Inadequate laser coagulation is an important cause of treatment failure in Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine the cause of treatment failures in Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical charts of all infants with disease persistence after laser treatment at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, during a 10-year period (2009-2019) were reviewed. RetCam photography and angiography were used to document the retinal appearance before and after retreatment. RESULTS: Ten infants (18 eyes), of whom nine were referred from other hospitals, had persistence of Type 1 ROP in zone I or zone II despite previous laser treatment. Their mean gestational age was 24 weeks and their mean birth weight was 618 g. Seven eyes were diagnosed as stage 3 plus, eight eyes as stage 4A and three eyes as stage 4B. In eight infants (14 eyes), inadequate laser coagulation was suspected to be the cause for persistence of type 1 disease. Two infants (four eyes) were appreciated to have persistence of plus disease because of presence of zone I disease. For persistence of Type 1 ROP, five infants (seven eyes) were treated with vitrectomy, two infants (three eyes) with laser photocoagulation and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), two infants (four eyes) with anti-VEGF alone and finally two infants (four eyes) with laser photocoagulation alone. The anatomical outcome was good in 14 eyes and poor in four eyes (three infants). CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate laser coagulation is an important cause of treatment failure of ROP Type 1. Another cause is laser coagulation in zone I. To minimize remaining visual disability, some kind of centralization of the ROP treatment is suggested.

Time to consider a new treatment protocol for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity?

PURPOSE: To discuss treatment modalities for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). METHODS: The medical charts of all infants with AP-ROP at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, during a 2-year period (2009 and 2010) were reviewed. Eight infants (16 eyes) with a mean gestational age of 23.8 weeks and a mean birth weight of 592 g were treated with laser and/or intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (0.4 and 0.625 mg). RetCam photography was used to document the retinal appearance before and after treatment. RESULTS: All infants (16 eyes) had AP-ROP in zone I. Mean time at initial treatment was 34 weeks postmenstrual age. Two eyes (one infant) were only treated with laser, and six eyes (three infants) were treated with laser therapy or cryopexy and, because of lack of regression, with bevacizumab as salvage therapy. Eight eyes (four infants) were treated with a first-line bevacizumab injection and four of these eyes (two infants) with additional laser ablation for continued disease progression in zone II. Macular dragging occurred in one eye of one infant primarily treated with laser. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high complication rate of the extensive laser treatment for zone I ROP, it is worth considering anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment as an alternative therapy. Further knowledge concerning side effects and long-term ocular and systemic outcome is warranted before this drug becomes general clinical practice.

Intravitreal Bevacizumab, Plasminogen, and Pneumatic Retinopexy for Subfoveal Hemorrhage in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of intravitreal bevacizumab combined with intravitreal plasminogen and pneumatic retinopexy as treatment of subfoveal hemorrhages due to exudative age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Clinical interventional case series study. METHODS: Ten patients (10 eyes) with exudative age-related macular degeneration, presented with a subfoveal hemorrhage larger than 1 disc size and smaller than 5 disc sizes. They received an intravitreal injection of 50 µg of plasminogen and 0.3 mL of 100% sulfur hexafluoride gas combined with intravitreal 1.5 mg of bevacizumab, followed by 2 additional intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg of bevacizumab in an interval of 6 weeks. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity improved slightly, although not statistically significant (P = 0.24), from 1.56 ± 0.47 to 1.48 ± 0.60 logMAR at 1 month after the procedure and to 1.35 ± 0.54 logMAR at 3 months after baseline. Subfoveal hemorrhage recurred in none of the patients during the follow-up. In all patients, the subfoveal hemorrhage had at least partially been moved to the infrafoveal region. Pronounced degenerative subfoveal changes were the main reason for a lack of a marked increase in visual acuity after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: For some patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and a subfoveal hemorrhage larger than 1 disc size and smaller than 5 disc sizes, the combined intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, plasminogen, and gas followed by 2 additional intravitreal bevacizumab injections can lead to a stabilization or slight improvement in visual acuity, unless subfoveal degenerative changes are not too marked to prevent a gain in vision.

Combined intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone in exudative age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: We report on the combined application of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: The clinical interventional case-series study included 16 patients (16 eyes) with exudative AMD who had previously received 3.5±1.8 mono-injections of bevacizumab (1.5mg) without significant improvement in visual acuity (VA) or reduction in macular exudation. All patients underwent a combined intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.5mg) and triamcinolone acetonide (about 20mg). Main outcome measures were VA and macular thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography. All patients were re-examined at 2-3months after the intervention. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved significantly (p=0.03) from 0.80±0.40 logMAR prior to the combined injection to 0.65±0.42 logMAR at 3 months after the injection. An improvement of ≥1Snellen line was found in eight subjects, an increase of ≥2lines in five subjects, and an improvement of ≥3lines in two subjects. One patient lost 1line and one patient lost 3lines. Central retinal thickness decreased significantly from 272±62µm to 220±47µm (p=0.03). At the 6-month follow-up examination, central retinal thickness had increased again to 319±142µm, which was not significantly (p=0.30) different from baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The combined intravitreal application of bevacizumab and triamcinolone may temporarily be helpful in the treatment of exudative AMD if previous intravitreal bevacizumab mono-injections have failed to improve vision and reduce macular oedema.

Lens capsular bag irrigation for low-grade endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: In postoperative low-grade endophthalmitis, microorganisms of low pathogenicity exhibit prolonged survival times by sequestration into the capsular bag. Thus, removal or irrigation of the capsular bag as nidus of the microorganisms is an essential therapeutic step. Correspondingly, guidelines suggest pars plana vitrectomy, capsulectomy and/or intraocular lens removal. Here, we report on capsular bag irrigation alone as an alternative, minimally invasive therapeutic method for postoperative infectious low-grade endophthalmitis. METHODS: Nine patients consecutively presenting with whitish precipitates in the capsular bag, anterior chamber inflammation and mild vitritis 2 weeks to 6 months following uncomplicated cataract surgery were included. Using an irrigation/aspiration cannula, synechiae were opened, the intraocular lens was rotated within the intact capsular bag and irrigated with 30 ml Ringer's solution containing 0.16 mg/ml gentamicin and 0.04 mg/ml vancomycin in topical anaesthesia. RESULTS: In all patients, the inflammation subsided within 2 days to 2 weeks. Visual acuity improved in all patients, mostly to post cataract surgery levels. Visual acuity remained stable during follow-up ranging from 2 to 39 months. No further interventions were required. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that capsular bag irrigation as first and single surgical step can be a useful, minimally invasive procedure in the surgical armamentarium for the treatment of infectious low-grade endophthalmitis. It may avoid removal of the intraocular lens and reduce the surgical risks of more complex procedures.

Early intravitreal bevacizumab for non-ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of early intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of macular oedema caused by non-ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: The study included 25 patients (25 eyes) with macular oedema caused by non-ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion, who received three intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg bevacizumab with an interval of 6 weeks between the injections. Mean duration of central retinal vein occlusion prior to the first injection was 4.2 +/- 3.6 days. All patients were re-examined 1, 3 and 6 months after the first injection. The main outcome parameters were visual acuity and macular thickness, as measured by optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity improved significantly from 0.97 +/- 0.40 logMAR at baseline to 0.70 +/- 0.42 logMAR (P = 0.007) at 1 month, 0.69 +/- 0.46 (P = 0.006) 3 months and 0.69 +/- 0.52 (P = 0.015) 6 months after the first injection. Mean central retinal thickness decreased significantly from 530 +/- 152 microm at baseline to 347 +/- 127 microm (P < 0.001) at 1 month, 370 +/- 165 microm (P < 0.001) 3 months and 346 +/- 129 microm (P < 0.001) 6 months (P < 0.001) after the first injection. The increase in visual acuity correlated significantly (P < 0.01) with the decrease in macular thickness. Mean intraocular pressure was 14.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg at baseline and did not differ significantly from the measurement obtained at 1 month (P = 0.59), 3 months (P = 0.88) and 6 months after the first injection (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections given shortly after onset of non-ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion may result in a significant increase in vision and a corresponding decrease in macular oedema.

Intravitreal bevacizumab versus triamcinolone acetonide for exudative age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: To compare an intravitreal high-dose injection of triamcinolone acetonide with an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of progressive exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHOD: The comparative nonrandomized retrospective clinical interventional study included 305 patients with progressive AMD, divided into a bevacizumab group of 36 patients (1.5 mg bevacizumab) and a triamcinolone group of 269 patients (about 20 mg triamcinolone). All patients were consecutively included, in the first phase of the study for triamcinolone, and in the second phase of the study for bevacizumab. The mean follow-up was 8.5+/-6.8 months (2-35.7 months). RESULTS: In the bevacizumab group, best visual acuity increased significantly (p<0.001) by 3.2+/-3.4 Snellen lines, with 25 (69%) eyes and 21 (58%) eyes, improving by at least 2 and 3 Snellen lines, respectively. In the triamcinolone group, the visual acuity change was not statistically significant for any specific follow-up examination within the first 3 months. The maximal increase in visual acuity, the visual acuity change at 2 months after injection and the percentage of patients with an improvement by at least 2 and 3 Snellen lines were significantly (p<0.001) higher in the bevacizumab group than in the triamcinolone group. Intraocular pressure increased significantly (p<0.001) in the triamcinolone group and did not change significantly (p=0.47) in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSION: In exudative AMD, intravitreal bevacizumab (1.5 mg) compared with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (about 20 mg) results in a higher improvement of visual acuity and does not markedly influence intraocular pressure within 2 months after injection.

Early intravitreal bevacizumab for non-ischaemic branch retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of early intravitreal bevacizumab application in patients with macular oedema due to non-ischaemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). PROCEDURES: The study included 21 patients (21 eyes) with macular oedema due to non-ischaemic BRVO. Inclusion criteria were significant macular oedema as measured by optical coherence tomography, loss of visual acuity and leakage in fluorescence angiography. All patients received 3 intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg bevacizumab. The mean follow-up was 6.2 +/- 1.2 months (mean +/- standard deviation). The mean duration of the BRVO prior to treatment was 9.2 +/- 5.4 days. RESULTS: The visual acuity improved significantly from baseline 0.81 +/- 0.53 logMAR to 0.54 +/- 0.47 logMAR (p < 0.001) at 1 month, 0.55 +/- 0.46 (p = 0.001) at 3 months and to 0.55 +/- 0.49 (p = 0.002) at 6 months after the first injection. The mean central retinal thickness decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 492 +/- 113 microm at baseline to 294 +/- 117 microm at 1 month after the first injection to 325 +/- 127 microm at 3 months (p < 0.001) and to 316 +/- 117 microm at 6 months (p < 0.001) after the first injection. The increase in visual acuity correlated significantly (p < 0.01) with the decrease in macular thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Early intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may decrease macular oedema and improve visual acuity in eyes with non-ischaemic BRVO.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on visual acuity in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective case series study included 13 patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization who received three intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg of bevacizumab. RESULTS: At 1, 3, and 6 months after the first injection, mean visual acuity improved significantly from 0.63 +/- 0.41 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (LogMAR) to 0.39 +/- 0.22 (P< .001), 0.47 +/- 0.49 (P= .002), and 0.52 +/- 0.49 LogMAR (P = 0.009), respectively. The increase in visual acuity was correlated with a significant decrease in central retinal thickness (P = .003) as measured by optical coherence tomography. Mean intraocular pressure did not change significantly (P> .05) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injections of bevacizumab may be a therapeutic option for exudative myopic macular degeneration.

Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with cataract surgery for treatment of exudative macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report on the combination of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and cataract surgery in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: The interventional case series study included 11 patients (11 eyes) who received an intravitreal injection of 1.5 mg bevacizumab as treatment of exudative AMD (n = 10) or exudative myopic macular degeneration (n = 1), combined with a routine phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens implantation for treatment of cataract. RESULTS: Intraoperatively and during the follow-up of 150 +/- 77.5 days, there were no complications related to the intravitreal application of bevacizumab combined with cataract surgery, such as wound dehiscence and leakage, delayed wound healing, corneal edema, dislocation of the pseudophakos, rupture of the posterior lens capsule, or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that from a safety point of view, intravitreal injections of bevacizumab may be combined with routine cataract surgery.

Infectious and noninfectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal bevacizumab.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of infectious and noninfectious endophthalmitis after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. METHODS: This clinical interventional case-series study included 1218 intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg of bevacizumab consecutively performed for 684 eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Among the injections were 534 reinjections. Follow-up after each injection was at least 4 weeks. RESULTS: One (1) eye developed an infectious endophthalmitis 3 days after a second injection. In none of the other eyes, were signs of an infectious or noninfectious endophthalmitis observed with the cellular infiltration or amorphous opacification of the vitreous as marked by the Tyndall phenomenon in the anterior chamber, retinal infiltration, or pain. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of infectious endophthalmitis after an intravitreal injection of 1.5 mg bevacizumab may be approximately 1:1000, similar to injections of other drugs available thus far.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for filtering surgery.

BACKGROUND: It was the aim of this study to report on the intravitreal use of bevacizumab as antiproliferative agent in combination with filtering surgery. METHODS: The clinical interventional case series study included 2 patients (2 eyes) who underwent standard antiglaucomatous penetrating filtering surgery combined with an intravitreal application of 1.5 mg bevacizumab. The intraocular pressure was elevated due to an intravitreal triamcinolone injection as treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (patient No. 1) or due to neovascular glaucoma (patient No. 2) after an ischemic retinal branch vein occlusion. RESULTS: At 4 and 12 weeks after surgery, intraocular pressure was reduced in both patients to 10 and 14 mm Hg with functioning filtering blebs. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab may potentially be helpful as addition to antiglaucomatous filtering surgery, particularly in neovascular glaucoma.

Visual acuity change after intravitreal bevacizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration in relation to subfoveal membrane type.

PURPOSE: To examine an association between the subfoveal neovascular membrane type and visual acuity change after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We carried out a clinical, retrospective, interventional case-series study including 66 consecutive patients (67 eyes) with exudative AMD who received an intravitreal injection of 1.5 mg bevacizumab. Study subgroups included the occult type without or with minimally classic subfoveal neovascularization (n = 28 eyes, 42%), predominantly or purely classic subfoveal neovascularization (n = 22 eyes, 33%), and eyes with retinal pigment epithelium detachment (n = 17 eyes, 25%). Follow-up was >or= 2 months. RESULTS: The maximal visual acuity (VA) gain (mean +/- standard deviation - 0.07 +/- 0.30 logMAR, 0.5 +/- 2.9 Snellen lines; p = 0.87), and VA gain at 1 month (p = 0.10), 2 months (p = 0.77) and 3 months (p = 0.35) after the injection did not vary significantly between the three study subgroups. Correspondingly, a multivariate analysis did not reveal a statistically significant (p = 0.57) influence of subfoveal lesion type on gain in VA. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab does not differ markedly between various types of subfoveal neovascularization in AMD.