Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does septum resection improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus? SUMMARY ANSWER: Hysteroscopic septum resection does not improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A septate uterus is a congenital uterine anomaly. Women with a septate uterus are at increased risk of subfertility, pregnancy loss and preterm birth. Hysteroscopic resection of a septum may improve the chance of a live birth in affected women, but this has never been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We assessed whether septum resection improves reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus, wanting to become pregnant. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial in 10 centres in The Netherlands, UK, USA and Iran between October 2010 and September 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with a septate uterus and a history of subfertility, pregnancy loss or preterm birth were randomly allocated to septum resection or expectant management. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. We analysed the data on an intention-to-treat basis and calculated relative risks with 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We randomly assigned 80 women with a septate uterus to septum resection (n = 40) or expectant management (n = 40). We excluded one woman who underwent septum resection from the intention-to-treat analysis, because she withdrew informed consent for the study shortly after randomization. Live birth occurred in 12 of 39 women allocated to septum resection (31%) and in 14 of 40 women allocated to expectant management (35%) (relative risk (RR) 0.88 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.65)). There was one uterine perforation which occurred during surgery (1/39 = 2.6%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this was a major international trial, the sample size was still limited and recruitment took a long period. Since surgical techniques did not fundamentally change over time, we consider the latter of limited clinical significance. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The trial generated high-level evidence in addition to evidence from a recently published large cohort study. Both studies unequivocally do not reveal any improvements in reproductive outcomes, thereby questioning any rationale behind surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no study funding. M.H.E. reports a patent on a surgical endoscopic cutting device and process for the removal of tissue from a body cavity licensed to Medtronic, outside the scope of the submitted work. H.A.v.V. reports personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. B.W.J.M. reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck Merck KGaA, personal fees from Guerbet, personal fees from iGenomix, outside the submitted work. M.G. reports several research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck and Ferring (location VUMC) outside the scope of the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch trial registry: NTR 1676. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 18 February 2009. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 20 October 2010.

Septum resection in women with a septate uterus: a cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Does septum resection improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus? SUMMARY ANSWER: In women with a septate uterus, septum resection does not increase live birth rate nor does it decrease the rates of pregnancy loss or preterm birth, compared with expectant management. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The septate uterus is the most common uterine anomaly with an estimated prevalence of 0.2-2.3% in women of reproductive age, depending on the classification system. The definition of the septate uterus has been a long-lasting and ongoing subject of debate, and currently two classification systems are used worldwide. Women with a septate uterus may be at increased risk of subfertility, pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation. Based on low quality evidence, current guidelines recommend removal of the intrauterine septum or, more cautiously, state that the procedure should be evaluated in future studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed an international multicentre cohort study in which we identified women mainly retrospectively by searching in electronic patient files, medical records and databases within the time frame of January 2000 until August 2018. Searching of the databases, files and records took place between January 2016 and July 2018. By doing so, we collected data on 257 women with a septate uterus in 21 centres in the Netherlands, USA and UK. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We included women with a septate uterus, defined by the treating physician, according to the classification system at that time. The women were ascertained among those with a history of subfertility, pregnancy loss, preterm birth or foetal malpresentation or during a routine diagnostic procedure. Allocation to septum resection or expectant management was dependent on the reproductive history and severity of the disease. We excluded women who did not have a wish to conceive at time of diagnosis. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation. All conceptions during follow-up were registered but for the comparative analyses, only the first live birth or ongoing pregnancy was included. To evaluate differences in live birth and ongoing pregnancy, we used Cox proportional regression to calculate hazard rates (HRs) and 95% CI. To evaluate differences in pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation, we used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% CI. We adjusted all reproductive outcomes for possible confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 257 women were included in the cohort. Of these, 151 women underwent a septum resection and 106 women had expectant management. The median follow-up time was 46 months. During this time, live birth occurred in 80 women following a septum resection (53.0%) compared to 76 women following expectant management (71.7%) (HR 0.71 95% CI 0.49-1.02) and ongoing pregnancy occurred in 89 women who underwent septum resection (58.9%), compared to 80 women who had expectant management (75.5%) (HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.52-1.06)). Pregnancy loss occurred in 51 women who underwent septum resection (46.8%) versus 31 women who had expectant management (34.4%) (OR 1.58 (0.81-3.09)), while preterm birth occurred in 26 women who underwent septum resection (29.2%) versus 13 women who had expectant management (16.7%) (OR 1.26 (95% CI 0.52-3.04)) and foetal malpresentation occurred in 17 women who underwent septum resection (19.1%) versus 27 women who had expectant management (34.6%) (OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.24-1.33)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our retrospective study has a less robust design compared with a randomized controlled trial. Over the years, the ideas about the definition of the septate uterus has changed, but since the 257 women with a septate uterus included in this study had been diagnosed by their treating physician according to the leading classification system at that time, the data of this study reflect the daily practice of recent decades. Despite correcting for the most relevant patient characteristics, our estimates might not be free of residual confounding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results suggest that septum resection, a procedure that is widely offered and associated with financial costs for society, healthcare systems or individuals, does not lead to improved reproductive outcomes compared to expectant management for women with a septate uterus. The results of this study need to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): A travel for JFWR to Chicago was supported by the Jo Kolk Studyfund. Otherwise, no specific funding was received for this study. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre, Groningen, received an unrestricted educational grant from Ferring Pharmaceutical Company unrelated to the present study. BWM reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Guerbet, other payment from Guerbet and grants from Merck, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conficts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol.

BACKGROUND: A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to assess whether hysteroscopic septum resection improves reproductive outcome in women with a septate uterus. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing hysteroscopic septum resection and expectant management in women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and diagnosed with a septate uterus. The primary outcome is live birth, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. Secondary outcomes are ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and complications following hysteroscopic septum resection. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed, estimating the cumulative probability of conception leading to live birth rate over time. Based on retrospective studies, we anticipate an improvement of the live birth rate from 35% without surgery to 70% with surgery. To demonstrate this difference, 68 women need to be randomised. DISCUSSION: Hysteroscopic septum resection is worldwide considered as a standard procedure in women with a septate uterus. Solid evidence for this recommendation is lacking and data from randomised trials is urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry ( NTR1676 , 18th of February 2009).

A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer.

STUDY QUESTION: Are live birth rates (LBRs) after artificial cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) non-inferior to LBRs after modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (mNC-FET)? SUMMARY ANSWER: AC-FET is non-inferior to mNC-FET with regard to LBRs, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) but AC-FET does result in higher cancellation rates. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Pooling prior retrospective studies of AC-FET and mNC-FET results in comparable pregnancy and LBRs. However, these results have not yet been confirmed by a prospective randomized trial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: In this non-inferiority prospective randomized controlled trial (acronym 'ANTARCTICA' trial), conducted from February 2009 to April 2014, 1032 patients were included of which 959 were available for analysis. The primary outcome of the study was live birth. Secondary outcomes were clinical and ongoing pregnancy, cycle cancellation and endometrium thickness. A cost-efficiency analysis was performed. PARTICIPANT/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was conducted in both secondary and tertiary fertility centres in the Netherlands. Patients included in this study had to be 18-40 years old, had to have a regular menstruation cycle between 26 and 35 days and frozen-thawed embryos to be transferred had to derive from one of the first three IVF or IVF-ICSI treatment cycles. Patients with a uterine anomaly, a contraindication for one of the prescribed medications in this study or patients undergoing a donor gamete procedure were excluded from participation. Patients were randomized based on a 1:1 allocation to either one cycle of mNC-FET or AC-FET. All embryos were cryopreserved using a slow-freeze technique. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: LBR after mNC-FET was 11.5% (57/495) versus 8.8% in AC-FET (41/464) resulting in an absolute difference in LBR of -0.027 in favour of mNC-FET (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.065-0.012; P = 0.171). Clinical pregnancy occurred in 94/495 (19.0%) patients in mNC-FET versus 75/464 (16.0%) patients in AC-FET (odds ratio (OR) 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-1.1, P = 0.25). 57/495 (11.5%) mNC-FET resulted in ongoing pregnancy versus 45/464 (9.6%) AC-FET (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.1, P = 0.15). χ(2) test confirmed the lack of superiority. Significantly more cycles were cancelled in AC-FET (124/464 versus 101/495, OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, P = 0.02). The costs of each of the endometrial preparation methods were comparable (€617.50 per cycle in NC-FET versus €625.73 per cycle in AC-FET, P = 0.54). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The minimum of 1150 patients required for adequate statistical power was not achieved. Moreover, LBRs were lower than anticipated in the sample size calculation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: LBRs after AC-FET were not inferior to those achieved by mNC-FET. No significant differences in clinical and OPR were observed. The costs of both treatment approaches were comparable. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: An educational grant was received during the conduct of this study. Merck Sharpe Dohme had no influence on the design, execution and analyses of this study. E.R.G. received an education grant by Merck Sharpe Dohme (MSD) during the conduct of the present study. B.J.C. reports grants from MSD during the conduct of the study. A.H. reports grants from MSD and Ferring BV the Netherlands and personal fees from MSD. Grants from ZonMW, the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development. J.S.E.L. reports grants from Ferring, MSD, Organon, Merck Serono and Schering-Plough during the conduct of the study. F.J.M.B. receives monetary compensation as member of the external advisory board for Merck Serono, consultancy work for Gedeon Richter, educational activities for Ferring BV, research cooperation with Ansh Labs and a strategic cooperation with Roche on automated anti Mullerian hormone assay development. N.S.M. reports receiving monetary compensations for external advisory and speaking work for Ferring BV, MSD, Anecova and Merck Serono during the conduct of the study. All reported competing interests are outside the submitted work. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands trial register, number NTR 1586. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 13 January 2009. FIRST PATIENT INCLUDED: 20 April 2009.

Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of recurrent miscarriage in women with a septate uterus has increased. Restoration of the morphology of the uterus can hypothetically increase live birth rate and subsequent pregnancies in women with a septate uterus and recurrent miscarriage. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with a septate uterus and two or more preceding miscarriages improves pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register (inception to August 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (inception to August 2010),  MEDLINE (1950 to August 2010), EMBASE (1980 to August 2010). PSYCHINFO (1806 to August 2010). In addition we searched trial registers for ongoing and registered trials, conference abstracts and OpenSigle and sources of Grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assess the effect on reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with a history of two or more preceding miscarriages and a septate uterus were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: If there had been data to include, two authors would have independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. They would have also contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse effects information from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials were identified for inclusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus is being performed in many countries to improve reproductive outcomes in women.This treatment has been assessed in non-controlled studies, which suggested a positive effect on pregnancy outcomes. However, these studies are biased due to the fact that the participants with recurrent miscarriage treated by hysteroscopic metroplasty served as their own controls. Until now, the effectiveness and possible complications of hysteroscopic metroplasty have never been considered in a randomised controlled trial.Taking this into account there is insufficient evidence to support this treatment in these women. A randomised controlled trial is urgently needed and currently underway (www.studies-obsgyn.nl/trust NTR 1676).

Post partum intra-abdominal hemorrhage due to placenta percreta.

Placenta percreta is a serious complication of pregnancy. A 38-year-old nullipara presented at 25 weeks gestation with preterm labour. Spontaneous delivery was followed by retained placenta. During an attempt to remove the placenta manually placental tissue could not be distinguished. Initially, placenta increta was considered as the most likely diagnosis and conservative management was planned, but progressive shock emerged due to intra-abdominal hemorrhage and laparotomy was performed. Placenta percreta was diagnosed, followed by a supracervical hysterectomy. A review of risk factors, diagnostic tools and treatment possibilities is given.

The effect of 6 weeks of testosterone treatment on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in eugonadal female-to-male transsexuals.

Polycystic ovary disease generally is associated with elevated androgen levels and elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, whereas follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels are (sub)normal. To assess the role of androgens on gonadotropin secretion, we investigated the effect of 6 weeks of testosterone (T) undecanoate, 120 to 160 mg/d orally, on the parameters of the pulsatile secretion of LH in a group of six eugonadal female-to-male transsexuals with normal menstrual cycles. The treatment suppressed menstrual activity in all patients. Serum T and estrone were significantly elevated after treatment with oral T undecanoate. The parameters of the pulsatile secretion of LH were not affected by androgen administration. Levels of FSH, estradiol, and progesterone also did not change significantly.

The effects of long term testosterone administration on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion and on ovarian histology in eugonadal female to male transsexual subjects.

Polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD) is associated with elevated serum LH and (sub)normal FSH levels, while serum androgen levels are often elevated. To clarify the role of androgens in this abnormal pattern of gonadotropin secretion, LH secretion was studied in 1) 9 eugonadal female to male transsexual subjects before and during long term (6 months) testosterone (T) administration (250 mg/2 weeks, im), and 2) in a woman with an androgen-secreting ovarian tumor both before and after surgical removal of the tumor. Finally, we studied the effects of high serum androgen levels on ovarian histology in 3) 26 transsexual subjects after long term (9-36 months) T administration (250 mg/2 weeks, im) to assess whether T-induced ovarian abnormalities are similar to those that occur in women with PCOD. Long term T treatment in the nine female to male transsexual subjects resulted in increases in the mean serum T level from 1.7 +/- 0.8 (+/- SD) to 40.8 +/- 31.9 nmol/L (P less than 0.01), the mean serum dihydrotestosterone level from 0.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.3 +/- 1.5 nmol/L (P less than 0.02), and the mean serum free T level from 9.5 +/- 5.2 to 149 +/- 46 pmol/L (P less than 0.02). Mean serum estrone and estradiol levels were similar before and during T treatment. The mean serum LH level decreased from 6.3 +/- 2.0 to 2.9 +/- 1.1 U/L (P less than 0.01), and the mean FSH levels decreased from 6.6 +/- 2.0 to 3.7 +/- 2.2 U/L (P less than 0.02). Pulsatile LH secretion before and during T treatment was studied in five subjects. Neither the mean nadir LH interval nor the LH pulse amplitude changed significantly in these five subjects. The serum T level in the woman with the androgen-secreting ovarian tumor was 9.6 nmol/L, and it declined to normal after removal of the tumor. Her mean serum LH and FSH levels, the mean nadir LH interval, and LH pulse amplitude were in the normal range before and after removal of the tumor. Studies of ovarian histopathology in 26 transsexual subjects after long term androgen treatment revealed multiple cystic follicles in 18 subjects (69.2%), diffuse ovarian stromal hyperplasia in 21 subjects (80.8%), collagenization of the tunica albuginea in 25 subjects (96.2%), and luteinization of stromal cells in 7 subjects (26.9%). Findings consistent with criteria for the pathological diagnosis of polycystic ovaries, that is 3 of the 4 findings listed above, were present in 18 of the 26 subjects (69.2%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of long-term testosterone administration on gonadotropin secretion in agonadal female to male transsexuals compared with hypogonadal and normal women.

We investigated the effects of long term testosterone (T) administration on pulsatile gonadotropin secretion in agonadal women and the effects of estradiol (E2) on gonadotropin secretion in eugonadal women in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. We studied 4 groups: A) 28 eugonadal women in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, B) 11 hypogonadal women, C) 13 agonadal female to male (f-t-m) transsexuals treated for at least 3 months with 120-160 mg T undecanoate (TU)/day, orally, and D) 5 agonadal f-to-m transsexuals treated for at least 6 months with 250 mg of a mixture of testosterone esters, im (im T-esters), every 2 weeks. The eugonadal women in the early follicular phase had a mean serum E2 level of 193 +/- 94 (+/- SD) pmol/L, significantly higher (P less than 0.01) than that in the hypogonadal women (60 +/- 24 pmol/L), whereas there was no difference in the mean serum T levels (1.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.5 nmol/L). the higher serum E2 level in the eugonadal women was associated with a significantly lower mean serum LH level (6.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 44.6 +/- 17.6 U/L; P less than 0.01) and LH pulse amplitude (2.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 12.6 +/- 4.8 U/L; P less than 0.01), whereas the mean nadir LH interval did not differ between the two groups (75 +/- 29 vs. 81 +/- 49 min). The mean serum T level in the agonadal f-to-m transsexuals treated with oral TU was significantly higher (P less than 0.01) than that in the hypogonadal women (9.7 +/- 4.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.5 nmol/L). In spite of this elevated T level there was no difference in the mean serum LH level (38.4 +/- 14.7 vs. 44.6 +/- 17.6 U/L), LH pulse amplitude (14.3 +/- 5.7 vs. 12.6 +/- 4.8 U/L), or nadir LH interval (72 +/- 27 vs. 81 +/- 49 min) in these groups. Also, the mean serum E2 (64 +/- 16 vs. 60 +/- 24 pmol/L and FSH levels (62 +/- 17 vs. 64 +/- 28 U/L) did not differ between these groups. Treatment of the agonadal f-to-m transsexuals with im T-esters resulted in mean serum T and E2 levels of 34.4 +/- 27.0 nmol/L and 121 +/- 54 pmol/L, respectively, both significantly higher (P less than 0.01) than those in groups B and C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pulsatile luteinizing hormone release and ovarian steroid levels in female-to-male transsexuals compared to heterosexual women.

It has been suggested that there is a difference in the interaction between sex steroids and gonadotropin secretion between transsexual and heterosexual women. In this study we tested whether there is a difference in the pulsatile release characteristics of luteinizing hormone (LH) and in ovarian steroid concentrations between 16 female-to-male (f-to-m) transsexuals and eight eugonadal heterosexual women during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Blood samples for LH determination were collected every 10 min for 7 hr in the transsexual group, and every 10 min for 6 hr in the heterosexual group. There were no significant differences between the transsexual and heterosexual group in mean serum LH concentration (6.9 +/- 2.4 U/l vs. 7.5 +/- 2.6 U/l), mean LH nadir interval (77 +/- 37 min vs. 70 +/- 16 min), and mean LH pulse amplitude (2.9 +/- 1.1 U/l vs. 3.0 +/- 1.1 U/l). Serum estrone, 17-beta-estradiol, testosterone, progesterone and FSH concentrations also did not differ between the two groups. There also was not a higher prevalence of polycystic ovarian disease in our f-to-m transsexual group than in the general population.

Effects of opiate receptor blockade on gonadotrophin secretion before and after administration of the oestrogen receptor blocker tamoxifen in eugonadal men.

Both gonadal steroids and endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) exert an inhibitory effect on gonadotrophin secretion. It is thought that the negative feedback action of the gonadal steroids, testosterone (T) and oestradiol (E2), on the gonadotrophin secretion is mediated by EOPs. To assess the effects of EOPs and oestrogen and their interrelationship on pulsatile LH secretion we studied two groups of eugonadal men. The subjects of the first group were tested on three different occasions, firstly under basal conditions, secondly during infusion of the opiate receptor blocker naloxone (NAL) (bolus 5 mg + 2.1 mg/h for 7 h), and finally during NAL infusion after 6 weeks administration of the oestrogen receptor blocker tamoxifen (10 mg twice daily). The subjects of the second group were studied before and after 6 weeks administration of tamoxifen. NAL infusion produced a significant increase in mean serum LH levels (4.8 +/- SD 1.5 to 6.2 +/- 1.8 U/l) and LH pulse frequency (3.7 +/- 1.6 to 5.3 +/- 1.2 pulses/7 h). No change was seen in mean LH pulse amplitudes (3.5 +/- 1.5 vs 3.4 +/- 1.0 U/l). After tamoxifen administration alone there was a significant increase in mean LH level (from 5.7 +/- 1.3 to 10.1 +/- 2.4 U/l), LH pulse amplitude (from 3.8 +/- 0.9 to 4.6 +/- 0.9 U/l) and LH pulse frequency (from 4.2 +/- 1.5 to 5.8 +/- 1.7 pulses/7 h). A significant rise in mean serum LH levels was observed during NAL infusion after previous tamoxifen administration in comparison to the infusion of NAL alone (from 6.2 +/- 1.8 to 10.5 +/- 6.2 U/l). LH pulse frequency (5.3 +/- 1.2 vs 6.3 +/- 1.3 pulses/7h) and amplitude (3.4 +/- 1.0 vs 3.6 +/- 1.5 U/l) however, did not change. Mean serum LH level and LH pulse frequency after opiate receptor and oestrogen receptor blockade together did not differ from the results obtained after oestrogen receptor blockade alone. NAL however was expected not only to block opioid-mediated oestrogen action but also androgen action and therefore to have additional effect on LH secretion, whereas tamoxifen was supposed to block only oestrogen action. From these data we conclude that EOPs exert a negative feedback effect on LH secretion by slowing the GnRH pulse generator. Because there was no additional effect of opiate receptor blockade after oestrogen receptor blockade on pulsatile LH secretion we infer that androgens may be impeded in their negative feedback action in the presence of the antioestrogen tamoxifen.

Divergent effects of the antiestrogen tamoxifen and of estrogens on luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency, but not on basal LH levels and LH pulse amplitude in men.

We studied the role of estrogens on LH pulse modulation in men in two ways. Firstly, we compared LH pulse frequency and amplitude in 13 normal men before and after 6 weeks administration of the antiestrogen tamoxifen (10 mg twice daily). Secondly, we compared LH pulse frequency and amplitude between a group of 10 agonadal men not receiving sex steroid treatment and a group of 9 agonadal men (male to female transsexuals) continuously treated with 50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol/day. Tamoxifen administration to normal men resulted in a significant rise in the mean serum LH level from 5.7 +/- 1.3 (+/- SD) to 10.1 +/- 2.4 U/L, which was associated with significant increases in LH pulse frequency (from 4.2 +/- 1.5 to 5.8 +/- 1.7/7 h) and LH pulse amplitude (from 3.8 +/- 0.9 to 4.6 +/- 0.7 U/L). In the group of agonadal men the mean LH pulse frequency was 6.8 +/- 1.5/7 h, while it was 5.9 +/- 1.7/7 h in the estrogen-treated agonadal group (P = NS). The mean serum LH level and LH pulse amplitude were, however, significantly lower in the estrogen-treated agonadal men than in the agonadal men (14.7 +/- 7.0 vs. 34.3 +/- 8.6 and 4.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.4 +/- 1.8 U/L, respectively). We conclude that estrogens reduce basal LH levels and LH pulse amplitude. With regard to the modulation of LH pulse frequency our data provide contradictory results. While an antiestrogen increased LH pulse frequency in normal men, estrogen alone produced no change in LH pulse frequency in agonadal men. The study design in the agonadal men ignores the possible interaction of the two major testicular hormones (estradiol and testosterone) on gonadotropin secretion. Therefore, a possible explanation for this discrepancy in the effects of antiestrogen and estrogen could be an interaction between estrogens and androgens on gonadotropin secretion at the level of the LHRH pulse generator.

Short-term patterns of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion do not differ between male-to-female transsexuals and heterosexual men.

This study tested whether there is a difference in the pulsatile LH secretion between male-to-female transsexuals and eugonadal heterosexual men. The mean serum LH concentrations, the LH pulse frequency, and the LH pulse amplitude were compared between a group of eight male-to-female transsexuals and a group of 22 heterosexual men. Blood samples for LH determinations were collected every 10 min for seven hours. 17-beta-estradiol and testosterone were measured at the beginning of each test. There were no significant differences between the heterosexual and transsexual group in LH pulse frequency (3.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.7), LH pulse amplitude (3.7 +/- 1.3 U/l vs. 3.0 +/- 0.5 U/l), mean serum LH concentration (5.2 +/- 1.4 U/l vs. 5.4 +/- 1.1 U/l), 17-beta-estradiol (0.07 +/- 0.01 nmol/l vs. 0.08 +/- 0.02 nmol/l), or testosterone (22.9 +/- 3.7 nmol/l vs. 21.8 +/- 8.0 nmol/l). We conclude that the pulsatile release characteristics of LH do not allow a distinction between eugonadal heterosexual men and eugonadal male-to-female transsexuals.

Sex steroids and pulsatile luteinizing hormone release in men. Studies in estrogen-treated agonadal subjects and eugonadal subjects treated with a novel nonsteroidal antiandrogen.

This study evaluated the effects of estrogens and androgens on LH pulse frequency and amplitude in male subjects. To assess the role of estrogens we compared the serum LH pulse frequency and amplitude between 3 groups: 8 agonadal subjects receiving no steroid treatment; 6 agonadal subjects continuously treated with 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol/day; and 17 eugonadal men. Mean serum LH levels and LH pulse amplitude were significantly lower in the agonadal subjects receiving estrogens (14.8 +/- 5.4 (SD) U/L and 4.1 +/- 1.5 U/L, respectively) than in the group of agonadal subjects not receiving sex steroid treatment (35.7 +/- 8.4 U/L and 7.3 +/- 2.0 U/L, respectively). The mean LH pulse frequency was 7.1 +/- 1.5/7 h in the group not receiving sex steroid treatment and 6.0 +/- 1.4/7 h in the group receiving estrogens (P NS). The LH pulse frequency in the eugonadal men (3.8 +/- 1.3/7 h) was significantly lower than the frequency in both groups of agonadal subjects. The LH pulse amplitude was of the same magnitude in the estrogen-treated agonadal subjects and in eugonadal men (4.1 +/- 1.5 U/L and 3.5 +/- 1.2 U/L, respectively). The role of androgens was studied in 15 eugonadal male subjects (who presented for female role reassignment) by determining the effects of a novel nonsteroidal androgen receptor blocker, Anandron, on basal and LH-releasing hormone (LHRH)-stimulated serum LH/FSH levels; LH pulse frequency and amplitude; sex steroid and sex hormone-binding globulin levels; and serum PRL levels during an 8-week period. Basal and LHRH-stimulated LH levels and testosterone rose progressively during the first 6 weeks and reached a plateau thereafter, while estradiol levels continued to increase somewhat. The LH pulse amplitude and frequency had increased after 6 weeks (3.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.5 +/- 1.2 U/L and 4.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.1 pulses/7 h, respectively). Basal FSH levels were not affected while LHRH-stimulated FSH levels progressively decreased from 2 to 6 weeks, after which they did not change. Along with the rise of estradiol levels an increase of sex hormone-binding globulin and PRL levels occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)