Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: YouTube is an increasingly common source of health information; however, the reliability and quality of the information are inadequately understood. Several studies have evaluated YouTube as a resource during pregnancy and found the available information to be of poor quality. Given the increasing attention to postpartum health and the importance of promoting safe opioid use after birth, YouTube may be a source of information for birthing individuals. However, little is known about the available information on YouTube regarding postpartum pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the quality of YouTube videos as an educational resource for postpartum cesarean pain management. METHODS: A systematic search of YouTube videos was conducted on June 25, 2021, using 36 postpartum cesarean pain management-related keywords, which were identified by clinical experts. The search replicated a default YouTube search via a public account. The first 60 results from each keyword search were reviewed, and unique videos were analyzed. An overall content score was developed based on prior literature and expert opinion to evaluate the video's relevance and comprehensiveness. The DISCERN instrument, a validated metric to assess consumer health information, was used to evaluate the reliability of video information. Videos with an overall content score of ≥5 and a DISCERN score of ≥39 were classified as high-quality health education resources. Descriptive analysis and intergroup comparisons by video source and quality were conducted. RESULTS: Of 73 unique videos, video sources included medical videos (n=36, 49%), followed by personal video blogs (vlogs; n=32, 44%), advertisements (n=3, 4%), and media (n=2, 3%). The average overall content score was 3.6 (SD 2.0) out of 9, and the average DISCERN score was 39.2 (SD 8.1) out of 75, indicating low comprehensiveness and fair information reliability, respectively. High-quality videos (n=22, 30%) most frequently addressed overall content regarding pain duration (22/22, 100%), pain types (20/22, 91%), return-to-activity instructions (19/22, 86%), and nonpharmacologic methods for pain control (19/22, 86%). There were differences in the overall content score (P=.02) by video source but not DISCERN score (P=.45). Personal vlogs had the highest overall content score at 4.0 (SD 2.1), followed by medical videos at 3.3 (SD 2.0). Longer video duration and a greater number of comments and likes were significantly correlated with the overall content score, whereas the number of video comments was inversely correlated with the DISCERN score. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals seeking information from YouTube regarding postpartum cesarean pain management are likely to encounter videos that lack adequate comprehensiveness and reliability. Clinicians should counsel patients to exercise caution when using YouTube as a health information resource.

Healthcare-based interventions to address food insecurity during pregnancy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This study was a systematic review aimed to assess published literature regarding healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy and their effects on patient-reported, pregnancy, or nutritional outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed in February 2022 (subsequently updated in August 2022) using Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using terms related to food insecurity interventions during pregnancy. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies examining healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy with patient-reported outcomes (eg, program satisfaction), adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, preterm birth), or nutritional outcomes (eg, dietary intake) were included. Studies using data before 1995, conducted outside the United States, or focused solely on dietary content or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program as the intervention of interest were excluded. METHODS: Of note, 3 authors screened the abstracts and full articles for inclusion. The final cohort included 5 studies. Moreover, 3 authors independently extracted data from each article and assessed the study quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations and the risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools. RESULTS: Overall, 5 studies describing the interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy were included. Study designs included prospective cohort (n=1) and retrospective cohort (n=4) studies. There was heterogeneity in the type of intervention, with 3 using food vouchers, 1 focusing on a group prenatal service with nutrition and food management education, and 1 using a food connection program. Most studies (4 [80%]) shared patient-reported outcomes (eg, food security levels and program utilization rates), with 2 studies examining pregnancy-related outcomes (ie, glucose level, blood pressure, and preterm birth) and 2 studies examining nutritional outcomes. The interventions were associated with improved levels of food insecurity, reduced odds of preterm birth, and improved blood pressure trends; the findings demonstrated a 56% to 81% program utilization rate. All studies exhibited moderate to low study quality, with fair to good internal validity. CONCLUSION: Although data on healthcare-based interventions targeted at food insecurity during pregnancy are limited, the few studies identified suggest that such interventions may affect pregnancy outcomes. A better understanding of the local scope and context of food insecurity and community-based organizations' efforts not captured by the literature in this area can help inform the development of interventions targeting food access during pregnancy.

Housing instability and adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the published literature on housing instability during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal healthcare utilization. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search in November 2020 using Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using terms related to housing instability during pregnancy, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and perinatal healthcare utilization. The search was limited to the United States. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies examining housing instability (including homelessness) during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes (including preterm birth, low birthweight neonates, and maternal morbidity) and perinatal healthcare utilization were included. METHODS: Two authors screened abstracts and full-length articles for inclusion. The final cohort consisted of 14 studies. Two authors independently extracted data from each article and assessed the study quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools. RESULTS: All included studies were observational, including retrospective cohort (n=10, 71.4%), cross-sectional observational (n=3, 21.4%), or prospective cohort studies (n=1, 7.1%). There was significant heterogeneity in the definitions of housing instability and homelessness. Most of the studies only examined homelessness (n=9, 64.3%) and not lesser degrees of housing instability. Housing instability and homelessness during pregnancy were significantly associated with preterm birth, low birthweight neonates, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and delivery complications. Among studies examining perinatal healthcare utilization, housing instability was associated with inadequate prenatal care and increased hospital utilization. All studies exhibited moderate, low, or very low study quality and fair or poor internal validity. CONCLUSION: Although data on housing instability during pregnancy are limited by the lack of a standardized definition, a consistent relationship between housing instability and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been suggested by this systematic review. The evaluation and development of a standardized definition and measurement of housing instability among pregnant individuals is warranted to address future interventions targeted to housing instability during pregnancy.