Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 203: 110871, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) refines the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction in patients with Type-2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to identify the determinants for high CACS in CVD-free patients with T2D. METHODS: We studied 796 patients with T2D with CACS measured in three centers: two in continental France and a third in the Reunion Island. To predict a CACS ≥ 100, we derived a risk score in patients in continental France, and validated it in those in the Reunion Island. RESULTS: The distributions of CACS distributions were similar among patients in continental France and Reunion Island. The French-CAC100 score included 5 parameters (age, sex, diabetes duration, non-CV end-organ damage and presence of ≥ 2 other CVD risk factors), ranging from 0 to 22 points. Similar areas under the curves were found for the risk score in both settings (0.80 vs. 0.73, p = 0.10). A French-CAC100 score < 10 excluded the odds for CACS ≥ 100 and CACS ≥ 400 with negative predictive values of 90% and 97% respectively, avoiding 58% of CT-scans. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the geographic area, patients with T2D share similar risk factors for high CACS. The French-CAC100 score allows the identification of those at higher risk of elevated CACS.

2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 116(6-7): 357-363, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37150644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, increased risk of amputation under sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors has been debated. Similar concerns have been raised with other "traditional" diuretics, more particularly in patients with or at risk of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). AIM: To collect all available data on any potential risk of amputation associated with diuretics in patients with or at risk of LEAD. Additionally, we looked for other limb-related events in these patients. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases up to February 2021 for references, using peripheral or lower extremity arterial disease, diuretics and amputation keywords, excluding case reports, experimental animal studies and non-English reports. RESULTS: Among the 1376 hits identified in the databases, six studies were finally included in this review, including one cross-sectional and five longitudinal studies (total of 47,612 participants). One study was limited to thiazide diuretics, one focused on loop diuretics and the remainder mixed all diuretics. All studies reported a significant association between diuretic use and amputation risk in patients with or at high risk of LEAD. Despite some limitations in several studies, the meta-analysis showed an increased risk of amputation associated with diuretics (odds ratio: 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.53-1.99; P<0.001). Beyond amputation, patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics appeared to be at increased risk of other lower limb events, mostly in the presence of other comorbidities, including diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the amount of data in the literature is scarce, this first systematic review and meta-analysis favours an increased risk of amputation in patients with or at risk of LEAD under diuretics. Further prospective studies must be conducted to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms. Meanwhile, the use of diuretics in these patients should be parsimonious, considering alternatives whenever possible.


Assuntos
Diuréticos , Doença Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Extremidade Inferior , Amputação Cirúrgica , Fatores de Risco
4.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 16(1): 196-201, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996689

RESUMO

AIMS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined by a low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is a predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to compare four GFR equations in predicting future cardiovascular events in T2D and the presence of subclinical vascular disease. METHODS: Four equations were used to estimate GFR in asymptomatic T2D patients consulting our centre for cardiovascular assessment. Follow-up was performed to collect cardiovascular events. Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) was used to build and compare prediction models, and the incremental value of the addition of GFR with any of the 4 formulas was evaluated. The ability to triage patients with and without CVD events according to GFR were assessed by comparing the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves with the 4 models. RESULTS: Among 829 asymptomatic T2D patients, the CKD prevalence was 20.2% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), 17.3% for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), 20.7% for Lund-Malmö Revised (LMR) and 21.4% for Full Age Spectrum (FAS). All the estimated GFRs were well correlated from one formula to another, with stronger agreement to define CKD (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) between MDRD and CKD-EPI, and between LMR and FAS. The 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events was 8% (n = 63). After adjustment on covariables, CKD was significantly associated with cardiovascular events when defined by MDRD (HR = 2.04; 1.15-3.60) and CKD-EPI (HR = 1.90; 1.05-3.41) but missed statistical significance when using LMR (HR = 1.74; 0.97-3.14) or FAS (HR = 1.71; 0.94-3.14). Only the prediction models including MDRD and CKD-EPI provided a significant incremental information to the predictive model without GFR, but the area under the ROC curves were similar with the 4 models: 0.60 [0.54-0.68] for MDRD, 0.61 [0.49-0.65] for CKD-EPI and 0.62 [0.55-0.69] for LMR and FAS, without any significant difference among formulas. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic T2D patients, MDRD and CKD-EPI may be preferable when more specificity is desired (stronger association between GFR and CVD events), while LMR and FAS appear more sensitive by including a higher number of patients with GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Doenças Vasculares , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Creatinina , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...