[Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease]. / Qualita' della vita nei nefropatici.

Assessment of quality of life in patients with different degrees of chronic kidney disease is an important issue because of its impact on clinical decisions and financial resource management in the health-care system. The aim of this study was to assess whether a generic instrument like the SF-36 questionnaire is able to discriminate three different populations of patients with different degrees of renal disease (pre-ESRD, ESRD, TxR). Five hundred sixty-three patients from 12 Italian nephrology units completed the SF-36 scales by themselves. The results from these samples were compared with those from the general population. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression were used. The generic SF-36 questionnaire proved to be a powerful instrument to discriminate populations with different degrees of chronic renal failure. The quality of life of patients on dialysis is significantly worse than that of the normal population and other patients with less severe renal function impairment.

Online convective therapies: results from a hemofiltration trial.

With the introduction of the on-line preparation of dialysis fluids, the hemofiltration technique, which has never had a widespread diffusion in its old version with the infusion bags, has gained a new interest. We planned a prospective, randomized, 3-year-long study comparing survival and morbidity in ultrapure bicarbonate dialysis (BD) with on-line predilution hemofiltration (HF). Since comorbidity is one of the main factors limiting survival, the study was addressed to patients with a severe degree of comorbidity. The paper presents the preliminary results of the trial. Sixty-four patients were enrolled and randomized to either BD (N = 32) or HF (N = 32). Mean age and dialysis vintage were comparable. Twenty patients died during the study, 12 in BD and 8 in HF. The relative risk of death was 11% higher in patients treated with BD compared to those in the HF group (p < 0.005). The number of hospitalisation events per single patient was lower, even though not significantly, in HF compared to BD (1.94 + 1.26 in HF vs 2.48 + 1.98 in BD, p = NS). As concerns biochemistry, apart from beta-2-microglobulin, any other substantial difference was not found during the study, though the small solute concentration was generally a little more elevated in HF than in BD. Dialysis hypotension showed a trend to decrease in both the dialysis modalities up to near half of the trial, then, during the last year, it remained quite stable in HF, while, on the contrary, it increased in the BD group. By the end of the protocol, patients in HF showed a 2.5% incidence of acute dialysis hypotension, while patients in BD had 23%.

[Acute biocompatibility of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR)]. / Emodiafiltrazione con reinfusione endogena (HFR): profilo di biocompatibilità in acuto.

PURPOSE: In order to reduce the hemodialysis (HD)-induced pro-inflammatory activity we need to use a biocompatible dialysis membrane, avoid backfiltration and possibly use adsorbents. Hemodiafiltration reinfusion (HFR) is a new on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) technique combining these aspects. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility of the single dialysis session comparing standard HD and HFR. METHODS: Eighteen patients on chronic HD were enrolled in five Centers. Patients underwent one standard and two HFR study sessions; in each session we evaluated leukocyte activation at 0, 5, 15, 60 and 240 min; and interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) levels at 0, 60 and 240 min. RESULTS: Leukocyte activation was similar in HD and HFR, while the post-dialysis IL-6 increase was lower with HFR; CRP levels were stable during HFR, but increased after HD, and IL-1Ra did not demonstrate any difference. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that HFR still has a better biocompatibility in the single dialysis session.