Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms with well differentiated morphology and high proliferative activity: illustrated by a case series and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are subdivided in carcinoids and neuroendocrine carcinomas (small cell lung carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)), based on the presence of necrosis and mitotic index (MI). However, it is unclear if tumors with well differentiated morphology but high proliferation rate should be regarded as LCNEC or as high grade carcinoids. In previous case series, a longer overall survival then expected in LCNEC has been suggested. We describe 7 of those cases analyzed for pRb expression and overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cases with well differentiated morphology, but MI > 10/2mm2 and/or Ki-67 proliferation index >20% were selected based on pathology reports of consecutive NENs in our university medical center (Maastricht UMC+, 2007-2018) and confirmed by pathological review. Immunohistochemistry was performed to assess pRb expression. RESULTS: Seven stage IV cases were included in this study. Median overall survival was 8 months (95% confidence interval 5-11 months). Cases with well differentiated morphology and preserved pRb expression (4/7) had a median overall survival of 45 months. CONCLUSION: A subgroup of pulmonary NENs with well differentiated morphology but high proliferation rate likely exists. pRb staining might be helpful to predict prognosis, but clinical relevance remains to be studied.

Exploring imaging features of molecular subtypes of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

OBJECTIVES: Radiological characteristics and radiomics signatures can aid in differentiation between small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We investigated whether molecular subtypes of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), i.e. SCLC-like (with pRb loss) vs. NSCLC-like (with pRb expression), can be distinguished by imaging based on (1) imaging interpretation, (2) semantic features, and/or (3) a radiomics signature, designed to differentiate between SCLC and NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary oncologists and chest radiologists assessed chest CT-scans of 44 LCNEC patients for 'small cell-like' or 'non-small cell-like' appearance. The radiologists also scored semantic features of 50 LCNEC scans. Finally, a radiomics signature was trained on a dataset containing 48 SCLC and 76 NSCLC scans and validated on an external set of 58 SCLC and 40 NSCLC scans. This signature was applied on scans of 28 SCLC-like and 8 NSCLC-like LCNEC patients. RESULTS: Pulmonary oncologists and radiologists were unable to differentiate between molecular subtypes of LCNEC and no significant differences in semantic features were found. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of the radiomics signature in the validation set (SCLC vs. NSCLC) was 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.92) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.29-0.86) in the LCNEC dataset (SCLC-like vs. NSCLC-like). CONCLUSION: LCNEC appears to have radiological characteristics of both SCLC and NSCLC, irrespective of pRb loss, compatible with the SCLC-like subtype. Imaging interpretation, semantic features and our radiomics signature designed to differentiate between SCLC and NSCLC were unable to separate molecular LCNEC subtypes, which underscores that LCNEC is a unique disease.

DLL3 expression in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and association with molecular subtypes and neuroendocrine profile.

OBJECTIVES: For stage IV pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), the only therapeutic option is palliative chemotherapy. DLL3 is a new therapeutic target, which seems to be often expressed in SCLC and LCNEC. It has recently been reported that DLL3 mRNA expression is particularly upregulated in the LCNEC subgroup with STK11/KEAP1 and TP53 co-mutations, in contrast to lower expression levels in RB1 and TP53 co-mutated LCNEC. Our aim was to investigate DLL3 protein expression in stage IV LCNEC and correlate data with mutational profiles (i.e.STK11/KEAP1/RB1), immunostaining results (pRb, NE markers) and clinical characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis for DLL3 (SC16.65) and ASCL1 (SC72.201) was performed on 94 and 51 FFPE tissue sections, respectively, of pathologically reviewed stage IV LCNEC. DLL3 and ASCL1 were scored positive if ≥1% of the tumor cells showed cytoplasmic/membranous or dotlike (DLL3) or nuclear (ASCL1) immunostaining. Data were correlated with available sequencing (TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1), immunostaining (pRb, NE markers) and clinical data. RESULTS: DLL3 was expressed in 70/94 (74%) LCNEC, 56 (80%) of which showed cytoplasmic/membranous staining. Median H-score was 55 (interquartile range 0-160). DLL3 staining was not different in pRb immunohistochemistry negative and positive patients (DLL3+ in 53/70 (76%) vs. 14/21 (67%), p = 0.409) or RB1 mutated and wildtype patients (DLL3+ in 27/34 (79%) vs. 23/33 (70%), p = 0.361). Nevertheless, 6/6 (100%) STK11 mutated, 10/11 (91%) KEAP1 mutated and 9/9 (100%) TP53 wildtype tumors were DLL3+ . Furthermore, DLL3 expression was associated with expression of ASCL1 and at least 2 out of 3 neuroendocrine markers. CONCLUSION: The high percentage (74%) of DLL3 expression in stage IV LCNEC denotes the potential of DLL3 targeted therapy in this patient group.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a solitary brain metastasis and low Ki-67: a unique subtype.

INTRODUCTION: Stage IV large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung generally presents as disseminated and aggressive disease with a Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) 40-80%. LCNEC can be subdivided in two main subtypes: the first harboring TP53/RB1 mutations (small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC)-like), the second with mutations in TP53 and STK11/KEAP1 (non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)-like). Here we evaluated 11 LCNEC patients with only a solitary brain metastasis and evaluate phenotype, genotype and follow-up. METHODS: Eleven LCNEC patients with solitary brain metastases were analyzed. Clinical characteristics and survival data were retrieved from medical records. Pathological analysis included histomorphological analysis, immunohistochemistry (pRB and Ki-67 PI) and next-generation sequencing (TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1 and MEN1). RESULTS: All patients had N0 or N1 disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-18.5 months). Mean Ki-67 PI was 59% (range 15-100%). In 6/11 LCNEC Ki-67 PI was ≤40%. OS was longer for Ki-67 ≤40% compared to >40% (17 months (95% CI 11-23 months) vs 5 months (95% CI 0.7-9 months), P = 0.007). Two patients were still alive at follow-up after 86 and 103 months, both had Ki-67 ≤40%. 8/11 patients could be subclassified, and both SCLC-like (n = 6) and NSCLC-like (n = 2) subtypes were present. No MEN1 mutation was found. CONCLUSION: Stage IV LCNEC with a solitary brain metastasis and N0/N1 disease show in the majority of cases Ki-67 PI ≤40% and prolonged survival, distinguishing them from general LCNEC. This unique subgroup can be both of the SCLC-like and NSCLC-like subtype.

ALK immunohistochemistry positive, FISH negative NSCLC is infrequent, but associated with impaired survival following treatment with crizotinib.

OBJECTIVE: Metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is usually sensitive to a range of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ALK-positive NSCLC have been identified in pivotal phase III trials with fluorescence in situ hybridization (ALK FISH+). These tumors are also expressing the fusion product (ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)+). However, discrepant cases occur, including ALK IHC + FISH-. The aim of this study was to collect ALK IHC + cases and compare within this group response to crizotinib treatment of ALK FISH + cases with ALK FISH- cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this European prospective multicenter research study patients with Stage IV ALK IHC + NSCLC treated with crizotinib were enrolled. Tumor slides were validated centrally for ALK IHC and ALK FISH. RESULTS: Registration of 3523 ALK IHC tests revealed a prevalence of 2.7% (n = 94) ALK IHC + cases. Local ALK FISH analysis resulted in 48 concordant (ALK IHC+/FISH+) and 16 discordant (ALK IHC+/FISH-) cases. Central validation revealed 37 concordant and 7 discordant cases, 5 of which had follow-up. Validation was hampered by limited amount of tissue in biopsy samples. The PFS at 1 year for ALK concordant and discordant was 58% and 20%, respectively (HR = 2.4; 95% CI: 0.78-7.3; p = 0.11). Overall survival was significantly better for concordant cases than discordant cases after central validation (HR=4.5; 95% CI= 1.2-15.9; p=0.010. CONCLUSION: ALK IHC + FISH- NSCLC is infrequent and associated with a worse outcome on personalized treatment. A suitable predictive testing strategy may be to screen first with IHC and then confirm with FISH instead of considering ALK IHC equivalent to ALK FISH according to the current guidelines.

Prevalence and prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in molecular subtypes of metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare tumor with high mutational burden. Two subtypes of LCNEC are recognized, the co-mutated TP53 and RB1 group and the TP53 and STK11/KEAP1 group. We investigated PD-L1 and CD8 expression in a well characterized stage IV LCNEC cohort and compared expression in the two subtypes. METHODS: Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for PD-L1 and CD8 was performed on pathological reviewed pretreatment tumor samples for 148 stage IV LCNEC. Data about targeted next generation sequencing (TNGS) (TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1) and IHC for RB1 were available for most tumors. IHC staining for PD-L1 (DAKO 28-8) was performed and scored positive if tumors showed ≥1% membranous staining. CD8 was scored for intra-tumor T-cells and stromal cells. RESULTS: PD-L1 IHC expression data could be generated in 98/148 confirmed LCNEC samples along with RB1 IHC (n = 97) of which 77 passed quality control for TNGS. PD-L1 expression was positive in 16/98 cases (16%); 5 (5%) with ≥50%. PD-L1 expression was equal in RB1 mutated and RB1 wildtype tumors. None of STK11 mutated tumors (n = 7) expressed PD-L1. PD-L1 expression was correlated with superior overall survival (OS), hazard ratio 0.55 ((95% Confidence Interval 0.31-0.96), p = 0.038). Intra-tumor CD8 was associated with PD-L1 expression (p = 0.021) and stromal and intra-tumor CD8 were correlated with improved OS (p = 0.037 and p = 0.026 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 expression was positive in 16% of stage IV LCNEC tumors. This was independent of molecular subtype but associated with CD8 expression. In LCNEC patients with PD-L1 and/or CD8 expression superior OS was observed.

Methylation of L1RE1, RARB, and RASSF1 function as possible biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Differential diagnosis can be difficult, especially when only small samples are available. Epigenetic changes are frequently tissue-specific events in carcinogenesis and hence may serve as diagnostic biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 138 representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues (116 lung cancer cases and 22 benign controls) were used for targeted DNA methylation analysis via pyrosequencing of ten literature-derived methylation markers (APC, CDH1, CDKN2A, EFEMP1, FHIT, L1RE1, MGMT, PTEN, RARB, and RASSF1). Methylation levels were analyzed with the Classification and Regression Tree Algorithm (CART), Conditional Interference Trees (ctree) and ROC. Validation was performed with additional 27 lung cancer cases and 38 benign controls. TCGA data for 282 lung cancer cases was included in the analysis. RESULTS: CART and ctree analysis identified the combination of L1RE1 and RARB as well as L1RE1 and RASSF1 as independent methylation markers with high discriminative power between tumor and benign tissue (for each combination, 91% specificity and 100% sensitivity). L1RE1 methylation associated significantly with tumor type and grade (p<0.001) with highest methylation in the control group. The opposite was found for RARB (p<0.001). RASSF1 methylation increased with tumor type and grade (p<0.001) with strongest methylation in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). CONCLUSION: Hypomethylation of L1RE1 is frequent in tumors compared to benign controls and associates with higher grade, whereas increasing methylation of RARB is an independent marker for tumors and higher grade. RASSF1 hypermethylation was frequent in tumors and most prominent in NET making it an auxiliary marker for separation of NSCLC and NET. L1RE1 in combination with either RARB or RASSF1 could function as biomarkers for separating lung cancer and non-cancerous tissue and could be useful for samples of limited size such as biopsies.

Female urothelial cell carcinoma in a failed kidney graft of a male recipient.

We present a case of a male kidney transplant patient harbouring two kidney grafts of which one is functional. In the failed graft, he developed urothelial cell carcinoma with cells containing XX-chromosome, and female tumour cells were also found in the bladder. The patient underwent donor nephrectomy, was treated with epirubicin bladder instillations, and immunosuppression was tapered. Less than a year before re-transplantation a CT scan showed no abnormalities of the first graft. Transplantectomy before a second kidney transplantation is debated.

Dichotomous ALK-IHC Is a Better Predictor for ALK Inhibition Outcome than Traditional ALK-FISH in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose: ALK rearrangement detection using FISH is the standard test to identify patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) eligible for treatment with ALK inhibitors. Recently, ALK protein expression in resectable NSCLC showed predictive value. We evaluated tumor response rate and survival after crizotinib treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with ALK activation using both dichotomous immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and FISH.Experimental Design: Patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with crizotinib were selected. Tumor response was assessed. ALK rearrangements were detected by FISH (Vysis ALK-break-apart FISH-Probe KIT) and IHC [Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx assay]. Cohorts of patients with ALK-FISH-positive advanced NSCLC from four other hospitals were used for validation.Results: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC diagnosed by FISH and/or IHC on small biopsies or fine-needle aspirations (FNA) were treated with ALK inhibitors. All ALK-IHC-positive patients responded to crizotinib except three with primary resistance. No tumor response was observed in 13 ALK-FISH-positive but ALK-IHC-negative patients. This was confirmed in an external cohort of 16 patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ALK-IHC and ALK-FISH compared with treatment outcome showed that dichotomous ALK-IHC outperforms ALK-FISH [tumor response area under the curve: (AUC), 0.86 vs. 0.64, P = 0.03; progression-free survival (PFS): AUC 0.86 vs. 0.36, P = 0.005; overall survival (OS): AUC, 0.78 vs. 0.41, P = 0.01, respectively].Conclusions: Dichotomous ALK-IHC is superior to ALK-FISH on small biopsies and FNA to predict tumor response and survival to crizotinib for patients with advanced NSCLC. Our data strongly suggest adapting the guidelines and using dichotomous ALK-IHC as standard companion diagnostic test to select patients with NSCLC who benefit from ALK-targeting therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4251-8. ©2017 AACR.

Postzygotic mosaicism in basal cell naevus syndrome.

Basal cell naevus syndrome (BCNS) is an autosomal dominant disorder most commonly caused by a germline mutation in the Drosophila homologue of patched-1 gene (PTCH1). Here we describe a patient with clinical signs of BCNS, caused by postzygotic mosaicism of a PTCH1 mutation. We performed restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and Droplet Digital polymerase chain reaction to determine the degree of mosaicism in different tissues of this patient. Our case shows that a relatively low-grade mosaicism can lead to clinical signs reminiscent of those caused by a germline mutation. This finding has important implications for genetic counselling and therefore is pivotal to recognize for dermatologists, as well as for clinical geneticists and clinical laboratory geneticists.

Detection of HPV-associated oropharyngeal tumours in a 16-year cohort: more than meets the eye.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the prevalence of the human papilloma virus (HPV) in oropharyngeal tumours (OpSCC) is important because HPV-positive OpSCC are consistently associated with an improved overall survival. Recently, an algorithm has become available that reliably detects clinically relevant HPV in tumour tissue, however, no complete cohorts have been tested. The aim was to determine the prevalence of active high-risk HPV infection in a complete cohort of OpSCC collected over a 16-year period. METHODS: Using a triple algorithm of p16 immunohistochemistry, HPV-BRISH and HPV-PCR, we assessed the prevalence of active HPV infection in all OpSCC diagnosed in our hospital from 1997 to 2012 (n=193) and a random selection of 200 oral tumours (OSCC). RESULTS: Forty-seven OpSCC (24%) were HPVGP PCR-positive; 42 cases were HPV16+, 1 HPV18+, 3 HPV33+ and 1 HPV35+. Brightfield in situ hybridisation did not identify additional HPV-positive cases. Human papilloma virus-associated tumour proportion increased from 13% (1997-2004) to 30% (2005-2012). Human papilloma virus-positivity was an independent predictor for longer disease-specific survival (HR=0.22; 95%CI:0.10-0.47). Only one OSCC was HPV+. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the incidence of HPV-associated OpSCC is low but increasing rapidly. The strict detection algorithm, analysis of disease-specific survival and the complete cohort, including palliatively treated patients, may influence the reported prevalence and prognostic value of HPV in OpSCC.

EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients: more prone to development of bone and brain metastases?

OBJECTIVES: Both bone and brain are frequent sites of metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conflicting data exist whether EGFR mutant (+) patients are more prone to develop brain metastases or have a better outcome with brain metastases compared to EGFR/KRAS wildtype (WT) or KRAS+ patients. For bone metastases this has not been studied. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study all EGFR+ (exons 19 and 21) patients diagnosed at two pathology departments were selected (2004/2008 to 2012). For every EGFR+ patient a consecutive KRAS+ and WT patient with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) was identified. Patients with another malignancy within 2 years of mNSCLC diagnosis were excluded. Data regarding age, gender, performance score, histology, treatment, bone/brain metastases diagnosis, skeletal related events (SRE) and subsequent survival were collected. RESULTS: 189 patients were included: 62 EGFR+, 65 KRAS+, 62 WT. 32%, 35% and 40%, respectively, had brain metastases (p=0.645). Mean time to brain metastases was 20.8 [± 12.0], 10.8 [± 9.8], 16.4 [± 10.2] months (EGFR+-KRAS+, p = 0.020, EGFR+-WT, p = 0.321). Median post brain metastases survival was 12.1 [5.0-19.1], 7.6 [1.2-14.0], 10.7 [1.5-19.8] months (p = 0.674). 60%, 52% and 50% had metastatic bone disease (p=0.528). Mean time to development of metastatic bone disease was 13.4 [± 10.6], 23.3 [± 19.4], 16.4 [± 9.6] months (p = 0.201). Median post metastatic bone disease survival was 15.0 [10.6-20.3], 9.0 [5.2-12.9], 3.2 [0.0-6.9] months (p = 0.010). Time to 1st SRE was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of brain and bone metastases was not different between EGFR+, KRAS+ and WT patients. Post brain metastases survival, time from mNSCLC diagnosis to metastatic bone disease and 1st SRE did not differ either. Post metastatic bone disease survival was significantly longer in EGFR+ patients. Although prevention of SRE's is important for all patients, the latter finding calls for a separate study for SRE preventing agents in EGFR+ patients.

Chromosome instability predicts the progression of premalignant oral lesions.

OBJECTIVES: One of the main problems in reducing the incidence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the inability to appropriately deal with leukoplakia. Accurately identifying lesions which will progress to malignancy is currently not possible. The present study aims to establish the value of chromosome instability (CI) detection by DNA image cytometry and FISH analysis for prognosis and monitoring of oral leukoplakia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this purpose, we included from our archives 102 oral leukoplakia cases, which had been diagnosed between 1991 and 2008. Patient follow-up data were collected and the histopathological diagnosis was revised. CI assessment was carried out on paraffin-embedded tissue sections using both DNA image cytometry (ICM) and dual target FISH for chromosomes 1 and 7. RESULTS: 16 of 102 Patients developed carcinoma in situ or OSCC. Both detection methods were found to yield prognostic information independent of the histopathological diagnosis. CI was a strong individual marker of progression, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 7.2 and 6.8 for ICM and FISH respectively. Moreover, this approach seems suitable for monitoring lesions over time (especially ICM). Combining histopathology and CI enables subdivision of patients into three risk groups, with different probabilities of malignant progression. CONCLUSION: CI detection seems a reliable method for risk assessment of oral premalignancies and its application may contribute to a better risk-counselling and appropriate treatment regimen or watchfull-waiting approach of patients.

Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study regarding Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption.

We aimed to determine the role of HPV in the pathogenesis and outcome of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in lifelong nonsmoking and nondrinking patients. A case-case analysis was performed to compare the presence of HPV-DNA in tumor cells of 16 nonsmoking and nondrinking with 16 matched smoking and drinking patients (matching criteria: age at incidence, gender, tumor sublocation, tumor stage). HPV was detected using 2 PCR tests, FISH analysis, and p16(INK4A) immunostaining. Nonsmoking and nondrinking patients had more HPV-positive tumors than smoking and drinking patients (n = 12; 75% versus n = 2; 13%; P < 0.001). All HPV-positive tumors showed p16(INK4A) overexpression, and 1 HPV-negative tumor had p16(INK4A) overexpression, (P < 0.001). Overall survival and disease-specific survival were higher for HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative cases (P = 0.027, P = 0.039, resp.). In conclusion, HPV is strongly associated with OSCC of nonsmoking and nondrinking patients. Specific diagnostic and therapeutic actions should be considered for these patients to achieve a better prognosis.

Nuclear survivin expression is associated with HPV-independent carcinogenesis and is an indicator of poor prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer.

The relationship between expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin and the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains unclear. This also accounts for its role as a predictor of survival. Therefore, we conducted a multicentre retrospective study on 106 consecutive oropharyngeal cancer patients. Human papillomavirus sequences were detected by nested PCR protocols. Survivin and p16 expression as a surrogate marker for HPV status were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Sequences of high-risk HPV were detected in 29% of cases. Prominent cytoplasmatic expression of survivin was found in 58% of cases and nuclear expression of survivin was found in 19% of the survivin-positive tumours. Nuclear expression of survivin was significantly correlated with HPV-negative tumours (P=0.023) and with a poor disease-free survival rate with an estimated 3-year disease-free survival probability of 35% for tumours with nuclear expression of survivin vs 78% for tumours with non-nuclear expression of survivin (hazard ratio=8.264; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=2.510-27.210; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, p16 expression status as well as nuclear expression of survivin were strong independent and opposing prognostic indicators of disease-free survival (hazard ratio=0.068; 95% CI=0.005-0.892; P=0.041 and hazard ratio=15.975; 95% CI=2.377-107.360; P=0.004, respectively). Our data show that nuclear accumulation of survivin correlates with HPV-independent carcinogenesis and is an independent predictor of poor survival in patients with OSCC.

DNA copy number status is a powerful predictor of poor survival in endocrine pancreatic tumor patients.

The clinical behavior of endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs) is difficult to predict in the absence of metastases or invasion to adjacent organs. Several markers have been indicated as potential predictors of metastatic disease, such as tumor size > or =2 cm, Ki67 proliferative index > or =2%, cytokeratin (CK) 19 status, and recently in insulinomas, chromosomal instability (CIN). The goal of this study was to evaluate the value of these markers, and in particular of the CIN, to predict tumor recurrence or progression and tumor-specific death, using a series of 47 insulinomas and 24 non-insulinoma EPTs. From these EPT cases, a genomic profile has been generated and follow-up data have been obtained. The proliferative index has been determined in 68 tumors and a CK19 expression pattern in 50 tumors. Results are statistically analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank statistic. General CIN, as well as specific chromosomal alterations such as 3p and 6q loss and 12q gain, turned out to be the most powerful indicators for poor tumor-free survival (P< or =0.0004) and tumor-specific death (P< or =0.0113) in insulinomas. The CIN, chromosome 7q gain, and a proliferative index > or =2% were reliable in predicting a poor tumor-free survival in non-insulinoma EPTs (P< or =0.0181, whereas CK19 expression was the most optimal predictor of tumor-specific death in these tumors. In conclusion, DNA copy number status is the most sensitive and efficient marker of adverse clinical outcome in insulinomas and of potential interest in non-insulinoma EPTs. As a consequence, this marker should be considered as a prognosticator to improve clinical diagnosis, most practically as a simple multi-target test.

Molecular alterations during insulinoma tumorigenesis.

Insulinomas are the most common functioning endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs). They present with clinical symptoms as a consequence of hypoglycemia induced by inappropriate insulin secretion. The etiology of these tumors is poorly understood. Some tumors may harbor MEN1 gene mutations, the susceptibility gene of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I syndrome, but most cases show wildtype MEN1. Currently, no reliable clinical tests are available to differentiate benign from malignant tumors. Approximately 30% of the tumors are unresectable, and they often show different growth rates, which hampers treatment. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular processes underlying the development and progression of insulinomas is required to improve diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Here we summarize the progress that has been made in insulinoma research in the past decade. We describe the clinical detection, classification and treatment of these tumors, and review the multiplicity of molecular and genetic studies that investigated tumor development and progression using either primary tumors, transgenic mouse models or tumor-derived cell lines. The identification of many interactors of the MEN1 gene product menin, as well as recurrent chromosomal abnormalities that pinpoint candidate genes of interest will likely result in a better understanding of the molecular pathways involved in insulinoma tumorigenesis. In addition, these studies will pave the way for the identification of novel targets for therapeutical intervention and more reliable markers for clinical diagnosis and prognosis.

Molecular parameters associated with insulinoma progression: chromosomal instability versus p53 and CK19 status.

Insulinomas represent the predominant syndromic subtype of endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs). Their metastatic potential cannot be predicted reliably using histopathological criteria. In the past few years, several attempts have been made to identify prognostic markers, among them TP53 mutations and immunostaining of p53 and recently cytokeratin 19 (CK19). In a previous study using conventional comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) we have shown that chromosomal instability (CIN) is associated with metastatic disease in insulinomas. It was our aim to evaluate these potential parameters in a single study. For the determination of CIN, we applied CGH to microarrays because it allows a high-resolution detection of DNA copy number changes in comparison with conventional CGH as well as the analysis of chromosomal regions close to the centromeres and telomeres, and at 1pter-->p32, 16p, 19 and 22. These regions are usually excluded from conventional CGH analysis, because they may show DNA gains in negative control hybridizations. Array CGH analysis of 30 insulinomas (15 tumors of benign, eight tumors of uncertain and seven tumors of malignant behavior) revealed that >or=20 chromosomal alterations and >or=6 telomeric losses were the best predictors of malignant progression. A subset of 22 insulinomas was further investigated for TP53 exon 5-8 gene mutations, and p53 and CK19 expression. Only one malignant tumor was shown to harbor an arginine 273 serine mutation and immunopositivity for p53. CK19 immunopositivity was detected in three malignant tumors and one tumor with uncertain behavior. In conclusion, our results indicate that CIN as well as telomeric loss are very powerful indicators for malignant progression in sporadic insulinomas. Our data do not support a critical role for p53 and CK19 as molecular parameters for this purpose.

Novel candidate tumour suppressor gene loci on chromosomes 11q23-24 and 22q13 involved in human insulinoma tumourigenesis.

Insulinomas represent the predominant syndromic subtype of endocrine pancreatic tumours. Previous molecular studies have shown that gain of chromosome 9q rather than MEN1 gene mutation is an important early event in tumour development and that chromosomal instability is associated with metastatic disease. In order to identify new gene loci and to define further the critical genetic events in insulinoma tumourigenesis, 27 insulinomas were investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) on 3.7 k genomic BAC arrays (resolution < or =1 Mb). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to validate alterations in a subset of tumours. Array CGH most frequently detected loss of chromosomes 11q and 22q and gains of chromosome 9q. The chromosomal regions of interest (CRI) included 11q24.1 (56%), 22q13.1 (67%), 22q13.31 (56%), and 9q32 (63%). Evaluation of the simultaneous occurrence of these aberrations in the individual tumours revealed that gain of 9q32 and loss of 22q13.1 are early genetic events in insulinomas, occurring independently of the other alterations. In tumours with increased genomic complexity, these alterations were often detected simultaneously, occurring in the same tumour cells. Losses of 11q24.1 and 22q13.31 were also associated with these more advanced tumour cases. The CRIs identified most likely harbour crucial candidate genes important in insulinoma tumourigenesis.