Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. METHODS: Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16+/-15% vs. 33+/-17% in the parent vessel, and 6+/-15% vs. 39+/-22% in the side branch; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter >2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.

Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis.

Previous studies have shown a high rate of repeat intervention after treating diffuse in-stent restenosis with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone. It is not clear whether debulking with atherectomy is more effective in this condition. Between January 1994 and February 1997, we treated 60 consecutive patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis of a native coronary artery using conventional PTCA (n=30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n=30). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after revascularization. The mean lesion lengths were 13.5+/-8.3 and 18.4+/-13.2 mm in the debulking and PTCA groups, respectively (p=0.09). Acute procedural success was 100% in both cohorts, with no major complications in either group. Treatment with atherectomy plus adjunctive PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure stenoses (18+/-10 vs 26+/-13%, p=0.01) than treatment with balloon angioplasty alone. At 1-year follow-up, repeat target vessel revascularization was required in 28% of patients in the debulking group compared with 46% in the PTCA group (p=0.18). Independent predictors of the need for repeat target vessel revascularization were longer lesion lengths, diabetes mellitus, and smaller postprocedure lumen diameter. Thus, the strategy of atherectomy and adjunctive PTCA for diffuse in-stent restenosis is safe, improves acute angiographic results compared with PTCA alone, and may decrease the need for target vessel revascularization.