow-up. Length of hospital stay and the associated costs were analyzed in both groups of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received dalbavancin and 47 SOC. The efficacy was similar between the groups (dalbavancin 18 [72%] vs SOC 44 [94%], P = 0.198). Hospital stay was shorter in the dalbavancin group (dalbavancin 22 days [16-34] vs SOC 37 days [23-49], P = 0.001), especially in those with E. faecalis IE (dalbavancin 30 days [20-36] vs SOC 65 days [46-74], P <0.001). A reduction of cost was observed between both groups (dalbavancin, 12,206 € [8998-17,283] vs SOC 16,249 € [11,496-22,367], P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin could be a safe and effective option in the sequential treatment of patients with IE. Also, a cost reduction was detected, due to a significant shortness of hospital stay.

A Confounder in the Study of a Patient With Infective Endocarditis.

Positron emission tomography (18FDG PET-CT) is a widely used method to help in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE). Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum (LHIS) is an uncommon fat deposition in the region of the interatrial septum. PET-CT images of LHIS may be indistinguishable from changes associated with IE.

Risk of cardiac device-related infection in patients with late-onset bloodstream infection. Analysis on a National Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of cardiac device-related infection (CDRI) among patients with cardiac device (CD) during late-onset bloodstream infection (BSI) and to identify the risk factors associated with CDRI. METHODS: Patients with a CD (cardiac implantable electronic devices -CIED- and/or prosthetic heart valve -PHV-) and late-onset-BSI (>1 year after the CD implantation/last manipulation) were selected from the PROBAC project, a prospective, observational cohort study including adult patients with bacteraemia consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals from October 2016 to March 2017. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed to identify the risk factors associated with CDRI. RESULTS: 317 BSI from patients carrying a CD were registered, 187 (56.2%) were late-onset-BSI. A total of 40 (21.4%) CDRI were identified during late-onset-BSI. The CDRI cumulative incidence in Gram-positive-BSI was 41.8% (38/91), with S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and viridans streptococci showing the greatest percentages: 40% (12/30), 42% (11/26) and 75% (6/8), respectively. Independent predictors of CDRI were an unknown source of infection (OR: 2.88 [CI 95%:1.18-7.06], p = 0.02), Gram-positive-aetiology (23.1 [5.23-102.1], p < 0.001) and persistent bacteraemia (4.81 [1.21-19], p = 0.03). In an exploratory analysis, S. aureus (3.99 [1.37-11.65], p = 0.011), Enterococcus spp. (5.21 [1.76-15.4], p = 0.003) and viridans streptococci (28.7 [4.71-173.5], p < 0.001) aetiology were also found to be risk factors for CDRI. CONCLUSIONS: CDRI during late-onset-BSI is a frequent phenomenon. Risk of CDRI differs among species, happening in almost half of the Gram-positive-BSI. An unknown source of the primary infection, Gram-positive-aetiology -especially S. aureus, Enterococcus spp. and viridans streptococci-, and persistent bacteraemia were identified as risk factors for CDRI.

Oral sequential therapy in the treatment of post-surgical epidural abscess and subdural empyema.

PURPOSE: The management of post-surgical subdural empyema and subdural abscess is not standardised. The objective was to analyse the efficacy and safety of oral sequential therapy (OST). METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital in Vigo (Spain). We included adult patients with subdural abscess or epidural empyema with microbiological isolation. Clinical and demographic variables, isolated microorganisms and treatment regimens were included, as well as mortality and adverse effects during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Thirty patients were reviewed, two died due to causes other than infection. Six-month recurrence rate was 2/28 and all other patients (26/28) had clinical cure at the end of the treatment. The commonest isolated microorganisms were Gram-positive, especially Staphylococcus aureus. The most widely used oral antibiotic was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (80%). No side effects related to oral treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: After adequate source control, OST can be a safe practice in the management of post-surgical epidural abscess and subdural empyema.

Impact of ceftazidime/avibactam versus best available therapy on mortality from infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CAVICOR study).

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are not well represented in pivotal trials with ceftazidime/avibactam. The best strategy for the treatment of these infections is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective observational study of patients who received ≥48 h of ceftazidime/avibactam or best available therapy (BAT) for documented CPE infections. The primary outcome was 30 day crude mortality. Secondary outcomes were 21 day clinical response and microbiological response. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of 30 day crude mortality. A propensity score to receive treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam was used as a covariate in the analysis. RESULTS: The cohort included 339 patients with CPE infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was used in 189 (55.8%) patients and 150 (44.2%) received BAT at a median of 2 days after diagnosis of infection. In multivariate analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was associated with survival (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.80; P = 0.01), whereas INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.18-1.5.58; P = 0.01) and SOFA score (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.34; P = 0.001) were associated with higher mortality. In patients with INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points, ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was associated with lower mortality compared with BAT (16/73, 21.9% versus 23/49, 46.9%; P = 0.004). Ceftazidime/avibactam was also an independent factor of 21 day clinical response (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.16-5.12; P = 0.02) and microbiological eradication (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.85; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam is an effective alternative for the treatment of CPE infections, especially in patients with INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points. A randomized controlled trial should confirm these findings.

Clinical characteristics, aetiology and mortality/recurrence risk factors of acute cholangitis in patients with and without biliary stent.

OBJECTIVES: Acute cholangitis is one of the most frequent complications in patients carrying biliary stents. The aim of our study is to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the microbiological profile and evolution of patients with acute bacteremic cholangitis, comparing them based upon they were or not biliary stent carriers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients over 18 years-old with a stent placement in our center between 2008 and 2017 were included. We compared them with our prospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of acute bacteremic cholangitis. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome was clinical cure at day 7, 14-day mortality and 90-day recurrence. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three patients were analyzed, including 156 in the stent-related (SR) and 117 in the stent not-related (SNR) group, respectively. Stent-related colangitis patients were younger, with more comorbidities and with a greater severity of infection. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia were the most frequent isolation. Enterococcus spp. was the third most frequent isolation in SR group but were uncommon in SNR patients; where E. coli was the most prevalent microorganism. Septic shock (HR 3.44, 95% [CI 1.18-8.77]), inadequate empirical treatment (HR 2.65, 95% CI [1.38-.7.98]) and advanced neoplasia (HR 2.41, 95% CI [1.55-6.44]) were independent 30-day mortality risk factors. The 90-day recurrence rate significantly higher in those patients with stent-related cholangitis (29% vs. 13%, p=0.016) and stent replacement was associated with lower recurrence rate (HR 0.38, 95% CI [0.11-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and microbiological profile, as well as outcome of patients with SR and SNR cholangitis were different. In SR group, recurrence rate was high and stent replacement was associated with a lower risk.

Clinical characteristics, aetiology and mortality/recurrence risk factors of acute cholangitis in patients with and without biliary stent / Características clínicas, etiología y factores de riesgo de mortalidad/recidiva de la colangitis bacteriana aguda en pacientes con y sin stent biliar

Objectives: Acute cholangitis is one of the most frequent complications in patients carrying biliary stents. The aim of our study is to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the microbiological profile and evolution of patients with acute bacteremic cholangitis, comparing them based upon they were or not biliary stent carriers. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients over 18 years-old with a stent placement in our center between 2008 and 2017 were included. We compared them with our prospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of acute bacteremic cholangitis. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome was clinical cure at day 7, 14-day mortality and 90-day recurrence. Results: Two hundred and seventy-three patients were analyzed, including 156 in the stent-related (SR) and 117 in the stent not-related (SNR) group, respectively. Stent-related colangitis patients were younger, with more comorbidities and with a greater severity of infection. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia were the most frequent isolation. Enterococcus spp. was the third most frequent isolation in SR group but were uncommon in SNR patients; where E. coli was the most prevalent microorganism. Septic shock (HR 3.44, 95% [CI 1.18–8.77]), inadequate empirical treatment (HR 2.65, 95% CI [1.38–.7.98]) and advanced neoplasia (HR 2.41, 95% CI [1.55–6.44]) were independent 30-day mortality risk factors. The 90-day recurrence rate significantly higher in those patients with stent-related cholangitis (29% vs. 13%, p=0.016) and stent replacement was associated with lower recurrence rate (HR 0.38, 95% CI [0.11–0.77]). Conclusions: Clinical and microbiological profile, as well as outcome of patients with SR and SNR cholangitis were different. In SR group, recurrence rate was high and stent replacement was associated with a lower risk.(AU)

Objetivos: La colangitis aguda es una de las complicaciones más frecuentes en los pacientes portadores de stents biliares. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es analizar las características demográficas y clínicas, así como el perfil microbiológico y la evolución de los pacientes con colangitis bacteriana aguda, comparándolos en función de si eran o no portadores de stents biliares. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes consecutivos mayores de 18 años con un stent colocado en nuestro centro entre 2008 y 2017. Los comparamos con nuestra cohorte prospectiva de pacientes con diagnóstico de colangitis bacteriana aguda. El criterio principal de valoración fue la mortalidad a los 30 días. Los criterios secundarios de valoración fueron la curación clínica el día 7, la mortalidad a los 14 días y la recidiva a los 90 días. Resultados: Se analizaron 273 pacientes, incluyendo 156 en el grupo relacionado con el stent (RS) y 117 en el grupo no relacionado con el stent (NRS). Los pacientes con colangitis RS eran más jóvenes, con más enfermedades concomitantes y con una mayor intensidad de la infección. Las cepas aisladas más frecuentes fueron Escherichia coli y Klebsiellapneumoniae. Enterococcus spp. fue la tercera cepa aislada más frecuente en el grupo RS, pero no fue frecuente en los pacientes NRS, en los que E. coli fue el microorganismo más prevalente. El choque septicémico (HR: 3,44; IC del 95%: 1,18-8,77), el tratamiento empírico inadecuado (HR: 2,65; IC del 95%: 1,38-7,98) y la neoplasia avanzada (HR: 2,41; IC del 95%: 1,55-6,44) fueron factores de riesgo de mortalidad a los 30 días independientes. La tasa de recidiva a los 90 días fue significativamente más elevada en aquellos pacientes con colangitis RS (29 frente al 13%; p=0,016) y el reemplazo del stent se asoció a una menor tasa de recidiva (HR: 0,38; IC del 95%: 0,11-0,77).(AU)

COVID-19 pneumonia in Galicia (Spain): Impact of prognostic factors and therapies on mortality and need for mechanical ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: This study was aimed to identify risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes (composite outcome variable: mortality and need for mechanical ventilation) in patients hospitalized in Galicia with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study carried out in the 8 Galician tertiary hospitals. All Patients admitted with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia from 1st of March to April 24th, 2020 were included. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify the relationship between risk factors, therapeutic interventions and the composite outcome variable. RESULTS: A total of 1292 patients (56.1% male) were included. Two hundred and twenty-five (17.4%) died and 327 (25.3%) reached the main outcome variable. Age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.04)], CRP quartiles 3 and 4 [OR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.39-3.63)] and [OR = 3.04 (95% CI: 1.88-4.92)], respectively, Charlson index [OR = 1.16 (95%CI: 1.06-1.26)], SaO2 upon admission [OR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95)], hydroxychloroquine prescription [OR = 0.22 (95%CI: 0.12-0.37)], systemic corticosteroids prescription [OR = 1.99 (95%CI: 1.45-2.75)], and tocilizumab prescription [OR = 3.39 (95%CI: 2.15-5.36)], significantly impacted the outcome. Sensitivity analysis using different alternative logistic regression models identified consistently the ratio admissions/hospital beds as a predictor of the outcome [OR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02-1.11)]. CONCLUSION: These findings may help to identify patients at hospital admission with a higher risk of death and may urge healthcare authorities to implement policies aimed at reducing deaths by increasing the availability of hospital beds.

The benefits and safety of oral sequential antibiotic therapy in non-complicated and complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Treatment optimization for serious infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), is a challenge for antimicrobial stewardship teams. Currently, SAB guidelines recommend a completely intravenous therapy (CIT). OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to analyze the usefulness and safety of oral sequential therapy (OST) in SAB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital in Spain. The inclusion criteria were complicated and non-complicated monomicrobial SAB and an adequate duration of therapy, with patients classified into OST or CIT. The primary endpoint was the 90-day recurrence of S. aureus infection. We also analyzed the mortality, the length of the hospital stay, and the duration of the intravenous antibiotic administration. RESULTS: Of a total of 201 patients with SAB, 125 (62%) underwent OST. The most commonly administered oral antibiotic was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (66% of patients). Of those administered OST, 43% had complicated bacteremia (most with an osteoarticular source of infection), and 6% had an intravascular device. The 90-day recurrence rate was 4%, with no differences between the two groups. The duration of the therapy (22 [16-28] vs. 13 days [8-17] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) and the hospital stay (36 [27-71] vs. 18 days [13-29] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) were shorter for OST. MRSA was related with mortality (OR 4.4, 95% CI [1.67-11.37]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: OST for properly selected patients with SAB could be a safe therapeutic option and can reduce their use of CIT and their hospital stay.

Clinical characteristics, aetiology and mortality/recurrence risk factors of acute cholangitis in patients with and without biliary stent.

OBJECTIVES: Acute cholangitis is one of the most frequent complications in patients carrying biliary stents. The aim of our study is to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the microbiological profile and evolution of patients with acute bacteremic cholangitis, comparing them based upon they were or not biliary stent carriers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients over 18 years-old with a stent placement in our center between 2008 and 2017 were included. We compared them with our prospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of acute bacteremic cholangitis. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome was clinical cure at day 7, 14-day mortality and 90-day recurrence. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three patients were analyzed, including 156 in the stent-related (SR) and 117 in the stent not-related (SNR) group, respectively. Stent-related colangitis patients were younger, with more comorbidities and with a greater severity of infection. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia were the most frequent isolation. Enterococcus spp. was the third most frequent isolation in SR group but were uncommon in SNR patients; where E. coli was the most prevalent microorganism. Septic shock (HR 3.44, 95% [CI 1.18-8.77]), inadequate empirical treatment (HR 2.65, 95% CI [1.38-.7.98]) and advanced neoplasia (HR 2.41, 95% CI [1.55-6.44]) were independent 30-day mortality risk factors. The 90-day recurrence rate significantly higher in those patients with stent-related cholangitis (29% vs. 13%, p=0.016) and stent replacement was associated with lower recurrence rate (HR 0.38, 95% CI [0.11-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and microbiological profile, as well as outcome of patients with SR and SNR cholangitis were different. In SR group, recurrence rate was high and stent replacement was associated with a lower risk.

Catheter-related bloodstream infections: predictive factors for Gram-negative bacteria aetiology and 30 day mortality in a multicentre prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospitalization and generate considerable medical costs. Recent guidelines for CRBSI recommend empirical therapy against Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and restrict coverage for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) only to specific circumstances. OBJECTIVES: To investigate predictors of GNB aetiology in CRBSI and to assess the predictors of outcome in patients with CRBSI. METHODS: Patients with CRBSI were selected from the PROBAC cohort, a prospective, observational, multicentre national cohort study including patients with bloodstream infections consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals in a 6 month period (October 2016-March 2017). Outcome variables were GNB aetiology and 30 day mortality. Adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-one episodes of CRBSI were included in the study. Risk factors independently related to GNB aetiology were central venous catheter (CVC) [OR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.05-2.44), P = 0.028], sepsis/septic shock [OR: 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.80), P = 0.016], antibiotic therapy in the previous 30 days [OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.02-2.36), P = 0.037], neutropenia <500/µL [OR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.04-3.87), P = 0.037] and peripheral vascular disease [OR: 2.04 (95% CI: 1.13-3.68), P = 0.018]. GNB were not associated with increased mortality in adjusted analysis, while removal of catheter [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09-0.61), P = 0.002] and adequate empirical treatment [OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.18-0.77), P = 0.008] were strong protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reinforces the recommendation that empirical coverage should cover GNB in patients presenting with sepsis/septic shock and in neutropenic patients. Catheter removal and adequate empirical treatment were both protective factors against mortality in patients with CRBSI.

Short- versus long-course therapy in gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections.

Bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli (GNB) is one of the most frequent causes of admission and prolongation of hospital stay. Nevertheless, optimal duration of antibiotic treatment is not clearly established. We designed an observational, prospective study of a cohort of adult patients with uncomplicated GNB bacteremia. They were classified according to the duration of treatment in short (7-10 days) or long (> 10 days) course. Mortality and bacteremia recurrence rate were evaluated, and propensity score for receiving short-course treatment was calculated. A total of 395 patients met eligibility criteria including 232 and 163 who received long- and short-course therapy, respectively. Median age was 71 years, 215 (54.4% male) and 51% had a urinary source. Thirty-day mortality was 12%. In multivariate analysis by logistic regression stratified according to propensity score quartile for receiving short-course therapy showed no association of duration of treatment with 30-day mortality or 90-day recurrence rate. Based on the results observed in our cohort, short-course therapy could be as safe and effective as longer courses.

Moving beyond unsolicited consultation: additional impact of a structured intervention on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

BACKGROUND: Some evidence-based bundles have tried to standardize the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) to improve the outcome. The aim of our study was to analyse the additional impact on mortality of a structured intervention in patients with SAB. METHODS: Compliance with the bundle was evaluated in an ambispective cohort of patients with SAB, which included a retrospective cohort [including patients treated before and after the implementation of a bacteraemia programme (no-BP and BP, respectively)] and a prospective cohort (i-BP), in which an additional specific intervention for bundle application was implemented. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the influence of the independent variables including compliance with the bundle on 14 and 30 day crude mortality. RESULTS: A total of 271 adult patients with SAB were included. Mortality was significantly different among the three groups (no-BP, BP and i-BP): mortality at 14 days was 18% versus 7% versus 2%, respectively, P = 0.002; and mortality at 30 days was 20% versus 12% versus 5%, respectively, P = 0.011. The factors associated with 14 and 30 day mortality in multivariable analysis were heart failure (OR = 7.63 and OR = 2.27, respectively), MRSA infection (OR = 4.02 and OR = 4.37, respectively) and persistent bacteraemia (OR = 11.01 and OR = 7.83, respectively); protective factors were catheter-related bacteraemia (OR = 0.16 and OR = 0.19, respectively) and >75% bundle compliance (OR = 0.15 and OR = 0.199, respectively). Time required to perform the intervention and the follow-up was 50 min (IQR 40-55 min) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: High-level compliance with a standardized bundle of intervention for management of SAB that requires little time was associated with lower mortality at 14 and 30 days.

Validation of a clinical decision tree to predict if a patient has a bacteraemia due to a ß-lactamase producing organism.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several scores and algorithms have been developed in order to guide empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteraemia according to the risk of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (BL) producing. Some of these algorithms do not have easy applicability or present some limitations in their validation. The aim of our study was to validate a recently designed decision tree in our prospective cohort of bacteraemia due to gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: We prospectively identified and analyzed all bacteraemia due to gram-negative bacilli in adult patients in our centre between January 2015 and December 2016. Previously developed clinical decision tree was used to classify patients in each of the terminal nodes. Patients were classified as BL group according to whether they were producers of any type of BL. The statistical power of the tree was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and by calculation of C-statistics. RESULTS: A total of 448 episodes of bacteraemia were included; 132 (29.5%) were BL group; 68 (15.1%) ESBL producing, 43 (9.6%) due to AmpC and 21 (4.7%) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The original clinical decision tree was modified according to the results of our multivariate analysis. The modified tree has a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 92%, predictive positive value (PPV) of 79% and predictive negative value (NPV) of 88% generating an ROC curve with a C-statistic of 0.76. CONCLUSIONS: An easy-to-apply clinical decision tree could be used at the exact moment of diagnosis and adjust the empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with gram-negative bacilli bacteraemia.

Effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam as salvage therapy for treatment of infections due to OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Background: Experience in real clinical practice with ceftazidime/avibactam is limited, and there are even fewer data on infections due to OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: We designed an observational study of a prospectively collected cohort of adult patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam in our centre. Only the first treatment course of each patient was analysed. Efficacy and safety were evaluated as 14 and 30 day mortality, recurrence rate at 90 days, resistance development and occurrence of adverse effects. Results: Fifty-seven patients were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. The median age was 64 years (range 26-86), 77% were male and the median Charlson index was 3. The most frequent sources of infection were intra-abdominal (28%), followed by respiratory (26%) and urinary (25%). Thirty-one (54%) patients had a severe infection (defined as presence of sepsis or septic shock). Most patients received ceftazidime/avibactam as monotherapy (81%) and the median duration of treatment was 13 days. Mortality at 14 days was 14%. In multivariate analysis, the only mortality risk factor was INCREMENT-CPE score >7 (HR 11.7, 95% CI 4.2-20.6). There was no association between mortality and monotherapy with ceftazidime/avibactam. The recurrence rate at 90 days was 10%. Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance was not detected in any case and only two patients developed adverse events related to treatment. Conclusions: Ceftazidime/avibactam shows promising results, even in monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with severe infections due to OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae and limited therapeutic options. The emergence of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was not observed.

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of unusual manifestations of invasive pneumococcal disease / Características clínicas y microbiológicas de las manifestaciones inusuales de la enfermedad invasiva neumocócica

INTRODUCTION: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) typically presents as bacterial pneumonia, meningitis or primary bacteraemia. However, Streptococcus pneumoniae can produce infection at any level of the body (endocarditis, arthritis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, etc.), which is also known as unusual IPD (uIPD). There are very limited data available about the clinical and microbiological profile of these uncommon manifestations of pneumococcal disease. Our aim was to analyse clinical forms, microbiological profile, epidemiology and prognosis of a cohort of patients with unusual invasive pneumococcal disease (uIPD). METHODS: We present a retrospective study of 389 patients (all adult and paediatric patients diagnosed during the period) diagnosed with IPD at our hospital (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo) between 1992 and 2014. We performed an analysis of clinical, microbiological and demographical characteristics of patients comparing the pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) period with the post-vaccination phase. IPD and uIPD were defined as follows; IPD: infection confirmed by the isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site, which classically presented as bacterial pneumonia, meningitis or primary bacteraemia; uIPD: any case of IPD excluding pneumonia, meningitis, otitis media, rhinosinusitis or primary bacteraemia. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (6%) met the criteria of uIPD. A Charlson index >2 was more prevalent in uIPD patients than IPD patients (45% vs 24%; p = 0.08). The most common clinical presentation of uIPD was osteoarticular infection (8 patients, 36%), followed by gastrointestinal disease (4 patients, 18%). Infection with serotypes included in PCV-13 was significantly higher in IPD patients (65%) than in patients with uIPD, 35% (p = 0.018). Conversely, infection with multidrug-resistant strains was higher among patient with uIPD (27% vs 9%; p = 0.014). The all-cause mortality rate was 15%, 13% in the IPD group and 32% among patients with uIPD (p = 0.07). According to the multivariate analysis, a Charlson Index >2 (OR 5.1, 95% CI, 1.8-14.0) and a Pitt Score >2 (OR 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: uIPD is a rare entity that affects patients with more comorbidities than typical IPD and it is usually caused by non-vaccine serotypes with greater antimicrobial resistancen

INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad neumocócica invasiva (ENI) se presenta típicamente como neumonía bacteriana, meningitis o bacteriemia primaria. Sin embargo, Streptococcus pneumoniae puede producir infección a cualquier nivel del organismo (endocarditis, artritis, peritonitis bacteriana espontánea...), también conocida como ENI inusual (ENIi). Hay pocos datos sobre el perfil clínico y microbiológico de estas manifestaciones poco frecuentes de enfermedad neumocócica. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar las formas clínicas, el perfil microbiológico, la epidemiología así como el pronóstico de una cohorte de pacientes con ENIi. MÉTODOS: Presentamos un estudio retrospectivo de 389 pacientes (todos los adultos y pacientes pediátricos diagnosticados durante el período) con ENI diagnosticados en nuestro hospital (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo) entre 1992 y 2014. Realizamos un análisis de las características clínicas, microbiológicas y demográficas de los pacientes que comparan el período de preintroducción de la vacuna neumocócica conjugada con la fase postimplantación. Las definiciones de ENI y ENIi fueron las siguientes: ENIes una infección confirmada con aislamiento de Streptococcus pneumoniae de un sitio normalmente estéril y con presentación típica como neumonía bacteriana, meningitis o bacteriemia primaria; ENIies cualquier caso de ENI, excluyendo neumonía, meningitis, otitis media, sinusitis de rinoceronte o bacteriemia primaria. RESULTADOS: Un total de 22 pacientes (6%) cumplieron los criterios de ENIi. Los pacientes con uIPD presentaron mayor proporción de índice de Charlson > 2 (45 vs. 24%; p = 0,08). La presentación clínica más frecuente de ENIi fue la infección osteoarticular (8 pacientes; 36%), seguida de enfermedad gastrointestinal (4 pacientes; 18%). La infección con serotipos incluidos en VNC-13 fue significativamente mayor en pacientes con ENI (65%) que en pacientes con ENIi (35%; p = 0,018). Por el contrario, la infección con cepas multirresistentes fue más frecuente entre los pacientes con ENIi (27 vs. 9%; p = 0,014). La tasa de mortalidad por todas las causas fue del 15% (13% en el grupo IPD y 32% entre los pacientes con uIPD; p = 0,07). Por análisis multivariante, el índice de Charlson > 2 (OR: 5,1; IC 95%: 1,8-14,0) y el Pitt score > 2 (OR: 1,4; IC 95%: 1,2-1,9) fueron predictores independientes de mortalidad. CONCLUSIÓN: La ENIi es una entidad rara que afecta a pacientes con más comorbilidades que la ENI típica y es generalmente causada por serotipos no vacunales con mayor nivel de resistencia a los antimicrobianos

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of unusual manifestations of invasive pneumococcal disease.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) typically presents as bacterial pneumonia, meningitis or primary bacteraemia. However, Streptococcus pneumoniae can produce infection at any level of the body (endocarditis, arthritis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, etc.), which is also known as unusual IPD (uIPD). There are very limited data available about the clinical and microbiological profile of these uncommon manifestations of pneumococcal disease. Our aim was to analyse clinical forms, microbiological profile, epidemiology and prognosis of a cohort of patients with unusual invasive pneumococcal disease (uIPD). METHODS: We present a retrospective study of 389 patients (all adult and paediatric patients diagnosed during the period) diagnosed with IPD at our hospital (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo) between 1992 and 2014. We performed an analysis of clinical, microbiological and demographical characteristics of patients comparing the pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) period with the post-vaccination phase. IPD and uIPD were defined as follows; IPD: infection confirmed by the isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site, which classically presented as bacterial pneumonia, meningitis or primary bacteraemia; uIPD: any case of IPD excluding pneumonia, meningitis, otitis media, rhinosinusitis or primary bacteraemia. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (6%) met the criteria of uIPD. A Charlson index >2 was more prevalent in uIPD patients than IPD patients (45% vs 24%; p=0.08). The most common clinical presentation of uIPD was osteoarticular infection (8 patients, 36%), followed by gastrointestinal disease (4 patients, 18%). Infection with serotypes included in PCV-13 was significantly higher in IPD patients (65%) than in patients with uIPD, 35% (p=0.018). Conversely, infection with multidrug-resistant strains was higher among patient with uIPD (27% vs 9%; p=0.014). The all-cause mortality rate was 15%, 13% in the IPD group and 32% among patients with uIPD (p=0.07). According to the multivariate analysis, a Charlson Index >2 (OR 5.1, 95% CI, 1.8-14.0) and a Pitt Score >2 (OR 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: uIPD is a rare entity that affects patients with more comorbidities than typical IPD and it is usually caused by non-vaccine serotypes with greater antimicrobial resistance.