Inflammatory pain-induced signaling events following a conditional deletion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in spinal cord dorsal horn.

The N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in the spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH) is one of the mechanisms involved in central sensitization during chronic pain. Previously, this laboratory created a spatio-temporal knockout (KO) of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor I (NR1) subunit in the mouse SCDH. The NR1 KO completely blocks NR1 gene and subsequent NMDA receptor expression and function in SCDH neurons. In the NR1 KO mice, the mechanical and cold allodynia induced at 24 h after complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) was reduced. However, the protective effects of KO were transient and were not seen at 48 h after CFA. These observations suggest the presence of NMDA-independent pathways that contribute to CFA-induced pain. CFA induces the activation of several signaling cascades in the SCDH, including protein kinase C (PKC)gamma and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2). The phosphorylation of PKCgamma and ERK1/2 was inhibited in the SCDH of NR1 KO mice up to 48 h after CFA treatment, suggesting that these pathways are NMDA receptor-dependent. Interestingly, neuronal cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 expression and microglial p38 phosphorylation were induced in the SCDH of the NR1 KO at 48 h after CFA. Our findings provide evidence that inflammatory reactions are responsible for the recurrence of pain after NR1 KO in the SCDH.

Sex-related differences in antinociception and tolerance development following chronic intravenous infusion of morphine in the rat: modulatory role of testosterone via morphine clearance.

This study investigated possible sex-related differences in levels of antinociception and the rate of development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects following prolonged (48 h) intravenous (i.v.) morphine administration in the rat. Groups of adult intact male, castrated male, female, and testosterone-pretreated female Sprague-Dawley rats received prolonged (48 h) infusions of i.v. morphine (5 or 10 mg/day) plus intra-arterial (i.a.) saline or i.v. morphine (5 mg/day) plus i.a. chloramphenicol (300 mg/day). Antinociception was quantified using the hotplate test. Serum concentrations of morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) were assayed using high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, whereas the serum testosterone concentrations were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Consistent with our previous findings in intact male rats, prolonged coinfusion of chloramphenicol with morphine produced a marked increase in the extent and duration of morphine antinociception in all experimental groups. Additionally, female and castrated male rats developed tolerance more slowly than either intact male or testosterone-pretreated female rats, when coinfused with parenteral morphine plus chloramphenicol. However, mean levels of antinociception were not significantly correlated with either the mean serum morphine or M3G concentrations, but were significantly inversely correlated with the mean values of the M3G/morphine serum molar concentration ratio. Testosterone pretreatment of female rats for 1 week before chronic morphine infusion abolished antinociception and markedly reduced both the serum morphine and M3G concentrations. These latter findings imply that testosterone modulates antinociception evoked by prolonged morphine infusion in rats via a mechanism that appears to involve modulation of morphine metabolism.

Apparent insensitivity of the hotplate latency test for detection of antinociception following intraperitoneal, intravenous or intracerebroventricular M6G administration to rats.

Although morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) has been shown to be analgesically active, the relative involvement of spinal and supraspinal structures in mediating M6G's pain-relieving effects following central and systemic administration to rats is unclear. As the tail flick and hotplate latency tests are reported to quantify antinociception mediated primarily by spinal and supraspinal mechanisms respectively, these methods were used to determine the comparative "apparent" levels of antinociception (expressed as percentage maximum possible effect, % MPE) achieved after M6G or morphine administration. Following i.v. or i.p. M6G (1.9-5.4 micromol) dosing or i.p. morphine (10 micromol) dosing, high levels of antinociception (>50% MPE) were achieved using the tail flick test whereas base-line levels of antinociception were observed 30 sec later in the same rats using the hotplate test. By contrast, antinociception evoked by i.v. morphine (10 micromol) exceeded 50% MPE using both the hotplate and tail flick tests although the "apparent" potency was approximately 2.5 times greater using the tail flick test. After i.c.v. dosing, M6G (0.22-3.3 nmol) was significantly (P < .05) more potent when assessed using the tail flick compared with the hotplate test. Taken together, these data strongly indicate that following central and systemic administration, M6G's antinociceptive effects are mediated primarily by spinal structures whereas both spinal and supraspinal mechanisms contribute to systemic morphine's antinociceptive effects.