Selective LC-MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations.

Two methods using LC-MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)-CTP] and the enantiomers (R)-CTP and (S)-CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The non-enantioselective method was conducted using a C18 column, and the mobile phase consisted of water for solvent A and acetonitrile for solvent B, both with 0.1% formic acid. For the chiral method, an analytical column Lux Cellulose-1 was used. Mobile phase A was composed of water with 0.025% of formic acid and 0.05% of diethylamine, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:2-propanol (95:5, v/v). No significant matrix effects were observed at the retention times of analytes and internal standard. The mean recovery was 89%, and the assays were linear in the concentration range of 1-50 and 5-30 ng/mL for the non-enantioselective and enantioselective methods, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precisions of both methods were less than 12.30%, and the accuracies were less than 12.13%. The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20-mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study. HIGHLIGHTS: Simple and rapid LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of citalopram and its enantiomers in human plasma. Both methods were demonstrated to be selective, reliable, and sensitive. Both methods have sufficient sensitivity to quantify the steady state through concentrations already reported for citalopram and escitalopram. Validated method presented in this study can be suitably applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving citalopram and escitalopram. Bland-Altman analysis suggested that non-enantioselective and enantioselective methods can be applied in pharmacokinetic studies.

Desenvolvimento e validação de metodologias analíticas para quantificação de um derivado tiofênico em sistemas microemulsionados / Development and validation of analytical methodologies for measurement of a tiophene derivative in microemulsion systems

O presente trabalho teve por objetivo validar métodos por espectrofotometria UV-Vis e por CLAE para a análise quantitativa de um derivado do tiofeno, o 2-[(3,4-dicloro-benzilideno)-amino]-5,6-diidro-4H-ciclopen-ta[b]tiofeno-3-carbonitrila (5CN05) e aplicá-los no doseamento da molécula contida em microemulsões, Os métodos propostos foram validados conforme a Resolução 899/2003 da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), O comprimento de onda de máxima absorção do fármaco 5CN05 foi detectado em λ max= 387nm, O método espectrofotométrico validado mostrou-se seletivo, apresentando linearidade na faixa de 3 a 16 µg.mL-1, coeficiente de correlação (r) igual a 0,9998 e limites de detecção e quantificação de 0,12 µg.mL-1 e 0,41 µg.mL-1, respectivamente, Para o método CLAE, observou-se linearidade na faixa de 0,1 a 3,0 µg.mL-1, r = 0,99915, limites de detecção e quantificação de 0,07 µg.mL-1 e 0,10 µg.mL-1 respectivamente, Para ambos os métodos, os parâmetros precisão, exatidão e robustez mostraram-se adequados para o uso pretendido, As metodologias propostas podem ser seguramente aplicadas para quantificação do 5CN05 em produtos farmacêuticos como microemulsões...

This study aims to validate methods of Uv-Vis) and HPLC for quantitative determination of a thiophene derivative, 2 - [(3,4-dichloro -benzylidene)-amino] -5,6-dihydro-4H-cyclopentyl-ta [b] thiophene-3- carbonitrile referred in this study as 5CN05, and apply them to quantify the 5CN05 in microemulsions. The proposed methods were validated according to the Resolution RE 899/2003 of the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). The 5CN05 was detected by UV-Vis at λ max= 387nm. The validated UVVis UVVis method proved to be selective, showing linearity in the range of 3-16 µg.mL-1, correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9998 and limits of detection and quantification of 0.12 µg.mL-1 and 0.41 µg.mL-1 respectively. For the CLAE method the linearity was observed in the range 0.1 to 3.0 µg.mL-1, r = 0.99915, limits of detection and quantification of 0.07 µg.mL-1 and 0.10 µg.mL-1 respectively. For both UV-Vis and CLAE methods, the precision parameters, accuracy and robustness were adequate for the intended use. The proposed methodologies can be safely applied to quantify the 5CN05 in pharmaceutical microemulsions products...

Relative bioavailability of two formulations of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules in healthy brazilian male volunteers: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in the fasting and fed states.

BACKGROUND: The oral antidepressant venlafaxine hydrochloride is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to comply with regulatory criteria for marketing of the test product in Brazil. METHODS: This single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy male volunteers and consisted of separate fast- ing and fed phases. A single oral dose of the test or reference formulation was followed by a 7-day washout period, after which subjects received the alternative formulation. There was a 3-month interval between the fasting and fed portions of the study. There was no standardization of race because of the difficulty of achieving standardization in the Brazilian population. Blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after dosing. Venlafaxine concentrations were determined using an HPLC-MS/MS method. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (test:reference) for C(max) and AUC(0-t) were within the regulatory range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events were monitored through-out the study based on vital signs, laboratory tests, interviews, and spontaneous patient reports. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were enrolled in both phases of the study; all 48 subjects completed the fasting phase, and 1 subject withdrew during the fed phase. The mean (SD) age of participants in the fasting and fed phases was 24.96 (5.5) and 24.90 (4.7) years, respectively; their mean weight was 69.65 (9.6) and 71.00 (10.6) kg and their mean height was 172.0 (6.9) and 173.0 (6.6) cm. Under fasting conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C(max) was 35.705 (23.946) ng/mL for the test formulation and 34.470 (20.639) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.04. The arithmetic mean AUC(0-t) for the respective formulations was 562.015 (481.875) and 508.509 (439.456) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.11. The arithmetic mean T(max) was 6.188 (1.560) and 5.885 (1.648) hours. Under fed conditions, the arithmetic mean venlafaxine C(max) was 42.892 (24.348) ng/mL for the test formulation and 46.275 (23.011) ng/mL for the reference formulation, with a geometric mean ratio of 0.93. The arithmetic mean AUC(0-t) for the respective formulations was 737.218 (603.998) and 682.124 (524.713) ng · h/mL, with a geometric mean ratio of 1.08. The arithmetic mean T(max) was 6.787 (1.769) and 5.957 (1.661) hours. There were no significant increases in venlafaxine C(max), AUC(0-t), or T(max) for either formulation in the fed phase compared with the fasting phase. In both the fasting and fed portions of the study, the 90% CIs for the ratio (test:reference) of log-transformed C(max) (fasting: 93.24-105.93; fed: 84.67-97.85) and AUC(0-t) (fasting: 102.90-116.71; fed: 98.19-114.41) were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. The most common adverse events (≥ 5% of subjects) in the fasting phase were nausea (46%), diarrhea (29%), headache (29%), vomiting (15%), and colic (6%); the most common adverse events in the fed phase were nausea (15%), headache (13%), and dizziness (9%). CONCLUSION: In this single-dose study in healthy fasting and fed volunteers, the test formulation of venlafaxine extended-release 75-mg capsules met Brazilian regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

Determination of ampicillin in human plasma by solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) and its use in bioequivalence studies.

A simple, fast, sensitive and selective solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative analysis of ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4) in human plasma was developed using amoxicillin as internal standard, and sample extraction by solid-phase extraction (SPE). Extracts were separated by reversed-phase C18 with aqueous mobile phase (acetonitrile, 80:20, v/v) with 0.1% formic acid. The method was validated and successfully applied in a bioequivalence study of capsules 500 mg of ampicillin. Using a short running time of 2.5 min, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for obtained ampicillin was 0.1 microg/ml for a plasma sample of 250 microl and a recovery of 94.38% +/- 4.05. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf values for the test and reference products, which were within the 0.80-1.25 interval proposed by FDA and EMEA. It is concluded that the two formulations are bioequivalent in their rate and extent of absorption, and thus, may be used interchangeably.

Development and validation of a new method for the quantification of norfloxacin by HPLC-UV and its application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers

The development and validation of a simple and accurate method based on HPLC with ultraviolet detection for the quantification of norfloxacin (NFX) in human plasma and its application to a bioequivalence study between two norfloxacin formulations is described. NFX and the internal standard (cyprofloxacin) were extracted from plasma using liquid-liquid extraction. Chromatographic separation of norfloxacin, cyprofloxacin and plasma interferents was achieved with a C-18 column and a mobile phase consisting of 20 mM sodium hydrogen phosphate buffer pH 3.0 and acetonitrile (88:12, v/v) and quantitation was done at 280 nm. The method was linear from 25 to 3000 ng mL-1 (r² > 0.997578), and norfloxacin and cyprofloxacin had an average recovery from plasma of 93.9 percent and 91.2 percent respectively. The RSD of inter-day quality control samples at the lower limit of quantification was less than 15 percent. After a single oral dose (400 mg) of norfloxacin administered to healthy human volunteers using a randomized 2x2 crossover design, pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t, AUC0-00, Cmax, t1/2) were derived from the plasma concentration curves for both formulations. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the data showed that the two formulations were bioequivalent, while no adverse reactions to the drug were observed.

O desenvolvimento e validação de um método simples e preciso por CLAE-UV para quantificação de norfloxacino (NFX) em plasma humano e a sua aplicação a um estudo de bioequivalência entre duas formulações são descritos. NFX e o padrão interno (ciprofloxacino, PI) foram extraídos do plasma através de extração líquido-líquido. A separação cromatográfica do NFX, do PI e dos interferentes do plasma foi realizada com uma coluna C-18 e fase móvel composta de tampão fosfato de sódio 20 mM pH 3,0 e acetonitrila (88/12, v/v) e quantificado em 280 nm. A resposta do detector aos analitos mostrou-se linear entre 25 a 3000 ng mL-1 (r² > 0,997578) e a recuperação média de NFX e PI foi de 93,9 por cento e 91,2 por cento respectivamente. O desvio padrão relativo de amostras analisadas ao nível do limite inferior de quantificação foi menor que 15 por cento. Foi administrada uma dose de NFX (400 mg) por via oral a voluntários humanos em um estudo aberto, aleatório e cruzado 2x2 entre duas formulações. Os parâmetros farmacocinéticos (AUC0-t, AUC0-00, Cmáx, T1/2) foram observados a partir da curva de concentração versus tempo. A análise farmacocinética mostrou que as duas formulações são bioequivalentes entre si. Nenhum efeito adverso foi observado.