Ventricular repolarization time, location of pacing stimulus and current pulse amplitude conspire to determine arrhythmogenicity in mice.

AIM: In this study, we investigate the impact of altered action potential durations (APD) on ventricular repolarization time and proarrhythmia in mice with and without genetic deletion of the K+ -channel-interacting protein 2 (KChIP2-/- and WT respectively). Moreover, we examine the interrelationship between the dispersion of repolarization time and current pulse amplitude in provoking ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: Intracardiac pacing in anesthetized mice determined refractory periods and proarrhythmia susceptibility. Regional activation time (AT), APD and repolarization time (=AT + APD) were measured in isolated hearts using floating microelectrodes. RESULTS: Proarrhythmia in WT and KChIP2-/- was not sensitive to changes in refractory periods. Action potentials were longer in KChIP2-/- hearts compared to WT hearts. Isolated WT hearts had large apico-basal dispersion of repolarization time, whereas hearts from KChIP2-/- mice had large left-to-right ventricular dispersion of repolarization time. Pacing from the right ventricle in KChIP2-/- mice in vivo revealed significant lower current pulse amplitudes needed to induce arrhythmias in these mice. CONCLUSION: Large heterogeneity of repolarization time is proarrhythmic when pacing is delivered from the location of earlier repolarization time. Ventricular repolarization time, location of the pacing stimulus and the amplitude of the stimulating current pulse are critical parameters underlying arrhythmia vulnerability.

Physiology and analysis of the electrocardiographic T wave in mice.

AIM: The murine electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable tool in cardiac research, although the definition of the T wave has been a matter of debate for several years potentially leading to incomparable data. By this study, we seek to make a clear definition of the murine T wave. Moreover, we investigate the consequences of performing QT interval correction in anaesthetized mice. METHODS: Electrocardiograms from conscious mice were recorded by implanted telemetry devices. Surface ECGs were recorded from anaesthetized mice before and during pharmacological interventions, ventricular ischaemia and heart failure. Right atrial pacing was performed to evaluate the relationship between heart rate and QT intervals. RESULTS: Electrocardiogram traces of conscious and anaesthetized mice (lead II) showed separable positive J waves and negative T waves. The end of the T wave was determined as the point where the T wave returned to the isoelectric line. Atrial pacing revealed that the duration of the QT interval is independent of heart rate in anaesthetized mice. The calcium channel blocker, verapamil, prolonged the PR interval; however, the polarities of the J and T waves were not changed. Local cardiac ischaemia and ß-adrenergic stimulation caused indistinguishable positive J and T waves. In contrast, chronic heart failure caused entirely negative J and T waves. In every case, the end of the T wave was clearly distinguishable on the ECG. CONCLUSION: The end of the T wave is readily available from conscious and anaesthetized mice. Heart rate correction of QT interval duration in the anaesthetized mouse is not recommended.

beta-Arrestin 1 and 2 stabilize the angiotensin II type I receptor in distinct high-affinity conformations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor belongs to family A of 7 transmembrane (7TM) receptors. The receptor has important roles in the cardiovascular system and is commonly used as a drug target in cardiovascular diseases. Interaction of 7TM receptors with G proteins or beta-arrestins often induces higher binding affinity for agonists. Here, we examined interactions between AT(1A) receptors and beta-arrestins to look for differences between the AT(1A) receptor interaction with beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Ligand-induced interaction between AT(1A) receptors and beta-arrestins was measured by Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer 2. AT(1A)-beta-arrestin1 and AT(1A)-beta-arrestin2 fusion proteins were cloned and tested for differences using immunocytochemistry, inositol phosphate hydrolysis and competition radioligand binding. KEY RESULTS: Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer 2 analysis showed that beta-arrestin1 and 2 were recruited to AT(1A) receptors with similar ligand potencies and efficacies. The AT(1A)-beta-arrestin fusion proteins showed attenuated G protein signalling and increased agonist binding affinity, while antagonist affinity was unchanged. Importantly, larger agonist affinity shifts were observed for AT(1A)-beta-arrestin2 than for AT(1A)-beta-arrestin1. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: beta-Arrestin1 and 2 are recruited to AT(1A) receptors with similar ligand pharmacology and stabilize AT(1A) receptors in distinct high-affinity conformations. However, beta-arrestin2 induces a receptor conformation with a higher agonist-binding affinity than beta-arrestin1. Thus, this study demonstrates that beta-arrestins interact with AT(1A) receptors in different ways and suggest that AT(1) receptor biased agonists with the ability to recruit either of the beta-arrestins selectively, would be possible to design.