Efficacy and safety of platelet additive solution-E stored platelet concentrates.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, platelet (PLT) additive solution-E (PAS-E) was introduced. The implementation of PAS-E was expected to diminish the number of allergic reactions in recipients following a PLT transfusion. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transfusions with PLTs stored in PAS-E. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After implementation of PAS-E, data were collected from 2 cohorts of patients with hematological disorders as well as oncology patients, receiving PLTs in PAS-E. A similar patient group in a recent RCT, receiving PLTs in plasma, was used as a historical control group for both cohorts. Endpoints were corrected count increments (CCIs), bleeding scores (only reported in cohort 1), and the incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS: In cohort 1, the mean 1-h CCI was 14.3 ± 6.9, and the 24-h CCI was 8.7 ± 5.6. In cohort 2, the 1-h CCI was 11.6 ± 7.8 and the 24-h CCI was 7.0 ± 6.1. In the control group, the 1-h CCI was 15.4 ± 5.5 and 24-h CCI 8.7 ± 4.8. Bleeding complications of WHO grade ≥2 occurred in 40% of patients in cohort 1 compared to 44% in plasma PCs. The incidence of adverse reactions was 1.2% in the two PAS-E cohorts, compared to 3.0% in plasma PCs. National hemovigilance data showed a significant reduction in allergic reactions with PAS-E PC transfusions as compared to plasma PCs with an odds ratio of 0.46 (CI 95% 0.37-0.58). CONCLUSION: The CCIs of PLTs in PAS-E were decreased compared to plasma PCs, but clinically acceptable. Allergic transfusion reactions were decreased in PAS-E PCs compared to plasma PCs.

Clinical and in vitro evaluation of red blood cells collected and stored in a non-DEHP plasticized bag system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Di-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (DEHP) is currently the main plasticizer used for whole blood collection systems. However, in Europe, after May 2025, DEHP may no longer be used above 0.1% (w/w) in medical devices. DEHP stabilizes red cell membranes, thereby suppressing haemolysis during storage. Here we compared in vitro quality parameters of red cell concentrates (RCCs) collected and stored in DEHP-, DINCH- or DINCH/BTHC-PVC hybrid blood bags with saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol (SAGM) or phosphate-adenine-glucose-guanosine-saline-mannitol (PAGGSM) storage solution. Last, we performed haemovigilance surveillance for RCC collected in DINCH-PVC and stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro quality parameters of RCC were determined during 42 days of storage. Haemovigilance surveillance was conducted to compare the frequency and type of transfusion reaction. RESULTS: Haemolysis levels were increased in SAGM/BTHC-PVC as compared to SAGM/DEHP-PVC (0.66% ± 0.18% vs. 0.36% ± 0.17%). PAGGSM storage solution was able to adequately suppress haemolysis to levels observed during storage in SAGM/DEHP-PVC, both in BTHC-PVC (0.38% ± 0.12%), and to a slightly lesser extent in DINCH-PVC (0.48% ± 0.17%). A total of 1650 PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC and 5662 SAGM/DEHP-PVC RCC were transfused yielding a transfusion reaction frequency of 0.24% (95% CI 0.0000-0.0048) and 0.44% (95% CI 0.0027-0.0061) respectively. CONCLUSION: The in vitro quality of RCC stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC and SAGM/DEHP-PVC is comparable. There is no indication that transfusion of erythrocytes stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC results in increased transfusion reaction frequency. These initial results provide a basis for further clinical evaluation to narrow down the confidence interval of transfusion reaction frequency.