Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a very frequent complication of pregnancy, and anticipation of birth is often necessary. However, the best mode of giving birth remains to be established, although observational studies suggest better maternal and perinatal outcomes with vaginal birth. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of a policy of planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with severe pre-eclampsia on mortality and morbidity for mother and baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (6 September 2017) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include all randomised trials of planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia. Quasi-randomised and non-randomised studies are not eligible for inclusion in this review.The focus of this review is severe pre-eclampsia; studies of planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth in pregnant women with eclampsia are not eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. We excluded two studies. MAIN RESULTS: There are no included studies in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of robust evidence from randomised controlled trials that can inform practice regarding planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with severe pre-eclampsia. There is a need for high-quality randomised controlled trials to assess the short- and long-term effects of caesarean section and vaginal birth for these women and their babies.

Correlation between pre-pregnancy body mass index and maternal visceral adiposity with fetal biometry during the second trimester.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and maternal visceral adiposity with fetal biometry during the second trimester. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among pregnant women who received prenatal care at a center in Recife, Brazil, between October 3, 2011, and September 27, 2013. Pre-pregnancy BMI was determined at the first prenatal care visit. Maternal visceral adiposity and fetal biometry were measured at the same ultrasonography session. The associations between maternal and fetal variables were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R). The Student t test was used to test the null hypothesis of adjusted correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Overall, 740 women were included. No correlation was found between pre-pregnancy BMI and any of the fetal biometric variables assessed. By contrast, maternal visceral adiposity positively correlated with fetal abdominal circumference (R=0.529), estimated fetal weight (R=0.524), head circumference (R=0.521), femur length (R=0.521), and biparietal diameter (R=0.524; P<0.001 for all fetal variables). These findings remained statistically significant after controlling for pregnancy length. CONCLUSION: Maternal visceral adiposity, but not pre-pregnancy BMI, positively correlated with fetal biometry during the second trimester.

Anal cytology in women with cervical intraepithelial or invasive cancer: interobserver agreement / Citologia anal em mulheres com neoplasia intraepitelial ou invasiva cervical: concordância interobservadores

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Incidence rates of anal cancer have been rising worldwide in the last 20 years. Due to embryological, histological and immunohistochemical similarities between the anal canal and the cervix, routine screening with anal cytology for precursor lesions in high-risk groups has been adopted. Objective: To determine interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of anal neoplasia by anal cytology.Material and methods:A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 324 women with cervical intraepithelial or invasive cancers, for screening of anal cancer, from December 2008 to June 2009. Three hundred twenty-four cytological samples were analyzed by three cytopathologists. Cytological evaluation was based on the revised Bethesda terminology; samples were also classified into negative and positive for atypical cells. We calculated the kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess agreement among the three cytopathologists.Results:Interobserver agreement in the five categories of the Bethesda terminology was moderate (kappa for multiple raters: 0.6). Agreement among cytopathologists 1, 2 and 3 with a consensus diagnosis was strong (kappa: 0.71, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively).Conclusion:Interobserver agreement in anal cytology was moderate to strong, indicating that cervical cytomorphological criteria are reproducible also in anal samples.

RESUMOIntrodução:O número de casos de câncer de canal anal vem aumentando nos últimos 20 anos no mundo. Devido às similaridades embriológicas, histológicas e imuno-histoquímicas do canal anal com o colo uterino, adotou-se a citologia anal para rastreamento das lesões precursoras desse tipo de câncer em grupos de risco.Objetivo:Determinar a concordância interobservadores na citologia anal e a concordância entre os diagnósticos citológico e histopatológico no rastreamento das neoplasias anais.Material e métodos:Foi realizado um estudo observacional do tipo corte transversal para rastreamento de câncer anal em 324 mulheres com neoplasias intraepiteliais ou invasivas cervicais, no período de dezembro de 2008 a junho de 2009. Foram colhidas amostras citológicas anais, as quais foram analisadas por três citopatologistas; a seguir, elas foram classificadas de acordo com o consenso Bethesda 2001, sendo agrupadas em negativas e positivas para células atípicas. Biópsias e reação em cadeia de polimerase (PCR) para papilomavírus humano (HPV) foram realizadas para verificar a concordância interobservadores. Foi aplicado o coeficiente kappa múltiplo e simples, bem como o seu intervalo de confiança de 95%.Resultados:A concordância interobservadores, incluindo todas as categorias diagnósticas, foi moderada (coeficiente kappa múltiplo: 0,6). A concordância para identificar citologias anormais entre os citopatologistas 1, 2 e 3 com o diagnóstico de consenso foi forte (coeficiente de kappa simples: 0,71; 0,85 e 0,82; respectivamente).Conclusão:A concordância interobservadores na citologia anal foi de moderada a forte, indicando que os critérios citomorfológicos são reprodutíveis na interpretação de material anal.

High-resolution anoscopy in women with cervical neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) findings and compare them with histopathology results. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, observational study performed between December 2008 and December 2009, women receiving care at a center in Recife, Brazil, after a histopathologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer were screened for anal neoplasia by HRA. Patients with anal lesions were divided into groups A (metaplasia and/or human papillomavirus infection) and B (anal intraepithelial neoplasia [AIN]). Patients with squamous cell atypia in group A and all patients in group B underwent histopathologic analysis. Agreement between HRA and histopathology findings was estimated for group B. RESULTS: HRA was done in 324 women, 204 (63.0%) of whom had anal lesions. Overall, 169 cases (82.8%) were classified as group A and 35 (17.2%) as group B. Histopathologic data were obtained for 28 of the 35 group B cases. Histopathology was suggestive of AIN in 19 (67.9%), resulting in a κ coefficient of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.65; P<0.001). Relative to histopathology, HRA had sensitivity of 57.6% (95% CI 40.8%-72.7%), specificity of 86.1% (95% CI 75.7%-92.5%), positive likelihood ratio of 4.1 (95% CI 3.1-5.5), negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.5), and accuracy of 76.5% (95% CI 67.2%-83.8%). CONCLUSION: HRA findings can be systematized, reducing the subjectivity of interpretation.

Maternal outcomes according to mode of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between mode of delivery and maternal complications in patients with severe preeclampsia. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 500 pregnant women with severe preeclampsia. The mode of delivery, vaginal or caesarean section, was considered the exposure, while the postpartum maternal complications and severe maternal morbidity were the outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Labour was spontaneous in 22.0% and induced in 28.2%, while 49.8% had an elective caesarean section. Ninety-five (67.4%) of the patients in whom labour was induced delivered vaginally. Total Caesarean rate was 68.2%. The risk of severe maternal morbidity was significantly greater in patients submitted to Caesarean section (54.0% versus 32.7%) irrespective of the presence of labour. Factors that remained associated with severe maternal morbidity following multivariate analysis were a diagnosis of HELLP syndrome after delivery (OR = 3.73; 95% CI: 1.55-9.88) and having a caesarean (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.52-4.57). CONCLUSIONS: Caesareans are often performed in patients with severe preeclampsia and are associated with significant postpartum maternal morbidity. Induction of labour should be considered a feasible option in these patients.