Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Transarterial Yttrium-90 Glass Microsphere Radioembolization: Results of a Single Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 85 consecutive patients (41 men and 44 women; age, 73.4 ± 9.3 years) was performed. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression models, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-28.4); median OS from radioembolization was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.0-15.2). Seven episodes of severe toxicity occurred. At 3 months, 6.2% of patients had partial response, 64.2% had stable disease, and 29.6% had progressive disease. Median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 and 1 than patients with an ECOG score of 2 (18.5 vs 5.5 months, P = .0012), and median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with well-differentiated histology than patients with poorly differentiated histology (18.6 vs 9.7 months, P = .012). Patients with solitary tumors had significantly longer median OS from radioembolization than patients with multifocal disease (25 vs. 6.1 months, P = .006). The absence of extrahepatic metastasis was associated with significantly increased median OS (15.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = .003). Increased time from diagnosis to radioembolization was a negative predictor of OS. The morphology of the tumor (mass-forming or infiltrative, hyper- or hypo-enhancing) had no effect on survival. Post-treatment increased cancer antigen 19-9 level, increased international normalized ratio, decreased albumin, increased bilirubin, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score were significant predictors of decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the therapeutic role of radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable ICC with good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.

Adjuvant radiation provides survival benefit for resected pancreatic adenocarcinomas of the tail.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic cancer remains a controversy. We sought to determine the effect of adjuvant treatment on overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic tail adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with upfront surgically resected pancreatic tail cancer treated at our institution between 2000-2012 was performed to determine outcomes of patients treated with and without adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients met inclusion criteria. 79% received adjuvant chemotherapy, either concurrent with RT or alone. The groups were well matched, with the only significant difference being patient sex. On both UVA and MVA there was significantly worse survival in patients with a post-op CA19-9 >90 [hazard ratio (HR) 5.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-25.7, P=0.03] and improved survival in patients treated with adjuvant RT (HR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.58, P=0.006). The median and 2-year OS were 21.6 months and 47% for patients treated with adjuvant RT compared with 11.3 months and 21% for those treated without RT. CONCLUSIONS: Although few in patient numbers, this data suggests integration of adjuvant RT in resected pancreatic tail adenocarcinoma may improve OS.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Gastrointestinal Malignancies Participating in Phase I Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVES: Early-phase clinical trials play a pivotal role in drug development. However, limited data are available on outcomes of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Here, we evaluated the characteristics associated with survival in GI cancer patients participating in phase I clinical trials and attempted to validate previously established prognostic models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with advanced GI tumors who participated in phase I clinical trials at our institution from January 2007 to December 2013 and received at least 1 dose of the study drug were included. Cox regression models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: In 243 study patients (median age, 62 y [range, 26 to 82 y]; 55% male), treatment included chemotherapy only (14%), targeted therapy (41%), chemotherapy+targeted therapy (42%), and others (2%) for the following disease types: pancreatic (42%), colorectal (34%), gastroesophageal (10%), hepatobiliary (13%), and others (2%). Response rate was 4%, with 38% achieving stable disease and 42% having progressive disease. Median survival was 5.8 months (range, 0.2 to 52.4 mo). Our multivariable Cox regression analyses included the following as predictors of survival: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥1 (HR=1.76), prior systemic therapies ≥2 (HR=1.63), lactate dehydrogenase >618 IU/L (HR=1.85), sodium >135 mmol/L (HR=0.46), and white blood count >6×10/L (HR=1.5). Our data set was consistent with previous prognostic scores. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to assess clinical outcomes in this patient population. Phase I trials provide clinical benefit to patients with advanced GI malignancies and should be recommended as a treatment option in appropriate patients.

Use of Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Improves Survival: A SEER Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Although both radiation therapy and chemotherapy are frequently used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients, the role of radiation therapy remains controversial with data evaluating its efficacy mostly derived from small randomized trials. In this study, we evaluate the survival benefit of radiation therapy using SEER dataset in patients with LAPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SEER Registry dataset from 2004 to 2011 was queried to identify LAPC (TNM stage III) patients. Patients with survival <2 months, unknown radiation status, or who received postoperative radiation were excluded. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors related to survival were performed using a Cox proportional hazard-regression model. Propensity scores were estimated using probit regression. RESULTS: Our search identified 4460 patients; 59% who received radiation and 41% who did not. Radiation group patients were younger (below 65 y old: 49% vs. 38%), had smaller tumor size (largest dimension <4.5 cm: 80% vs. 75%), less lymph node involvement (33% vs. 36%), and lower rate of surgical resection (4% vs. 9%). Patients who received radiation therapy had better survival (HR=0.773; 95% CI, 0.687-0.782). The 12-month overall survival in the radiation group and nonradiation group was 43% versus 29%, respectively (P<0.001). On multivariate analyses, radiation was independently associated with improved outcomes. The survival benefit with radiation was observed in propensity score-matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy was associated with improved survival. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings. The optimal schedule and radiation type remain undetermined.

Outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node resection in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the effects of post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) and lymph node resection (LNR) on survival in patients ≥70 years with pancreatic cancer treated with surgery and chemotherapy. METHODS: An analysis of patients ≥70 years with surgically resected pancreatic cancer who received chemotherapy from the SEER database between 2004-2008 was performed to determine association of PORT and LNR on survival. RESULTS: We identified 961 patients who met inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards increased survival associated with PORT in all patients (P=0.052) and N1 patients (P=0.060) but no benefit in N0 patients (P=0.161). There was no difference in OS based on number of lymph nodes removed in all (P=0.741), N0 (P=0.588), and N1 (P=0.070) patients. MVA for all patients revealed that higher T stage, N1, and high grade tumors were prognostic for increased mortality, while there was decreased mortality with PORT and mild benefit with increased lymph nodes resected (P=0.084). CONCLUSIONS: PORT demonstrated no benefit in survival of pancreatic cancer patients ≥70 who are resected and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Future investigation will need to address age as a stratification factor for pancreatic cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Patterns of recurrence and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high grade dysplasia: implications for surveillance and future management guidelines.

BACKGROUND: While intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) are thought to represent non-invasive, high-risk lesions, its natural history following resection is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review of HGD-IPMN patients (1999-2015) was performed. Recurrence patterns and clinical outcomes following pancreatectomy were analyzed and the indications for surgery were explored based on current guidelines. RESULTS: HGD was diagnosed in 100 of 314 patients (32%) following pancreatectomy for IPMN. IPMNs were classified as main duct, branch duct, or mixed in 15, 58 and 27 patients, respectively. Following resection, 25 patients had low-risk residual disease in the remnant pancreas. With a median follow-up of 35 months (range 1-129), 9 patients developed progressive or recurrent disease, 4 of whom underwent additional pancreatectomy. Three patients developed invasive adenocarcinoma. Median time to recurrence was 15 months (range 7-72). Based on the management algorithm from the international consensus guidelines, resection was indicated in 76 patients (76%). Other indications for surgery included mixed-duct IPMN(13), increased cyst size(7) and other(4). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of HGD-IPMN following resection is good; however, HGD may be a marker for developing IPMN recurrence or adenocarcinoma. Current guidelines regarding surgical indications for IPMN can miss a significant number of patients with HGD.

Predictors and survival for pathologic tumor response grade in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy response correlates with survival in multiple gastrointestinal malignancies. To potentially augment neoadjuvant response for pancreas adenocarcinoma, we intensified treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) following multi-agent chemotherapy. Using this regimen, we analyzed whether the College of American Pathology (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) at pancreatectomy correlated with established response biomarkers and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer patients treated according to our institutional clinical pathway who underwent surgical resection with reported TRG (n = 81, median follow-up after surgery 24.2 months). Patients had baseline CA19-9, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound, and FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT then underwent multi-agent chemotherapy (79% with three cycles of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine) followed by 5-fraction SBRT. They then underwent restaging CT, PET/CT and CA19-9. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Univariate ordinal logistic regression correlated TRG with baseline, restaging and change in CA19-9 and the PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: Restaging level and decrease in CA19-9 correlated with improved TRG (p = .02 for both) as did restaging SUVmax (p < .01), yet there was no TRG correlation with decrease in SUVmax (p = .10) or CT response (p = .30). The TRG groups had similar OS and PFS except the TRG 0 (complete response) group. Compared to partial response levels (TRG 1-3, median OS 33.9 months, median PFS 13.0 months), the six (7%) patients with TRG 0 had no deaths (p = .05) and only one progression (p = .03). A group of 10 (12%) TRG 1 patients with only residual isolated tumor cells had similar outcomes to the other TRG 1-3 patients. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PET-CT and CA19-9 response correlate with histopathologic tumor regression. Patients with complete pathologic response have superior outcomes, suggesting a rationale for intensification and personalization of neoadjuvant therapy in BRPC and LAPC.

Systematic Review and Case Series Report of Acinar Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare malignancy representing less than 1% of all pancreatic malignancies. METHODS: We report on a case series of 21 patients with acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas treated at a high-volume quaternary center. A systematic review of the medical literature was performed that described typical therapeutic management approaches for acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas and reported on disease control and survival rates. Data for the case series were obtained from a prospective database. RESULTS: In our systematic review of 6 articles, study patients had a median age of 61 years, 66% were male, 52% had stage I/II disease, and 55% of lesions were located in the pancreatic head. The rates of median survival were approximately 47 months after resection with adjuvant therapy, 38 months for nonmetastatic, locally unresectable disease, and 17 months for metastatic disease treated with chemotherapy. Combination fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens had better rates of disease control than other therapies. Our case series included 21 study patients, 14 of whom required resection and 7 who had metastatic disease. The rates of median survival were 40.2 ± 31.9 months in those who underwent surgery and were treated with adjuvant therapy and 13.8 ± 11.3 months for patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary treatment for acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas should be considered due to the rarity of the disease and its lack of high-level therapeutic data. Progress in the molecular analysis of this tumor may improve outcomes through the use of personalized therapy based on underlying tumor mutations.

Longitudinal cohort study to determine effectiveness of a novel simulated case and feedback system to improve clinical pathway adherence in breast, lung and GI cancers.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether a measurement and feedback system led to improvements in adherence to clinical pathways. DESIGN: The M-QURE (Moffitt-Quality, Understanding, Research and Evidence) Initiative was introduced in 2012 to enhance and improve adherence to pathways at Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) in three broad clinical areas: breast, lung and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. M-QURE used simulated patient vignettes based on MCC's Clinical Pathways to benchmark clinician adherence and monitor change over three rounds of implementation. SETTING: MCC, located in Tampa, Florida, a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. PARTICIPANTS: Three non-overlapping cohorts at MCC (one each in breast, lung and GI) totalling 48 providers participated in this study, with each member of the multidisciplinary team (composed of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons and advanced practice providers) invited to participate. INTERVENTIONS: Each participant was asked to complete a set of simulated patient vignettes over three rounds within their own cancer specialty. Participants were required to complete all assigned vignettes over each of the three rounds, or they would be excluded from this study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Increased domain and overall provider care adherence to clinical pathways, as scored by blinded physician abstractors. RESULTS: We found significant improvements in pathway adherence between the third and first rounds of data collection particularly for workup and treatment of cancer cases. By clinical grouping, breast improved by 13.6% (p<0.001), and lung improved by 12.1% (p<0.001) over baseline, whereas GI showed a decrease of 1.4% (p=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pathway adherence improved in a short timeframe for breast and lung cancers using group-level measurement and individual feedback. This suggests that a measurement and feedback programme may be a useful tool to improve clinical pathway adherence.

Favorable perioperative outcomes after resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant stereotactic radiation and chemotherapy compared with upfront pancreatectomy for resectable cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are utilized to increase margin negative (R0) resection rates in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Concerns persist that these neoadjuvant therapies may worsen perioperative morbidities and mortality. METHODS: Upfront resection patients (n=241) underwent resection without neoadjuvant treatment for resectable disease. They were compared to BRPC or LAPC patients (n=61) who underwent resection after chemotherapy and 5 fraction SBRT. Group comparisons were performed by Mann-Whitney U or Fisher's exact test. Overall Survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank methods. RESULTS: In the neoadjuvant therapy group, there was significantly higher T classification, N classification, and vascular resection/repair rate. Surgical positive margin rate was lower after neoadjuvant therapy (3.3% vs. 16.2%, P=0.006). Post-operative morbidities (39.3% vs. 31.1%, P=0.226) and 90-day mortality (2% vs. 4%, P=0.693) were similar between the groups. Median OS was 33.5 months in the neoadjuvant therapy group compared to 23.1 months in upfront resection patients who received adjuvant treatment (P=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BRPC or LAPC and sufficient response to neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and SBRT have similar or improved peri-operative and long-term survival outcomes compared to upfront resection patients.

Histopathologic tumor response after induction chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: While clinical outcomes following induction chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have been reported for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) patients, pathologic response has not previously been described. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective review evaluated BRPC patients who completed induction gemcitabine-based chemotherapy followed by SBRT and surgical resection. Each surgical specimen was assigned two tumor regression grades (TRG), one using the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria and one using the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were correlated to TRG score. RESULTS: We evaluated 36 patients with a median follow-up of 13.8 months (range, 6.1-24.8 months). The most common induction chemotherapy regimen (82%) was GTX (gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine). A median SBRT dose of 35 Gy (range, 30-40 Gy) in 5 fractions was delivered to the region of vascular involvement. The margin-negative resection rate was 97.2%. Improved response according to MDACC grade trended towards superior PFS (P=061), but not OS. Any neoadjuvant treatment effect according to MDACC scoring (IIa-IV vs. I) was associated with improved OS and PFS (both P=0.019). We found no relationship between CAP score and OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the increased pathologic response after induction chemotherapy and SBRT is correlated with improved survival for BRPC patients.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for suspected pancreaticobiliary cancer.

PURPOSE: Occasionally, pancreaticobiliary cancer presents as a relatively indolent disease and localized blood-borne lung metastases may be resectable. We reviewed our experience with therapeutic lung resections in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent subsequent therapeutic lung resections, from 1996 to 2015, all clinical data were gathered for comparison between patients undergoing pancreatic pulmonary metastasectomy and those undergoing lung resection for other diseases. RESULTS: Among 29 patients with definitively treated pancreaticobiliary cancer who underwent lung resections with curative intent, 16 patients (55%) had resection of isolated pancreaticobiliary cancer metastases (group A) and 13 patients (45%) had 15 resections of primary lung cancers, and one granuloma (group B). No surgical complications or operative mortalities occurred. The median disease-free interval (DFI) from definitive pancreatic cancer treatment to pulmonary metastasectomy or other nonmetastasectomy therapeutic lung resection was 24.0 and 8.0 months, respectively. The estimated median overall survival after lung resection was 33 months for all patients (95% confidence interval: 0, 67) and 28 months for the group A pulmonary metastasectomy patients (95% confidence interval: 16, 40), corresponding to an estimated 5-year survival rate of 47% and 37%, respectively. Serum CA 19-9 level before lung resection significantly predicted mortality: adjusted hazard ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 1.09, 1.74) per each 100-unit increment, P = .006. CONCLUSIONS: Although pancreaticobiliary cancers have an overall dismal prognosis, we recommend pulmonary metastasectomy in highly selected patients. Additionally, not all new lung masses in pancreatic cancer patients are metastases, and resection should be considered, for a second primary lung cancer is often found.

Outcomes of a Clinical Pathway for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Without prospective data establishing a consensus multimodality approach to borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, institutional treatment regimens vary. This study investigated the outcomes of the clinical pathway at the author's institution, which consists of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine, and stereotactic radiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: The study reviewed all cases that met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) diagnostic criteria for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1 January 2006, to 31 December 2013. Pancreatectomy rates, margin status, pathologic response, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively examined. Standard statistical methods and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Of 121 patients who met criteria, 101 entered the clinical pathway, and 94 (93.1 %) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Of the 101 patients, 55 (54.5 %) underwent pancreatectomy, with 53 patients (96.4 %) having microscopically negative margins (R0) and 2 patients (3.6 %) having microscopically positive margins (R1). Vascular resection was required for 22 patients (40 %), with rates of 95.5 % for R0 (n = 21) and 4.5 % for R1 (n = 1). A pathologic response to treatment was demonstrated by 45 patients (81.8 %) and a complete response by 10 patients (14.5 %). Pancreatectomy resulted in a median DFS of 23 months (95 % conflidence interval [CI] 14.5-31.5), a median DSS of 43 months (95 % CI, 25.7-60.3), and a median OS of 33 months (95 % CI, 25.0-41.0) versus a median DSS and OS of 14 months (95 % CI, 10.9-17.1) for patients without pancreatectomy (DSS: P = 3.5 × 10(-13); OS: P = 4.7 × 10(-10)). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated high rates for neoajduvant therapy completion (93.1 %) and pancreatectomy (54.5 %). After pancreatectomy, DSS was significantly improved (43 months), with a pathologic response demonstrated by 81.8 % and a complete response by 14.5 % of the patients. The results support further study of this borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical pathway.

Outcomes of resected pancreatic cancer in patients age ≥70.

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes of patients ≥70 years with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A study was conducted to identify pancreatic cancer patients ≥70 years who underwent surgery for pancreatic carcinoma from 2000 to 2012. Patients were excluded if they had neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 112 patients with a median follow-up of surviving patients of 36 months. The median patient age was 77 years. The median and 5 year OS was 20.5 months and 19%, respectively. Univariate analysis (UVA) showed a significant correlation for increased mortality with N1 (P=0.03) as well as post-op CA19-9 >90 (P<0.001), with a trend towards decreased mortality with adjuvant chemoradiation (P=0.08). Multivariate analysis (MVA) showed a statistically significant increased mortality associated with N1 (P=0.008), post-op CA19-9 >90 (P=0.002), while adjuvant chemoradiation (P=0.04) was associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in patients ≥70, nodal status, post-op CA19-9, and adjuvant chemoradiation, were associated with OS. The data suggests that outcomes of patients ≥70 years who undergo upfront surgical resection are not inferior to younger patients.

Radiosensitivity index predicts for survival with adjuvant radiation in resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiation therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Sub-populations of radiosensitive tumors might exist given the genetic heterogeneity of pancreatic cancers. We evaluated whether RSI is predictive of survival in pancreatic cancer treated with radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 73 genomically-profiled pancreas cancer patients treated with upfront surgery between 2000 and 2011 (48 radiation, 25 no radiation). Briefly, RSI score is derived from the expression of 10 specific genes and a linear regression algorithm modeled on SF2 of 48 cancer cells. The primary endpoint was to assess the association of RSI with overall survival. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 67months for surviving patients. On multivariate analysis, patients with radioresistant tumors had a trend toward worse survival (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.1 [95% CI 1.0-4.3], p=0.054). Among high-risk, irradiated patients (positive margins, positive lymph nodes, or a post-operative CA19-9 >90; n=31), radiosensitive patients had significantly improved survival compared with radioresistant patients (median 31.2 vs. 13.2months; HR 0.42 [0.19, 0.94], p=0.04). Among irradiated patients (n=48), low-risk patients lived longer than both high-risk patients with radiosensitive tumors and radioresistant tumors (HR 2.7 [1.0, 7.2], p=0.04 and HR 6.3 [2.3, 17.0], p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating RSI with standard high-risk variables has the potential to refine the classification of high-risk resected pancreatic cancer patients treated with radiation therapy.

Phase I trial of combination of FOLFIRI and pasireotide, a somatostatin analogue, in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Pasireotide (SOM230) is a somatostatin analog with high binding affinity for somatostatin receptors including sst1, 2, 3 and 5 and inhibit insulin like growth factor-1. Blocking of IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy has demonstrated additive or synergistic activity in pre-clinical models. This study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pasireotide in combination with standard FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan) regimen in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: This was a phase 1, 3 + 3 design, open-label dose escalation study conducted in sequential cohorts to determine the MTD of pasireotide in combination with FOLFIRI. All patients had gastrointestinal malignancies and were previously treated. Sixteen patients enrolled in five dose cohorts at pasireotide doses of 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 mg were evaluated for safety and tolerability of the combination. RESULTS: The tumor types of the enrolled subjects included esophageal (n = 5), biliary tract (n = 3), colon (n = 3), gastric (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 1), anal (n = 1) and small bowel (n = 1). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The most common adverse events related to the study treatment included hyperglycemia (81 %), neutropenia (62 %), thrombocytopenia (44 %), anorexia (44 %), dehydration (25 %) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (25 %). Two patients had partial response and 7 patients had stable disease. Plasma levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were significantly reduced after treatment with pasireotide. DISCUSSION: Combination of pasireotide and FOLFIRI has manageable safety profile and is feasible in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Preliminary signals of activity were observed. Larger phase II trials are warranted.

Phase I study of combination of pasireotide LAR + gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Pasireotide LAR (SOM230 LAR) is a cyclohexapeptide engineered to bind to multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes to mimic the action of naturally occurring somatostatin with higher affinity to these receptors than octreotide and is a potent inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Somatostatin receptors and IGF receptors are highly expressed in pancreatic cancer, thereby potentially making it a valuable target. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability and preliminary tumor response of pasireotide LAR in combination with gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer were included. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Patients received gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 and pasireotide LAR IM monthly in a 28-day cycle. Two dose levels of pasireotide LAR were planned: 40 mg IM and 60 mg. Cohort was expanded by ten more patients at the highest tested dose to further assess the safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty patients were consented on this trial, and 16 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Two out sixteen patients (12%) had partial response, and nine of sixteen (56%) had stable disease as best response. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (range 1-16 months), and median overall survival was 6.9 months (range 1-25 months). Most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hyperglycemia (n = 5), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1) and thrombocytopenia (n = 2). Median baseline IGF-1 level was lower in patients with stable disease than in those with progressive disease (63 vs 71 ng/ml). CONCLUSION: Pasireotide in combination with gemcitabine was well tolerated with disease control rate of 68%. Larger trials are needed in the future to establish its efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01385956.

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials of Chemoradiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer deaths in the USA. Despite the fact that the radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy (CT) is frequently employed, the role of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains controversial. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of radiation treatment in addition to CT in patients with LAPC. METHODS: Only randomized controlled trials that compared CRT to CT and reported time to event summary were included in this study. The primary end point was overall survival expressed as hazard ratio (HR). Due to significant heterogeneity, random-effects model statistics were used. RESULTS: Five eligible studies were included with a total of 593 patients (CT, N = 298; CRT, N = 295). Two studies demonstrated statistically significant difference in OS in favor of CRT and the rest of the studies did not demonstrate any significant differences. Meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a non-significant trend toward a survival benefit in the CRT arm; HR 0.913 (95 % CI 0.595-1.400, p = 0.675). No significant differences in overall results were seen with sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of radiation therapy to CT in the treatment of LAPC is associated with a non-significant trend toward survival advantage. Larger randomized controlled trials using modern CT regimens and radiation techniques are needed to further clarify the role of radiation in this setting.

A Phase I dose-escalation study of afatinib combined with nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib combined with nintedanib. MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients received afatinib 10-20 mg daily plus nintedanib 150-200 mg twice daily (28-day cycle). Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design. RESULTS: Patients received afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg (n = 11); 10/200 mg (n = 13; MTD); 20/200 mg (n = 4). Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (all grade 3): increased alanine aminotransferase (afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg), diarrhea (10/200 mg), dehydration (20/200 mg), diarrhea with elevated liver enzymes (20/200 mg). Frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, fatigue and vomiting. In total, 14 patients (46.2%) had objective responses at the MTD. CONCLUSION: The MTD, afatinib 10 mg daily plus nintedanib 200 mg twice daily, had a manageable safety profile, but was considered subtherapeutic for Phase II evaluation.

Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy and neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Limited data are available to guide neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We updated our institutional outcomes with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) approach. An IRB-approved analysis was performed of all BRPC and LAPC patients treated with our departmental treatment protocol. After staging, medically fit patients underwent chemotherapy for 2-3 months, with regimen at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Patients then received SBRT delivered in five consecutive daily fractions with median total radiation doses of 30 Gy to tumor and 40 Gy dose painted to tumor-vessel interfaces. This was followed by restaging imaging for possible resection. Overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. RESULTS: We identified 159 patients, 110 BRPC and 49 LAPC, with 14.0 months median overall follow-up. The resection and margin negative (R0) rate for BRPC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy was 51% and 96%, respectively. Estimated median OS was 19.2 months for BRPC patients and 15.0 months for LAPC patients (p = 0.402). Median OS was 34.2 months for surgically resected patients versus 14.0 months for unresected patients (p < 0.001). Five of 21 (24%) LAPC patients receiving FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy underwent R0 resection. In LAPC, FOLFIRINOX recipients underwent R0 resection more often than other chemotherapy recipients (5 of 21 vs. 0 of 28, p = 0.011). There was a trend for improved survival in those resected LAPC patients (p = 0.09). For those not undergoing resection, one year LRC was 78%. Any grade ≥ 3 potentially radiation-related toxicity rate was 7%. CONCLUSIONS: These data underscore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy for BRPC and LAPC.