Does hospitalisation of a patient in the intensive care unit cause anxiety and does restriction of visiting cause depression for the relatives of these patients during COVID-19 pandemic?

OBJECTIVES: During the pandemic, anxiety and depression may occur increasingly in the whole society. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible cause, incidence and levels of anxiety and depression in the relatives of the patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) in accordance with the patients' SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was prospectively conducted on relatives of patients admitted to tertiary intensive care units during COVID-19 pandemic. Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients and their relatives were recorded. "The Turkish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" was applied twice to the relatives of 120 patients to determine the symptoms of anxiety and depression in accordance with the PCR results of the patients (PCR positive n = 60, PCR negative n = 60). RESULTS: The ratios above cut-off values for anxiety and depression among relatives of the patients were 45.8% and 67.5% for the first questionnaire and 46.7% and 62.5% for the second questionnaire, respectively. The anxiety and depression in the relatives of PCR-positive patients was more frequent than the PCR negative (P < .001 for HADS-A and P = .034 for HADS-D). The prevalence of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in female relatives (P = .046 for HADS-A and P = .009 for HADS-A). There was no significant correlation between HADS and age of the patient or education of the participants. The fact that the patients were hospitalised in the ICU during the pandemic was an independent risk factor for anxiety (AUC = 0.746) while restricted visitation in the ICU was an independent risk factor for depression (AUC = 0.703). CONCLUSION: Positive PCR and female gender were associated with both anxiety and depression while hospitalisation in the ICU due to COVID-19 was an independent risk factor for anxiety and restricted visitation in the ICU is an independent risk factor for depression.

Effectiveness of Intraoperative Laser Acupuncture Combined with Antiemetic Drugs for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Introduction: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative laser acupuncture stimulation of Pericardium 6 (PC6) and Large Intestine 4 (LI4) acupoints combined with antiemetic drug prophylaxis on PONV. Methods: A total of 88 patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were assigned into 2 groups. Group I received bilateral laser acupuncture on PC6 and LI4 acupoints after induction of anesthesia and also received antiemetic drug (metoclopramide) prophylaxis. Patients in Group II received only antiemetic drug prophylaxis. Nausea and vomiting frequencies and need for rescue antiemetic drug (ondansetron) were recorded after extubation, at 30th minute at recovery room and at 6th hour at ward. Results: The incidence of nausea and rescue antiemetic drug need was higher at postoperative 6th hour in Group II. Vomiting was not different in groups at any time. Conclusion: Intraoperative laser acupuncture stimulation of PC6 and LI4 acupoints combined with antiemetic drug prophylaxis decreases nausea and rescue antiemetic drug need in late postoperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Red Cell Distribution Width in Diagnosis of Brain Death.

INTRODUCTION: Red blood cell distribution (RDW) is a hematologic index automatically calculated by blood cell counters. Research about RDW in traumatic brain injury showed positive correlation between high RDW values and mortality, which inspired us to investigate whether RDW could be used as a supportive diagnostic biomarker for diagnosis of brain death. Our hypothesis is that RDW may be useful as a biomarker that supports the diagnosis of brain death. METHODS: After approval of the ethics committee, 209 patients who had been diagnosed with brain death between January 2012 and July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The RDW values of patients on the days of admission, brain death, and cardiac arrest were recorded. Data were collected from hospital database and patient charts. RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed that the RDW values on the days of brain death and cardiac arrest were significantly higher than on the day of admission. In addition, the RDW values for the cardiac arrest day were significantly higher than on the day of brain death (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We can say that the increase in RDW, which is reported to be an indicator of mortality for many diseases, can be a supporting biomarker for brain death diagnosis when evaluated concomitantly with clinical diagnostic criteria.

Brain Deaths and Donors in an Education and Research Hospital.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define the causes of brain death (BD), criteria, and tests used for diagnosis, rates of family consent, and rates of organ donation in intensive care units (ICUs) of an education and research hospital. METHODS: The data of patients with BD diagnosis in 7 years in our hospital was collected from an electronic database and archives retrospectively consisting of the demographic data, the causes of BD, criteria, and the tests used for diagnosis, family consent, and organ donation rates. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with BD diagnosis were enrolled in the study. There was a decline in number of patients with BD diagnosis between 2012 (54.76%) and 2018 (17.64%) in the neurology and neurosurgery ICU, while it increased from 35.71% in 2012 to 70.6% in 2018 in the general ICU. The most common cause of hospitalization for BD was spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (43.8%). A total of 47.6% of brain-dead patients who did not qualify for organ donation were resuscitated unnecessarily after cardiac death. In 2012, diagnosis was always supported by ancillary tests, while in 2018, a total of 35.29% of the patients were diagnosed solely by clinical examination; 23.8% of patients' families had given consent for organ donation, and 19.53% of 210 patients became donors. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware that patients with poor neurologic outcome can be candidates of BD donation, and careful examination and rapid diagnosis is crucial. All segments of society and the health care professionals should be informed and updated about organ donation and BD regularly to raise the numbers of organ donation.

Can ephedrine pretreatment be effective in alleviating rocuronium injection pain?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of ephedrine pretreatment on the intensity of rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle and also to compare this effect with lidocaine and placebo. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 120 American Society of Anesthesiology risk score I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive either 70 µg/kg ephedrine (ephedrine group, n = 40) or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (lidocaine group, n = 40) or 5 ml NaCl 0.9% (placebo group, n = 40) as pretreatment. Thirty seconds after pretreatment drugs, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered by the timing principle and rocuronium injection pain scores were recorded. Twenty seconds after rocuronium administration, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and the patient's trachea was intubated. Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The overall frequency of having pain was 82.5, 52.5 and 22.5% in placebo, ephedrine and lidocaine groups, respectively. Although the frequency of mild and moderate pain scores was higher in the ephedrine group than in the lidocaine group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although not as effective as lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg, 70 µg/kg ephedrine pretreatment was able to alleviate rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle.