Newborn Screening for Inherited Metabolic Disorders: Early Identification and Long-Term Care for Patients in the Plain Community, Wisconsin, 2011-2017.

The Plain community is the fastest-growing religious minority in Wisconsin. This community has a high incidence of genetic disorders, many of which are identifiable through newborn screening. We describe efforts by the Wisconsin Newborn Screening Program (WNSP) to improve health care in the Plain community by targeting early identification of, and intervention for, patients with inherited metabolic disorders. WNSP formed partnerships with families and health care providers to increase awareness of screening procedures and the intended benefits of screening, modify testing algorithms to enhance detection, and establish medical homes for patients with confirmed disorders. The estimated number of Plain newborns screened increased by 25.5% during the study period, from 547 in 2011 to 736 in 2017; 122 persons underwent carrier testing, and 143 newborns received second-tier testing. From 2014 to 2017, affected patients received 71 metabolic evaluations in their community medical home without travel to major health centers. This article demonstrates how a comprehensive public health program can help increase screening rates, enhance detection, and establish follow-up care in a hard-to-reach religious community. A key lesson learned was the importance of communication among all stakeholders to develop an effective public health program.

Cross-Sectional Survey on Newborn Screening in Wisconsin Amish and Mennonite Communities.

Old Order Amish and Mennonites, or Plain populations, are a growing minority in North America with unique health care delivery and access challenges coupled with higher frequencies of genetic disorders. The objective of this study was to determine newborn screening use and attitudes from western Wisconsin Plain communities. A cross-sectional survey, with an overall response rate of 25 %, provided data representing 2010 children. In households with children (n = 297), the rate of newborn screening was 74 % and all children were screened in 40 % of these households. Lack of access to testing was the most common reason for not screening all children and parental age was inversely associated with testing. The majority of respondents reported some or more knowledge of screening, viewed screening as important, and had access to screening in their communities. Households with children who had never received newborn screening (26 %) reported lower frequencies of favorable responses in all categories compared to households that had at least one child screened. The difference in access to newborn screening was less marked between the groups compared to differences on knowledge and consideration of its importance. Moreover, 55 % of households who had never screened any of their children reported being unlikely or unsure of screening any future children. A focus on improving access to newborn screening alongside establishing approaches to change parental perceptions on the importance of newborn screening is necessary for increasing newborn screening in these Plain communities.

Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in planned out-of-hospital births.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of pulse oximetry screening (POS) for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). STUDY DESIGN: This observational study of Wisconsin out-of-hospital births was performed from January to November, 2013. Licensed midwives, Amish birth attendants, and public health nurses were trained in the use of pulse oximetry to detect CCHD, supplied with pulse oximeters, and reported screening results and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Results of POS in 440 newborns were reviewed; 173/440 births were from Amish or Mennonite communities. Prenatal ultrasonography was performed in less than one-half of the pregnancies and in only 13% of Amish and Mennonite women. A total of 432 babies passed the screening, 5 babies were incorrectly assigned to have passed or failed, and 3 babies failed the screening. Two of the babies who failed the screening were treated for sepsis and the third had congenital heart disease. There was 1 false negative result (coarctation of the aorta and ventricular septal defect). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information on the use of POS for CCHD in out-of-hospital births and shows that POS can be successfully implemented outside the hospital setting. Although the failure rate in this small sample was higher than reported in studies of hospital births, those babies failing the screening had significant disease processes that were identified more rapidly because of the screening.