Clinical outcomes of children receiving intensive cardiopulmonary support during hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the short-term and 1-year clinical outcomes of 129 children who received intensive cardiopulmonary support during hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Intensive cardiopulmonary support was defined as receiving at least one of the following interventions: continuous positive pressure ventilation, dopamine infusion greater than or equal to 10 mcg/kg/minute, or the use of any other vasoactive infusion. Duration of intensive cardiopulmonary support, survival to hospital discharge, and predictors of these outcome variables were compared with 387 hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients who did not receive intensive support during the same period. We also report the 1-year survival; presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease; and renal, cardiac, and pulmonary function for all patients. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The ICU and hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit of nine pediatric tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: Children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant who required intensive cardiopulmonary support. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Predictors of the need for intensive support included unrelated donor allogeneic transplant, glomerular filtration rate less than 85 mL/minute/1.73 m, and nonmalignant disease as the indication for transplant. The survival to discontinuation of intensive support for all patients was 62% and 58% for patients who received invasive mechanical ventilatory support. The duration of mechanical ventilation was not predictive of survival. Predictors of intensive support mortality included macroscopic bleeding, engraftment, and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction score greater than one in two domains. Survival to hospital discharge was 50% for the intensive support group and 99% for the nonintensive support group. Overall 1-year survival was 40% in the intensive support population and 65% in the nonintensive support group. There were no significant differences in the survival, rates of chronic graft-versus-host disease, creatinine, forced expiratory volume in 1-minute, cardiac shortening fraction, or performance status in intensive and nonintensive support patients who survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Intensive cardiopulmonary support plays an important and potentially life-saving role in the care of pediatric stem cell transplant patients. Survivors of intensive support do not have compromised 1-year survival or organ function compared with children who did not receive intensive support.

Assessment of parental presence during bedside pediatric intensive care unit rounds: effect on duration, teaching, and privacy.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of literature evaluating the effects of family member presence during bedside medical rounds in the pediatric intensive care unit. We hypothesized that, when compared with rounds without family members, parental presence during morning medical rounds would increase time spent on rounds, decrease medical team teaching/education, increase staff dissatisfaction, create more stress in family members, and violate patient privacy in our open unit. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded, observational study. SETTING: Academic pediatric intensive care unit with 12 beds. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 105 admissions were studied, 81 family members completed a survey, and 187 medical team staff surveys were completed. INTERVENTIONS: Investigators documented parental presence and time allocated for presentation, teaching, and answering questions. Surveys related to perception of goals, teaching, and privacy of rounds were distributed to participants. MEASUREMENTS: Time spent on rounds, time spent teaching on rounds, and medical staff and family perception of the effects of parental presence on rounds. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between time spent on rounds in the presence or absence of family members (p = NS). There is no significant difference between the time spent teaching by the attending physician in the presence or absence of family members (p = NS). Overall, parents reported that the medical team spent an appropriate amount of time discussing their child and were not upset by this discussion. Parents did not perceive that their own or their child's privacy was violated during rounds. The majority of medical team members reported that the presence of family on rounds was beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Parental presence on rounds does not seem to interfere with the educational and communication process. Parents report satisfaction with participation in rounds, and privacy violations do not seem to be a concern from their perspective.